-
摘要: 为提高交通冲突严重程度的判别精度, 基于运动单元圆假设与视频检测技术, 提出了交叉口两车交通冲突严重程度量化方法。利用视频处理程序与实地采集的视频图像提取圆单元运动学参数, 并通过迭代方法进行了冲突检测与冲突时间判定。充分考虑车辆的制动性能, 将非完全制动停车距离与瞬时车速的比值作为冲突严重程度判别临界值, 以冲突时间与临界值为参数, 建立了冲突严重程度量化值, 并对其严重程度进行了量化与分级, 以北京市某交叉路口为例进行了应用实例分析。分析结果表明: 两运动单元驶入交叉口后, 二者之间的冲突严重程度量化值由1.32增大为2.45, 后又不断减小直至无交通冲突; 随着冲突严重程度的增大, 驾驶人会采取紧急制动措施使冲突严重程度减小, 直至冲突消解。可见该方法可以方便地检测交通冲突, 准确量化交叉口两运动单元之间的冲突严重程度。Abstract: In order to improve the precision in traffic conflict severity discrimination, a quantitative method for conflict severity at intersection was proposed based on the circle assumption of motor units and video detection technology.The moving parameters of motor units were obtained by using the video processing program and the real-time collected video images.Conflict detection and conflict time were determined by using iterative method.Considering the braking performance of vehicle, the critical value of conflict severity was obtained by the ratio of braking distance to instantaneous speed.The quantization value of conflict severity was established taking conflict time and critical value as parameters, and the severity of traffic conflict was quantified and classified.A certain intersection in Beijing was analyzed.Analysis result shows that the quantization values of conflict severity between two motor units increase from 1.32 to 2.45, and then decrease until no conflict exists.Driver would take emergency braking measures with the increasing of conflict severity, and then the conflict severity decreases until disappears.The quantitative result accords with the practical situation, and the method could be used in conflict detection and the severity quantification of traffic conflict conveniently.
-
Key words:
- traffic engineering /
- intersection /
- traffic conflict /
- circle assumption /
- video detection /
- conflict severity
-
[1] 唐阳山, 李江, 田育耕, 等. 交通冲突量的混沌预测[J]. 吉林大学学报: 工学版, 2005, 35(6): 646-648. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JLGY200506016.htmTANG Yang-shan, LI Jiang, TIAN Yu-geng, et al. Chaos forecast for traffic conflict flow[J]. Journal of Jilin University: Engineering and Technology Edition, 2005, 35(6): 646-648. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JLGY200506016.htm [2] CHIN H C, QUEK S T. Measurement of traffic conflicts[J]. Safety Science, 1997, 26(3): 169-185. doi: 10.1016/S0925-7535(97)00041-6 [3] 张苏. 中国交通冲突技术的研究[D]. 成都: 西南交通大学, 1997.ZHANG Su. A study of Chinese traffic conflict technique[D]. Chengdu: Southwest Jiaotong University, 1997. (in Chinese). [4] TIWARI G, MOHAN D, FAZIO J. Conflict analysis for prediction of fatal crash locations in mixed traffic streams[J]. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 1998, 30(2): 207-215. doi: 10.1016/S0001-4575(97)00082-1 [5] 周娇, 陈学武. 城市道路交叉口机非冲突概率研究[J]. 交通标准化, 2011(5): 75-78. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JTBH2011Z2057.htmZHOU Jiao, CHEN Xue-wu. Research on the probability of vehicle and non-vehicle collision at urban road intersection[J]. Transport Standardization, 2011(5): 75-78. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JTBH2011Z2057.htm [6] LU Guang-quan, LIU Miao-miao, WANG Yun-peng, et al. Quantifying the severity of traffic conflict by assuming mov-ing elements as points in intersection[C]∥ASCE. The2011International Conference of Chinese Transportation Profes-sionals. Nanjing: ASCE, 2011: 893-900. [7] 李芳, 吴芳. 基于交叉口冲突技术的交叉口安全评价[J]. 交通科技与经济, 2011(5): 64-66. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KJJJ201105021.htmLI Fang, WU Fang. Evalution of traffic safety at intersections based on traffic conflict technique[J]. Technology and Economy in Areas of Communications, 2011(5): 64-66. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KJJJ201105021.htm [8] 袁黎, 王文卿, 项乔君, 等. 公路平面交叉口交通冲突分析模型研究[J]. 公路, 2009(2): 105-110. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GLGL200902023.htmYUAN Li, WANG Wen-qing, XIANG Qiao-jun, et al. A study on analysis model of highway intersections based on traffic conflict techniques[J]. Highway, 2009(2): 105-110. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GLGL200902023.htm [9] 王俊骅, 张方方, 张兰芳. 基于OpenCV和Halcon的交通冲突视频自动检测及数据处理[J]. 同济大学学报: 自然科学版, 2010, 38(2): 238-244. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-374x.2010.02.015WANG Jun-hua, ZHANG Fang-fang, ZHANG Lan-fang. Halcon and OpenCV-based traffic automatic conflicting detecting method and data transaction[J]. Journal of Tongji University: Natural Science, 2010, 38(2): 238-244. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-374x.2010.02.015 [10] 张鑫. 交通冲突技术相关问题研究[D]. 北京: 北京交通大学, 2005.ZHANG Xin. Research on the related problems of traffic conflict technology[D]. Beijing: Beijing Jiaotong University, 2005. (in Chinese). [11] 丛颖. 公路平面交叉口交通冲突分类及严重性划分[D]. 南京: 东南大学, 2008.CONG Ying. Detection and classification of traffic conflict at intersections and distinguishing of conflict severity[D]. Nanjing: Southeast University, 2008. (in Chinese). [12] HU Wei-ming, XIAO Xue-juan, XIE Dan, et al. Traffic accident prediction using vehicle tracking and trajectory analysis[C]∥IEEE. Proceedings of Intelligent Transportation Systems. Shanghai: IEEE, 2003: 220-225. [13] ATEV S, ARUMUGAM H, MASOUD O, et al. A vision-based approach to collision prediction at traffic intersections[J]. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2005, 6(4): 416-423. doi: 10.1109/TITS.2005.858786 [14] SAUNIER N, SAYED T, LIM C. Probabilistic collision pre-diction for vision-based automated road safety analysis[C]∥IEEE. Proceedings of the2007IEEE Intelligent Transporta-tion Systems Conference. Seattle: IEEE, 2007: 872-878. [15] 张方方. 基于视频的平面交叉口机动车交通冲突检测技术研究[D]. 上海: 同济大学, 2008.ZHANG Fang-fang. Study on a computer vision system for detecting traffic conflict between vehicles at intersections[D]. Shanghai: Tongji University, 2008. (in Chinese). [16] 胡佳. 交叉口汽车冲突及避撞方式有效性分析[D]. 长沙: 湖南大学, 2005.HU Jia. Analysis on vehicles collision and effectiveness of crash avoidance manner at road intersections[D]. Changsha: Hunan University, 2005. (in Chinese). -
下载:
点击查看大图
图(8) / 表(3)
计量
- 文章访问数: 1117
- HTML全文浏览量: 72
- PDF下载量: 1363
- 被引次数: 0
