-
摘要: 利用T10型测试车测试了某机场水泥混凝土跑道不同区段摩擦因数, 利用照相法和特征描述法对道面不同尺度的构造进行了特征分析, 基于测试结果, 探讨了道面构造对其摩擦因数的影响规律, 提出了基于构造特征参数的道面抗滑能力表达模型。根据对道面宏观、粗观和细观构造特征参数的相关分析, 构建了基于构造特征的道面抗滑摩擦因数模型。研究结果表明: 构造特征相近的道面, 其构造深度为0.6~0.7 cm时, 摩擦因数为0.40~0.42;构造特征差异较大时, 构造深度分别为0.70、0.78 cm的区域, 摩擦因数分别为0.43、0.75, 构造特征对摩擦因数的影响不可忽视; 基于道面构造特征的参数化分析, 采用道面抗滑摩擦因数模型可定量分析旧道面抗滑性能。Abstract: The frictional coefficients of several parts for cement concrete runway in an airport were tested by an anti-slide-test truck of T10 type.Different textural features were analyzed by photo analysis method and characteristic description method.The influence law of pavement superficial texture on frictional coefficient was discussed based on test results.A model of pavement anti-slide capacity was proposed based on texture characteristic parameters.According to the analysis of macro, rough and micro texture characteristic parameters, a pavement anti-slide frictional coefficient model was proposed based on texture characteristic.Analysis result shows that frictional coefficients vary from 0.40 to 0.42 when constructional depths are 0.6-0.7 cm on the similar texture characteristic roads.For the significant different texture characteristics, frictional coefficients are 0.43, 0.75 when constructional depths are 0.70, 0.78 cm respectively, so the influence of texture characteristic on pavement frictional coefficient can not be neglected.Based on the analysis of pavement texture characteristic parameters, the anti-slide model can be used to analyze the anti-slide capacity of old runway pavement quantitatively.
-
图 2 距离跑道中线3.4 m处摩擦因数
Figure 2. Frictional coefficients along 3.4 m line from runway central line
图 3 距离跑道中线5.5 m处摩擦因数
Figure 3. Frictional coefficients along 5.5 m line from runway central line
图 4 距离跑道中线14.5 m处摩擦因数
Figure 4. Frictional coefficients along 14.5 m line from runway central line
图 5 3.4 m线摩擦因数与构造深度
Figure 5. Frictional coefficients and texture depths along 3.4 m testing line
图 6 14.5 m线摩擦因数与构造深度
Figure 6. Frictional coefficients and texture depths along 14.5 m testing line
图 7 3.4 m线上620 m处的道面表层构造外观特征
Figure 7. Superficial texture feature of pavement along 3.4 m testing line at 620 m
图 8 14.5 m线上620 m处的道面表层构造外观特征
Figure 8. Superficial texture feature of pavement along 14.5 m testing line at 620 m
图 9 3.4 m线上2 840 m处的道面表层构造外观特征
Figure 9. Superficial texture feature of pavement along 3.4 m testing line at 2 840 m
图 10 14.5 m线上2 890 m处的道面表层构造外观特征
Figure 10. Superficial texture feature of pavement along 14.5 m testing line at 2 890 m
图 11 弹性胎面与道面粗糙峰构造的接触状态
Figure 11. Contact state of elastic tyre with pavement asperity texture
-
[1] 何杰, 刘霞, 陈一锴, 等. 恶劣天气路面条件对行车安全的影响[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2011, 11(1): 58-63. http://transport.chd.edu.cn/article/id/201101010HE Jie, LIU Xia, CHEN Yi-kai, et al. Influence of road condition on running safety in atrocious weather[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2011, 11(1): 58-63. (in Chinese). http://transport.chd.edu.cn/article/id/201101010 [2] 和松, 夏礼秀. 高速公路路面摩擦因数的测试与评价[J]. 公路交通科技, 2002, 19(1): 8-11, 15. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GLJK200201002.htmHE Song, XIA Li-xiu. Friction coefficient measurement and evaluation for lane surface of expressway[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2002, 19(1): 8-11, 15. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GLJK200201002.htm [3] 李波, 韩森, 滕旭秋. 混凝土路面的表面纹理与抗滑性[J]. 交通标准化, 2008(7): 154-157. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JTBH200807048.htmLI Bo, HAN Sen, TENG Xu-qiu. Surface texture and skid resistance of concrete pavement[J]. Communications Stand-ardization, 2008(7): 154-157. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JTBH200807048.htm [4] 刘宽, 李华. 水泥混凝土路面抗滑措施的改进[J]. 公路, 1993(2): 9-10. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GLGL199302002.htmLIU Kuan, LI Hua. The improvement of skid measures of cement concrete pavement[J]. Highway, 1993(2): 9-10. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GLGL199302002.htm [5] 曹平, 严新平, 白秀琴. 沥青路面形貌对抗滑性能影响的理论分析[J]. 摩擦学学报, 2009, 29(4): 306-310. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1004-0595.2009.04.003CAO Ping, YAN Xin-ping, BAI Xiu-qin. Theory analysis of effect of topography on skid resistance of asphalt pavements[J]. Tribology, 2009, 29(4): 306-310. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1004-0595.2009.04.003 [6] 黄宝涛, 田伟平, 李家春, 等. 沥青路面抗滑性能定量评价的分形方法[J]. 中国公路学报, 2008, 21(4): 12-17. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGGL200804002.htmHUANG Bao-tao, TIAN Wei-ping, LI Jia-chun, et al. Fractal method based on quantitative evaluation of asphalt pavement anti-slide performance[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2008, 21(4): 12-17. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGGL200804002.htm [7] 周仲荣, 钱林茂. 摩擦学尺寸效应及相关问题的思考[J]. 机械工程学报, 2003, 39(8): 22-26. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JXXB200308003.htmZHOU Zhong-rong, QIAN Lin-mao. Tribological size effect and related problems[J]. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2003, 39(8): 22-26. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JXXB200308003.htm [8] 朱洪涛. 水泥混凝土路面抗滑机理及测试技术研究[D]. 西安: 长安大学, 2009.ZHU Hong-tao. Research on the cement concrete pavement friction mechanism and test technology[D]. Xi'an: Chang'an University, 2009. (in Chinese). [9] 杜浩, 周正峰, 凌建明, 等. 机场水泥道面切缝倒角应力分析[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2008, 8(6): 44-48, 52. http://transport.chd.edu.cn/article/id/200806009DU Hao, ZHOU Zheng-feng, LING Jian-ming, et al. Stress analysis on joint chamfer for cement concrete airport pave-ment[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2008, 8(6): 44-48, 52. (in Chinese). http://transport.chd.edu.cn/article/id/200806009 [10] DRAKOPOULOS A, ORNEK E. Effect of concrete pave-ment surface texture on traffic safety: longitudinal or trans-verse tines?[C]//Iowa State University. Proceedings of the 2007Mid-Continent Transportation Research Symposium. Ames: Iowa State University, 2007: 1-11. -
下载:
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 685
- HTML全文浏览量: 87
- PDF下载量: 710
- 被引次数: 0
