近距平行跑道间隔确定方法

田勇; 孙佳; 万莉莉; 李永庆

doi:10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2013.01.011

近距平行跑道间隔确定方法

doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2013.01.011

南京航空航天大学民航学院, 江苏南京 210016

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目 61104159

详细信息

作者简介:
田勇(1976-), 男, 湖北洪湖人, 南京航空航天大学副教授, 工学博士, 从事空中交通管理研究

中图分类号: V351.11
计量
- 文章访问数: 787
- HTML全文浏览量: 147
- PDF下载量: 924
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2012-08-27
- 刊出日期: 2013-02-25

Separation determining method of closely spaced parallel runways

School of Civil Aviation, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 210016, Jiangsu, China

More Information

Author Bio:
TIAN Yong(1976-), male, associate professor, PhD, +86-25-84893461, 138139@263.net

摘要

摘要: 应用最不利环境下的尾流运动特性,研究了近距平行跑道相关平行进近模式下配对飞机斜距、进近下滑角和机型组合对跑道间隔的影响,利用最小尾流间隔标准和NASA侧风统计数据,并根据机型参数,提出了跑道中心线间距和跑道头错开间距的确定方法。分析结果表明:当配对前后机的斜向间隔标准一定时,跑道头错开间距随中心线间距和配对后机下滑角的增大而减小;当配对前后机下滑角相同时,跑道头错开间距随中心线间距和斜向间隔标准的增大而减小;当跑道中心线间距为380m,前后机下滑角均为3°,斜向间隔标准为2 780m时,长沙黄花国际机场跑道头错开间距应不小于1 483m,符合国外已授权机场跑道参数。
- 航空运输 /
- 近距平行跑道 /
- 间隔标准 /
- 相关平行进近 /
- 尾流运动 /
- 跑道中心线间距 /
- 跑道头错开间距
Abstract: By using wake vortex movement characteristics under the most adverse environment, the effects of the slant range and approach glide angles of paired aircrafts and aircraft type combination on runway separation under the dependent parallel approach mode of closely spaced parallel runways were researched, the minimum wake vortex separation standard and crosswind statistical data of NASA were used, and the determination methods of runway centerline distance and threshold offset were put out based on aircraft type parameters. Analysis result shows that when the slant separation standard of paired leading and trailing aircrafts is a certain value, threshold offset decreases with the increases of runway centerline distance and the glide angle of paired trailing aircraft. When the glide angles of paired leading and trailing aircrafts are same, threshold offset decreases with the increases of runway centerline distance and slant separation standard. When runway centerline distance is 380 m, the glide angles of paired leading and trailing aircrafts are both 3°, and slant separation standard is 2 780 m, the threshold offset of Changsha Huanghua International Airport should be more than 1 483 m, which is accord with the runway parameter of foreign authorized airports.
- air transportation /
- closely spaced parallel runways /
- separation standard /
- dependent parallel approach /
- wake vortex movement /
- runway centerline distance /
- threshold offset

HTML全文

图 1 配对进近

Figure 1. Paired approach

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 下滑道垂直间距

Figure 2. Vertical distance of glide slopes

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 尾流下沉速度曲线

Figure 3. Wake sinking velocity curves

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 D、θ₂和C之间的关系

Figure 4. Relationship among D, θ₂and C

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 D、C和Z之间的关系

Figure 5. Relationship among D, C and Z

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 最小间隔标准

Table 1. Minimum separation standards

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 高角度进近时的D

Table 2. D of high angle approach

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 长沙黄花国际机场跑道头错开最小间距

Table 3. Minimum threhsold offsets of Changsha Huanghua International Airport

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(23)

[1]	胡明华, 田勇, 李凯. 机场近距平行跑道进近方法研究[J]. 交通运输工程与信息学报, 2003, 1(1): 64-69. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JTGC200301009.htm HU Ming-hua, TIAN Yong, LI Kai. Study of approach procedure to closely spaced parallel runways[J]. Journal of Transportation Engineering and Information, 2003, 1(1): 64-69. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JTGC200301009.htm
[2]	HAMMER J B. Case study of paired approach procedure to closely spaced parallel runways[J]. Air Traffic Control Quarterly, 2000, 8(3): 223-252. doi: 10.2514/atcq.8.3.223
[3]	EFTEKARI R R, HAMMER J B, HAVENS D A, et al. Feasibility analyses for paired approach procedures for closely spaced parallel runways[C]//IEEE. Integrated Communications, Navigation and Surveilance Conference(ICNS), 2011. Venice: IEEE, 2011: 1-14.
[4]	MUNDRA A D, COOPER W W, SMITH A P, et al. Potential Benefits of a paired approach procedure to closely spaced parallel runways in instrument and marginal visual conditions[C]//IEEE. Digital Avionics Systems Conference. St. Paul: IEEE, 2008: 10-27.
[5]	LAURENCE A, DAVID D, STEVEN L, et al. Increasing airport arrival capacity in NextGen with wake turbulence avoidance[C]//IEEE. Integrated Communications, Navigation and Surveilance Conference(ICNS), 2009. Richmond: IEEE, 2009: 1-15.
[6]	ROSSOW V J. Vortex-free flight corridors for aircraft executing compressed landing operations[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2006, 43(5): 1424-1428. doi: 10.2514/1.21614
[7]	ROSSOW V J, MEYN L A. Guidelines for avoiding vortex wakes during use of closely spaced parallel runways[R]. Washington DC: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 2012.
[8]	顾正兵. 虹桥机场近距平行跑道仪表运行方式研究[J]. 中国民航大学学报, 2010, 28(5): 21-24. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGMH201005006.htm GU Zheng-bing. Study on instrument operation modes for closely spaced parallel runways of Hongqiao Airport[J]. Journal of Civil Aviation University of China, 2010, 28(5): 21-24. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGMH201005006.htm
[9]	徐肖豪, 赵鸿盛, 王振宇. 尾流间隔缩减技术综述[J]. 航空学报, 2010, 31(4): 654-662. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HKXB201004002.htm XU Xiao-hao, ZHAO Hong-sheng, WANG Zhen-yu. Overview of wake vortex separation reduction systems[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautics Sinica, 2010, 31(4): 654-662. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HKXB201004002.htm
[10]	徐肖豪, 赵鸿盛, 杨传森, 等. 飞机进近中尾流的大涡数值模拟[J]. 南京航空航天大学学报, 2010, 42(2): 179-184. XU Xiao-hao, ZHAO Hong-sheng, YANG Chuan-sen, et al. Large eddy simulation of wake vortex during approach[J]. Journal of Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2010, 42(2): 179-184. (in Chinese).
[11]	韩红蓉, 李娜, 魏志强. 飞机遭遇尾涡的安全性分析[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2012, 12(1): 45-49. http://transport.chd.edu.cn/article/id/201201008 HAN Hong-rong, LI Na, WEI Zhi-qiang. Safety analysis of aircraft encountering wake vortex[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2012, 12(1): 45-49. (in Chinese). http://transport.chd.edu.cn/article/id/201201008
[12]	冯志勇. 尾流对飞行的影响及安全间隔研究[D]. 成都: 西南交通大学, 2007. FENG Zhi-yong. How wake vortexes affect the flights and safety separation[D]. Chengdu: Southwest Jiaotong University, 2007. (in Chinese).
[13]	杨新涅. 尾流对飞行影响的研究[J]. 空中交通管制, 2003, 1(1): 25-28. https://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-10613-2008042309.htm YANG Xin-nie. Influence of wake flow on flight[J]. Air Traffic Management, 2003, 1(1): 25-28. (in Chinese). https://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-10613-2008042309.htm
[14]	周彬, 王雪松, 王涛, 等. 侧向风速对飞机尾流运动的影响[J]. 航空学报, 2009, 30(5): 773-779. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HKXB200905003.htm ZHOU Bin, WANG Xue-song, WANG Tao, et al. Influence of cross wind speeds on aircraft wake vortex movement[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautics Sinica, 2009, 30(5): 773-779. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HKXB200905003.htm
[15]	周彬. 飞机尾流的微结构特征及散射特性研究[D]. 长沙: 国防科学技术大学, 2009. ZHOU Bin. Study on the microstructure and scattering characteristics of aircraft wake vortices[D]. Changsha: National University of Defense Technology, 2009. (in Chinese).
[16]	王维, 王美玲, 潜雪冰. 机场近距平行跑道间距和入口错开的选择研究[J]. 中国民航大学学报, 2011, 29(2): 23-26. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGMH201102006.htm WANG Wei, WANG Mei-ling, QIAN Xue-bing. Study on method of determination of centrally distance and threshold staggering manner for closely spaced parallel runways of airport[J]. Jounal of Civil Aviation University of China, 2011, 29(2): 23-26. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGMH201102006.htm
[17]	郭海琦, 朱金福. 近距平行跑道容量及延误水平计算模型[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2008, 8(4): 68-72. http://transport.chd.edu.cn/article/id/200804014 GUO Hai-qi, ZHU Jin-fu. Calculation models of capacity and delay for closely spaced parallel runway[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2008, 8(4): 68-72. (in Chinese). http://transport.chd.edu.cn/article/id/200804014
[18]	张洪海, 胡明华. 多跑道降落飞机协同调度优化[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2009, 9(3): 86-91. http://transport.chd.edu.cn/article/id/200903017 ZHANG Hong-hai, HU Ming-hua. Multi-runway collaborative scheduling optimization of aircraft landing[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2009, 9(3): 86-91. (in Chinese). http://transport.chd.edu.cn/article/id/200903017
[19]	ABDULMALIK A B, NARIN C, ROBERT E, et al. Closely spaced parallel approaches in terminal airspace[C]//IEEE. 2006Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium. Charlottesville: IEEE, 2006: 190-195.
[20]	STEVEN J L, ALFRED L. Safe zone for closely spaced parallel approaches[J]. Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics, 2011, 34(2): 608-613. doi: 10.2514/1.52567
[21]	张莹, 胡明华, 田勇. 一种新的机场地面容量评估模型[J]. 交通运输工程与信息学报, 2006, 4(2): 61-65, 93. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JTGC200602012.htm ZHANG Ying, HU Ming-hua, TIAN Yong. Research on a new capacity evaluation model of airport ground[J]. Journal of Transportation Engineering and Information, 2006, 4(2): 61-65, 93. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JTGC200602012.htm
[22]	田勇, 傅建军, 王艳军. 机场地面容量评估研究[J]. 南京航空航天大学学报, 2006, 38(5): 619-622. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NJHK200605017.htm TIAN Yong, FU Jian-jun, WANG Yan-jun. Research on airport ground capacity evaluation[J]. Journal of Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2006, 38(5): 619-622. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NJHK200605017.htm
[23]	叶博嘉, 胡明华, 田勇. 基于航班时刻优化的多机场地面等待问题——模型和算法[J]. 西南交通大学学报, 2010, 45(3): 464-469. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XNJT201003026.htm YE Bo-jia, HU Ming-hua, TIAN Yong. Multi-airport ground holding problem based on airline schedule optimization models and algorithm[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2010, 45(3): 464-469. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XNJT201003026.htm