钢筋混凝土空心桥墩应用及抗震性能研究综述

孙治国; 王东升; 李宏男; 杜修力

doi:10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2013.03.004

钢筋混凝土空心桥墩应用及抗震性能研究综述

doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2013.03.004

孙治国^{1, 2,},
王东升^{1, 2},
李宏男³,
杜修力⁴

1.
大连海事大学道路与桥梁工程研究所, 辽宁大连 116026
2.
大连海事大学辽宁省公路工程重点实验室, 辽宁大连 116026
3.
大连理工大学建设工程学部, 辽宁大连 116024
4.
北京工业大学城市与工程安全减灾教育部重点实验室, 北京 100124

基金项目:

国家973计划项目 2011CEO13605

国家自然科学基金项目 51008041

中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目 3132013068

中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目 3132013315

海岸和近海工程国家重点实验室开放基金项目 LP1212

详细信息

作者简介:
孙治国(1980-), 男, 山东德州人, 大连海事大学讲师, 工学博士, 从事桥梁与结构工程抗震研究

中图分类号: U443.22
计量
- 文章访问数: 656
- HTML全文浏览量: 107
- PDF下载量: 1071
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2012-12-18
- 刊出日期: 2013-06-25

Application of RC hollow bridge pier and review of seismic behavior research

1.
Institute of Road and Bridge Engineering, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian 116026, Liaoning, China
2.
Key Laboratory of Highway Engineering of Liaoning Province, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian 116026, Liaoning, China
3.
Faculty of Infrastructure Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, Liaoning, China
4.
Key Laboratory of Urban Security and Disaster Engineering of Ministry of Education, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China

More Information

Author Bio:
SUN Zhiguo(1980-), male, lecturer, PhD, +86-411-84725098, szg_1999_1999@163.com

摘要

摘要: 分析了中国6座大型铁路桥梁和26座大型公路桥梁中空心桥墩的设计情况, 从墩高、壁厚比、薄壁宽厚比和剪跨比等方面对空心桥墩在中国的应用情况进行了评述。总结了新西兰、美国、欧洲、日本以及中国对空心桥墩抗震问题开展的试验研究和理论分析成果, 指出了空心桥墩抗震研究存在的问题和进一步研究方向。分析结果表明: 剪跨比大于10.0的高墩、壁厚比小于0.2或薄壁宽厚比大于10.0的薄壁墩在中国大型桥梁工程中获得了广泛应用; 目前对空心桥墩抗震问题开展的研究集中于剪跨比在8.0以下的中低墩, 对壁厚比小于0.2或薄壁宽厚比大于5.0的薄壁墩开展的研究非常少; 合理的空心桥墩抗剪强度及抗震变形能力分析模型仍未建立; 分析水下空心桥墩抗开裂措施, 控制空心桥墩残余位移, 采用新型结构和新材料提高空心桥墩抗震能力, 应用现代试验技术研究空心桥墩抗震问题是未来重要的研究方向。
- 桥梁工程 /
- 高墩大跨桥梁 /
- 钢筋混凝土空心桥墩 /
- 抗震性能
Abstract: Design details of RC hollow bridge piers for 6 major railway bridges and 26 major highway bridges in China were analyzed. Pier height, web thickness to section width ratio, web width to thickness ratio and aspect ratio of pier used in China were reviewed.The experimental researches and theoretical analyses of seismic behaviors for RC hollow piers in New Zealand, America, Europe, Japan and China were summarized, and the existing problems and future research directions were pointed out. Analysis result shows that high piers with aspect ratio larger than 10.0, thin walled piers with web thickness to section width ratio less than 0.2 or web width to thickness ratio larger than 10.0 are commonly used in large bridges in China.Most of the researches have focused on the seismic behaviors of low and medium height piers with aspect ratio less than 8.0, and few researches have been conducted for piers with web thickness to section width ratio less than 0.2 or web width to thickness ratio larger than 5.0. There is still not any reasonable shear strength and seismic deformation analysis model for hollow bridge piers.Some important research directions in the future include anti-cracking measures of hollow bridge pier under the water, residual displacement control of hollow bridge pier, improving the seismic behavior of hollow bridge pier by new structures and materials, and researching the seismic behavior of hollow bridge pier by modern experimental techniques.
- bridge engineering /
- high-pier long-span bridge /
- RC hollow bridge pier /
- seismic behavior

HTML全文

图 1 参数定义

Figure 1. Definitions of parameters

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 铁路桥梁空心桥墩数据分布

Figure 2. Data distributions of hollow bridge piers for railway bridges

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 公路桥梁空心桥墩数据分布

Figure 3. Data distributions of hollow bridge piers for highway bridges

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 公路桥梁中c与ξ的关系

Figure 4. Relationships between c and ξ for highway bridges

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 矩形空心桥墩试验数据分布

Figure 5. Experimental data distributions of rectangular hollow bridge piers

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 Mander与Zahn研究的空心桥墩

Figure 6. Hollow bridge piers studied by Mander and Zahn

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 欧洲的典型矩形空心桥墩

Figure 7. Typical rectangular hollow bridge piers in Europe

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 8 意大利的矩形空心桥墩

Figure 8. Rectangular hollow bridge piers in Italy

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 9 斯洛文尼亚的空心桥墩

Figure 9. Hollow bridge pier in Slovenia

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 10 台湾的空心桥墩

Figure 10. Hollow bridge piers in Taiwan

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 空心桥墩设计情况

Table 1. Design details of hollow bridge piers

参数	H/m		c₁		c₂		λ
参数	范围	均值	范围	均值	范围	均值	范围	均值
铁路桥梁	16~110	47.8	0.125~0.780	0.28	0.18~0.42	0.30	2.0~7.2	4.0
公路桥梁	15~178	73.9	0.060~0.550	0.20	0.13~0.67	0.35	1.3~21.2	8.6

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(60)

[1]	周军生, 楼庄鸿. 大跨径预应力混凝土连续刚构桥的现状和发展趋势[J]. 中国公路学报, 2000, 13(1): 31-37. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-7372.2000.01.008 ZHOU Jun-sheng, LOU Zhuang-hong. The status quo and developing trends of large-span prestressed concrete bridges with continuous rigid frame structure[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2000, 13(1): 31-37. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-7372.2000.01.008
[2]	王钧利, 贺拴海. 高墩大跨径弯桥在悬臂施工阶段刚构的非线性稳定分析[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2006, 6(2): 30-34. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1671-1637.2006.02.007 WANG Jun-li, HE Shuan-hai. Nonlinear stability analysis of long-span curve bridge with high piers during cantilever construction[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2006, 6(2): 30-34. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1671-1637.2006.02.007
[3]	王钧利, 贺拴海. 大跨径弯桥圆心角对其内力、位移及稳定性的影响[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2007, 7(3): 86-90. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1671-1637.2007.03.018 WANG Jun-li, HE Shuan-hai. Central angle influence of long-span curve bridge on its inner forces, displacements and stability[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2007, 7(3): 86-90. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1671-1637.2007.03.018
[4]	MARIA H S, WOOD S L, BREEN J E. Behavior of hollow, rectangular reinforced concrete piers subjected to biaxial loading[J]. ACI Structural Journal, 2006, 103(3): 390-398.
[5]	PRIESTLEY M J N, PARK R. Strength and ductility of concrete bridge columns under seismic loading[J]. ACI Structural Journal, 1987, 84(1): 61-76.
[6]	孙治国, 王东升, 杜修力, 等. 钢筋混凝土桥墩塑性铰区约束箍筋用量研究[J]. 中国公路学报, 2010, 23(3): 48-57. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7372.2010.03.008 SUN Zhi-guo, WANG Dong-sheng, DU Xiu-li, et al. Research on amount of confining reinforcement in potential plastic hinge regions of RC bridge columns[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2010, 23(3): 48-57. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7372.2010.03.008
[7]	王东升, 司炳君, 孙治国, 等. 地震作用下钢筋混凝土桥墩塑性铰区抗剪强度试验[J]. 中国公路学报, 2011, 24(2): 34-41. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7372.2011.02.007 WANG Dong-sheng, SI Bing-jun, SUN Zhi-guo, et al. Experiment on shear strength of reinforced concrete bridge column in plastic hinge zone under seismic effect[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2011, 24(2): 34-41. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7372.2011.02.007
[8]	孙治国, 王东升, 郭迅, 等. 钢筋混凝土墩柱等效塑性铰长度研究[J]. 中国公路学报, 2011, 24(5): 56-64. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGGL201105011.htm SUN Zhi-guo, WANG Dong-sheng, GUO Xun, et al. Research on equivalent plastic hinge length of reinforced concrete bridge column[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2011, 24(5): 56-64. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGGL201105011.htm
[9]	孙治国, 司炳君, 王东升, 等. 钢筋混凝土桥墩震后修复技术研究综述[J]. 地震工程与工程振动, 2009, 29(5): 128-132. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DGGC200905016.htm SUN Zhi-guo, SI Bing-jun, WANG Dong-sheng, et al. Review on the repair techniques for earthquake damaged RC bridge piers[J]. Journal of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2009, 29(5): 128-132. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DGGC200905016.htm
[10]	刘健新, 张伟, 张茜. 洛河特大桥抗震性能计算[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2006, 6(1): 57-62. http://transport.chd.edu.cn/article/id/200601012 LIU Jian-xin, ZHANG Wei, ZHANG Qian. Anti-seismic performance calculation of Luohe bridge[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2006, 6(1): 57-62. (in Chinese). http://transport.chd.edu.cn/article/id/200601012
[11]	李建中, 宋晓东, 范立础. 桥梁高墩位移延性能力的探讨[J]. 地震工程与工程振动, 2005, 25(1): 43-48. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DGGC200501007.htm LI Jian-zhong, SONG Xiao-dong, FAN Li-chu. Investigation for displacement ductility capacity of tall piers[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2005, 25(1): 43-48. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DGGC200501007.htm
[12]	TAYLOR A W, ROWELL R B, BREEN J E. Behavior of thin-walled concrete box piers[J]. ACI Structural Journal, 1995, 92(3): 319-333.
[13]	MANDER J B. Seismic design of bridge piers[D]. Christchurch: University of Canterbury, 1983.
[14]	PINTO A V, MOLINA J, TSIONIS G. Cyclic tests on largescale models of existing bridge piers with rectangular hollow cross-section[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 2003, 32(13): 1995-2012. doi: 10.1002/eqe.311
[15]	CALVI G M, PAVESE A, RASULO A, et al. Experimental and numerical studies on the seismic response of R. C. hollow bridge piers[J]. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2005, 3(3): 267-297.
[16]	DELGADO R, DELGADO P, POUCA N V, et al. Shear effects on hollow section piers under seismic actions: experimental and numerical analysis[J]. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2009, 7(2): 377-389. doi: 10.1007/s10518-008-9098-x
[17]	FARIA R, POUCA N V, DELGADO R. Simulation of the cyclic behaviour of R/C rectangular hollow section bridge piers via a detailed numerical model[J]. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 2004, 8(5): 725-748.
[18]	MO Y L, YEH Y K, CHENG C T, et al. Seismic performance and retrofit of hollow bridge columns[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Seismology, 2001, 3(1): 59-66.
[19]	YEH Y K, MO Y L, YANG C Y. Seismic performance of hollow circular bridge piers[J]. ACI Structural Journal, 2001, 98(6): 862-871.
[20]	YEH Y K, MO Y L, YANG C Y. Seismic performance of rectangular hollow bridge columns[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2002, 128(1): 60-68.
[21]	YEH Y K, MO Y L, YANG C Y. Full-scale tests on rectangular hollow bridge piers[J]. Materials and Structures, 2002, 35(2): 117-125.
[22]	MO Y L, NIEN I C. Seismic performance of hollow high-strength concrete bridge columns[J]. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2002, 7(6): 338-349.
[23]	MO Y L, WONG D C, MAEKAW A K. Seismic performance of hollow bridge columns[J]. ACI Structural Journal, 2003, 100(3): 337-348.
[24]	CHENG C T, YANG J C, YEH Y K, et al. Seismic performance of repaired hollow-bridge piers[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2003, 17(5): 339-351.
[25]	MO Y L, YEH Y K, HSIEH D M. Seismic retrofit of hollow rectangular bridge columns[J]. Journal of Composites for Construction, 2004, 8(1): 43-51.
[26]	CHENG C T, MO Y L, YEH Y K. Evaluation of as-built, retrofitted, and repaired shear-critical hollow bridge columns under earthquake-type loading[J]. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2005, 10(5): 520-529.
[27]	MO Y L, JENG C H, PERNG S F. Seismic shear behavior of rectangular hollow bridge columns[J]. Structural Engineering and Mechanics, 2001, 12(4): 429-448.
[28]	宋晓东. 桥梁高墩延性抗震性能的理论与试验研究[D]. 上海: 同济大学, 2004. SONG Xiao-dong. Theory and experimental research on theseismic ductility of tall piers[D]. Shanghai: Tongji University, 2004. (in Chinese).
[29]	崔海琴, 贺拴海, 宋一凡. 空心矩形薄壁墩延性抗震性能试验[J]. 公路交通科技, 2010, 27(6): 58-63 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GLJK201006010.htm CUI Hai-qin, HE Shuan-hai, SONG Yi-fan. Experimental study on antiseismic ductility of hollow rectangular thin-walled pier[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2010, 27(6): 58-63. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GLJK201006010.htm
[30]	崔海琴, 贺拴海, 赵小星, 等. CFRP约束空心薄壁墩抗震性能试验[J]. 长安大学学报: 自然科学版, 2010, 30(3): 53-59 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XAGL201003014.htm CUI Hai-qin, HE Shuan-hai, ZHAO Xiao-xing, et al. Experimental research on seismic behavior of hollow rectangular thin-walled pier confined with CFRP[J]. Journal of Changan University: Natural Science Edition, 2010, 30(3): 53-59. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XAGL201003014.htm
[31]	杜修力, 陈明琦, 韩强. 钢筋混凝土空心桥墩抗震性能试验研究[J]. 振动与冲击, 2011, 30(11): 254-259. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZDCJ201111053.htm DU Xiu-li, CHEN Ming-qi, HAN Qiang. Experimental evaluation of seismic performance of reinforced concrete hollow bridge columns[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2011, 30(11): 254-259. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZDCJ201111053.htm
[32]	ZAHN F A, PARK R, PRIESTLEY M J N. Flexural strength and ductility of circular hollow reinforced concrete columns without confinement on inside face[J]. ACI Structural Journal, 1990, 87(2): 156-166.
[33]	HOSHIKUMA J I, PRIESTLEY M J N. Flexural behavior of circular hollow columns with a single layer of reinforcement under seismic loading[R]. San Diego: University of California, 2000.
[34]	OGATA T, OSADA K. Seismic retrofitting of expressway bridges in Japan[J]. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2000, 22(1): 17-27.
[35]	GUEDES J, PINTO A V, PEGON P. Non-linear shear model for R/C piers[R]. Ispra: Joint Research Center, 2010.
[36]	TSIONIS G, PINTO A. Numerical analysis of RC bridge piers with rectangular hollow cross-section retrofitted with FRP jackets[J]. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 2007, 11(4): 607-630.
[37]	KOWALSKY M J, PRIESTLEY M J N. Improved analytical model for shear strength of circular reinforced concrete columns in seismic regions[J]. ACI Structural Journal, 2000, 97(3): 388-396.
[38]	PAVESE A, BOLOGNINI D, PELOSO S. FRP seismic retrofit of RC square hollow section bridge piers[J]. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 2004, 8(S1): 225-250.
[39]	LIGNOLA G P, PROTA A, MANFREDI G, et al. Experimental performance of RC hollow columns confined with CFRP[J]. Journal of Composites for Construction, 2007, 11(1): 42-49.
[40]	LIGNOLA G P, PROTA A, MANFREDI G, et al. Deformability of reinforced concrete hollow columns confined with CFRP[J]. ACI Structural Journal, 2007, 104(5): 629-637.
[41]	ISAKOVIC T, BEVC L, FISCHINGER M. Modeling the cyclic flexural and shear response of the R. C. hollow box columns of an existing viaduct[J]. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 2008, 12(7): 1120-1138.
[42]	弓俊青, 朱晞. 钢筋混凝土空心圆端墩柱截面弯曲承载力和延性的分析研究[J]. 土木工程学报, 2001, 34(2): 11-16. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TMGC200102002.htm GONG Jun-qing, ZHU Xi. Study on flexural capacity and ductility of reinforced concrete piers with hollow round-nose section[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2001, 34(2): 11-16. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TMGC200102002.htm
[43]	禚一, 李忠献. 基于FENAP平台的RC高桥墩破坏过程模拟及分析[J]. 地震工程与工程振动, 2010, 30(4): 90-96. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DGGC201004013.htm ZHUO Yi, LI Zhong-xian. Simulation and analysis of damage process of RC high bridge piers based on FENAP platform[J]. Journal of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2010, 30(4): 90-96. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DGGC201004013.htm
[44]	孙治国, 郭迅, 王东升, 等. 钢筋混凝土空心墩延性变形能力分析[J]. 铁道学报, 2012, 34(1): 91-96. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDXB201201024.htm SUN Zhi-guo, GUO Xun, WANG Dong-sheng, et al. Analysis on ductile deformability of hollow reinforced concrete bridge piers[J]. Journal of the China Railway Society, 2012, 34(1): 91-96. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDXB201201024.htm
[45]	孙治国, 王东升, 郭迅, 等. 矩形空心墩变形能力及塑性铰区约束箍筋用量[J]. 土木建筑与环境工程, 2012, 34(3): 95-102. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JIAN201203017.htm SUN Zhi-guo, WANG Dong-sheng, GUO Xun, et al. Deformation capacity and amount of confining reinforcement in potential plastic hinge regions of rectangular hollow bridge piers[J]. Journal of Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering, 2012, 34(3): 95-102. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JIAN201203017.htm
[46]	刘林. 高墩大跨铁路桥梁抗震设计与减震控制研究[D]. 北京: 北京交通大学, 2004. LIU Lin. Investigation of seismic design and seismic response control of high-pier-and-long-span railway bridges[D]. Beijing: Beijing Jiaotong University, 2004. (in Chinese).
[47]	郝文秀, 钟铁毅. 活性粉末混凝土桥墩延性试验研究与数值分析[J]. 土木工程学报, 2010, 43(6): 82-86. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TMGC201006011.htm HAO Wen-xiu, ZHONG Tie-yi. Experimental study and numerical analysis of the ductility of reactive powder concrete piers[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2010, 43(6): 82-86. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TMGC201006011.htm
[48]	宗周红, 陈树辉, 夏樟华. 钢筋混凝土箱型高墩双向拟静力试验研究[J]. 防灾减灾工程学报, 2010, 30(4): 369-374. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZXK201004004.htm ZONG Zhou-hong, CHEN Shu-hui, XIA Zhang-hua. Bi-axial quasi-static testing research of high hollow reinforced concrete piers[J]. Journal of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation Engineering, 2010, 30(4): 369-374. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZXK201004004.htm
[49]	李志兴. 高墩大跨混凝土刚构桥抗震性能研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 中国地震局工程力学研究所, 2010. LI Zhi-xing. Study on seismic performance of concrete rigidframe bridge with long spans and high piers[D]. Harbin: Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration, 2010. (in Chinese).
[50]	LEE D H, ELNASHAI A S. Seismic analysis of RC bridge columns with flexure-shear interaction[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2001, 127(5): 546-553.
[51]	XU Shi-yu, ZHANG Jian. Hysteretic shear-flexure interaction model of reinforced concrete columns for seismic response assessment of bridges[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 2011, 40(3): 315-337.
[52]	FISCHER G, LI V C. Deformation behavior of fiber-rein-forced polymer reinforced engineered cementitious composite(ECC)flexural members under reversed cyclic loading conditions[J]. ACI Structural Journal, 2003, 100(1): 25-35.
[53]	徐世烺, 李贺东. 超高韧性水泥基复合材料研究进展及其工程应用[J]. 土木工程学报, 2008, 41(6): 45-60. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TMGC200806012.htm XU Shi-lang, LI He-dong. A review on the development of research and application of ultra high toughness cementitious composites[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2008, 41(6): 45-60. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TMGC200806012.htm
[54]	SAIIDI M S, OBRIEN M, SADROSSADAT-ZADEH M. Cyclic response of concrete bridge columns using superelastic nitinol and bendable concrete[J]. ACI Structural Journal, 2009, 106(1): 69-77.
[55]	崔迪, 李宏男, 宋钢兵. 形状记忆合金混凝土柱动力特性试验研究[J]. 振动与冲击, 2010, 29(4): 150-154. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZDCJ201004036.htm CUI Di, LI Hong-nan, SONG Gang-bing. Experimental study on dynamic properties of SMA reinforced concrete columns[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2010, 29(4): 150-154. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZDCJ201004036.htm
[56]	HINES E M, DAZIO A, SEIBLE F. Structural testing of new East Bay Skyway piers[J]. ACI Structural Journal, 2006, 103(1): 103-112.
[57]	HAN T H, STALLINGS J M, CHO S K, et al. Behaviour of a hollow RC column with an internal tube[J]. Magazine of Concrete Research, 2010, 62(1): 25-38.
[58]	WANG J C, OU Y C, CHANG K C, et al. Large-scale seismic tests of tall concrete bridge columns with precast segmental construction[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 2008, 37(12): 1449-1465.
[59]	OU Y C, WANG P H, TSAI M S, et al. Large-scale experimental study of precast segmental unbonded posttensioned concrete bridge columns for seismic regions[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2010, 136(3): 255-264.
[60]	司炳君, 孙治国, 王东升, 等. 高强箍筋约束高强混凝土柱抗震性能研究综述[J]. 土木工程学报, 2009, 42(4): 1-9. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TMGC200904002.htm SI Bing-jun, SUN Zhi-guo, WANG Dong-sheng, et al. Review of studies on the seismic behavior of high strength concrete columns with high strength transverse reinforcement[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2009, 42(4): 1-9. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TMGC200904002.htm