绿色生态型城市道路评价指标体系

李满良; 郑晨; 王朝辉; 曾伟; 狄升贯

doi:10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2015.02.002

绿色生态型城市道路评价指标体系

doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2015.02.002

1.
长安大学公路学院, 陕西西安 710064
2.
天津市市政工程设计研究院, 天津 300051

基金项目:

住房和城乡建设部科学技术项目 2014-R1-019

中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目 2014G1211003

详细信息

作者简介:
李满良(1974-), 男, 河南漯河人, 长安大学讲师, 工学博士研究生, 从事城市规划研究

中图分类号: U412.1
计量
- 文章访问数: 952
- HTML全文浏览量: 126
- PDF下载量: 1210
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2014-12-10
- 刊出日期: 2015-02-25

Evaluation index system of green ecotype city road

1.
School of Highway, Chang'an University, Xi'an 710064, Shaanxi, China
2.
Tianjin Municipal Engineering Design and Research Institute, Tianjin 300051, China

More Information

Author Bio:
LI Man-liang(1974-), male, lecturer, doctoral student, +86-29-82334741, gl01@chd.edu.cn

摘要

摘要: 为科学合理地评价绿色生态型城市道路, 确立了绿色生态型城市道路概念, 从设计合理性、道路功能效果、节能减排效果、绿化效果和环境保护效果五方面提出了绿色生态型城市道路评价指标体系, 包括5个一级指标、14个二级指标与31个三级指标, 并对各指标进行了阐述, 确定了各指标的评价标准, 提出了基于Spearman等级相关系数组合赋权方法与区间逼近方法的绿色生态型城市道路评价方法, 并对中新天津生态城绿色生态型道路进行了评价。评价结果表明: 中新天津生态城绿色生态型道路21个三级指标评定结果为优, 其余10个指标评定结果为良; 12个二级指标评定结果为优, 其余2个指标评定结果为良; 一级指标中设计合理性与环境保护效果评定结果为良, 其余指标评定结果为优; 绿色生态型城市道路评价指标集合到评价等级优的距离为3.82, 为评价指标集合到各评价等级的最小距离, 中新天津生态城绿色生态型道路评价结果为优, 与实际相符, 因此, 绿色生态型城市道路评价指标体系与评价方法合理、可靠。
- 道路工程 /
- 生态型城市道路 /
- 评价指标体系 /
- 评价方法 /
- 综合赋权
Abstract: In order to evaluate green ecotype city road scientifically and rationally, the concept of green ecotype city road was proposed, and the evaluation index system was set up from 5aspects, namely, rationality of design, effect of road function, energy-conservation and emission-reduction effect, greening effect and environmental protection effect.5first grade indexes, 14 second grade indexes and 31 third grade indexes were elaborated, and their evaluation standards were determined.The evaluation method of green ecotype city road was established on the basis of Spearman rank correlation coefficient combination determining method and interval approximation method.The green ecotype road of China-Singapore Tianjin Ecotype City was evaluated by using the method and the index system.Evaluation result shows that for the road, 21 third grade indexes are excellent and 10 third grade indexes are good.12 second grade indexes are excellent and 2second grade indexes are good.2first grade indexes, namely, rationality of design and environmental protection effect are good and the rest are excellent.The distance between the excellent evaluation grade and the evaluation index set of green ecotype city road is 3.82, and is smallest in the distances between the evaluation index set and the evaluation grades, which shows the greenecotype city road is excellent and the evaluation result is consistent with the reality.Therefore, the evaluation index system and the evaluation method are reasonable and reliable.
- road engineering /
- ecotype city road /
- evaluation index system /
- evaluation method /
- combination determining weight
注释:

1) 导师简介：王建伟（1965－），男，黑龙江哈尔滨人，长安大学教授，工学博士。

HTML全文

表 1 评价指标体系

Table 1. Evaluation index system

表 2 交通安全分级标准

Table 2. Grading standards of traffic safety

表 3 公众满意度分级标准

Table 3. Grading standards of public satisfaction

表 4 降噪效果分级标准

Table 4. Grading standards of noise reduction effect

表 5 K/L的标尺

Table 5. Scales of K/L

表 6 土地利用分级标准

Table 6. Grading standards of land use

表 7 空间伸缩分级标准

Table 7. Grading standards of spatial flexibility

表 8 道路通行能力与交通安全分级标准

Table 8. Grading standards of road traffic capacity and traffic safety

表 9 行车舒适性分级标准

Table 9. Grading standards of riding comfort

表 10 景观适宜性分级标准

Table 10. Grading standards of landscape suitability

表 11 排水与降噪效果分级标准

Table 11. Grading standards of drainage and noise reduction effects

表 12 区域噪声分级标准

Table 12. Grading standards of regional noise

表 13 缓解城市热岛效果分级标准

Table 13. Grading standards of remission urban heat island effect

表 14 低碳环保材料使用分级标准

Table 14. Grading standards of use of low-carbon eco-friendly materials

表 15 新技术应用效果分级标准

Table 15. Grading standards of using effect of new technologies

表 16 循环材料与废弃物利用分级标准

Table 16. Grading standards of utilization of recycled materials and wastes

表 17 滞尘杀菌能力与降温增湿分级标准

Table 17. Grading standards of removal-bactericidal dust capacity and cooling-humidifying capacity

表 18 固碳释氧分级标准

Table 18. Grading standards of carbon fixation and oxygen release

表 19 绿化覆盖与人均绿地占有水平分级标准

Table 19. Grading standards of greening coverage and per capita greening possession level

表 20 视线诱导分级标准

Table 20. Grading standards of sight induction

表 21 缓解疲劳分级标准

Table 21. Grading standards of relieving fatigue

表 22 降低大气污染效果分级标准

Table 22. Grading standards of reducing atmospheric pollution effect

表 23 降低水污染效果分级标准

Table 23. Grading standards of reducing water pollution effect

表 24 评价指标的离散语言标尺

Table 24. Scales of discrete languages of evaluation indexes

表 25 一级指标主观权重

Table 25. Subjective weights of first grade indexes

表 26 单指标等级划分标准

Table 26. Grading standards of single indexes

表 27 设计合理性评价指标效果分值

Table 27. Effect scores of rational design evaluation indexes

表 28 道路功能评价指标效果分值

Table 28. Effect scores of road function evaluation indexes

表 29 节能减排评价指标效果分值

Table 29. Effect scores of energy-conservation and emission-reduction evaluation indexes

表 30 绿化评价指标效果分值

Table 30. Effect scores of greening evaluation indexes

表 31 环境保护评价指标效果分值

Table 31. Effect scores of environmental protection evaluation indexes

表 32 各指标的区间数

Table 32. Intervals of indexes

表 33 二级指标综合评价结果

Table 33. Comprehensive evaluation result of second indexes

表 34 一级指标综合评价结果

Table 34. Comprehensive evaluation result of first grade indexes

参考文献(21)

[1]	黄勇, 汪亚峰, 肖飞, 等. 公路景观生态规划研究综述[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2010, 19(增2): 161-164. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CJLY2010S2027.htm HUANG Yong, WANG Ya-feng, XIAO Fei, et al. A review of landscape eco-planning for road[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2010, 19(S2): 161-164. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CJLY2010S2027.htm
[2]	LEE J, EDIL T B, BENSON C H, et al. Use of BE2ST in-highways for green highway construction rating in Wisconsin[C]∥WEINSTEIN N. Green Streets and Highways 2010. Reston: American Society of Civil Engineers, 2010: 480-494.
[3]	MCPHERSON E G, SIMPSON J R, XIAO Qing-fu, et al. Million trees Los Angeles canopy cover and benefit assessment[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2011, 99(1): 40-50. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.08.011
[4]	TOLEMAN R, ROSE G. Partnerships for progress: towards sustainable road systems[J]. Transportation Research Record, 2008(2067): 155-163.
[5]	PENG B, CAI C L, YIN G K, et al. Evaluation system for CO2emission of hot asphalt mixture[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering: English Edition, 2015, 2(2): 116-124. doi: 10.1016/j.jtte.2015.02.005
[6]	彭波, 李文瑛, 杜迁, 等. 道路绿化美学在高速公路中应用[J]. 长安大学学报: 自然科学版, 2002, 22(2): 28-31. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XAGL200202008.htm PENG Bo, LI Wen-ying, DU Qian, et al. The application of highway landscape aesthetic in expressway[J]. Journal of Chang' an University: Natural Science Edition, 2002, 22(2): 28-31. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XAGL200202008.htm
[7]	陈红, 梁立杰, 杨彩霞. 可持续发展的公路建设生态观[J]. 长安大学学报: 自然科学版, 2004, 24(1): 69-71, 103. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XAGL200401017.htm CHEN Hong, LIANG Li-jie, YANG Cai-xia. Ecological view of sustainable development highway construction[J]. Journal of Chang' an University: Natural Science Edition, 2004, 24(1): 69-71, 103. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XAGL200401017.htm
[8]	LEE J, EDIL T B, BENSON C H, et al. Building environmentally and economically sustainable transportation infrastructure: green highway rating system[J]. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2013, 139(12): 1-10.
[9]	FÁBOS J G, RYAN R L. An introduction to greenway planning around the world[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2006, 76(1-4): 1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2004.09.028
[10]	秦晓春, 沈毅. 关于推进公路交通行业生态文明建设的思考[J]. 交通标准化, 2014, 42(3): 3-6. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JTBH201403003.htm QIN Xiao-chun, SHEN Yi, Thinking about promoting construction of ecological civilization in highway transport industry[J]. Transportation Standardization, 2014, 42(3): 3-6. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JTBH201403003.htm
[11]	FÁBOS J G, RYAN R L. International greenway planning: an introduction[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2004, 68(2): 143-146.
[12]	郝培文, 蒋小茜, 石载. 绿色公路理念及评价体系[J]. 筑路机械与施工机械化, 2011, 28(5): 30-35. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZLJX201105025.htm HAO Pei-wen, JIANG Xiao-qian, SHI Zai. Concept of green road and its evaluation system[J]. Road Machinery and Construction Mechanization, 2011, 28(5): 30-35. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZLJX201105025.htm
[13]	TUNER T. Greenway planning in Britain: recent work and future plans[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2006, 76(1-4): 240-251. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2004.09.035
[14]	GIORDANO L C, RIEDEL P S. Multi-criteria spatial decision analysis for demarcation of greenway: a case study of the city of Rio Claro, S'o Paulo, Brazil[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2008, 84(3/4): 301-311.
[15]	EKEL P, QUEIROZ J, PARREIRAS R, et al. Fuzzy set based models and methods of multicriteria group decision making[J]. Nonlinear Analysis, 2009, 71(12): 409-419. doi: 10.1016/j.na.2008.11.087
[16]	SRDJEVIC B. Combining different prioritization methods in the analytic hierarchy process synthesis[J]. Computers and Operations Research, 2005, 32(7): 1897-1919. doi: 10.1016/j.cor.2003.12.005
[17]	王朝辉, 王选仓, 高建立, 等. 高等级公路复合式路面养护标准[J]. 长安大学学报: 自然科学版, 2007, 27(6): 19-23. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XAGL200706004.htm WANG Chao-hui, WANG Xuan-cang, GAO Jian-li, et al. Maintenance standards of composite pavement on high-level highway[J]. Journal of Chang' an University: Natural Science Edition, 2007, 27(6): 19-23. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XAGL200706004.htm
[18]	王朝辉, 王丽君, 杨育生, 等. 高速公路建设费用控制决策体系[J]. 长安大学学报: 自然科学版, 2010, 30(5): 40-44, 51. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XAGL201005011.htm WANG Chao-hui, WANG Li-jun, YANG Yu-sheng, et al. Decision system of expressway construction cost control[J]. Journal of Chang' an University: Natural Science Edition, 2010, 30(5): 40-44, 51. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XAGL201005011.htm
[19]	袁玉玲, 王选仓, 王朝辉. 公路建设投资决策系统分析及评价[J]. 公路, 2008(5): 133-138. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GLGL200805034.htm YUAN Yu-ling, WANG Xuan-cang, WANG Chao-hui. Analysis and evaluation of highway construction investment decision-making system[J]. Highway, 2008(5): 133-138. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GLGL200805034.htm
[20]	朱建国, 王朝辉. 高速公路建设精细化管理效果评价体系[J]. 长安大学学报: 自然科学版, 2012, 32(2): 52-57. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XAGL201202012.htm ZHU Jian-guo, WANG Chao-hui. Effect evaluation system of freeway construction meticulous management[J]. Journal of Chang' an University: Natural Science Edition, 2012, 32(2): 52-57. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XAGL201202012.htm
[21]	王朝辉, 王选仓, 马士宾. 基于区间数逼近法的路面使用性能综合评价[J]. 公路交通科技, 2009, 26(1): 21-24. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GLJK200901006.htm WANG Chao-hui, WANG Xuan-cang, MA Shi-bin. An approximating method of interval numbers for comprehensive evaluation of pavement performance[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2009, 26(1): 21-24. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GLJK200901006.htm