-
摘要: 为了比较3种不同备用制动系统的差异, 以制动距离与车钩力为评价指标, 采用AMESim与Simulink软件联合搭建列车制动系统仿真模型与性能参数分析模型。在直通电空制动系统故障情况下, 分析了不同备用制动系统时的制动特性。以120 km·h-1满载运行的某列车为例, 在某单车车辆直通电空制动系统故障后, 对比分析故障、单车热备切换制动、全车热备切换制动与冷备切换制动4种工况下的列车制动距离与车钩力变化趋势, 研究了故障车辆位置对制动距离与车钩力的影响。分析结果表明: 与无备用制动系统的故障工况相比, 实施单车热备切换制动方式后, 制动距离最大减小10.14%, 最大拉钩力最大减小84.59%, 最大压钩力最大减小76.87%;实施全车热备切换制动方式后, 制动距离最大减小6.41%, 最大拉钩力最大减小46.24%, 最大压钩力最大减小10.24%;实施冷备切换制动方式后, 制动距离最小增大3.13%, 最大拉钩力最大减小48.73%, 最大压钩力最大减小25.58%;随着故障车辆的后移, 最大压钩力逐渐增大, 最大拉钩力逐渐减小, 若此时采用单车热备切换制动方式, 最大压钩力与最大拉钩力均呈现逐渐增大的趋势。Abstract: In order to compare the differences among three kinds of backup brake systems, the braking distance and coupler force were taken as evaluation indexes, and the simulation model of train brake system and the analysis model of performance parameters were built through the cosimulation of AMESim and Simulink.When the failure of direct electro-pneumatic brake system occurred, the characteristics of different backup brake systems were analyzed.Taking a full laden train with the speed of 120 km·h-1 as an example, when the failure of direct electro-pneumatic brake system of a vehicle occurred, the changing trends of braking distance and coupler force were comparatively analyzed in four conditions including fault, single vehicle switching with hot standby backup brake, whole vehicles switching with hot standby backup brake, switching with cold standby backup brake, and the influences of fault vehicle's location on braking distance and coupler force were studied.Analysis result indicates that compared with the fault condition without backup brake system, the braking distance in the condition of single vehicle switchingwith hot standby backup brake decreases by 10.14% at most, the maximum tensile coupler force and the maximum pressed coupler force decrease by 84.59% and 76.87% at most respectively.In the condition of whole vehicles switching woth hot standby backup brake, the braking distance decreases by 6.41% at most, the maximum tensile coupler force and the maximum pressed coupler force decrease by 46.24% and 10.24% at most respectively.In the condition of switching with cold standby backup brake, the braking distance increases by 3.13% at least, the maximum tensile coupler force and the maximum pressed coupler force decrease by 48.73% and 25.58% at most respectively.With the retroposition of fault vehicle, the maximum tensile coupler force increases gradually, while the maximum pressed coupler force decreases gradually, and in the condition of single vehicle switching with hot standby backup brake, the maximum tensile coupler force and the maximum pressed coupler force both increase gradually.
-
表 1 车辆基本参数
Table 1. Basic parameters of vehicles
表 2 列车模型参数
Table 2. Parameters of train model
表 3 制动系统参数
Table 3. Parameters of braking system
表 4 不同工况的制动距离对比
Table 4. Comparison of braking distances in different conditions
-
[1] 阳靖. 马来西亚动车组备用制动系统概述[J]. 电力机车与城轨车辆, 2013, 36(2): 15-18. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1187.2013.02.004YANG Jing. Summary of backup brake system for Malaysia EMU[J]. Electric Locomotives and Mass Transit Vehicles, 2013, 36(2): 15-18. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1187.2013.02.004 [2] 武青海, 张宝, 王群伟. 和谐号动车组备用制动系统[J]. 铁道机车车辆, 2011, 31(5): 61-63. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-7842.2011.05.013WU Qing-hai, ZHANG Bao, WANG Qun-wei. Back-up brake system of the CRH3 EMU[J]. Railway Locomotive and Car, 2011, 31(5): 61-63. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-7842.2011.05.013 [3] 李和平, 曹宏发, 杨伟君, 等. 和谐号动车组制动技术概述[J]. 铁道机车车辆, 2011, 31(5): 1-11, 38. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDJC201105004.htmLI He-ping, CAO Hong-fa, YANG Wei-jun, et al. A summary of Hexie EMU braking technology[J]. Railway Locomotive and Car, 2011, 31(5): 1-11, 38. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDJC201105004.htm [4] 乔峰, 亢磊, 沈迪. CRH380CL新一代高速动车组制动系统研制[J]. 铁道机车车辆, 2013, 33(6): 10-13, 33. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDJC201306005.htmQIAO Feng, KANG Lei, SHEN Di. Research and manufacture of braking system for CRH380CL new generation high-speed EMU[J]. Railway Locomotive and Car, 2013, 33(6): 10-13, 33. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDJC201306005.htm [5] 林祜亭. "中华之星"电动车组制动系统[J]. 机车电传动, 2003(5): 80-84. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-128X.2003.05.021LIN Hu-ting. Braking system of"China Star"High Speed EMU[J]. Electric Drive for Locomotives, 2003(5): 80-84. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-128X.2003.05.021 [6] 万国强. "中华之星"动车组拖车制动系统简介[J]. 铁道机车车辆, 2006, 26(3): 37-41. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDJC200603010.htmWAN Guo-qiang. Trailer's braking system of Central China Star EMU[J]. Railway Locomotive and Car, 2006, 26(3): 37-41. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDJC200603010.htm [7] 林祜亭. "中华之星"动车组制动系统的技术分析和评估[J]. 铁道机车车辆, 2003, 23(3): 1-8, 39. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDJC200303000.htmLIN Hu-ting. Analyzing and estimating for"China Star"electric motor train unit brake system[J]. Railway Locomotive and Car, 2003, 23(3): 1-8, 39. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDJC200303000.htm [8] KERMARREC A M, MERRER E L, SCOUARNEC N L, et al. Performance evaluation of a peer-to-peer backup system using buffering at the edge[J]. Computer Communications, 2014, 52(5): 71-81. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140366414002230 [9] LIN Y K, HUANG Cheng-fu. Backup reliability assessment within tolerable packet error rate for a multi-state unreliable vertex computer network[J]. Information Sciences, 2014, 277(2): 582-596. [10] LIMI H, SIDHU T S. A new local backup scheme considering simultaneous faults of protection IEDs in an IEC 61850-based substation[J]. International Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems, 2016, 77: 151-157. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0142061515004445 [11] KOUBÀA M, BAKRI M, BOUALLÈGUE A. Survivable routing and wavelength assignment performance improvement using primary-backup multiplexing with 100%fault recovery guarantee[J]. Optical Switching and Networking, 2014, 12(3): 56-67. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1573427713001239 [12] LEVITIN G, XING Liu-dong, DAI Yuan-shun. Cold vs. hot standby mission operation cost minimization for 1-out-of-N systems[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2014, 234(1): 155-162. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221713008746 [13] JIA Xiang, CHEN Hao, CHENG Zhi-jun, et al. A comparison between two stwitching policies for two-unit standby system[J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2016, 148: 109-118. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832015003580 [14] LEVITIN G, XING Liu-dong, DAI Yuan-shun. Cold-standby sequencing optimization considering mission cost[J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2013, 118(10): 28-34. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832013001051 [15] 李邦国, 杨伟君, 金哲, 等. 高速动车组备用制动系统仿真分析研究[J]. 铁道机车车辆, 2011, 31(5): 124-127. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDJC201105034.htmLI Bang-guo, YANG Wei-jun, JIN Zhe, et al. Modeling and simulation of backup brake for high-speed EMU[J]. Railway Locomotive and Car, 2011, 31(5): 124-127. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDJC201105034.htm [16] 李亮. 基于AMESim的动车组制动系统仿真研究[D]. 成都: 西南交通大学, 2013.LI Liang. Simulation on braking system of EMU based on AMESim[D]. Chengdu: Southwest Jiaotong University, 2013. (in Chinese). [17] 张晶. 动车组制动系统建模与仿真研究[D]. 成都: 西南交通大学, 2013.ZHANG Jing. Modeling and simulation research of EMU braking system[D]. Chengdu: Southwest Jiaotong University, 2013. (in Chinese). [18] 许志泉. 基于AMESim动车组空气制动系统仿真与研究[D]. 成都: 西南交通大学, 2013.XU Zhi-quan. Simulation and study on air brake system of EMU based on AMESim[D]. Chengdu: Southwest Jiaotong University, 2013. (in Chinese). [19] 左建勇, 王宗明, 吴萌岭. 地铁列车空气制动系统仿真模型[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2013, 13(2): 42-47. http://transport.chd.edu.cn/article/id/201302006ZUO Jian-yong, WANG Zong-ming, WU Meng-ling. Simulation model of air braking system for subway train[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2013, 13(2): 42-47. (in Chinese). http://transport.chd.edu.cn/article/id/201302006 [20] 魏伟, 赵旭宝, 姜岩, 等. 列车空气制动与纵向动力学集成仿真[J]. 铁道学报, 2012, 34(4): 39-46. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDXB201204010.htmWEI Wei, ZHAO Xu-bao, JIANG Yan, et al. The integrated model of train air brake and longitudinal dynamics[J]. Journal of the China Railway Society, 2012, 34(4): 39-46. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDXB201204010.htm [21] CHOU M, XIA X, KAYSER C. Modelling and model validation of heavy-haul trains equipped with electronically controlled pneumatic brake systems[J]. Control Engineering Practice, 2007, 15(4): 501-509. [22] WU Qing, COLE C, LUO Shi-hui, et al. A review of dynamics modelling of friction draft gear[J]. Vehicle System Dynamics, 2014, 52(6): 733-758. https://trid.trb.org/view/1310803 [23] XU Z Q, MA W H, WU Q, et al. Coupler rotation behaviour and its effect on heavy haul trains[J]. Vehicle System Dynamics, 2013, 51(12): 1818-1838. https://trid.trb.org/view/1278662