正交异性钢桥面板横隔板弧形切口疲劳性能

祝志文; 向泽; 李健朋

doi:10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2018.02.002

正交异性钢桥面板横隔板弧形切口疲劳性能

doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2018.02.002

祝志文^1,,
向泽^{1, 2},
李健朋¹

1.
湖南大学土木工程学院, 湖南长沙 410082
2.
邵阳学院机构城乡建设学院, 湖南邵阳 422000

基金项目:

国家重点研发计划 2015CB057701

国家自然科学基金项目 51278191

湖南省交通科技项目 201522

详细信息

作者简介:
祝志文(1968-), 男, 湖南益阳人, 湖南大学教授, 工学博士, 从事工程结构抗风和抗震、钢桥疲劳和断裂研究

中图分类号: U448.36
计量
- 文章访问数: 804
- HTML全文浏览量: 245
- PDF下载量: 634
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2017-11-28
- 刊出日期: 2018-04-25

Fatigue performance of floorbeam cutout on orthotropic steel bridge decks

1.
College of Civil Engineering, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, Hunan, China
2.
College of Urban and Rural Construction, Shaoyang University, Shaoyang 422000, Hunan, China

More Information

Author Bio:
ZHUZhi-wen(1968-), male, professor, PhD, zwzhu@hnu.edu.cn

摘要

摘要: 为了揭示正交异性钢桥面板弧形切口母材的开裂机理, 采用有限元程序ANSYS建立钢箱梁节段模型与钢桥面板单元子模型, 为确保计算的精确性, 进行了网格无关性检查, 分析了弧形切口疲劳细节在移动轮载作用下的应力响应特征, 分别采用热点应力法与名义应力法评估了弧形切口细节的疲劳性能, 并研究了横隔板厚度与切口形状对构造细节应力的影响。研究结果表明: 弧形切口细节应力影响线长度在纵桥向为横隔板间距的2倍, 因而可用疲劳车的中轴组单独加载, 根据AASHTO LRFD, 1辆5轴疲劳车会在该构造细节上产生2或3个应力循环; 弧形切口在纵、横桥向的最不利荷载位置分别为轮载中心作用于纵肋腹板与面板交界处和中轴前轮作用于距横隔板0.3m处; 弧形切口边缘应力集中点的应力方向与水平面的倾角为67.2°; 疲劳评估结果与名义应力提取位置密切相关, 可采用热点应力法并基于FAT125的疲劳寿命曲线进行弧形切口的疲劳评价, 也可根据疲劳等效原则提取距切口边缘5mm处的应力, 并基于名义应力法开展疲劳评价; 建议采用Eurocode 3中圆弧半径较大的公路桥梁切口形状, 其热点应力与研究的切口形状相比降低了12.4%, 且当横隔板厚度不小于12mm时, 弧形切口细节的应力幅小于截止应力幅, 为无限疲劳寿命; 横隔板弧形切口的开裂与切口形状不佳、横隔板厚度偏小、制造工艺不完善以及货车通行量大等因素密切相关。
- 桥梁工程 /
- 正交异性钢桥面板 /
- 横隔板弧形切口 /
- 疲劳性能 /
- 有限元分析 /
- 参数分析
Abstract: In order to reveal the mechanism involved in base-metal cracking of floorbeam cutout on orthotropic steel bridge deck, the finite element program ANSYS was employed to establish both the segmental model of steel box girder and the local submodel of bridge deck, and the check of mesh independent was conducted to ensure the calculating precision.Thereby, the stress response characteristics of floorbeam cutout were analyzed under moving wheel loads, the fatigue evaluations were performed based on hot spot stress method and nominal stress method, respectively, and the influences of floorbeam thickness and cutout shape on the stress of structural detail stress were discussed.Research result shows that the length of stress influence line of floorbeam cutout detail in longitudinal direction of bridge is 2 times of floorbeam spacing, thus, loading with merely middle-axle group is appropriate.According to AASHTO LRFD, a fatigue truck with five axles can generate 2 or 3 stress cycles at the structural detail.The worstlongitudinal and transverse loading locations of floorbeam cutout are the wheel loads center locating at the intersection of rib wall and deck plate, and the front wheel of middle-axle group locating at 0.3 mfrom the floorbeam, respectively.The angle between the stress direction of stress concentration point of floorbeam cutout edge and the horizontal plane is 67.2°.Fatigue assessment result is closely relevant to the nominal stress extraction position.The hot spot stress method based on fatigue life curve of FAT125 is feasible for the fatigue assessment of floorbeam cutout.According to the equivalent principle of fatigue damage, the stress at 5 mm from cutout edge can also be extracted for the fatigue assessment base on the nominal stress method.It is suggested that the cutout shape in Eurocode 3 (highway bridge) with a large curve radius is preferable, and the hot spot stress reduces by 12.4% compared with the researched cutout shape.The stress range is below the cut-off limit as the thickness of floorbeam is not less than 12 mm, hence the cutout reaches a infinite fatigue life.Floorbeam cutout cracking is related to poor cutout shape, thin floorbeam, imperfect fabrication technology and high truck traffic volume.
- bridge engineering /
- orthotropic steel bridge deck /
- floorbeam cutout /
- fatigue performance /
- FEA /
- parametric analysis

HTML全文

图 1 桥梁立面

Figure 1. Elevation layout of bridge

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 钢箱梁横断面

Figure 2. Cross section of steel box girder

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 正交异性钢桥面板构造细节

Figure 3. Structural detail of orthotropic steel bridge deck

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 横隔板弧形切口母材开裂

Figure 4. Base-metal cracking of floorbeam cutout

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 AASHTO LRFD中的疲劳车

Figure 5. Fatigue truck in AASHTO LRFD

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 轮载分布宽度

Figure 6. Distribution widths of wheel loads

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 典型横桥向轮载位置

Figure 7. Typical wheel loading locations in transverse direction of bridge

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 8 轮载纵桥向荷载步布置

Figure 8. Layout of wheel loading steps in longitudinal direction of bridge

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 9 横隔板弧形切口网格(单位: mm)

Figure 9. Mesh around floorbeam cutout (unit: mm)

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 10 横隔板弧形切口应力提取位置

Figure 10. Stress extraction locations on floorbeam cutout

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 11 细节应力

Figure 11. Detail stresses

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 12 典型工况构造细节变形

Figure 12. Stuructural detail deformations under typical conditions

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 13 弧形切口应力

Figure 13. Stresses around cutout

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 14 弧形切口应力方向场

Figure 14. Stress direction field around cutout

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 15 应力法线方向的应力路径

Figure 15. Detail stress path in normal direction

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 16 疲劳寿命曲线

Figure 16. Fatigue life curves

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 17 不同弧形切口形状

Figure 17. Different cutout shapes

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 18 Ⅰ型切口应力

Figure 18. Stresses of cutoutⅠ

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 19 Ⅱ型切口应力

Figure 19. Stresses of cutoutⅡ

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 20 Ⅲ型切口应力

Figure 20. Stresses of cutoutⅢ

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 21 四种切口形状的热点应力对比

Figure 21. Comparison of hot spot stresses of four types of cutout shapes

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 不同网格尺寸的切口名义应力对比

Table 1. Comparison of nominal stresses at cutouts under different element scales

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 最大应力

Table 2. Maximum stresses

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 基于名义应力法确定的疲劳寿命

Table 3. Fatigue lifes based on nominal stress method

下载: 导出CSV

表 4 基于热点应力法疲劳评估结果

Table 4. Fatigue assessment results based on hot spot stress method

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(27)

[1]	《中国公路学报》编辑部. 中国桥梁工程学术研究综述[J]. 中国公路学报, 2014, 27 (5): 1-96. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7372.2014.05.001 Editorial Department of China Journal of Highway and Transport. Review on China's bridge engineering research: 2014[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2014, 27 (5): 1-96. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7372.2014.05.001
[2]	王春生, 付炳宁, 张芹, 等. 正交异性钢桥面板横隔板挖孔型式[J]. 长安大学学报: 自然科学版, 2012, 32 (2): 58-64. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-8879.2012.02.011 WANG Chun-sheng, FU Bing-ning, ZHANG Qin, et al. Floor-beam web cutout shape analysis in orthotropic steel bridge deck[J]. Journal of Chang'an University: Natural Science Edition, 2012, 32 (2): 58-64. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-8879.2012.02.011
[3]	蒋永, 陈惟珍, 钱骥. 正交异性板疲劳分析及构造细节改进设想[J]. 武汉工程大学学报, 2012, 34 (7): 19-23, 32. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-2869.2012.07.004 JIANG Yong, CHEN Wei-zhen, QIAN Ji. Fatigue analysis of orthotropic steel bridge deck and improvement of ideas of structural details[J]. Journal of Wuhan Institute of Technology, 2012, 34 (7): 19-23, 32. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-2869.2012.07.004
[4]	张允士, 李法雄, 熊锋, 等. 正交异性钢桥面板疲劳裂纹成因分析及控制[J]. 公路交通科技, 2013, 30 (8): 75-80. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0268.2013.08.013 ZHANG Yun-shi, LI Fa-xiong, XIONG Feng, et al. Cause analysis and control measures of fatigue cracks in orthotropic steel bridge deck[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2013, 30 (8): 75-80. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0268.2013.08.013
[5]	SANCHEZ J S, NOONAN J, PERCY R. West Gate Bridge—management of fatigue cracking[C]//ARRB. 9th Austroads Bridge Conference. Sydney: ARRB Group Ltd., 2014: 1-12.
[6]	TSAKOPOULOS P A, FISHER J W. Fatigue performance and design refinements of steel orthotropic deck panels based on full-scale laboratory tests[J]. Steel Structure, 2005, 5 (3): 211-223.
[7]	陶晓燕. 正交异性钢桥面板节段模型疲劳性能试验研究[J]. 中国铁道科学, 2013, 34 (4): 22-26. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4632.2013.04.04 TAO Xiao-yan. Experimental study on the fatigue performance of the section model of orthotropic steel bridge deck[J]. China Railway Science, 2013, 34 (4): 22-26. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4632.2013.04.04
[8]	王春生, 付炳宁, 张芹, 等. 正交异性钢桥面板足尺疲劳试验[J]. 中国公路学报, 2013, 26 (2): 69-76. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7372.2013.02.011 WANG Chun-sheng, FU Bing-ning, ZHANG Qin, et al. Fatigue test on full-scale orthotropic steel bridge deck[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2013, 26 (2): 69-76. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7372.2013.02.011
[9]	CONNOR R J. Influence of cutout geometry on stresses at welded rib-to-diaphragm connections in steel orthotropic bridge decks[J]. Transportation Research Record, 2004 (1892): 78-87.
[10]	DE CORTE W. Parametric study of floorbeam cutouts for orthotropic bridge decks to determine shape factors[J]. Bridge Structures, 2009, 5 (2/3): 75-85.
[11]	李传习, 陈卓异, 周爱国, 等. 钢箱梁横隔板疲劳裂纹特征与实桥试验的轮载应力[J]. 土木工程学报, 2017, 50 (8): 59-67. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TMGC201708007.htm LI Chuan-xi, CHEN Zhuo-yi, ZHOU Ai-guo, et al. The fatigue crack characteristics and wheel load stresses of steel box girder diaphragms in an existing bridge[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2017, 50 (8): 59-67. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TMGC201708007.htm
[12]	祝志文, 黄炎, 向泽, 等. 货运繁重公路正交异性板钢桥弧形切口的疲劳性能[J]. 中国公路学报, 2017, 30 (3): 104-112. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7372.2017.03.011 ZHU Zhi-wen, HUANG Yan, XIANG Ze, et al. Fatigue performance of floorbeam cutout detail of orthotropic steel bridge on heavy freight transportation highway[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2017, 30 (3): 104-112. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7372.2017.03.011
[13]	XIAO Z G, YAMADA K, YA S, et al. Stress analyses and fatigue evaluation of rib-to-deck joints in steel orthotropic decks[J]. International Journal of Fatigue, 2008, 30 (8): 1387-1397. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2007.10.008
[14]	丁楠, 邵旭东. 轻型组合桥面板的疲劳性能研究[J]. 土木工程学报, 2015, 48 (1): 74-81. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TMGC201501010.htm DING Nan, SHAO Xu-dong. Study on fatigue performance of light-weighted composite bridge deck[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2015, 48 (1): 74-81. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TMGC201501010.htm
[15]	HOBBACHER A F. The new IIW recommendations for fatigue assessment of welded joints and components—a comprehensive code recently updated[J]. International Journal of Fatigue, 2009, 31 (1): 50-58. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2008.04.002
[16]	CONNOR R J, FISHER J W. Consistent approach to calculating stresses for fatigue design of welded rib-to-web connections in steel orthotropic bridge decks[J]. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2006, 11 (5): 517-525. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2006)11:5(517)
[17]	ZHU Zhi-wen, YUAN Tao, XIANG Ze, et al. Behavior and fatigue performance of details in an orthotropic steel bridge with UHPC-deck plate composite system under in-service traffic flows[J]. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2018, 23 (3): 1-21.
[18]	祝志文, 黄炎, 文鹏翔, 等. 随机车流下钢-UHPC组合正交异性桥面疲劳性能研究[J]. 中国公路学报, 2017, 30 (3): 200-209. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7372.2017.03.022 ZHU Zhi-wen, HUANG Yan, WEN Peng-xiang, et al. Investigation on fatigue performance of orthotropic bridge deck with steel-UHPC composite system under random traffic flows[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2017, 30 (3): 200-209. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7372.2017.03.022
[19]	张清华, 崔闯, 卜一之, 等. 港珠澳大桥正交异性钢桥面板疲劳特性研究[J]. 土木工程学报, 2014, 47 (9): 110-119. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TMGC201409016.htm ZHANG Qing-hua, CUI Chuang, BU Yi-zhi, et al. Study on fatigue features of orthotropic decks in steel box girder of Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macao Bridge[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2014, 47 (9): 110-119. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TMGC201409016.htm
[20]	崔闯, 卜一之, 张清华. 正交异性钢桥面板焊缝疲劳性能评估方法[J]. 中国公路学报, 2015, 28 (7): 52-57, 76. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7372.2015.07.007 CUI Chuang, BU Yi-zhi, ZHANG Qing-hua. Fatigue property assessment methods for weld joint in orthotropic steel bridge deck[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2015, 28 (7): 52-57, 76. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7372.2015.07.007
[21]	KONDA N, NISHIO M, LCHIMIYA M, et al. Development of fatigue test method and improvement of fatigue life by new functional steel plates for welding of trough rib and deck plate of orthotropic decks[J]. International Journal of Steel Structures, 2013, 13 (1): 191-197. doi: 10.1007/s13296-013-1018-5
[22]	JI Bo-hai, LIU Rong, CHEN Ce, et al. Evaluation on rootdeck fatigue of orthotropic steel bridge deck[J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2013, 90 (5): 174-183.
[23]	YA S, YAMADA K, ISHIKAWA T. Fatigue evaluation of rib-to-deck welded joints of orthotropic steel bridge deck[J]. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2011, 16 (4): 492-499. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000181
[24]	LIU Rong, JI Bo-hai, WANG Man-man, et al. Numerical evaluation of toe-deck fatigue in orthotropic steel bridge deck[J]. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 2015, 29 (6): 1-10.
[25]	KOZY B M, CONNOR R J, PATERSON D, et al. Proposed revisions to AASHTO-LRFD bridge design specifications for orthotropic steel deck bridges[J]. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2011, 16 (6): 759-767. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000214
[26]	ZHU Zhi-wen, HUANG Yan, CHEN Wei, et al. Investigation on base metal cracking on diaphragm cutout at self-anchored suspension bridges[C]//ASCE. Proceedings of the 4th Orthotropic Bridge Conference. Washington DC: ASCE, 2015: 125-136.
[27]	祝志文, 黄炎, 向泽. 货运繁重公路的车辆荷载谱和疲劳车辆模型[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2017, 17 (3): 13-24. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1637.2017.03.002 ZHU Zhi-wen, HUANG Yan, XIANG Ze. Vehicular loading spectrum and fatigue truck models of heavy cargo highway[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2017, 17 (3): 13-24. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1637.2017.03.002