-
摘要: 依托南大梁高速公路复合式路面试验段, 测试了不同糙化界面的露骨率和构造深度, 并钻取芯样进行45°剪切试验。结合45°剪切试验测试结果与层间剪切过程力学特性, 将层间剪变特性曲线划分为弹性阶段、破坏阶段、剪切强度衰减阶段和残余阶段, 采用界面构造深度、剪切强度峰值、剪切强度峰值对应层间相对滑动位移和残余剪切强度等指标评价层间剪变特性, 分析了界面糙化方式、防水黏结材料类型和用量、温度和加载速率对复合式路面层间剪变特性的影响。测试结果表明: 凿毛界面构造深度(1.17mm) 大于喷砂界面构造深度(0.37mm), 结合不同糙化界面下剪切过程的层间力学特性差异, 凿毛界面较喷砂界面所成型复合试件具有更优的抗剪性能; 防水黏结材料相同时, 凿毛界面层间剪切强度峰值对应层间相对滑动位移(0.19~0.79mm) 较喷砂界面(0.16~0.33mm) 更大, 且防水黏结材料对残余剪切强度和剪切强度峰值的影响大于层间剪切强度峰值对应层间相对滑动位移的影响; 整体而言, 温度对层间剪变特性影响显著, 5℃时层间剪切强度峰值为40℃时的7.0~10.0倍, 测试条件对层间剪切强度影响较大, 50mm·min-1加载速率时测试层间剪切强度峰值为5mm·min-1加载速率时的1.9~3.5倍。可见, 凿毛糙化方式更有助于提高复合式路面层间剪切强度, 且复合式路面层间剪变特性需采用多指标予以评价。Abstract: Based on the composite pavement test section of Nandaliang Expressway, the exposed bone ratios and texture depths of different roughened interfaces were tested, and 45°shear tests were carried out with core samples drilling in the field test section. Combined with 45°shear test results and the mechanical properties in the interlaminar shear process, the interlaminar shear and deformation curve was divided into four stages: elastic stage, failure stage, shear strength reduction phase, and residual phase. The interlaminar shear and deformation behavior was evaluated by using the texture depth, peak shear strength, relative interlaminar slip displacement corresponding to the peak shear strength, and residual shear strength. The effects of interface roughness mode, types and amounts of waterproof cohesive materials, temperature, and loading rates on the interlaminar shear and deformation characteristics of composite pavement wereanalyzed. Test result shows that the texture depth of the chiseling interface (1.17 mm) is greater than that of the sand-blasting interface (0.37 mm). Combined with the interlaminar mechanical property differences of different roughened interfaces in the shearing process, the composite specimen formed at the chiseling interface has better shear resistance performance than that formed at the sand-blasting interface. The relative interlaminar sliding displacement corresponding to the peak shear strength of the chiseling interface (0.19-0.79 mm) is larger than that of the sandblasting interface (0.16-0.33 mm) with the same waterproof cohesive materials. Moreover, the effect of waterproof cohesive materials on the peak shear strength and residual shear strength is greater than that of the interlaminar relative slip displacement corresponding to the peak shear strength. As a whole, the effect of temperature on interlaminar shear and deformation characteristics is remarkable, and the peak shear strength at 5℃is 7.0-10.0 times of the value at40℃. The test conditions have a great influence on the interlaminar shear strength, and the interlaminar peak shear strength measured at 50 mm·min-1 loading rate is 1.9-3.5 times of the value measured at 5 mm·min-1 loading rate. Thus, the chiseling roughened method is more helpful to improve the interlaminar shear strength of the composite pavement, and the multiindex should be used to evaluate the interlaminar shear and deformation characteristics of the composite pavement.
-
图 1 水泥混凝土基面病害与钻芯取样
Figure 1. Disease of cement concrete base surface and core sample drilling
图 5 糙化方式对层间滑移特性的影响
Figure 5. Effect of roughened methods on interlaminar slip characteristics
图 6 防水黏结材料用量对喷砂界面滑移特性影响
Figure 6. Effect of waterproof cohesive material amounts on slip behaviors of sand blasting interface
图 7 防水黏结材料用量对凿毛界面滑移特性影响
Figure 7. Effect of waterproof cohesive material amounts on slip behaviors of chiseling interface
图 8 温度对防水黏结涂料层间滑移特性影响
Figure 8. Effect of temperatures on interlaminar slip characteristics with waterproof cohesive coating
图 9 温度对SBS改性沥青碎石封层层间滑移特性影响
Figure 9. Effect of temperatures on interlaminar slip characteristics with SBS modified asphalt gravel seal layer
图 10 加载速率对层间滑移特性影响
Figure 10. Effect of loading rates on interlaminar slip characteristics
表 4 凿毛试件失效剪切强度和剪切强度峰值
Table 4. Failure shear strengths and peak shear strengths of chiseling specimens
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] 李明国. 混凝土梁桥沥青铺装结构分析与材料优化研究[D]. 西安: 长安大学, 2010.LI Ming-guo. Structure analysis and material optimization for concrete beam bridge asphalt mixture deck[D]. Xi'an: Chang'an University, 2010. (in Chinese). [2] KHWEIR K, FORDYCE D. Influence of layer bonding on the prediction of pavement life[J]. Transport, 2003, 156 (2): 73-83. [3] 黄优, 刘朝晖, 李盛, 等. 不同层间结合状态下刚柔复合式路面的剪应力分析[J]. 公路交通科技, 2015, 32 (6): 32-38, 61. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0268.2015.06.006HUANG You, LIU Zhao-hui, LI Sheng, et al. Analysis of shear stress of rigid-flexible composite pavement under different interlaminar bonding conditions[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2015, 32 (6): 32-38, 61. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0268.2015.06.006 [4] 乔志, 王选仓, 张志芳, 等. 半刚性基层双层连续摊铺层间结合状态[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2016, 16 (3): 28-34. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1637.2016.03.004QIAO Zhi, WANG Xuan-cang, ZHANG Zhi-fang, et al. Interlayer combination state of double-layer continuous paving semi-rigid base[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2016, 16 (3): 28-34. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1637.2016.03.004 [5] CASTRO M. Structural design of asphalt pavement on concrete bridges[J]. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 2004, 31 (4): 695-702. doi: 10.1139/l04-032 [6] KRUNTCHEVA M R, COLLOP A C, THOM N H. Effect of bond condition on flexible pavement performance[J]. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 2005, 131 (11): 880-888. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2005)131:11(880) [7] RAAB C, PARTL M N. Interlayer bonding of binder, base and subbase layers of asphalt pavements: long-term performance[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2009, 23 (8): 2926-2931. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.02.025 [8] WEST R C, ZHANG Jing-na, MOORE J. Evaluation of bond strength between pavement layers[R]. Auburn: Auburn University, 2005. [9] 张娟. 水泥混凝土桥面防水粘结层性能研究[D]. 西安: 长安大学, 2008.ZHANG Juan. Study on the waterproofing and bonding layer of concrete bridge deck[D]. Xi'an: Chang'an University, 2008. (in Chinese). [10] 王火明. 刚柔性路面界面层强度特性研究[D]. 重庆: 重庆交通大学, 2008.WANG Huo-ming. Research on strength characteristics of the interface layer of rigid-flexible pavement[D]. Chongqing: Chongqing Jiaotong University, 2008. (in Chinese). [11] ZHEN Leng, AL-QADI I L, CARPENTER S H, et al. Interface bonding between hot-mix asphalt and various Portland cement concrete surfaces: assessment of accelerated pavement testing and measurement of interface strain[J]. Transportation Research Record, 2009 (2127): 20-28. [12] ZHEN Leng, OZER H, AL-QADI I L, et al. Interface bonding between hot-mix asphalt and various Portland cement concrete surfaces: laboratory assessment[J]. Transportation Research Record, 2008 (2057): 46-53. [13] MOHAMMAD L N, BAE A, ELSEIFI M A, et al. Effects of pavement surface type and sample preparation method on tack coat interface shear strength[J]. Transportation Research Record, 2010 (2180): 93-101. [14] 罗志刚, 曾俊, 王随原. 界面污染对半刚性基层与沥青混凝土面层层间黏结性能影响的试验研究[J]. 公路, 2011 (1): 109-113. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GLGL201101021.htmLUO Zhi-gang, ZENG Jun, WANG Sui-yuan. Experiment and study on influence of interface pollution on interlaminar bonding performance between semi-rigid base and asphalt concrete course[J]. Highway, 2011 (1): 109-113. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GLGL201101021.htm [15] 曹明明, 黄晚清, 陆阳, 等. 复合式路面层间剪切性能试验和评价方法[J]. 公路交通科技, 2018, 35 (4): 40-48. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GLJK201804006.htmCAO Ming-ming, HUANG Wan-qing, LU Yang, et al. Test and evaluation method of interlaminar shear property of composite pavement[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2018, 35 (4): 40-48. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GLJK201804006.htm [16] 李忠林. 水泥砼桥面铺装结构与层间界面力学特性研究[D]. 重庆: 重庆交通大学, 2009.LI Zhong-lin. Research on cement concrete bridge deck interface layer structure and mechanical properties[D]. Chongqing: Chongqing Jiaotong University, 2009. (in Chinese). [17] 裴建中. 桥面柔性防水材料技术性能研究[D]. 西安: 长安大学, 2001.PEI Jian-zhong. Study on technical performance of flexible waterproof material for bridge deck[D]. Xi'an: Chang'an University, 2001. (in Chinese). [18] 刘丽. 沥青路面层间处治技术研究[D]. 西安: 长安大学, 2008.LIU Li. Study on the technology performance of asphalt pavement layer interfaces[D]. Xi'an: Chang'an University, 2008. (in Chinese). [19] 田帅, 张铁志, 李野, 等. 加铺碳纤维桥面板与桥面铺装结构层间剪切试验研究[J]. 武汉理工大学学报, 2011, 33 (6): 80-84. doi: 10.3963/j.issn.1671-4431.2011.06.019TIAN Shuai, ZHANG Tie-zhi, LI Ye, et al. Research on shear test of the interface between bridge deck wit carbon fiber and deck pavement[J]. Journal of Wuhan University of Technology, 2011, 33 (6): 80-84. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3963/j.issn.1671-4431.2011.06.019 [20] CHEN J S, HUANG C C. Effect of surface characteristics on bonding properties of bituminous tack coat[J]. Transportation Research Record, 2010 (2180): 142-149. [21] 张金荣. 长寿命沥青路面层间处治技术研究[D]. 西安: 长安大学, 2008.ZHANG Jin-rong. Study on technology of interlayer treatment for perpetual asphalt pavement[D]. Xi'an: Chang'an University, 2008. (in Chinese). [22] SANTAGATA F A, FERROTTI G, PARTL M N, et al. Statistical investigation of two different interlayer shear test methods[J]. Materials and Structures, 2009, 42 (6): 705-714. doi: 10.1617/s11527-008-9414-6 [23] UZAN J, LIVNEH M, ESHED Y. Investigation of adhesion properties betweenasphaltic-concretelayers[C]∥TRB. Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists Proceedings. Washington DC: TRB, 1978: 495-521. [24] 徐鸥明, 韩森, 于静涛. 层间界面对混凝土桥面铺装结构性能的影响[J]. 长安大学学报: 自然科学版, 2009, 29 (5): 17-20, 53. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XAGL200905005.htmXU Ou-ming, HAN Sen, YU Jing-tao. Effect of interlayer interface on structural performance of concrete bridge deck pavement[J]. Journal of Chang'an University: Natural Science Edition, 2009, 29 (5): 17-20, 53. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XAGL200905005.htm [25] XU Qin-wu, ZHOU Qing-hua, MEDINA C, et al. Experimental and numerical analysis of a waterproofing adhesive layer used on concrete-bridge decks[J]. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, 2009, 29 (5): 525-534. doi: 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2008.12.001 [26] YILDIRIM Y, SMIT A F, KORKMAZ A. Development of a laboratory test procedure to evaluate tack coat performance[J]. Turkish Journal of Engineering and Environmental Sciences, 2005, 29 (4): 195-205. [27] 冯德成, 宋宇. 沥青路面层间结合状态试验与评价方法研究[J]. 哈尔滨工业大学学报, 2007, 39 (4): 627-631. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HEBX200704027.htmFENG De-cheng, SONG Yu. Study of test and evaluation method on interfacial combining state of asphalt pavement[J]. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology, 2007, 39 (4): 627-631. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HEBX200704027.htm [28] MO Lian-tong, HUURMAN M, WU Shao-peng, et al. Ravelling investigation of porous asphalt concrete based on fatigue characteristics of bitumen-stone adhesion and mortar[J]. Materials and Design, 2009, 30 (1): 170-179. [29] 李盛, 刘朝晖, 张景怡, 等. 刚柔复合式路面层间沥青材料路用性能试验评价[J]. 公路交通科技, 2013, 30 (11): 7-12, 67. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GLJK201311002.htmLI Sheng, LIU Zhao-hui, ZHANG Jing-yi, et al. Test evaluation of pavement performance of interlaminar asphalt material for rigid-flexible composite pavement[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2013, 30 (11): 7-12, 67. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GLJK201311002.htm [30] 纪伦, 李云良, 任俊达, 等. 桥面铺面防水粘结层胶结材料洒布量的确定方法[J]. 哈尔滨工业大学学报, 2014, 46 (4): 57-62. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HEBX201404010.htmJI Lun, LI Yun-liang, REN Jun-da, et al. Method of determining the spraying amount of waterproof binder for bridge deck pavement[J]. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology, 2014, 46 (4): 57-62. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HEBX201404010.htm -
点击查看大图
图(10) / 表(4)
计量
- 文章访问数: 886
- HTML全文浏览量: 174
- PDF下载量: 569
- 被引次数: 0
