Dynamics modeling of asymmetrical tension and compression characteristics of gas-hydraulic and ring spring combined draft gear and impact simulation
-
摘要: 为解决气液环簧组合式缓冲器呈现非对称拉压动态特性问题,构建了气液环簧组合式缓冲器动力学模型,基于MATLAB/Simulink软件编制了考虑不同吸能元件特性的车辆冲击动力学模型程序,研究了两辆单车冲击及两列动车组冲击的动态特性。研究结果表明:组合式缓冲器动力学模型既能有效地模拟拉伸状态下环簧缓冲器的线性加载特性,又能较好地模拟压缩状态下气液缓冲器随冲击速度变化的非线性加载动态特性,即组合式缓冲器动力学模型体现了明显的非对称拉压特性;低速与中高速冲击过程中,组合式缓冲器动力学模型及车辆冲击模型可依次完整有效地模拟缓冲器-压溃管-防爬器-车体结构变形产生的缓冲吸能动态过程及磁滞拉压特性曲线;列车冲击速度为5 km·h-1时,最大车钩力及组合式缓冲器最大行程均小于缓冲器阻抗力和行程限值,其压缩加载特性曲线仅呈现出气液缓冲器的加载特性;冲击速度为20 km·h-1时,最大车钩力为2 900 kN,最大行程为534 mm,防爬器已经触发,其压缩加载特性曲线呈现出了气液缓冲器-压溃管-防爬器组成的连续力学特性,此时车体结构未发生破坏;冲击速度达到25~30 km·h-1时,列车开始发生结构破坏,车钩力陡升;全自动车钩与半永久车钩参数选型能够满足冲击速度20 km·h-1以内的列车车体结构安全性。Abstract: A dynamics model of a gas-hydraulic and ring spring combined draft gear was established to simulate the asymmetric dynamic tension and compression characteristics of the gear.Based on the characteristics of different energy-absorbing elements, a vehicle impact dynamics model program was compiled using MATLAB/Simulink software, and the impact dynamic characteristics of two vehicles and two groups of EMUs were evaluated. Research results show that the linear loading characteristics of the ring spring draft gear under tension can be simulated precisely. Moreover, the varying nonlinear characteristics of the gas-hydraulic draft gear with impact speed under compression can be simulated satisfactorily using the combined draft gear dynamics model. The asymmetric tension and compression characteristics are shown in the combined draft gear dynamics model. Under low-speed and medium/high-speed impacts, the dynamic energy absorption process and hysteresis tension-compression characteristic curve can be entirely and effectively simulated using a combined draft gear dynamics and vehicle impact model. This is caused by the deformation of the draft gear, crushing tube, anticlimbing device, and vehicle body structure in sequence. When the impact speed is 5 km·h-1, the maximum coupler force and the maximum stroke of the combined draft gear are lower than the resistance force and stroke limit, and the loading characteristic curve of the gas-hydraulic draft gear only exhibits compression loading characteristics. When the impact speed is 20 km·h-1, the maximum coupler force is 2 900 kN, the maximum stroke is 534 mm, and the anticlimbing device is triggered. The continuous mechanical characteristics of the gas-hydraulic draft gear, crushing tube, and anticlimbing device are exhibited in the compression-loading characteristics curve, and the structure of the vehicle body is not damaged. When the impact speed reaches 25-30 km·h-1, the vehicle body structure is deformed, and the coupler force increases sharply. The structural safety of the vehicle body can be satisfied through the parameter selection of the fully automatic coupler and semi-permanent coupler within an impact speed of 20 km·h-1. 2 tabs, 12 figs, 33 refs.
-
表 1 某Ⅱ型动车组全自动钩缓装置参数
Table 1. Parameters of a fully automatic coupler and draft gear for a type Ⅱ EMUs
车钩类型 性能参数 数值 布置位置 备注 全自动车钩 拉伸工况(环簧) 最大阻抗力/kN 600 车端 每端1套 最大行程/mm 30 压缩工况(气液) 最大阻抗力/kN 1 000 最大行程/mm 100 压馈管 稳态阻抗力/kN 1 500 最大行程/mm 600 防爬器 压馈管 动态平均阻抗力/kN 700 车端 每端2个 最大行程/mm 200 表 2 某Ⅱ型动车组半永久车钩缓冲器参数
Table 2. Parameters of a semi-permanent coupler and draft gear for a type Ⅱ EMUs
车钩类型 性能参数 数值 布置位置 备注 带缓冲器半永久车钩A 拉伸工况(环簧) 最大阻抗力/kN 600 车间 A、B成对使用 最大行程/mm 23 压缩工况(气液) 最大阻抗力/kN 800 最大行程/mm 62 带压馈管半永久车钩B 压馈管 稳态阻抗力/kN 1 500 车间 最大行程/mm 350 -
[1] COLE C, SPIRYAGIN M, WU Q, et al. Modelling, simulation and applications of longitudinal train dynamics[J]. Vehicle System Dynamics, 2017, 55(1): 1498-1571. [2] COLE C, SPIRYAGIN M, BOSOMWORTH C. Examining longitudinal train dynamics in ore car tipplers[J]. Vehicle System Dynamics, 2017, 55(4): 534-551. doi: 10.1080/00423114.2016.1263393 [3] COLE C, SUN Y Q. Simulated comparisons of wagon coupler systems in heavy haul trains[J]. Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, 2006, 220(3): 247-256. doi: 10.1243/09544097JRRT35 [4] CHELI F E. GIALLEONARDO D, MELZI S. Freight trains dynamics: effect of payload and braking power distribution on coupling forces[J]. Vehicle System Dynamics, 2017, 55(4): 464-479. doi: 10.1080/00423114.2016.1246743 [5] CHELI F, MELZI S. Experimental characterization and modelling of a side buffer for freight trains[J]. Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, 2010, 224(6): 535-546. doi: 10.1243/09544097JRRT317 [6] WU Q, SPIRYAGIN M, SUN Y Q, et al. Parallel co- simulation of locomotive wheel wear and rolling contact fatigue in a heavy haul train operational environment[J]. Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, 2020, DOI: 10.1177/0954409720908497. [7] WU Q, COLE C, SPIRYAGIN M, et al. Parallel multiobjective optimisations of draft gear designs[J]. Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, 2018, 232(3): 744-758. doi: 10.1177/0954409717690981 [8] WU Q, LUO S H, QU T W, et al. Comparisons of draft gear damping mechanisms[J]. Vehicle System Dynamics, 2017, 55(4): 501-516. doi: 10.1080/00423114.2016.1252049 [9] COPACI I, T AAĂG N AAĂG SOIU A. Experimental study of the characteristics of shock insulators used on railway vehicles[C]//WSEAS. 6th WSEAS International Conference on Dynamical Systems and Control. Sousse: WSEAS Press, 2010: 25-29. [10] T AAĂG N AAĂG SOIU A, COPACI I, OLARU S. On the static and dynamic characteristics of the shock insulators equipping railway vehicles[J]. Recent Researches in Energy, Environment, Devices, Systems, Communications and Computers, 2009, 978(4): 103-107. http://acta.fih.upt.ro/pdf/2009-1/ACTA-2009-1-05.pdf [11] WEI W, ZHANG J, ZHAO X B, et al. Heavy haul train impulse and reduction in train force method[J]. Australian Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2018, 16(2): 118-125. doi: 10.1080/14484846.2018.1457259 [12] 李朋, 魏伟, 李开颜. 无调车作业重载列车制动工况缓冲器特性研究[J]. 大连交通大学学报, 2019, 40(1): 31-35. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DLTD201901007.htmLI Peng, WEI Wei, LI Kai-yan. Characteristic study of heavy haul train draft gear on braking condition without shunting operation[J]. Journal of Dalian Jiaotong University, 2019, 40(1): 31-35. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DLTD201901007.htm [13] 常崇义, 王新锐, 姜岩, 等. 钢摩擦与弹性胶泥复合型缓冲器数值模型[J]. 中国铁道科学, 2016, 37(4): 83-88. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4632.2016.04.13CHANG Chong-yi, WANG Xin-rui, JIANG Yan, et al. Numerical model of steel friction and elasticity cement composite draft gear[J]. China Railway Science, 2016, 37(4): 83-88. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4632.2016.04.13 [14] 刘鹏飞, 王开云, 张大伟. 牵引及制动操纵对重载机车轮轨动力作用的影响[J]. 中国铁道科学, 2017, 38(2): 96-104. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4632.2017.02.15LIU Peng-fei, WANG Kai-yun, ZHANG Da-wei. Influence of traction and braking operation on wheel-rail dynamic interaction for heavy haul locomotive[J]. China Railway Science, 2017, 38(2): 96-104. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4632.2017.02.15 [15] 赵旭宝, 魏伟, 张军, 等. 缓冲器分段阻抗特性对重载列车纵向冲动的影响[J]. 铁道学报, 2017, 39(10): 33-42. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8360.2017.10.005ZHAO Xu-bao, WEI Wei, ZHANG Jun, et al. Influence of segment impedance characteristics of draft gear on longitudinal impulse of heavy haul train[J]. Journal of the China Railway Society, 2017, 39(10): 33-42. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8360.2017.10.005 [16] 马卫华, 宋荣荣, 揭长安, 等. 缓冲器阻抗特性对重载列车动力学性能的影响[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2011, 11(2): 59-64. http://transport.chd.edu.cn/oa/DArticle.aspx?type=view&id=201102010MA Wei-hua, SONG Rong-rong, JIE Chang-an, et al. Influences of buffer impedance characteristics on dynamics performances for heavy haul train[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2011, 11(2): 59-64. (in Chinese) http://transport.chd.edu.cn/oa/DArticle.aspx?type=view&id=201102010 [17] 黄运华, 李芾, 付茂海, 等. 新型铁道车辆液气缓冲器动态特性[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2005, 5(4): 1-5. http://transport.chd.edu.cn/oa/DArticle.aspx?type=view&id=200504001HUANG Yun-hua, LI Fu, FU Mao-hai, et al. Dynamic characteristic of new hydro-pneumatic buffer for railway vehicle[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2005, 5(4): 1-5. (in Chinese) http://transport.chd.edu.cn/oa/DArticle.aspx?type=view&id=200504001 [18] 黄运华, 李芾, 廖小平, 等. 机车车辆液气缓冲器特性研究[J]. 铁道学报, 2005, 27(5): 31-35. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDXB200505007.htmHUANG Yun-hua, LI Fu, LIAO Xiao-ping, et al. Research on characteristics of the hydro-pneumatic buffer for locomotives and vehicles[J]. Journal of the China Railway Society, 2005, 27(5): 31-35. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDXB200505007.htm [19] 张笑慰, 毛从强, 李辛, 等. 基于MATLAB Simulink的气液缓冲器动态特性仿真与分析[J]. 铁道车辆, 2018, 56(1): 1-4. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDCL201801001.htmZHANG Xiao-wei, MAO Cong-qiang, LI Xin, et al. Simulation and analysis of dynamic features of gas-liquid buffer based upon MATLAB Simulink[J]. Rolling Stock, 2018, 56(1): 1-4. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDCL201801001.htm [20] 马飞, 张笑慰, 毛从强, 等. 基于MATLAB Simulink的气液缓冲器静态仿真与分析[J]. 铁道车辆, 2016, 54(11): 1-4. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDCL201611001.htmMA Fei, ZHANG Xiao-wei, MAO Cong-qiang, et al. Static simulation and analysis of the hydro-pneumatic buffer based on MATLAB Simulink[J]. Rolling Stock, 2016, 54(11): 1-4. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDCL201611001.htm [21] 李伟刚, 张锁怀, 吴一凡. 铁道车辆新型液气缓冲器建模与仿真分析[J]. 机床与液压, 2014, 42(11): 163-166. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JCYY201411053.htmLI Wei-gang, ZHANG Suo-huai, WU Yi-fan. Modeling and simulation analysis to a new kind of hydro-pneumatic buffer for railway vehicle[J]. Machine Tool and Hydraulics, 2014, 42(11): 163-166. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JCYY201411053.htm [22] 王颖, 邵万珍. 新型液气缓冲器结构参数对阻抗力的影响研究[J]. 轻工科技, 2019, 35(10): 60-62. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GXQG201910028.htmWANG Ying, SHAO Wan-zhen. Research on the influence of the structural parameters of the new type of gas-hydraulic draft gear on the impedance[J]. Light Industry Science and Technology, 2019, 35(10): 60-62. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GXQG201910028.htm [23] ZHU T, YANG B Z, YANG C, et al. The mechanism for the coupler and draft gear and its influence on safety during a train collision[J]. Vehicle System Dynamics, 2018, 56(9): 1375-1393. [24] XIE Su-chao, DU Xuan-jin, ZHOU Hui, et al. Analysis of the crashworthiness design and collision dynamics of a subway train[J]. Chemistry of Materials, 2019, 31: 938-946. http://www.researchgate.net/publication/336387640_Analysis_of_the_crashworthiness_design_and_collision_dynamics_of_a_subway_train [25] SUN Y Q, COLE C, SPIRYAGIN M. Rail passenger vehicle crashworthiness simulations using multibody dynamics approaches[J]. Journal of Computational and Nonlinear Dynamics, 2017, 12(4): 1-11. http://smartsearch.nstl.gov.cn/paper_detail.html?id=343af940ec335b5ea3d34769ca60f5f3 [26] LU G. Collision behaviour of crashworthy vehicles in rakes[J]. Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, 1999, 213(3): 143-160. http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-GWTD200505006.htm [27] 张锁怀, 孟旭. 地铁车辆连挂冲击非线性动力学模型[J]. 机械工程学报, 2012, 48(9): 111-116. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JXXB201209016.htmZHANG Suo-huai, MENG Xu. Nonlinear impacting dynamic model of a metro vehicle[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2012, 48(9): 111-116. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JXXB201209016.htm [28] 孙树磊, 李芾, 黄运华, 等. 车辆调车纵向冲击特性研究[J]. 铁道学报, 2014, 36(1): 22-27. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDXB201401006.htmSUN Shu-lei, LI Fu, HUANG Yun-hua, et al. Research on longitudinal characteristics of vehicle shunting impact[J]. Journal of the China Railway Society, 2014, 36(1): 22-27. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDXB201401006.htm [29] 秦睿贤, 周俊先, 陈秉智. 基于柔性单元的一维列车碰撞模型及参数校正[J]. 铁道学报, 2019, 41(11): 58-64. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDXB201911011.htmQIN Rui-xian, ZHOU Jun-xian, CHEN Bing-zhi. One-dimensional train collision model based on flexible element and parameters calibration[J]. Journal of the China Railway Society, 2019, 41(11): 58-64. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDXB201911011.htm [30] 周和超, 徐世洲, 詹军, 等. 基于有限元和多刚体动力学联合仿真技术的列车碰撞爬车现象研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2017, 53(12): 166-171. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JXXB201712020.htmZHOU He-chao, XU Shi-zhou, ZHAN Jun, et al. Research on the overriding phenomenon during train collision based on FEM and MBS joint simulation[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2017, 53(12): 166-171. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JXXB201712020.htm [31] 王文斌, 康康, 赵洪伦. 列车耐碰撞系统有限元和多体动力学联合仿真[J]. 同济大学学报: 自然科学版, 2011, 39(10): 1552-1556. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TJDZ201110027.htmWANG Wen-bin, KANG Kang, ZHAO Hong-lun. Joint simulation of crashworthy train set based on finite element and multibody dynamic[J]. Journal of Tongji University: Natural Science, 2011, 39(10): 1552-1556. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TJDZ201110027.htm [32] 孙树磊, 李芾, 黄运华, 等. 重载货车摩擦缓冲器动力学模型研究[J]. 铁道学报, 2015, 37(8): 17-23. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDXB201508004.htmSUN Shu-lei, LI Fu, HUANG Yun-hua, et al. Study on dynamic model of friction draft gear of heavy freight wagon[J]. Journal of the China Railway Society, 2015, 37(8): 17-23. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDXB201508004.htm [33] 孙树磊, 王广超, 彭忆强, 等. 重载货车冲击动态特性及其对摇枕横向载荷的影响[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2018, 18(3): 94-104. http://transport.chd.edu.cn/oa/DArticle.aspx?type=view&id=201803010SUN Shu-lei, WANG Guang-chao, PENG Yi-qiang, et al. Heavy freight wagon impact dynamics and the effect on bolster lateral load[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2018, 18(3): 94-104. (in Chinese) http://transport.chd.edu.cn/oa/DArticle.aspx?type=view&id=201803010