Influence of double-track embankment height on aerodynamic performance of high-speed train under crosswind
-
摘要: 利用Creo软件建立了某型动车组头中尾3车编组和不同高度的路堤模型，通过Fluent软件模拟列车在车速分别为300和350 km·h-1，横风风速分别为17.10、20.70、24.40和28.40 m·s-1的环境下运行，将获取的高速列车气动力载荷施加到Simpack建立的动力学模型中，计算其动力学性能参数；深入分析了横风工况下高速列车在不同高度复线路堤背风侧运行时车体的压力分布、气流场结构、气动力与风致安全性，并重点探究了头车在不同运行速度和横风风速下的运行安全性。分析结果表明：在相同车速和横风环境下，随着路堤高度的增加，列车受到的侧向力整体呈增大趋势，尾车在横风作用下受到反向侧向力，头车所受侧向力最大，且升力持续增大，中间车所受升力相对较大，尾车所受阻力最大；横风环境下列车压力峰值点位于头车鼻尖处且向迎风侧偏移，各路堤高度工况下气流场结构基本相同，头车背风侧和底部转向架处有明显的涡流，但尾车处的涡流却在迎风侧，这可能是导致尾车反向侧向力的主因；脱轨系数、轮轴横向力、轮轨垂向力和轮重减载率均随路堤高度和横风风速的增大而增大，轮轨垂向力始终在安全限值内，当横风风速分别为24.40和28.40 m·s-1时，列车运行速度应分别低于350和300 km·h-1，以保证列车行车安全。Abstract: Models for embankments with different heights and a specific type of electric multiple units (EMUs) with three vehicles, including a locomotive, an ordinary vehicle, and a caboose, were established with the help of Creo and Fluent to simulate the operation of a train at the speeds of 300 and 350 km·h-1 under the crosswind speeds of 17.10, 20.70, 24.40 and 28.40 m·s-1, respectively. The obtained aerodynamic loads of the high-speed train were subsequently applied to the dynamics model established using the Simpack to calculate the dynamics performance parameters. The pressure distributions, airflow field structures, aerodynamic forces and wind-induced safeties of the high-speed train running on the leeward side of a double-track were analyzed under different embankment heights in a crosswind environment. Considerable attention was also given to the safety of the locomotive under different operating speeds and crosswind speeds. Analysis results indicate that for the same vehicle speed and crosswind environment, as the embankment height increases, the lateral force acting on the train increases overall, and the caboose experiences an opposite lateral force under crosswinds. The locomotive is subjected to the largest lateral force, while the lift increases continuously. The ordinary vehicle is subjected to a relatively large lift, and the caboose is subjected to the greatest resistance. The pressure peak of the train in a crosswind environment is at the nose tip of the locomotive and offset to the windward side. The airflow field structure remains basically the same regardless of the embankment height. There are obvious eddy currents on the leeward side of the locomotive and the bottom bogie. However, the eddy currents at the caboose are observed on the windward side. They may be the main factor causing an opposite force acting on the caboose. As the embankment height and crosswind speed increase, the derailment coefficient, wheel axle lateral force, wheel rail vertical force and wheel load reduction rate also increase, and the wheel rail vertical force is always within the safety limit. To ensure the safety of the train under the crosswind speeds of 24.40 and 28.40 m·s-1, the speed of the high-speed train should be lower than 350 and 300 km·h-1, respectively. 2 tabs, 21 figs, 32 refs.
-
Key words:
- high-speed train /
- crosswind /
- embankment /
- aerodynamic performance /
- wind-induced safety
-
图 8 路堤高度分别为2和8 m时头车迎风侧压力
Figure 8. Windward side pressures of locomotive for embankment heights of 2 and 8 m, respectively
图 9 路堤高分别为2和8 m时头车背风侧压力
Figure 9. Leeward side pressures of locomotive for embankment heights of 2 and 8 m, respectively
图 10 路堤高分别为2和8 m时列车纵向对称截面压力
Figure 10. Pressures on longitudinally symmetrical cross section of train for embankment heights of 2 and 8 m, respectively
图 12 各路堤工况下头车横截面压力
Figure 12. Cross section pressures of locomotive under various embankment conditions
图 13 各路堤工况下尾车横截面压力
Figure 13. Cross section pressures of caboose under various embankment conditions
图 14 各路堤工况下头车周围气流轨迹与流场分布
Figure 14. Airflow trajectories and flow field distributions around locomotive under various embankment conditions
图 15 各路堤工况下尾车周围气流轨迹与流场分布
Figure 15. Airflow trajectories and flow field distributions around caboose under various embankment conditions
图 20 车速为300 km·h-1时动力学性能指标
Figure 20. Dynamics performance indices for vehicle speed of 300 km·h-1
图 21 350 km·h-1车速时动力学性能指标
Figure 21. Dynamics performance indices for vehicle speed of 350 km·h-1
表 1 区域与网格无关性验证结果
Table 1. Area and grid independence verifications results
模型 网格数/107 风速/(m·s-1) 侧向力/kN 阻力/kN 原始模型 3.20 17.10 57.13 11.79 区域无关性 3.75 17.10 57.48 11.67 网格无关性 1.60 17.10 56.70 11.92 4.10 17.10 57.65 11.70 
下载: 导出CSV
表 2 数值模拟与风洞试验结果对比
Table 2. Comparison between numerical simulation and wind tunnel experiment results
结果与误差 头车 中间车 侧向力/kN 升力/kN 侧向力/kN 升力/kN 风洞试验结果 36.10 19.70 16.50 28.20 数值计算结果 39.80 21.30 15.80 27.20 相对误差/% 9.20 7.20 -4.40 -3.60
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] 朱海燕, 胡华涛, 尹必超, 等. 轨道车辆车轮多边形研究进展[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2020, 20(1): 102-119. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2020.01.008ZHU Hai-yan, HU Hua-tao, YIN Bi-chao, et al. Research progress on wheel polygons of rail vehicles[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2020, 20(1): 102-119. (in Chinese) doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2020.01.008 [2] 朱海燕, 尹必超, 胡华涛, 等. 谐波转矩对高速列车齿轮箱体与牵引电机振动特性的影响[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2019, 19(6): 65-76. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2019.06.007ZHU Hai-yan, YIN Bi-chao, HU Hua-tao, et al. Effects of harmonic torque on vibration characteristics of gear box housing and traction motor of high-speed train[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2019, 19(6): 65-76. (in Chinese) doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2019.06.007 [3] HOPPMANN U, KOENIG S, TIELKES T, et al. A short-term strong wind prediction model for railway application: design and verification[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2002, 90(10): 1127-1134. doi: 10.1016/S0167-6105(02)00226-X [4] TOMASINI G, GIAPPINO S, CORRADI R. Experimental investigation of the effects of embankment scenario on railway vehicle aerodynamic coefficients[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2014, 131: 59-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jweia.2014.05.004 [5] DIEDRICHS B, SIMA M, ORELLANO A, et al. Crosswind stability of a high-speed train on a high embankment[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, 2007, 221(2): 205-225. doi: 10.1243/0954409JRRT126 [6] 张业, 孙振旭, 姚永芳, 等. 典型路基结构对高速列车横风气动特性影响分析[J]. 机械工程学报, 2018, 54(4): 186-195. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JXXB201804028.htmZHANG Ye, SUN Zhen-xu, YAO Yong-fang, et al. Influence of typical subgrade structures on aerodynamic characteristics of high speed trains in cross wind conditions[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2018, 54(4): 186-195. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JXXB201804028.htm [7] 韩运动, 陈大伟, 刘韶庆, 等. 不同风速风向条件下的列车风特性[J]. 中国铁道科学, 2018, 39(6): 104-111. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4632.2018.06.14HAN Yun-dong, CHEN Da-wei, LIU Shao-qing, et al. Characteristics of train induced wind under different wind speeds and directions[J]. China Railway Science, 2018, 39(6): 104-111. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4632.2018.06.14 [8] 毛军, 郗艳红, 高亮, 等. 横风作用下高速列车气动阻力[J]. 中南大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 45(11): 4059-4067. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZNGD201411047.htmMAO Jun, XI Yan-hong, GAO Liang, et al. Aerodynamic drag of a high-speed train under cross wind conditions[J]. Journal of Central South University (Science and Technology), 2014, 45(11): 4059-4067. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZNGD201411047.htm [9] 李田, 张继业, 张卫华. 高速列车流固耦合的平衡状态方法[J]. 机械工程学报, 2013, 49(2): 95-101. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JXXB201302017.htmLI Tian, ZHANG Ji-ye, ZHANG Wei-hua. Co-simulation of high-speed train fluid-structure interaction based on the equilibrium state[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2013, 49(2): 95-101. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JXXB201302017.htm [10] 李田, 张继业, 张卫华. 横风下车辆-轨道耦合动力学性能[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2011, 11(5): 55-60. http://transport.chd.edu.cn/article/id/201105009LI Tian, ZHANG Ji-ye, ZHANG Wei-hua. Coupling dynamics performance of vehicle track under cross wind[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2011, 11(5): 55-60. (in Chinese) http://transport.chd.edu.cn/article/id/201105009 [11] 李田, 张继业, 张卫华. 横风下高速列车流固耦合动力学联合仿真[J]. 振动工程学报, 2012, 25(2): 138-145. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-4523.2012.02.006LI Tian, ZHANG Ji-ye, ZHANG Wei-hua. Co-simulation of high-speed train fluid-structure interaction dynamics in crosswinds[J]. Journal of Vibration Engineering, 2012, 25(2): 138-145. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-4523.2012.02.006 [12] 朱海燕, 张翼, 赵怀瑞, 等. 基于边界层控制的高速列车减阻技术[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2017, 17(2): 64-72. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1637.2017.02.007ZHU Hai-yan, ZHANG Yi, ZHAO Huai-rui, et al. Drag reduction technology of high-speed train based on boundary layer control[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2017, 17(2): 64-72. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1637.2017.02.007 [13] 朱海燕, 胡华涛, 尹必超. 凸包非光滑表面高速列车气动阻力及噪声研究[J]. 华东交通大学学报, 2020, 37(4): 88-95. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HDJT202004014.htmZHU Hai-yan, HU Hua-tao, YIN Bi-chao. Research on aerodynamic resistance and noise of high-speed train with convex non-smooth surface[J]. Journal of East China Jiaotong University, 2020, 37(4): 88-95. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HDJT202004014.htm [14] 于梦阁, 张继业, 张卫华. 随机风作用下高速列车的非定常气动载荷[J]. 机械工程学报, 2012, 48(20): 113-120. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JXXB201220023.htmYU Meng-ge, ZHANG Ji-ye, ZHANG Wei-hua. Unsteady aerodynamic loads of high-speed trains under stochastic winds[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2012, 48(20): 113-120. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JXXB201220023.htm [15] 王政, 李田, 张继业. 不同类型横风下高速列车气动性能研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2018, 54(4): 203-211. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JXXB201804030.htmWANG Zheng, LI Tian, ZHANG Ji-ye. Research on aerodynamic performance of high-speed train subjected to different types of crosswind[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2018, 54(4): 203-211. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JXXB201804030.htm [16] 刘加利, 于梦阁, 张继业, 等. 基于大涡模拟的高速列车横风运行安全性研究[J]. 铁道学报, 2011, 33(4): 13-21. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8360.2011.04.003LIU Jia-li, YU Meng-ge, ZHANG Ji-ye, et al. Study on running safety of high-speed train under crosswind by large eddy simulation[J]. Journal of the China Railway Society, 2011, 33(4): 13-21. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8360.2011.04.003 [17] 邹思敏, 何旭辉, 王汉封, 等. 横风作用下高速列车-桥梁系统气动特性风洞试验[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2020, 20(1): 132-139. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2020.01.010ZOU Si-min, HE Xu-hui, WANG Han-feng, et al. Wind tunnel experiment on aerodynamic characteristics of high-speed train-bridge system under crosswind[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2020, 20(1): 132-139. (in Chinese) doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2020.01.010 [18] 李鹏, 梁习锋, 牛纪强. 突风口环境下的高速列车周围流场数值模拟[J]. 铁道科学与工程学报, 2017, 14(6): 1113-1121. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7029.2017.06.001LI Peng, LIANG Xi-feng, NIU Ji-qiang. Numerical simulation of the flow around a high-speed train moving through a crosswind flow[J]. Journal of Railway Science and Engineering, 2017, 14(6): 1113-1121. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7029.2017.06.001 [19] GUO Di-long, SHANG Ke-ming, ZHANG Ye, et al. Influences of affiliated components and train length on the train wind[J]. Acta Mechanica Sinica, 2016, 32(2): 191-205. doi: 10.1007/s10409-015-0553-z [20] 曾永平, 李永乐, 张明金, 等. 高路堤上列车横风荷载的分布研究[J]. 铁道科学与工程学报, 2018, 15(10): 2471-2477. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CSTD201810003.htmZENG Yong-ping, LI Yong-le, ZHANG Ming-jin, et al. Study on the distribution of wind load of the train on the high embankment[J]. Journal of Railway Science and Engineering, 2018, 15(10): 2471-2477. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CSTD201810003.htm [21] 张胜, 戴志远, 李田. 明线运行列车气动地面效应数值模拟[J]. 交通运输工程与信息学报, 2020, 18(1): 120-125, 132. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-4747.2020.01.016ZHANG Sheng, DAI Zhi-yuan, LI Tian. Numerical simulation of aerodynamic ground effect of a train running in the open air[J]. Journal of Transportation Engineering and Information, 2020, 18(1): 120-125, 132. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-4747.2020.01.016 [22] 周鹏, 常城, 李田, 等. 悬挂系统参数对高速列车横风运行安全性的影响[J]. 交通运输工程与信息学报, 2020, 18(4): 83-92. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-4747.2020.04.011ZHOU Peng, CHANG Cheng, LI Tian, et al. Effect of suspension-system parameters on crosswind stability of high-speed trains[J]. Journal of Transportation Engineering and Information, 2020, 18(4): 83-92. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-4747.2020.04.011 [23] 翟建平, 张继业, 李田. 横风下高速列车动力学参数的多目标优化[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2020, 20(3): 80-88. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2020.03.007ZHAI Jian-ping, ZHANG Ji-ye, LI Tian. Multi-objective optimization for dynamics parameters of high-speed trains under side wind[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2020, 20(3): 80-88. (in Chinese) doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2020.03.007 [24] LI Tian, QIN Deng, ZHANG Ji-ye. Effect of RANS turbulence model on aerodynamic behavior of trains in crosswind[J]. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2019, 32(1): 1-12. doi: 10.1186/s10033-018-0313-7 [25] LI Tian, ZHANG Ji-ye, RASHIDI M M, et al. On the Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes modelling of the flow around a simplified train in crosswinds[J]. Journal of Applied Fluid Mechanics, 2019, 12(2): 551-563. doi: 10.29252/jafm.12.02.28958 [26] 张亮, 张继业, 李田, 等. 横风下高速列车的非定常气动特性及安全性[J]. 机械工程学报, 2016, 52(6): 124-135. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JXXB201606017.htmZHANG Liang, ZHANG Ji-ye, LI Tian, et al. Unsteady aerodynamic characteristics and safety of high-speed trains under crosswinds[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2016, 52(6): 124-135. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JXXB201606017.htm [27] GUO Zi-jian, LIU Tang-hong, CHEN Zheng-wei, et al. Aerodynamic influences of bogie's geometric complexity on high-speed trains under crosswind[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2020, 196: 104053. doi: 10.1016/j.jweia.2019.104053 [28] LI Hai-qing, YU Meng-ge, ZHANG Qian, et al. A numerical study of the aerodynamic characteristics of a high-speed train under the effect of crosswind and rain[J]. Fluid Dynamics and Materials Processing, 2020, 16(1): 77-90. doi: 10.32604/fdmp.2020.07797 [29] DENG E, YANG Wei-chao, HE Xu-hui, et al. Aerodynamic response of high-speed trains under crosswind in a bridge-tunnel section with or without a wind barrier[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2021, 210: 104502. doi: 10.1016/j.jweia.2020.104502 [30] FAVRE T, EFRAIMSSON G. An assessment of detached- eddy simulations of unsteady crosswind aerodynamics of road vehicles[J]. Flow, Turbulence and Combustion, 2011, 87(1): 133-163. doi: 10.1007/s10494-011-9333-4 [31] 田红旗, 高广军. 270 km·h-1高速列车气动力性能研究[J]. 中国铁道科学, 2003, 24(2): 14-18. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGTK200302003.htmTIAN Hong-qi, GAO Guang-jun. The analysis and evaluation on the aerodynamic behavior of 270 km·h-1 high-speed train[J]. China Railway Science, 2003, 24(2): 14-18. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGTK200302003.htm [32] 苗秀娟, 高广军. 基于DES的车辆横风气动性能模拟[J]. 中南大学学报(自然科学版), 2012, 43(7): 2855-2860. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZNGD201207058.htmMIAO Xiu-juan, GAO Guang-jun. Aerodynamic performance of train under cross-wind based on DES[J]. Journal of Central South University (Science and Technology), 2012, 43(7): 2855-2860. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZNGD201207058.htm -
点击查看大图
图(21) / 表(2)
计量
- 文章访问数: 438
- HTML全文浏览量: 167
- PDF下载量: 43
- 被引次数: 0
