-
摘要: 为了对地铁车辆的运行性能实现更准确的评估和更有效的优化,借助有限元理论和子结构理论建立了车体和转向架构架等关键零部件的柔性动力学模型;基于天棚半主动控制算法和柔性多体动力学理论,建立了考虑半主动控制悬挂的地铁车辆刚柔耦合动力学模型;考虑轨道随机不平顺的影响,研究了半主动控制悬挂以及结构柔性对地铁车辆运行稳定性和乘坐舒适性的影响。研究结果表明:相对于传统的悬挂装置,天棚半主动控制极大降低了车辆的振动加速度,并使其变化趋势更加平缓,对车辆的低频振动有明显的抑制作用;采用本文的研究参数,天棚半主动控制在直线段可使车辆的垂向Sperling指标和垂向振动加速度均方根(RMS)分别降低26.8%和7.5%,使车体横向Sperling指标和横向振动加速度RMS分别降低8.8%和4.9%,而在曲线段,天棚半主动控制可使车辆垂向Sperling指标和垂向振动加速度RMS分别降低25.1%和5.7%,使横向Sperling指标和横向振动加速度RMS分别降低15.6%和8.3%,车辆的乘坐舒适性和运行稳定性大幅提升;考虑结构柔性时,车辆的垂向Sperling指标和垂向振动加速度RMS相比于未考虑结构柔性时分别增大了4.3%和6.8%,横向Sperling指标和横向振动加速度RMS分别增大了3.0%和3.4%。可见,车体和构架的结构柔性对车辆的动态特性有较大影响,在对车辆运行稳定性和乘坐舒适性进行计算和评估时不可忽略。Abstract: To realize more accurate evaluation and more effective optimization of the running performance of metro vehicles, based on the finite element theory and substructure theory, the flexible dynamics models of critical parts, such as car body and bogie frame, were established. Based on the algorithm of semi-active skyhook control and the theory of flexible multi-body dynamics, the rigid-flexible coupling dynamics model of a metro vehicle was established considering a semi-active control suspension.The effect of random track irregularity was considered, and the influences of semi-active control suspension and structural flexibility on the running stability and ride comfort of metro vehicles were investigated. Analysis results show that compared to the traditional suspension device, the semi-active skyhook control can significantly reduce the vibration acceleration of the vehicle and decrease its variation trend, suppressing the low-frequency vibration of the vehicle obviously. Based on the parameters adopted in this study, the semi-active skyhook control decreases the vertical Sperling index and root mean square (RMS) of vertical vibration acceleration on the straight segment by 26.8% and 7.5%, respectively, and 8.8% and 4.9% for lateral vibration acceleation, respectively. The semi-active skyhook control decreases the values of vertical vibration acceleration on the curve segment by 25.1% and 5.7%, respectively, and 15.6% and 8.3% for lateral vibration acceleration, respectively. Thus, the ride comfort and running stability of the vehicle improve significantly. Under considering the structural flexibility, the vertical Sperling index and RMS of vertical vibration acceleration of the vehicle increase by 4.3% and 6.8%, respectively, compared to those under no considering the structural flexibility, and 3.0% and 3.4% for lateral vibration acceleration, respectively. Thus, the structural flexibilities of the car body and frame significantly influence the dynamic characteristics of the vehicle and should be considered in calculating and evaluating the vehicle running stability and ride comfort. 5 tabs, 21 figs, 29 refs.
-
表 1 车体振型与频率
Table 1. Vibration modes and frequencies of car body
阶数 频率/Hz 描述 1 4.96 侧墙一阶弯曲 2 6.19 车顶一阶弯曲 3 7.37 菱形变形 4 8.69 一阶垂向弯曲 5 13.27 侧墙二阶弯曲 6 14.16 车顶二阶弯曲 7 14.34 车体一阶扭转 8 17.06 端墙内凹 表 2 计算工况
Table 2. Calculation conditions
工况 线路 模型 悬挂 直线 曲线 刚体 刚柔耦合 被动 半主动 1 √ √ √ 2 √ √ √ 3 √ √ √ 4 √ √ √ 5 √ √ √ 6 √ √ √ 表 3 轨道参数
Table 3. Parameters of track
参数 数值 钢轨横截面积/m2 7.745×10-3 钢轨弹性模量/MPa 2.1×10-5 钢轨惯性力矩/m4 3.214×10-5 扣件间距/m 0.6 扣件刚度/(MN·m-1) 30 扣件阻尼/(kN·s·m-1) 10 轨道类型 整体道床轨道 曲线半径/m 800 曲线段长度/m 100 过渡曲线长度/m 50 超高/m 0.095 表 4 地铁车辆动力学参数
Table 4. Dynamics parameters of metro vehicle
参数 数值 轮对质量/t 1.878 构架质量/t 4.007 车体质量/t 35.443 轮对绕x、y、z轴的惯量/(t·m2) 1.055、0.139、1.055 构架绕x、y、z轴的惯量/(t·m2) 1.194、0.876、2.099 车体绕x、y、z轴的惯量/(t·m2) 50.929、1 410.960、1 401.490 一系纵、横、垂向刚度/(MN·m-1) 7.0、4.0、0.9 一系纵、横、垂向阻尼/(kN·s·m-1) 10、10、10 二系纵、横、垂向刚度/(kN·m-1) 220.1、220.1、341.9 二系纵、横、垂向阻尼/(kN·s·m-1) 60、60、80 车轮名义滚动圆半径/m 0.42 车轮踏面型式 LM踏面 表 5 天棚控制参数
Table 5. Parameters of skyhook control
kN·s·m-1 参数 横向 垂向 Cmin 20.58 28.00 Cmax 102.90 140.00 Cs 58.80 80.00 -
[1] 丁问司, 卜继玲, 刘友梅. 我国高速列车横向半主动悬挂系统控制策略及控制方式[J]. 中国铁道科学, 2002, 23(4): 1-7. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-4632.2002.04.001DING Wen-si, BU Ji-ling, LIU You-mei. Strategy and method of high-speed train suspension's lateral semi-active control in China[J]. China Railway Science, 2002, 23(4): 1-7. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-4632.2002.04.001 [2] 孙国春, 史文库, 田彦涛. 振动主动控制技术的研究与发展[J]. 机床与液压, 2004(3): 1-6. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3881.2004.03.001SUN Guo-chun, SHI Wen-ku, TIAN Yan-tao. Research and development in active vibration control technology[J]. Machine Tool and Hydraulics, 2004(3): 1-6. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3881.2004.03.001 [3] 胡海岩, 郭大蕾, 翁建生. 振动半主动控制技术的进展[J]. 振动、测试与诊断, 2001, 21(4): 235-244. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZDCS200104000.htmHU Hai-yan, GUO Da-lei, WENG Jian-sheng. Recent advances in semi-active control of vibration[J]. Journal of Vibration, Measurement and Diagnosis, 2001, 21(4): 235-244. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZDCS200104000.htm [4] 王月明, 曾京. 车辆横向半主动悬挂的神经网络自适应控制[J]. 铁道学报, 2002, 24(4): 34-37. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-8360.2002.04.007WANG Yue-ming, ZENG Jing. Adaptive control of semi-active lateral suspension of vehicle using neural network[J]. Journal of the China Railway Society, 2002, 24(4): 34-37. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-8360.2002.04.007 [5] ESCALONA J L, SUGIYAMA H, SHABANA A A. Modelling of structural flexiblity in multibody railroad vehicle systems[J]. Vehicle System Dynamics, 2013, 51(7): 1027-1058. (in Chinese) doi: 10.1080/00423114.2013.786835 [6] 洪嘉振, 蒋丽忠. 柔性多体系统刚-柔耦合动力学[J]. 力学进展, 2000, 30(1): 15-20. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0992.2000.01.003HONG Jia-zhen, JIANG Li-zhong. Flexible multibody dynamics with coupled rigid and deformation motions[J]. Advances in Mechanics, 2000, 30(1): 15-20. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0992.2000.01.003 [7] 何万龙, 任伟新, 吴建基. 柔性梁上高速移动质量动力响应分析[J]. 振动与冲击, 1998, 17(1): 67-72. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZDCJ199801017.htmHE Wan-long, REN Wei-xin, WU Jian-ji. Dynamic response analysis of flexible beam with a high speed moving mass[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 1998, 17(1): 67-72. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZDCJ199801017.htm [8] DIANA G, CHELI F, COLLINA A, et al. The development of a numerical model for railway vehicles comfort assessment through comparison with experimental measurements[J]. Vehicle System Dynamics, 2002, 38(3): 165-183. doi: 10.1076/vesd.38.3.165.8287 [9] CHEN Zhao-wei, FANG Hui. An alternative solution of train-track dynamic interaction[J]. Shock and Vibration, 2019, DOI: 10.1155/2019/1859261. [10] NETTER H, SCHUPP G, RULKA W, et al. New aspects of contact modelling and validation within multibody system simulation of railway vehicles[J]. Vehicle System Dynamics, 1998, 29(S1): 246-269. [11] 程海涛, 王成国, 钱立新. 考虑车体柔性的货车动力学仿真[J]. 铁道学报, 2000, 22(6): 40-45. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-8360.2000.06.009CHENG Hai-tao, WANG Cheng-guo, QIAN Li-xin. Dynamics simulation of freight car considering the car body's flexible property[J]. Journal of the China Railway Society, 2000, 22(6): 40-45. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-8360.2000.06.009 [12] 张波, 罗光兵, 蒋忠城, 等. 柔性结构对车辆运动稳定性的影响[J]. 技术与市场, 2019, 26(6): 5-8. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JSYS201906008.htmZHANG Bo, LUO Guang-bing, JIANG Zhong-cheng, et al. The influence of flexible structure on vehicle dynamic stability[J]. Technology and Market, 2019, 26(6): 5-8. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JSYS201906008.htm [13] 丁问司, 卜继玲. 铁道车辆横向开关半主动悬架系统研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2004, 40(9): 161-164, 170. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0577-6686.2004.09.034DING Wen-si, BU Ji-ling. Research on lateral on-off semi-active suspensions of railway vehicle[J]. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2004, 40(9): 161-164, 170. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0577-6686.2004.09.034 [14] 陆正刚, 郭慧明. 柔性车辆振动和运行平稳性控制研究[J]. 中国机械工程, 2006, 17(10): 1026-1031. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1004-132X.2006.10.010LU Zheng-gang, GUO Hui-ming. Flexible vehicle vibration active control and ride quality improvement[J]. China Mechanical Engineering, 2006, 17(10): 1026-1031. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1004-132X.2006.10.010 [15] 陆正刚, 胡用生. 基于磁流变阻尼器的铁道车辆结构振动半主动控制[J]. 机械工程学报, 2006, 42(8): 95-100. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0577-6686.2006.08.016LU Zheng-gang, HU Yong-sheng. Semi-active control of railway vehicle structure vibration based on MR damper[J]. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2006, 42(8): 95-100. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0577-6686.2006.08.016 [16] 董孝卿, 王悦明, 文彬. 铁道车辆横向半主动悬挂系统仿真[J]. 中国铁道科学, 2005, 26(2): 84-89. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-4632.2005.02.018DONG Xiao-qing, WANG Yue-ming, WEN Bin. Simulation of the lateral semi-active suspension system of railway vehicle[J]. China Railway Science, 2005, 26(2): 84-89. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-4632.2005.02.018 [17] 杨建伟, 黄强. 基于模糊控制的高速车辆横向半主动悬挂仿真[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2006, 18(12): 3542-3546. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-731X.2006.12.054YANG Jian-wei, HUANG Qiang. Simulation of lateral semi-active suspension for high-speed railway vehicle based on fuzzy control[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2006, 18(12): 3542-3546. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-731X.2006.12.054 [18] VALÁŠEK M, NOVÁK M, ŠIKA Z, et al. Extended ground-hook—new concept of semi-active control of truck's suspension[J]. Vehicle System Dynamics, 1997, 27(5/6): 289-303. [19] 郭孔辉, 隋记魁, 郭耀华. 基于天棚和地棚混合阻尼的高速车辆横向减振器半主动控制[J]. 振动与冲击, 2013, 32(2): 18-23. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3835.2013.02.005GUO Kong-hui, SUI Ji-kui, GUO Yao-hua. Semi-active control method for a high-speed railway vehicle lateral damper based on skyhook and groundhook hybrid damping[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2013, 32(2): 18-23. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3835.2013.02.005 [20] KARNOPP D. Active damping in road vehicle suspension systems[J]. Vehicle System Dynamics, 1983, 12(6): 291-311. doi: 10.1080/00423118308968758 [21] KARNOPP D, CROSBY M J, HARWOOD R A. Vibration control using semi-active force generators[J]. Journal of Engineering for Industry, 1974, 96(2): 619-626. doi: 10.1115/1.3438373 [22] 王月明. 车辆半主动悬挂开关控制特性的研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2002, 38(6): 148-151. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0577-6686.2002.06.033WANG Yue-ming. Research on characteristics of on-off control for semi-active suspensions of vehicle[J]. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2002, 38(6): 148-151. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0577-6686.2002.06.033 [23] 刘宏友, 曾京, 李莉, 等. 高速列车二系横向阻尼连续可调式半主动悬挂系统的研究[J]. 中国铁道科学, 2012, 33(4): 69-74. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4632.2012.04.12LIU Hong-you, ZENG Jing, LI Li, et al. Study on secondary lateral continuous adjustable damping semi-active suspension device for high-speed train[J]. China Railway Science, 2012, 33(4): 69-74. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4632.2012.04.12 [24] 包学海, 池茂儒, 杨飞. 子结构分析中主自由度选取方法研究[J]. 机械, 2009, 36(4): 18-20. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-MECH200904008.htmBAO Xue-hai, CHI Mao-ru, YANG Fei. Research on the selection method of master degree of freedom in substructure analysis[J]. Machinery, 2009, 36(4): 18-20. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-MECH200904008.htm [25] CHEN Zhao-wei, FANG Hui, HAN Zhao-ling, et al. Influence of bridge-based designed TMD on running trains[J]. Journal of Vibration and Control, 2019, 25(1): 182-193. doi: 10.1177/1077546318773022 [26] ANTOLÍN P, ZHANG Nan, GOICOLEA J M, et al. Consideration of nonlinear wheel-rail contact forces for dynamic vehicle-bridge interaction in high-speed railway[J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2013(332): 1231-1251. [27] ZHAO Xin, LI Zi-li. The solution of frictional wheel-rail rolling contact with a 3D transient finite element model: validation and error analysis[J]. Wear, 2011(271): 444-452. [28] CHEN Zhao-wei, BI Li, ZHAO Jiang-wei. Comparison of single-pier settlement model and multi-pier settlement model in solving train-track-bridge interaction[J]. Vehicle System Dynamics, 2021, 59(10): 1484-1508. doi: 10.1080/00423114.2020.1763406 [29] 倪纯双, 王悦明. 浅析平稳性指标和舒适度指标[J]. 铁道机车车辆, 2003, 23(6): 1-3. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDJC200306000.htmNI Chun-shuang, WANG Yue-ming. A brief discussion for ride index and comfort[J]. Railway Locomotive and Car, 2003, 23(6): 1-3. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDJC200306000.htm