-
摘要: 为设计可提升列车小半径曲线通过性能的钢轨非对称打磨目标廓形，对中国现有CN60钢轨廓形进行了几何推导；以钢轨廓形几何参数作为设计变量，以车辆系统多体动力学指标作为综合目标函数，考虑钢轨打磨约束条件，提出了一种针对小半径曲线钢轨非对称打磨廓形的多目标数值优化模型；基于差分进化算法编写了相应的数值计算程序，并选择合理的计算参数求解了优化模型；根据实际线路参数分析了优化后钢轨打磨廓形的轮轨接触几何特性，并验证了列车的小半径曲线动力学性能。研究结果表明：提出的优化方法具有较快的计算速度，优化模型仅迭代了97次即可获得理想的钢轨打磨廓形；非对称打磨使内外钢轨具有差异性的打磨位置与打磨深度，将轮轨对中位置向轨道内侧移动了约10 mm，且不会改变轮缘处的轮轨匹配特性，有效增大了轮对横移10 mm范围内的轮对滚动圆半径差与轮轨接触角差，降低了列车在通过小半径曲线时的轮对横移、轮轨横向力、脱轨系数和轮重减载率，提高了转向架的横向稳定性和轮轨磨耗性能；虽然该打磨方式获得的钢轨廓形增大了轮轨接触应力，但并不会引起轮轨塑性变形。由此可见，该设计方法为提高列车的中小半径曲线通过能力提供了一种可行途径。Abstract: For improving the performance of trains passing through sharp curves, the geometric derivation was performed on the profile of existing CN60 rails in China to design the target rail profile by asymmetric grinding. Taking the geometric parameters of the rail profile as design variables and the multi-body dynamics index of vehicle system as the comprehensive objective function, a multi-objective numerical optimization model for the asymmetric grinding profile of rails in sharp curves was proposed considering the rail grinding constraints. On the basis of the differential evolution algorithm, the corresponding numerical calculation program was written, and reasonable calculation parameters were selected to solve the optimization model. According to the actual line parameters, the wheel-rail contact geometric characteristics of the optimized grinding profile of rails were analyzed, and the dynamics performance of trains passing through sharp curves was verified. Research results reveal that the proposed optimization method is fast in calculations, and the ideal grinding profile of rails can be obtained after only 97 iterations of the optimization model. Due to the asymmetric grinding, the inner and outer rails have different grinding positions and grinding depths, and the centering positions of wheels and rails move to the inner side of rails by about 10 mm, without any change in the wheel-rail matching characteristics at the flange. This effectively increases the wheelset rolling radius difference and the difference in wheel-rail contact angles in the wheelset lateral displacement range of 10 mm, reduces the lateral displacement of wheelset, lateral wheel-rail force, derailment coefficient, and rate of wheel load reduction when trains pass through sharp curves, and improves the lateral stability of the bogie and the wheel-rail wear performance. Although the rail profile obtained by this grinding method increases the wheel-rail contact stress, it does not cause the plastic wheel-rail deformation. Therefore, this design method is feasible to improve the capability of trains passing through small- and medium-radius curves. 3 tabs, 16 figs, 31 refs.
-
表 1 小半径曲线仿真参数
Table 1. Simulation parameters of sharp curve
参数 数值 两端直线长度/m 100 两端缓和曲线长度/m 100 曲线半径/m 800 曲线长度/m 300 线路超高/mm 100 采样频率/Hz 200 运行速度/(km·h-1) 90 
下载: 导出CSV
表 2 计算参数
Table 2. Calculation parameters
参数 数值 N 50 F 0.5 C 0.9 G 200 ε 1.0×10-5 p1 (25.330, -2.195) p5 (-35.400, -14.200) kp1 -0.232 kp5 20
下载: 导出CSV
表 3 曲线通过性能验证结果
Table 3. Verification result of curve passing performance
性能指标 打磨前均值 打磨后均值 提升率/% 轮对横移/mm 9.85 9.09 -7.70 轮重减载率 0.322 0.251 -22.05 转向架横向加速度/(m·s-2) 1.794 1.575 -12.20 外轨横向力/kN 12.85 9.06 -29.40 外轨脱轨系数 0.337 0.245 -27.30 外轨磨耗指数 95.85 84.05 -12.30 外轨接触斑面积/mm2 60.73 56.90 -5.70 外轨接触应力/MPa 955.57 964.34 0.91 内轨横向力/kN 5.87 5.38 -8.30 内轨脱轨系数 0.245 0.226 -7.70 内轨磨耗指数 63.465 58.413 -7.90 内轨接触斑面积/mm2 61.27 42.36 -30.80 内轨接触应力/MPa 597.28 910.16 52.40
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] 彭敬康, 崔大宾, 付耀东, 等. 提速货物列车车轮凹磨限值研究[J]. 铁道科学与工程学报, 2022, 19(2): 511-519. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CSTD202202025.htmPENG Jing-kang, CUI Da-bin, FU Yao-dong, et al. Research on hollow-worn limit of wheel treads of freight trains subjected to speed increase[J]. Journal of Railway Science and Engineering, 2022, 19(2): 511-519. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CSTD202202025.htm [2] 王璐颖. 钢轨打磨车抗脱轨稳定性研究[D]. 成都: 西南交通大学, 2012.WANG Lu-ying. Research on anti-derailment of rail grinding train[D]. Chengdu: Southwest Jiaotong University, 2012. (in Chinese) [3] 傅荧. 我国铁路货运市场占有率现状分析及展望[J]. 四川教育学院学报, 2002(7): 56-59. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-5757.2002.07.023FU Ying. Analysis and prospect of railway freight market share in China[J]. Journal of Sichuan College of Education, 2002(7): 56-59. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-5757.2002.07.023 [4] 田生奎. 中国铁路货运市场现状及发展战略研究[D]. 北京: 对外经济贸易大学, 2007.TIAN Sheng-kui. Research on current situation and development strategy of railway freight market in China[D]. Beijing: University of International Business and Economics, 2007. (in Chinese) [5] 卢军. 钢轨打磨列车打磨质量控制[J]. 铁道技术监督, 2011, 39(1): 26-28. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9178.2011.01.011LU Jun. Grinding quality control of rail grinding train[J]. Railway Quality Control, 2011, 39(1): 26-28. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9178.2011.01.011 [6] 杨国伟, 魏宇杰, 赵桂林, 等. 高速列车的关键力学问题[J]. 力学进展, 2015, 45: 217-460. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LXJZ201500007.htmYANG Guo-wei, WEI Yu-jie, ZHAO Gui-lin, et al. Research progress on the mechanics of high speed rails[J]. Advances in Mechanics, 2015, 45: 217-460. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LXJZ201500007.htm [7] 温士明. 地铁线路小半径曲线钢轨打磨廓形研究[D]. 成都: 西南交通大学, 2018.WEN Shi-ming. Study on rail grinding profile for small radius curved track of metro line[D]. Chengdu: Southwest Jiaotong University, 2018. (in Chinese) [8] 周清跃, 田常海, 张银花, 等. 高速铁路钢轨打磨关键技术研究[J]. 中国铁道科学, 2012, 33(2): 66-70. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4632.2012.02.12ZHOU Qing-yue, TIAN Chang-hai, ZHANG Yin-hua, et al. Research on key rail grinding technology of high-speed railway[J]. China Railway Science, 2012, 33(2): 66-70. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4632.2012.02.12 [9] MAGEL E, RONEY M, KALOUSEK J, et al. The blending of theory and practice in modern rail grinding[J]. Fatigue and Fracture of Engineering Materials and Structures, 2003, 26(10): 921-929. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-2695.2003.00669.x [10] 贺振中. 国外钢轨打磨技术的应用与思考[J]. 中国铁路, 2000(10): 38-40. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-683X.2000.10.014HE Zhen-zhong. Application and thinking of rail grinding technology abroad[J]. China Railway, 2000(10): 38-40. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-683X.2000.10.014 [11] MARICH S. Rail grinding strategies adopted in Australia[J]. Rail Engineering International Edition, 2005, 34(1): 4-6. [12] 郭俊. 轮轨滚动接触疲劳损伤机理研究[D]. 成都: 西南交通大学, 2006.GUO Jun. Study on mechanism of wheel-rail rolling contact fatigue and damage[D]. Chengdu: Southwest Jiaotong University, 2006. (in Chinese) [13] 郭俊, 刘启跃, 王文健. 钢轨打磨对轮轨滚动接触斑行为影响研究[J]. 铁道建筑, 2009, 49(12): 92-94. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDJZ200912034.htmGUO Jun, LIU Qi-yue, WANG Wen-jian. Research on influence of rail grinding on wheel-rail rolling contact spot behavior[J]. Railway Engineering, 2009, 49(12): 92-94. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDJZ200912034.htm [14] SMALLWOOD R, SINCLAIR J C, SAWLEY K J. An optimization technique to minimize rail contact stresses[J]. Wear, 1991, 144(1/2): 373-384. [15] MAGEL E, KALOUSEK J. Designing and assessing wheel/rail profiles for improved rolling contact fatigue and wear performance[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail Rapid Transit, 2017, 231(7): 805-818. doi: 10.1177/0954409717708079 [16] MAGEL E E, KALOUSEK J. The application of contact mechanics to rail profile design and rail grinding[J]. Wear, 2002, 253(1/2): 308-316. [17] 崔大宾, 李立, 金学松, 等. 铁路钢轨打磨目标型面研究[J]. 工程力学, 2011, 28(4): 178-184. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GCLX201104030.htmCUI Da-bin, LI Li, JIN Xue-song, et al. Study on rail goal profile by grinding[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2011, 28(4): 178-184. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GCLX201104030.htm [18] 崔大宾, 李立, 金学松, 等. 基于轮轨法向间隙的车轮踏面优化方法[J]. 机械工程学报, 2009, 45(12): 205-211. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JXXB200912038.htmCUI Da-bin, LI Li, JIN Xue-song, et al. Numerical optimization technique for wheel profile considering the normal gap of the wheel and rail[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2009, 45(12): 205-211. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JXXB200912038.htm [19] 崔大宾, 李立, 金学松. 重载货车车轮踏面优化研究[J]. 铁道学报, 2011, 33(5): 31-37. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDXB201105010.htmCUI Da-bin, LI Li, JIN Xue-song. Study on optimization of wheel profiles on heavy haul freight car[J]. Journal of the China Railway Society, 2011, 33(5): 31-37. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDXB201105010.htm [20] ZHAI Wan-ming, GAO Jian-min, LIU Peng-fei, et al. Reducing rail side wear on heavy-haul railway curves based on wheel-rail dynamic interaction[J]. Vehicle System Dynamics, 2014, 52(S1): 440-454. [21] 毛鑫, 沈钢. 基于轮径差函数的曲线钢轨打磨廓形设计[J]. 同济大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 46(2): 253-259. doi: 10.11908/j.issn.0253-374x.2018.02.017MAO Xin, SHEN Gang. Curved rail grinding profile design based on rolling radii difference function[J]. Journal of Tongji University (Natural Science), 2018, 46(2): 253-259. (in Chinese) doi: 10.11908/j.issn.0253-374x.2018.02.017 [22] 陈步琛, 沈钢. 基于平均踏面廓形的动力学最优钢轨廓形设计[J]. 齐齐哈尔大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 35(4): 30-35. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QQHE201904008.htmCHEN Bu-chen, SHEN Gang. Optimized design of rail profile based on mean tread profile[J]. Journal of Qiqihar University (Natural Science Edition), 2019, 35(4): 30-35. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QQHE201904008.htm [23] 林凤涛, 吴涛, 杨洋, 等. 高速铁路辙叉区钢轨打磨廓形设计方法[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2021, 21(6): 124-135. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JYGC202106009.htmLIN Feng-tao, WU Tao, YANG Yang, et al. Design method of rail grinding profile in frog area of high-speed railway[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2021, 21(6): 124-135. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JYGC202106009.htm [24] 林凤涛, 胡伟豪. 磨耗钢轨经济性打磨型面研究[J]. 铁道科学与工程学报, 2020, 17(10): 2493-2502. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CSTD202010007.htmLIN Feng-tao, HU Wei-hao. Study on the economical grinding surface of wear rail[J]. Journal of Railway Science and Engineering, 2020, 17(10): 2493-2502. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CSTD202010007.htm [25] 林凤涛, 庞华飞, 邓卓鑫, 等. 曲线区钢轨双打磨廓形设计方法[J]. 铁道科学与工程学报, 2022, 19(1): 87-99. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CSTD202201011.htmLIN Feng-tao, PANG Hua-fei, DENG Zhuo-xin, et al. Design method of double grinding profile for curved rail[J]. Journal of Railway Science and Engineering, 2022, 19(1): 87-99. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CSTD202201011.htm [26] VERMA K A, PANDEY K M, RAY M, et al. The numerical analysis of combustion performance of a wedge shaped strut-based scramjet combustor[J]. Thermal Science and Engineering Progress, 2020, 20: 10074. [27] HASSAN S, HEMEIDA A M, ALKHALAF S, et al. Multi-variant differential evolution algorithm for feature selection[J]. Scientific Reports, 2020, 10(1): 17261. [28] YU Xiao-bing, LI Chen-liang, ZHOU Jia-fang. A constrained differential evolution algorithm to solve UAV path planning in disaster scenarios[J]. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2020, 204: 106209. [29] ZHANG Zhi-bo, WU Ping-bo, LUO Ren, et al. The relationship between contact angle difference and equivalent conicity of high-speed EMU[J]. Advanced Materials Research, 2012, 591/592/593: 1920-1924. [30] 刘启跃. 钢轨的安定状态研究[J]. 西南交通大学学报, 1995, 30(4): 466-471. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XNJT504.019.htmLIU Qi-yue. The study of shakedown of rail[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 1995, 30(4): 466-471. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XNJT504.019.htm [31] 张银花, 陈朝阳, 周清跃. 钢轨屈服强度指标取值研究[J]. 铁道建筑, 2006, 46(3): 92-94. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDJZ200603035.htmZHANG Yin-hua, CHEN Chao-yang, ZHOU Qing-yue. Research on the value of yield strength index of rail[J]. Railway Engineering, 2006, 46(3): 92-94. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDJZ200603035.htm -
点击查看大图
图(16) / 表(3)
计量
- 文章访问数: 524
- HTML全文浏览量: 159
- PDF下载量: 44
- 被引次数: 0
