Numerical simulation and law analysis of water accumulation distribution at superelevation transition section of multilane expressway
Article Text (Baidu Translation)
-
摘要: 为了揭示多车道高速公路超高过渡段积水分布规律，基于流体动力学理论，选取典型多车道高速公路超高过渡段设计参数，利用道路BIM设计软件建立了40组三维道路模型；分析了路面积水量和排水设施径流量的关系，建立了考虑排水设施与路面构造深度影响的降雨模拟方案；采用离散相模型和多相流模型耦合，模拟了降雨条件下的路面积水状态；分析了不同组合参数下的超高过渡段积水厚度数据，得到了合成坡度、道路宽度、降雨强度与超高渐变率对积水厚度的影响模式，计算了各车道最大积水厚度，分析了六车道、八车道高速公路积水横向分布规律。研究结果表明：积水厚度与合成坡度、超高渐变率负相关，与降雨强度、道路宽度正相关，其中降雨强度对积水厚度的影响最大，超高渐变率对积水厚度的影响最小；合成坡度为2.02%~8.54%，降雨强度为1~5 mm·min-1时，多车道高速公路超高过渡段最小积水厚度为0.58 mm，最大达到28.35 mm；当降雨强度为5 mm·min-1时，高速公路超高过渡段内外侧车道最大积水厚度差异明显，六车道由内侧车道到外侧车道的最大积水厚度比例为1.0∶3.1∶3.3，八车道为1.00∶0.96∶1.03∶1.36；多车道高速公路超高过渡段积水厚度峰值先出现在道路中间附近，然后向外侧移动，最大积水厚度一般出现在外侧车道。Abstract: In order to reveal the distribution law of water accumulation at the superelevation transition section of multilane expressway, the design parameters of the typical superelevation transition section of multilane expressway were selected based on the fluid dynamics theory, and the road design software BIM was used to establish 40 groups of 3D road models. By analyzing the relationship between road area water quantity and drainage facilities runoff, a rainfall simulation scheme considering the influence of drainage facilities and pavement structure depth was established. The discrete phase model and multiphase flow model were coupled to simulate the water accumulation state of road area under rainfall condition. By analyzing the water accumulation thickness data of superelevation transition section under different combination parameters, the influence modes of synthetic slope, road width, rainfall intensity and superelevation gradient rate on the water accumulation thickness were obtained. The maximum water accumulation thicknesses of each lane were calculated, and the horizontal distribution laws of water accumulation at six-lane and eight-lane transition sections were revealed. Analysis results show that the thickness of stagnant water is negatively correlated with synthetic slope and superelevation gradient rate, and positively correlated with rainfall intensity and road width. The rainfall intensity has the greatest influence on the ponding water thickness, and the superelevation gradation rate has the least influence on the ponding water thickness. When the synthetic slope is 2.02%-8.54% and the rainfall intensity is 1-5 mm·min-1, the minimum water thickness at the superelevation section of multilane expressway is 0.58 mm, and the maximum is 28.35 mm. When the rainfall intensity is 5 mm·min-1, the maximum water thicknesses of the inner and outer lanes at the superelevation transition section of the expressway are significantly different. The maximum water thickness ratio from the inner lane to the outer lane at the six-lane transition section is 1.0∶3.1∶3.3, and the ratio is 1.00∶0.96∶1.03∶1.36 at the eight-lane transition section. The peak value of water accumulation thickness at the superelevation transition section of multi-lane expressway first appears near the middle of the expressway and then moves outward, and the maximum water accumulation thickness generally appears in the outer lane. 3 tabs, 13 figs, 26 refs.
-
图 4 合成坡度对积水厚度的影响
Figure 4. Effect of synthetic slope on thickness of water accumulation
图 5 降雨强度对积水厚度的影响
Figure 5. Effect of rainfall intensity on thickness of water accumulation
图 7 超高渐变率对积水厚度的影响
Figure 7. Effect of superelevation transition ratio on thickness of water accumulation
图 8 六车道试验路段积水横向分布
Figure 8. Horizontal distributions of water accumulation at six-lanes test section
图 9 八车道试验路段积水横向分布
Figure 9. Horizontal distributions of water accumulation at eight-lane test section
图 12 六车道试验路段积水厚度比与降雨强度的关系
Figure 12. Relationship between water accumulation thickness ratio and rainfall intensity at six-lane test section
图 13 八车道试验路段积水厚度比与降雨强度的关系
Figure 13. Relationship between water accumulation thickness ratio and rainfall intensity at eight-lane test section
表 1 试验路段设计参数
Table 1. Design parameters of test section
道路宽度/m 纵坡/% 超高/% 合成坡度/% 长度/m 超高渐变率 15.00~18.75 0.3~3.0 2~8 2.02~8.54 225~300 1/330~1/200 
下载: 导出CSV
表 2 路面参数设置
Table 2. Pavement parameters setting
参数选项 设置情况 壁面运动 固定壁面 剪切条件 无剪切 壁面粗糙度 标准 粗糙高度 0.55 mm
下载: 导出CSV
表 3 极差分析结果
Table 3. Range analysis result
参数 合成坡度 降雨强度 道路宽度 超高渐变率 极差 0.024 0.064 0.041 0.019
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] LUO Wen-ting, WANG K C P, LI Lin. Field test validation of water film depth (WFD) prediction models for pavement surface drainage[J]. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 2019, 20(10): 1170-1181. doi: 10.1080/10298436.2017.1394099 [2] LUO Wen-ting, LI Lin, WANG K C P, et al. Surface drainage evaluation of asphalt pavement using a new analytical water film depth model[J]. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 2020, 21(7): 1985-2004. doi: 10.1080/14680629.2019.1590220 [3] PICCARDI A, COLACE L. Optical detection of dangerous road conditions[J]. Sensors, 2019, 19(6): 1360. doi: 10.3390/s19061360 [4] SINGH A K, ZHU Y, HAN M, et al. Simultaneous load and temperature measurement using Lophine-coated fiber Bragg gratings[J]. Smart Materials and Structures, 2016, 25(11): 115019. doi: 10.1088/0964-1726/25/11/115019 [5] 罗京, 刘建蓓, 王元庆. 路面水膜深度预测模型验证试验[J]. 中国公路学报, 2015, 28(12): 57-63. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7372.2015.12.008LUO Jing, LIU Jian-bei, WANG Yuan-qing. Validation test on pavement water film depth prediction model[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2015, 28(12): 57-63. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7372.2015.12.008 [6] 罗京, 刘建蓓, 戈普塔, 等. 路面水膜厚度检验评价方法[J]. 交通信息与安全, 2016, 34(6): 54-59, 82. doi: 10.3963/j.issn1674-4861.2016.06.008LUO Jing, LIU Jian-bei, GOPTA P K, et al. An inspection and evaluation method of thickness of water film on road surface[J]. Journal of Transport Information and Safety, 2016, 34(6): 54-59, 82. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3963/j.issn1674-4861.2016.06.008 [7] 季天剑, 黄晓明, 刘清泉, 等. 沥青路面表面水膜厚度试验[J]. 公路交通科技, 2004, 21(12): 14-17. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0268.2004.12.004JI Tian-jian, HUANG Xiao-ming, LIU Qing-quan, et al. Test depth of water film on asphalt pavement surface[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2004, 21(12): 14-17. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0268.2004.12.004 [8] 黄镜入, 时海龙, 崔庚鑫. 基于无人机图像的高速公路积水预警系统设计[J]. 工业控制计算机, 2020, 33(3): 41-44. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-182X.2020.03.016HUANG Jing-ru, SHI Hai-long, CUI Geng-xin. Design of highway water warning system based on UAV image[J]. Industrial Control Computer, 2020, 33(3): 41-44. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-182X.2020.03.016 [9] 孙婧. 基于改进LEACH算法的路面积水深度测量系统的设计与实现[J]. 计算机测量与控制, 2014, 22(4): 1297-1299. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-4598.2014.04.102SUN Jing. Pavement water depth measurement system design based on LEACH algorithm[J]. Computer Measurement and Control, 2014, 22 (4): 1297-1299. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-4598.2014.04.102 [10] LUO Wen-ting, LI Lin. Estimation of water film depth for rutting pavement using IMU and 3D laser imaging data[J]. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 2021, 22(10): 1334-1349. doi: 10.1080/10298436.2019.1684495 [11] LUO Wen-ting, LI Lin. Development of a new analytical water film depth (WFD) prediction model for asphalt pavement drainage evaluation[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2019, 218: 530-542. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.05.142 [12] MA Yao-lu, GENG Yan-fen, CHEN Xian-hua, et al. Prediction for asphalt pavement water film thickness based on artificial neural network[J]. Journal of Southeast University (English Edition), 2017, 33(4): 490-495. [13] ZAGVOZDA M, ŽELJKO K. Analysis of solutions for superelevation design from standpoint of efficient drainage[J]. Road and Rail Infrastructure, 2016(5): 209-215 [14] RESSEL W, WOLFF A, ALBER S, et al. Modelling and simulation of pavement drainage[J]. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 2019, 20(7): 801-810 doi: 10.1080/10298436.2017.1347437 [15] LIU Shi-he, TAI Wei, FAN Min, et al. Numerical simulation of atomization rainfall and the generated flow on a slope[J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2012, 24(2): 273-279. doi: 10.1016/S1001-6058(11)60244-8 [16] CHARBENEAU R, JEONG J, BARRETT M. Highway drainage at superelevation transitions[J]. Highway Design, 2008(3): 1-180. [17] 季天剑, 黄晓明, 刘清泉, 等. 道路表面水膜厚度预测模型[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2004, 4(3): 1-3. http://transport.chd.edu.cn/article/id/200403001JI Tian-jian, HUANG Xiao-ming, LIU Qing-quan, et al. Prediction model of rain water depth on road surface[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2004, 4(3): 1-3. (in Chinese) http://transport.chd.edu.cn/article/id/200403001 [18] 季天剑, 高玉峰, 陈荣生. 轿车轮胎动力滑水分析[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2010, 10(5): 57-60. http://transport.chd.edu.cn/article/id/201005010JI Tian-jian, GAO Yu-feng, CHEN Rong-sheng. Dynamic hydroplaning analysis of car tire[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2010, 10(5): 57-60. (in Chinese) http://transport.chd.edu.cn/article/id/201005010 [19] 周海超, 陈磊, 翟辉辉, 等. 基于CFD的轮胎滑水及其性能影响因素分析[J]. 重庆交通大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 36(1): 110-116. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CQJT201701020.htmZHOU Hai-chao, CHEN Lei, ZHAI Hui-hui, et al. Reserch on flow field and influencing factors of tire hydroplaning based on CFD method[J]. Journal of Chongqing Jiaotong University (Natural Science), 2017, 36(1): 110-116. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CQJT201701020.htm [20] HERMANGE C, OGER G, CHENADEC Y L, et al. A 3D SPH-FE coupling for FSI problems and its application to tire hydroplaning simulations on rough ground[J]. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2019, 355: 558-590. doi: 10.1016/j.cma.2019.06.033 [21] 黄晓明, 刘修宇, 曹青青, 等. 积水路面轮胎部分滑水数值模拟[J]. 湖南大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 45(9): 113-121. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HNDX201809013.htmHUANG Xiao-ming, LIU Xiu-yu, CAO Qing-qing, et al. Numerical simulation of tire partial hydroplaning on flooded pavement[J]. Journal of Hunan University (Natural Sciences), 2018, 45(9): 113-121. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HNDX201809013.htm [22] 李映夏, 焦圣明, 包云轩, 等. 高速公路路面干湿状态判别及积水模型应用研究[J]. 热带气象学报, 2017, 33(4): 558-567. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-RDQX201704013.htmLI Ying-xia, JIAO Sheng-ming, BAO Yun-xuan, et al. Dry and wet state discrimination and the application of water/snow accumulation model on the road surface of expressway[J]. Journal of Tropical Meteorology, 2017, 33(4): 558-567. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-RDQX201704013.htm [23] 张驰, 王博, 贺九平, 等. 基于行车动力学的高速公路积水路段行车风险分析[J]. 交通信息与安全, 2019, 37(5): 9-17. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JTJS201905002.htmZHANG Chi, WANG Bo, HE Jiu-ping, et al. Traffic risk analysis of ponding sections on freeways based on driving dynamics[J]. Journal of Transport Information and Safety, 2019, 37(5): 9-17. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JTJS201905002.htm [24] 张驰, 郭鑫鑫, 崔卜心. 不均匀积水条件对路面行车安全的影响[J]. 公路交通科技, 2014, 31(10): 104-111. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GLJK201410017.htmZHANG Chi, GUO Xin-xin, CUI Bu-xin. Influence of uneven wet pavement surface condition on driving safety[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2014, 31(10): 104-111. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GLJK201410017.htm [25] 徐进, 彭其渊, 邵毅明. 直线路段积水路面车辆事故产生机理分析[J]. 中国公路学报, 2009, 22(1): 97-103. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGGL200901018.htmXU Jin, PENG Qi-yuan, SHAO Yi-ming. Mechanism analysis of vehicle accident on surface gathered water in straight sections[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2009, 22(1): 97-103. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGGL200901018.htm [26] 管朝鹏. 基于DPM及EWF模型的积水分布研究[D]. 重庆: 重庆交通大学, 2015.GUAN Chao-peng. Research on the distribution of accumulated water based on DPM and EWF model[D]. Chongqing: Chongqing Jiaotong University, 2015. (in Chinese) -
点击查看大图
图(13) / 表(3)
计量
- 文章访问数: 863
- HTML全文浏览量: 334
- PDF下载量: 86
- 被引次数: 0
