XIANYU Jian-chuan, JUAN Zhi-cai, ZHU Tai-ying. Travel choice behavior based on regret theory view[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2012, 12(3): 67-72. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2012.03.010
Citation: XIANYU Jian-chuan, JUAN Zhi-cai, ZHU Tai-ying. Travel choice behavior based on regret theory view[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2012, 12(3): 67-72. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2012.03.010

Travel choice behavior based on regret theory view

doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2012.03.010
Funds:

National Natural Science Foundation of China 51008190

National Natural Science Foundation of China 50878129

Research Foundation of Selecting and Training Outstanding Young Teachersin Shanghai Universities sdj10009

esearch Foundation of Shanghai Dianji University 10C201

Subject Construction Project of Shanghai Dianji University 10XKJ01

More Information
  • Author Bio:

    XIANYU Jian-chuan (1976-), Female, Mianyang, Sichuan, Lecturer of Shanghai Dianji University, PhD, Research on Traffic Demand Forecast and Management, +86-21-38223272, jianchuanxy@gmail.com

  • Received Date: 2011-12-22
  • Publish Date: 2012-06-25
  • Based on random regret minimization(RRM) theory and random utility maximization(RUM) theory, RRM-MNL model and RUM-MNL model were set up to research the choice behaviors of travel modes respectively.Aiming at RRM-MNL model and RUM-MNL model, the parameters and the goodnesses of fit were compared, their difference on the evaluation of traffic management measures was analyzed through direct elasticity, and practical verification was carried out based on four travel data such as aircraft, train, coach and car during intercity travel.Analysis result shows that compared with RUM-MNL model, in RRM-MNL model, the partial compensatory decision-making behavior and compromise effect during the choice process of multi-attribute method are described better, and the choice process of travel behavior can be reflected more really.The choice probabilities of wait time, travel time and travel cost on three travel methods such as aircraft, train and coach have significant elaticities.In RRM-MNL model, the elasticities of wait time for aircraft, train and coach all are lower than those in RUM-MNL model, and reduce by 7.30%, 13.14% and 7.70% respectively.So, for the same attribute variable, while the traveler has different choice preferences, the different choice behaviors will be displayed.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    ARENTZE T, TIMMERMANS H. Parametric action deci-sion-marking trees: incorporating continuous attribute vari-ables into rule-based models of discrete choice[J]. Transpor-tation Research Part B: Methodological, 2007, 41(7): 772-783. doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2007.01.001
    [2]
    BELL D E. Regret in decision making under uncertainty[J]. Operations Research, 1982, 30(5): 961-981. doi: 10.1287/opre.30.5.961
    [3]
    ZHANG Jun-yi, TIMMERMANS H, BORGERS A, et al. Modeling traveler choice behavior using the concepts of rela-tive utility and relative interest[J]. Transportation ResearchPart B: Methodological, 2004, 38(3): 215-234. doi: 10.1016/S0191-2615(03)00009-2
    [4]
    GILBRIDE T J, ALLENBY G M. A choice model with con-junctive, disjunctive, and compensatory screening rules[J]. Marketing Science, 2004, 23(3): 391-406. doi: 10.1287/mksc.1030.0032
    [5]
    HESS S, STATHOPOULOS A, DALY A. Mixing of behaviorprocesses: a modeling framework and three case-studies[C]∥TRB. 90th Annual Meeting of Transportation ResearchBoard. Washington DC: TRB, 2011: 1-18.
    [6]
    DENANT-BOEMONT L, PETIOT R. Information value andsequential decision-making in a transport setting: an experi-mental study[J]. Transportation Research Part B: Methodo-logical, 2003, 37(4): 365-386. doi: 10.1016/S0191-2615(02)00018-8
    [7]
    LEONG W, HENSHER D A. Embedding decision heuristicsin discrete choice models: a review[J]. Transport Reviews, 2012, 32(3): 313-331. doi: 10.1080/01441647.2012.671195
    [8]
    ARENTZE T A, TIMMERMANS H J P. ALBATROSS: overview of the model, application and experiences[C]∥TRB. Innovation in Travel Modeling 2008. Portland: TRB, 2008: 1-27.
    [9]
    JOU R C, KITAMURA R, WENG M C, et al. Dynamiccommuter departure time choice under uncertainty[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2008, 42(5): 774-783. doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2008.01.017
    [10]
    HANNES E, JANSSENS D, WETS G. Mental map of dailyactivity travel routines[C]∥TRB. 88th Annual Meeting ofTransportation Research Board. Washington DC: TRB, 2009: 1-17.
    [11]
    CHORUS C G. A new model of random regret minimization[J]. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research, 2010, 10(2): 181-196. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/254906856_A_New_Model_of_Random_Regret_Minimization
    [12]
    THIENE M, BOERI M, CHORUS G C. Random regretminimization: exploration of a new choice model for environ-mental and resource economics[J]. Environmental andResource Economics, 2012, 51(3): 413-429. doi: 10.1007/s10640-011-9505-7
    [13]
    CASPAR G C. Random regret minimization: an overview ofmodel properties and empirical evidence[J]. TransportReviews, 2012, 32(1): 75-92.
    [14]
    KIVETZ R, NETZER O, SRINIVASAN V. Alternativemodels for capturing the compromise effect[J]. Journal ofMarketing Research, 2004, 41(3): 237-257. doi: 10.1509/jmkr.41.3.237.35990
    [15]
    BIERLAIRE M, FETIARISION M. Estimation of discretechoice models: extending BIOGEME[C]∥STRC. 9th SwissTransport Research Conference. Ascona: STRC, 2009: 1-21.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (1122) PDF downloads(1464) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return