LI Song-qi, ZHANG Kun-lun, CHEN Yin, GUO Wei, LIANG Hao-ran. Judgment method of maglev vehicle dynamic stability on flexible track[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2015, 15(1): 43-49. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2015.01.006
Citation: LI Song-qi, ZHANG Kun-lun, CHEN Yin, GUO Wei, LIANG Hao-ran. Judgment method of maglev vehicle dynamic stability on flexible track[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2015, 15(1): 43-49. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2015.01.006

Judgment method of maglev vehicle dynamic stability on flexible track

doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2015.01.006
More Information
  • Author Bio:

    LISong-qi(1980-), male, lecturer, doctoralstudent, +86-28-87600338, li.songqi@qq.com

    ZHANG Kun-lun(1964-), male, professor, +86-28-87600338, zhangkunlun@263.net

  • Received Date: 2014-09-21
  • Publish Date: 2015-02-25
  • The dynamic stability of EMS maglev vehicle was analyzed, a simplified dynamics model of vehicle-track coupling vibration system was set up, and the time-varying linear kinetics equations of the system were deduced based on each track mode separately.The state matrix and the correlation coefficients of characteristic equations for the system were produced by simplifying the equations.The basic conditions of the system on dynamic stability were derived from the proper relationship among the coefficients under the condition of asymptotically stable system, and the quick dynamic stability criterion was given.When the criterion value was greater than 1, the system was stable.When the criterion value was less than 1, the system was unstable.Research result indicates that when the speeds of 6kinds of working conditions are 100, 180, 260, 340, 420, 500km·h-1 respectively, the track bending stiffnesses are 4.83×1010, 3.86×1010, 3.38×1010, 3.38×1010, 3.86×1010, 4.83×1010 N·m2 respectively, and the track beam lengths are 24.8, 22.4, 20.4, 20.4, 22.4, 24.8mrespectively, the stability criterion values are1.639, 0.624, 2.339, 0.870, 3.252, 0.571 respectively, and the related Lyapunov characteristic exponents are-3.580×10-2, 2.443×10-1, -3.910×10-2, 1.515×10-1, -5.471×10-2, 1.939×10-1 respectively.Under conditions 1, 3, 5, the stability criterion values are greater than1, the related exponents are less than 0, so the system is stable.Under conditions 2, 4, 6, the stability criterion values are less than 1, the related exponents are greater than 0, so the system is unstable.The two judgment results are coincident, so the criterion is reliable.the stability criterion explains the reason of resonance caused by vehicle speed increase, reveals the relationship among maglev vehicle dynamic stability, vehicle speed and vehicle-track system main parameters, avoids the complexity to solve high-dimension dynamics differential equation, and is simpler and more convenient in engineering application.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    ZHAI Wan-ming, ZHAO Chun-fa. Dynamics of maglev vehicle/guideway systems(Ⅰ)―magnet/rail interaction and system stability[J]. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2005, 41(7): 1-10. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0577-6686.2005.07.001
    [2]
    ZHAO Chun-fa, ZHAI Wan-ming. Dynamics of maglev vehicle/guideway systems(Ⅱ)―modeling and simulation[J]. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2005, 41(8): 163-175. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0577-6686.2005.08.029
    [3]
    LI Li, MENG Guang. Summary of the dynamic research on EMS-maglev trains[J]. Journal of the China Railway Society, 2003, 25(4): 110-114. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-8360.2003.04.022
    [4]
    WANG Kai-yun, HUANG Chao, ZHAI Wan-ming, et al. Progress on wheel-rail dynamic performance of railway curve negotiation[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering: English Edition, 2014, 1(3): 209-220. doi: 10.1016/S2095-7564(15)30104-5
    [5]
    SHI Jin, YAU J D, WANG Ying-jie. Dynamic response of guideway girders due to high-speed maglev trains moving at resonant speeds[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2012, 29(12): 196-203. (in Chinese) doi: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2011.05.0262
    [6]
    ZENG You-wen, WANG Shao-hua, ZHANG Kun-lun. A study of vertical coupling dynamics of EMS maglev train and guideway systems[J]. Journal of the China Railway Society, 1999, 21(2): 21-25. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-8360.1999.02.005
    [7]
    LIANG Xin, LUO Shi-hui, MA Wei-hua, et al. Coupling vibration analysis of single-magnet suspension vehicle-bridge for maglev train[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2012, 12(2): 32-37. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1637.2012.02.006
    [8]
    WANG Hui, SHEN Gang. Small-scale similarity model of maglev-guideway coupling vibration[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2014, 14(1): 49-56. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1637.2014.01.009
    [9]
    LI Jin-hui, LI Jie, ZHOU Dan-feng, et al. Self-excited vibration problems of maglev vehicle-bridge interaction system[J]. Journal of Central South University, 2014, 21(11): 4184-4192. doi: 10.1007/s11771-014-2414-5
    [10]
    HE Zhuo-yu, LUO Shi-hui, LIANG Hai-qing. Dynamic analysis of secondary suspension for low-speed maglev train[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2009, 9(1): 12-16. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1671-1637.2009.01.003
    [11]
    ZHOU D F, HANSEN C H, LI J. Suppression of maglev vehicle-girder self-excited vibration using a virtual tuned mass damper[J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2011, 330(5): 883-901. doi: 10.1016/j.jsv.2010.09.018
    [12]
    ZOU Dong-sheng, SHE Long-hua, ZHANG Zhi-qiang, et al. Maglev vehicle and guideway coupling vibration analysis[J]. Acta Electronica Sinica, 2010, 38(9): 2071-2075. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZXU201009019.htm
    [13]
    WANG Hong-po, LI Jie. Sub-harmonic resonances of the non-autonomous system with delayed position feedback control[J]. Acta Physica Sinica, 2007, 56(5): 2504-2516. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-3290.2007.05.007
    [14]
    ZHANG Ling-ling, HUANG Li-hong, ZHANG Zhi-zhou. Hopf bifurcation of the maglev time-delay feedback system via pseudo-oscillator analysis[J]. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 2010, 52(5/6): 667-673.
    [15]
    POPP K. Mathematical modeling and control system design of maglev vehicles[D]. Hannover: Leibniz Universit?t Hannover, 1982.
    [16]
    ZHOU You-he, WU Jian-jun, ZHENG Xiao-jing, et al. Analysis of dynamic stability for magnetic levitation vehicles by Lyapunov characteristic number[J]. Acta Mechanica Sinica, 2000, 32(1): 42-51. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0459-1879.2000.01.005
    [17]
    WU Jian-jun, ZHENG Xiao-jing, ZHOU You-he. Dynamic characteristic analysis of maglev vehicle with two degrees of freedom on flexible guideways[J]. Journal of Vibration Engineering, 1999, 12(4): 439-446. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZDGC199904000.htm
    [18]
    ZHENG Xiao-jing, WU Jian-jun, ZHOU You-he. Numerical analyses on dynamic control of five-degree-of-freedom maglev vehicle moving on flexible guideways[J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2000, 235(1): 43-61. doi: 10.1006/jsvi.1999.2911
    [19]
    LI Yun-gang, CHANG Wen-sen. Cascade control of an EMS maglev vehicle's levitation control system[J]. Acta Automatica Sinica, 1999, 25(2): 247-251. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-MOTO902.016.htm
    [20]
    ZHANG Dong-sheng, MEI Xue-song, HAO Xiao-hong, et al. Current control method for magnetic suspension system[J]. Journal of Xi'an Jiaotong University, 2007, 41(9): 1096-1100. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-987x.2007.09.021

Catalog

    Article Metrics

    Article views (945) PDF downloads(858) Cited by()
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return