YU Meng-ge, LI Tian, ZHANG Qian, LIU Jia-li. Aerodynamic performance of high-speed train under heavy rain condition[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2019, 19(5): 96-105. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2019.05.010
Citation: YU Meng-ge, LI Tian, ZHANG Qian, LIU Jia-li. Aerodynamic performance of high-speed train under heavy rain condition[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2019, 19(5): 96-105. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2019.05.010

Aerodynamic performance of high-speed train under heavy rain condition

doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2019.05.010
More Information
  • Author Bio:

    YU Meng-ge(1985-), female, associate professor, PhD, yumengge0627@163.com

  • Received Date: 2019-05-08
  • Publish Date: 2019-10-25
  • In order to study the influence of heavy rain on the aerodynamic performance of a high-speed train, the aerodynamics computation model of high-speed train under heavy rain was established based on the Euler-Lagrange method. The air was modelled as the continuous phase, which was described by the Euler method. The raindrop was modelled as the discrete phase, which was described by the Lagrange method. The two-way coupled method was used to simulate the rainfall environment. The calculation of train aerodynamic performance and raindrop simulation were carried out, respectively, and the accuracy of the calculation method was verified by comparing with the experimental data. The flow field structure and aerodynamic performance of a high-speed train under heavy rain conditions were simulated numerically. Calculation result shows that with the increasing of rainfall intensity, under the impact of raindrops, the positive pressure on the front-end area of streamlined head increases, and the negative pressure on the back-end area of streamlined head decreases. As a result, the aerodynamic drag of head car increases. The rainfall intensity has great influence on the aerodynamic drag coefficient of the head car of a train, while has little influence on the aerodynamic lift coefficient. Compared with the aerodynamic drag coefficient under no rain conditions, when the rainfall intensity is 100-500 mm·h-1, for the train speed of 200 km·h-1, the aerodynamic drag coefficient increases by 0.004 0-0.020 4, the aerodynamic drag increases by 85-432 N, and the increasing percentage is 2.64%-13.46%. For the train speed of 300 km·h-1, the aerodynamic drag coefficient increases by 0.002 7-0.013 7, the aerodynamic drag increases by 129-652 N, and the increasing percentage is 1.78%-9.05%. For the train speed of 400 km·h-1, the aerodynamic drag coefficient increases by 0.002 3-0.009 8, the aerodynamic drag increases by 195-829 N, and the increasing percentage is 1.52%-6.49%. Therefore, the aerodynamic drag coefficient increases with the rainfall intensity at different train speeds, and there is an approximately linear relationship between the coefficient and the rainfall intensity. Under the train speed of 300 km·h-1 and the raindrop intensity of 100 mm·h-1, when the raindrop diameter increases from 2 mm to 4 mm, the aerodynamic drag coefficient increases from 0.152 0 to 0.154 9, the aerodynamic drag increases by 138 N, and the increasing percentage is 1.91 %. Therefore the aerodynamic drag coefficient of a high-speed train increases with the increasing of raindrop diameter, and there is an approximately linear relationship between the coefficient and the raindrop diameter.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    BAKER C. The flow around high speed trains[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2010, 98(6/7): 277-298.
    [2]
    WANG Ming, LI Xiao-zhen, XIAO Jun, et al. An experimental analysis of the aerodynamic characteristics of a high-speed train on a bridge under crosswinds[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2018, 177: 92-100. doi: 10.1016/j.jweia.2018.03.021
    [3]
    WEINMAN K A, FRAGNER M, DEITERDING R, et al. Assessment of the mesh refinement influence on the computed flow-fields about a model train in comparison with wind tunnel measurements[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2018, 179: 102-117. doi: 10.1016/j.jweia.2018.05.005
    [4]
    YAN Nai-jie, CHEN Xin-zhong, LI Yong-le. Assessment of overturning risk of high-speed trains in strong crosswinds using spectral analysis approach[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2018, 174: 103-118. doi: 10.1016/j.jweia.2017.12.024
    [5]
    TIAN Hong-qi. Research progress in railway safety under strong wind condition in China[J]. Journal of Central South University (Science and Technology), 2010, 41(6): 2435-2443. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZNGD201006063.htm
    [6]
    YU Meng-ge, ZHANG Qian, LIU Jia-li, et al. Study on the operational safety evaluation of the high-speed train exposed to stochastic winds[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2018, 54(4): 245-254. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JXXB201804036.htm
    [7]
    BEZOS G M, DUNHAM R E, GENTRY G L, et al. Wind tunnel aerodynamic characteristics of a transport-type airfoil in a simulated heavy rain environment[R]. Washington DC: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 1992.
    [8]
    WU Zhen-long, CAO Yi-hua. Numerical simulation of flow over an airfoil in heavy rain via a two-way coupled Eulerian-Lagrangian approach[J]. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 2015, 69: 81-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2014.11.006
    [9]
    HUANG Sheng-hong, LI Qiu-sheng. Numerical simulations of wind-driven rain on building envelopes based on Eulerian multiphase model[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2010, 98: 843-857. doi: 10.1016/j.jweia.2010.08.003
    [10]
    REN Hong-peng. The mechanism research of rain-wind-induced vibration based on wind-rain two phase flow[D]. Tianjin: Tianjin University, 2012. (in Chinese).
    [11]
    FOROUSHANIS S M, GE Hua, NAYLOR D. Effects of roof overhangs on wind-driven rain wetting of a low-rise cubic building: a numerical study[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2014, 25: 8-51.
    [12]
    HUANG Cheng-tao, WANG Li-xin. Effects of rain and wind on aircraft flight safety[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2010, 31(4): 694-700. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HKXB201004008.htm
    [13]
    SI Tian-wen. The operational safety of subway trains on large steel truss arch bridge under cross wind and rain[D]. Chengdu: Southwest Jiaotong Universtiy, 2016. (in Chinese).
    [14]
    LI Jun-chan. Simulation of the action effect of wind-driven rain on high-speed moving passenger vehicle[D]. Changsha: Central South University, 2012. (in Chinese).
    [15]
    ZHANG Miao. Numerical simulation and analysis of high-speed train in multiphase flow based on Lagrangian-Eulerian scheme[D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang Universtiy, 2011. (in Chinese).
    [16]
    JING Jun-e, GAO Guang-jun. Simulation of the action effect of wind-drive rain on high-speed train[J]. Journal of Railway Science and Engineering, 2013, 10(3): 99-102. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CSTD201303019.htm
    [17]
    NI Shou-long. Study on the running safety of train under rain and sandstorm conditions[D]. Dalian: Dalian Jiaotong University, 2015. (in Chinese).
    [18]
    SHAO Xue-ming, WAN Jun, CHEN Da-wei, et al. Aerodynamic modeling and stability analysis of a high-speed train under strong rain and crosswind conditions[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University—Science A (Applied Physics and Engineering), 2011, 12(12): 964-970. doi: 10.1631/jzus.A11GT001
    [19]
    YUE Yu-fei, ZENG Qiu-lan, LI Zhen-shan, et al. Numerical simulating effects of rain-loaded wind on the aerodynamic characteristics and running stability of high-speed trains[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2016, 36(4): 943-950. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGSS201604011.htm
    [20]
    NESTOR D M. Influence of the crosswind and heavy rain on the flow around a high speed train[D]. Beijing: Beijing Jiaotong University, 2013. (in Chinese).
    [21]
    SUN Zi-bao, DU Li-ming. Influence of rainfall on aerodynamic characteristics of high speed trains based on Gamma rainfall spectrum[J]. Journal of Dalian Jiaotong University, 2018, 39(6): 24-29. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DLTD201806006.htm
    [22]
    LI Tian, ZHANG Ji-ye, RASHIDI M, et al. On the Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes modelling of the flow around a simplified train in crosswinds[J]. Journal of Applied Fluid Mechanics, 2019, 12(2): 551-563. doi: 10.29252/jafm.12.02.28958
    [23]
    WANG Zheng, LI Tian, ZHANG Ji-ye. Research on aerodynamic performance of high-speed train subjected to different types of crosswind[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2018, 54(4): 203-211. (in Chinese).
    [24]
    COHAN A C, ARASTOOPOUR H. Numerical simulation and analysis of the effect of rain and surface property on wind-turbine airfoil performance[J]. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 2016, 81: 46-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2016.01.006
    [25]
    MORSI S A, ALEXANDER A J. An investigation of particle trajectories in two-phase flow systems[J]. Journal of Fluids Mechanics, 1972, 55(2): 193-208. doi: 10.1017/S0022112072001806
    [26]
    BEST A C. The size distribution of raindrops[J]. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 1950, 76(327): 16-36. doi: 10.1002/qj.49707632704
    [27]
    MARKOWITZ A H. Raindrop size distribution expressions[J]. Journal of Applied Meteorology, 1976, 15(9): 1029-1031. doi: 10.1175/1520-0450(1976)015<1029:RSDE>2.0.CO;2
    [28]
    ELGHOBASHI S. On predicting particle-laden turbulent flows[J]. Applied Scientific Research, 1994, 52(4): 309-329.
    [29]
    CHOI E C C. Wind-drive rain and driving rain coefficient during thunderstorms and non-thunderstorms[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2001, 89(3): 293-308.
    [30]
    ZHANG Zai-zhong, ZHOU Dan. Wind tunnel experiment on aerodynamic characteristic of streamline head of high speed train with different head shapes[J]. Journal of Central South University (Science and Technology), 2013, 44(6): 2603-2608. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZNGD201306058.htm

Catalog

    Article Metrics

    Article views (1143) PDF downloads(534) Cited by()
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return