YUAN Yu-peng, WANG Kang-yu, YIN Qi-zhi, YAN Xin-ping. Review on ship speed optimization[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2020, 20(6): 18-34. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2020.06.002
Citation: YUAN Yu-peng, WANG Kang-yu, YIN Qi-zhi, YAN Xin-ping. Review on ship speed optimization[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2020, 20(6): 18-34. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2020.06.002

Review on ship speed optimization

doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2020.06.002
Funds:

National Natural Science Foundation of China 51809202

More Information
  • Author Bio:

    YUAN Yu-peng (1980-), male, associate professor, PhD, ypyuan@whut.edu.cn

    YAN Xin-ping (1959-), male, professor, PhD, academician of Chinese academy of engineering, xpyan@whut.edu.cn

  • Received Date: 2020-07-26
  • Publish Date: 2020-06-25
  • The status of ship speed optimization research in domestic and overseas, including ship speed optimization models, fuel consumption prediction methods, solutions of ship speed optimization models, and ship energy efficiency management systems, were summarized and analyzed. The existing problems in speed optimization research were discussed, and suggestions were made to solve these problems. Analysis result shows that, under the condition in which the shipping market continues to be depressed, economic navigation will be used more widely, and research on speed optimization will remain of great significance.In terms of speed optimization models, most speed optimization models are established with carbon emission policy, influence of uncertain factors, emission control area(ECA) policy and fleet scheduling as a single optimization objective. The main optimization objectives of speed optimization models are to minimize the cost and maximize the profit. Speed should be combined with route, trim and fleet deployment optimization, and a model of speed optimization should be established considering various uncertain factors and optimization objectives in the future.In terms of fuel consumption prediction model, prediction models are mainly divided into white box, black box, and gray box models. The white box model is better in terms of model interpretability, the black box model offers better prediction performance, and the gray box model compensates for the disadvantages of the white box model and the black box model and will become the focus of future research.Data learning should be based on accurate ship data and advanced artificial intelligence algorithms to improve the prediction accuracy of fuel consumption prediction model.In terms of optimization algorithm, due to the complexity of speed optimization model, heuristic algorithm is mostly used for optimization solution. This algorithm can reduce the optimization solution time and improve the solution quality. More accurate and efficient solution algorithms need to be explored in the future.In terms of optimization strategy, the use of big data analysis can identify the influence of weather on navigation, and the use of dynamic optimization strategies can compensate for disturbances caused by environmental factors, enabling further improvement in the energy efficiency of ships.In terms of ship energy efficiency management system, the ship energy efficiency management system mainly includes navigation data acquisition, data transmission, data storage, data analysis and intelligent decision making, it has not been applied on a large scale on ships as its high cost.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    UNCTAD. Review of maritime transport 2020[R]. New York: UNCTAD, 2020.
    [2]
    SHARMINA M, MCGLADE C, GILBERT P, et al. Global energy scenarios and their implications for future shipped trade[J]. Marine Policy, 2017, 84(1): 12-21.
    [3]
    IMO. Fourth IMO GHG study 2020-final report note by the secretariat[R]. London: IMO, 2020.
    [4]
    IMO. Understanding CO2 emissions and challenges in assessing the operational efficiency for ships[R]. London: IMO, 2018.
    [5]
    GOLIAS M M, SAHARIDIS G K, BOILE M, et al. The berth allocation problem: optimizing vessel arrival time[J]. Maritime Economics and Logistics, 2009, 11(4): 358-377. doi: 10.1057/mel.2009.12
    [6]
    FABER J, NELISSEN D, HON G, et al. Regulated slow steaming in maritime transport: an assessment of options[R]. Delft: CE Delft, 2012.
    [7]
    CHANG C C, CHANG C H. Energy conservation for international dry bulk carriers via vessel speed reduction[J]. Energy Policy, 2013, 59: 710-715. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.04.025
    [8]
    CORBETT J J, WANG Hai-feng, WINEBRAKE J J. The effectiveness and costs of speed reductions on emissions from international shipping[J]. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2009, 14(8): 593-598. doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2009.08.005
    [9]
    CHANG C C, WANG C M. Evaluating the effects of speed reduce for shipping costs and CO2 emission[J]. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2014, 31: 110-115. doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2014.05.020
    [10]
    PSARAFTIS H N, KONTOVAS C A. Ship speed optimization: concepts, models and combined speed-routing scenarios[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies. 2014, 44: 52-69.
    [11]
    WEN M, PACINO D, KONTOVAS C A, et al. A multiple ship routing and speed optimization problem under time, cost and environmental objectives[J]. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2017, 52: 303-321. doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2017.03.009
    [12]
    YU Bin, PENG Zi-xuan, TIAN Zhi-hui. et al. Sailing speed optimization for tramp ships with fuzzy time window[J]. Flexble Services and Manufacturing Journal, 2019, 31(2): 308-330. doi: 10.1007/s10696-017-9296-4
    [13]
    WANG Chuan-xu, XU Chang-yan. Sailing speed optimization in voyage chartering ship considering different carbon emissions taxation[J]. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 2015, 89(SI): 108-115.
    [14]
    LAN Xian-gang, ZUO Xiao-de, TANG Xia. The impact of different carbon emission policies on liner shipping[J]. Journal of Marine Sciences, 2020, 2020: 8956045-1-12.
    [15]
    XING Yu-wei, YANG Hua-long, MA Xue-fei, et al. Optimization of ship speed and fleet deployment under carbon emissions policies for container shipping[J]. Transport, 2019, 34(2): 260-274.
    [16]
    DING Wen-yi, WANG Yu-bing, DAI Lei, et al. Does a carbon tax affect the feasibility of arctic shipping?[J]. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. 2020, 80: 102257-1-15.
    [17]
    KOSMAS V, ACCIARO M. Bunker levy schemes for green house gas (GHG) emission reduction in international shipping[J]. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2017, 57: 195-206. doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2017.09.010
    [18]
    QI Xiang-tong, SONG Dong-Ping. Minimizing fuel emissions by optimizing vessel schedules in liner shipping with uncertain port times[J]. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 2012, 48(4): 863-880. doi: 10.1016/j.tre.2012.02.001
    [19]
    AYDIN N, LEE H, MANSOURIB S A. Speed optimization and bunkering in liner shipping in the presence of uncertain service times and time windows at ports[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2017, 259(1): 143-154. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2016.10.002
    [20]
    SHENG Xiao-ming, CHEW E P, LEE L H. (s, S) policy model for liner shipping refueling and sailing speed optimization problem[J]. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 2015, 76: 76-92. doi: 10.1016/j.tre.2014.12.001
    [21]
    WANG Ya-dong, MENG Qiang, KUANG Hai-bo. Jointly optimizing ship sailing speed and bunker purchase in liner shipping with distribution-free stochastic bunker prices[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2018, 89: 35-52. doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2018.01.020
    [22]
    HOU Yuan-hang, KANG Kai, LIANG Xiao. Vessel speed optimization for minimum EEOI in ice zone considering uncertainty[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2019, 188: 106240-1-9.
    [23]
    FAGERHOLT K, GAUSEL N T, RAKKE J G, et al. Maritime routing and speed optimization with emission control areas[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2015, 52: 57-73. doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2014.12.010
    [24]
    FAGERHOLT K, PSARAFTIS H N. On two speed optimization problems for ships that sail in and out of emission control areas[J]. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2015, 39: 56-64. doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2015.06.005
    [25]
    ZHEN Lu, HU Zhuang, YAN Ran, et al. Route and speed optimization for liner ships under emission control policies[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2020, 110: 330-345. doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2019.11.004
    [26]
    SHENG Dian, MENG Qiang, LI Zhi-Chun. Optimal vessel speed and fleet size for industrial shipping services under the emission control area regulation[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2019, 105: 37-53. doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2019.05.038
    [27]
    PSARAFTIS H N, KONTOVAS C A. Balancing the economic and environmental performance of maritime transportation[J]. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2010, 15(8): 458-462. doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2010.05.001
    [28]
    RONEN D. The effect of oil price on containership speed and fleet size[J]. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 2011, 62(1): 211-216. doi: 10.1057/jors.2009.169
    [29]
    WANG S, MENG Q. Sailing speed optimization for container ships in a liner shipping network[J]. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 2012, 48(3): 701-714. doi: 10.1016/j.tre.2011.12.003
    [30]
    CEPEDA M A F, ASSIS L F, MARUJO L G, et al. Effects of slow steaming strategies on a ship fleet[J]. Marine Systems and Ocean Technology, 2017, 12(3): 178-186. doi: 10.1007/s40868-017-0033-3
    [31]
    WANG Kai, LI Jia-yuan, YAN Xin-ping, et al. A novel bi-level distributed dynamic optimization method of ship fleets energy consumption[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2020, 197: 106802-1-13.
    [32]
    刘志全. 航速损失最小的船舶减摇控制策略研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工程大学, 2015.

    LIU Zhi-quan. Study on the roll stabilization control method with speed loss minimization[D]. Harbin: Harbin Engineering University, 2015. (in Chinese).
    [33]
    金鸿章, 刘志全, 姜述强. 船舶横摇运动姿态与波浪增阻的关系研究[J]. 应用科学学报, 2013, 31(3): 309-314. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0255-8297.2013.03.014

    JIN Hong-zhang, LIU Zhi-quan, JIANG Shu-qiang. Relationship between ship roll attitude and added resistance[J]. Journal of Applied Science-Electronics Information Engineering, 2013, 31(3): 309-314. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0255-8297.2013.03.014
    [34]
    CHEN C, SHIOTANI S, SASA K. Numerical ship navigation based on weather and ocean simulation[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2013, 69: 44-53. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2013.05.019
    [35]
    SUN Xing, YAN Xin-ping, WU Bing, et at. Analysis of the operational energy efficiency for inland river ships[J]. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2013, 22: 34-39. doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2013.03.002
    [36]
    孙星, 严新平, 尹奇志, 等. 考虑通航环境要素的内河船舶主机营运能效模型[J]. 武汉理工大学学报(交通科学与工程版), 2015, 39(2): 264-267. doi: 10.3963/j.issn.2095-3844.2015.02.008

    SUN Xing, YAN Xin-ping, YIN Qi-zhi, et al. Modeling of main engine operational energy efficiency for an inland waterway ship with the consideration of navigation environment[J]. Journal of Wuhan University of Technology (Transportation Science and Engineering), 2015, 39(2): 264-267. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3963/j.issn.2095-3844.2015.02.008
    [37]
    范爱龙, 严新平, 尹奇志, 等. 船舶主机能效模型[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2015, 15(4): 69-76. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2015.04.009

    FAN Ai-long, YAN Xin-ping, YIN Qi-zhi, et al. Energy efficiency model of marine main engine[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2015, 15(4): 69-76. (in Chinese). doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2015.04.009
    [38]
    HOLTROP J, MENMEN G G J. An approximate power prediction method[J]. International Shipbuilding Progress, 1982, 29(7): 166-170.
    [39]
    KWON Y. Speed loss due to added resistance in wind and waves[J]. Naval Architect, 2008(3): 14-16.
    [40]
    YANG Li-qian, CHEN Gang, ZHAO Jin-lou, et al. Ship speed optimization considering ocean currents to enhance environmental sustainability in maritime shipping[J]. Sustainability, 2020, 12(9): 3649-1-24.
    [41]
    LU Rui-hua, TURAN O, BOULOUGOURIS E, et al. A semi-empirical ship operational performance prediction model for voyage optimization towards energy efficient shipping[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2015, 110(SI): 18-28.
    [42]
    LI Xiao-he, SUN Bao-zhi, GUO Chun-yu, et al. Speed optimization of a container ship on a given route considering voluntary speed loss and emissions[J]. Applied Ocean Research, 2020, 94: 101995-1-10.
    [43]
    YAN Xin-ping, SUN Xing, YIN Qi-zhi. Multiparameter sensitivity analysis of operational energy efficiency for inland river ships based on backpropagation neural network method[J]. Marine Technology Society Journal, 2015, 49(1): 148-153. doi: 10.4031/MTSJ.49.1.5
    [44]
    SUN Chao, WANG Hai-yan, LIU Chao, et al. Dynamic prediction and optimization of energy efficiency operational index (EEOI) for an operating ship in varying environments[J]. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 2019, 7(11): 402-1-15.
    [45]
    ZHANG Chi, ZHANG Di, ZHANG Ming-yang, et al. Data-driven ship energy efficiency analysis and optimization model for route planning in ice-covered Arctic waters[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2019, 186: 106071-1-12.
    [46]
    孙星. 考虑通航环境要素的内河船舶营运能效研究[D]. 武汉: 武汉理工大学, 2015.

    SUN Xing. Research on operational energy efficiency for inland river ships with involvement of navigation environment[D]. Wuhan: Wuhan University of Technology, 2015. (in Chinese).
    [47]
    WANG Sheng-zheng, JI Bao-xian, ZHAO Jian-sen, et al. Predicting ship fuel consumption based on LASSO regression[J]. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2018, 65: 817-824. doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2017.09.014
    [48]
    GKEREKOS C, LAZAKIS I, THEOTOKATOS G. Machine learning models for predicting ship main engine fuel oil consumption: a comparative study[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2019, 188: 106288-1-14.
    [49]
    牟小辉, 袁裕鹏, 严新平, 等. 基于随机森林算法的内河船舶油耗预测模型[J]. 交通信息与安全, 2017, 35(4): 100-105. doi: 10.3963/j.issn.1674-4861.2017.04.013

    MOU Xiao-hui, YUAN Yu-peng, YAN Xin-ping, et al. A prediction model of fuel consumption for inland ships based on random forest algorithm[J]. Journal of Transport Information and Safety, 2017, 35(4): 100-105. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3963/j.issn.1674-4861.2017.04.013
    [50]
    FARAG Y B A, ÖLÇER A I. The development of a ship performance model in varying operating conditions based on ANN and regression techniques[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2020, 198: 106972-1-12.
    [51]
    王胜正, 申心泉, 赵建森, 等. 基于ASAE深度学习预测海洋气象对船舶航速的影响[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2018, 18(2): 139-147. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1637.2018.02.015

    WANG Sheng-zheng, SHEN Xin-quan, ZHAO Jian-sen, et al. Prediction of marine meteorological effect on ship speed based on ASAE deep learning[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2018, 18(2): 139-147. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1637.2018.02.015
    [52]
    CORADDU A, ONETO L, BALDI F, et al. Vessels fuel consumption forecast and trim optimisation: a data analytics perspective[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2017, 130: 351-370. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2016.11.058
    [53]
    MENG Qiang, DU Yu-quan, WANG Ya-dong. Shipping log data based container ship fuel efficiency modeling[J]. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 2016, 83: 207-229. doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2015.11.007
    [54]
    YANG Li-qiang, CHEN Gang, RYTTER N G M, et al. A genetic algorithm-based grey-box model for ship fuel consumption prediction towards sustainable shipping[J]. Annals of Operations Research, 2019, DOI:https:∥doi.org/ 10.1007/s10479-019-03183-5.
    [55]
    姚雪蕾, 袁成清, 赵相宽, 等. 基于CFD的粗糙度及污损附着对船舶阻力的影响[J]. 表面技术, 2017, 46(6): 27-34. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BMJS201706005.htm

    YAO Xue-lei, YUAN Cheng-qing, ZHAO Xiang-kuan, et al. Effect of surface roughness and fouling on ship resistance based on cfd analysis[J]. Surface Technology, 2017, 46(6): 27-34. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BMJS201706005.htm
    [56]
    FAGERHOLT K, LAPORTE G, NORSTAD I. Reducing fuel emissions by optimizing speed on shipping routes[J]. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 2010, 61(3): 523-529. doi: 10.1057/jors.2009.77
    [57]
    NORSTAD I, FAGERHOLTA K, LAPORTE G. Tramp ship routing and scheduling with speed optimization[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2011, 19(5): 853-865. doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2010.05.001
    [58]
    HE Qie, ZHANG Xiao-chen, NIP K. Speed optimization over a path with heterogeneous arc costs[J]. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 2017, 104: 198-214. doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2017.07.004
    [59]
    WEN M, ROPKE S, PETERSEN H L, et al. Full-shipload tramp ship routing and scheduling with variable speeds[J]. Computers and Operations Research, 2016, 70: 1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cor.2015.10.002
    [60]
    ANDERSSON H, FAGERHOLT K, HOBBESLAND K. Integrated maritime fleet deployment and speed optimization: Case study from RoRo shipping[J]. Computers and Operations Research, 2015, 55: 233-240. doi: 10.1016/j.cor.2014.03.017
    [61]
    WANG Kai, YAN Xin-ping, YUAN Yu-peng, et al. Optimizing ship energy efficiency: application of particle swarm optimization algorithm[J]. Journal of Engineering for the Maritime Environment, 2018, 232(4): 379-391.
    [62]
    ZHEN Lu, LI Miao, HU Zhuang, et al. The effects of emission control area regulations on cruise shipping[J]. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2018, 62: 47-63. doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2018.02.005
    [63]
    MA Dong-fang, MA Wei-hao, JIN Sheng, et al. Method for simultaneously optimizing ship route and speed with emission control areas[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2020, 202: 107170-1-10.
    [64]
    WANG Kai, YAN Xin-ping, YUAN Yu-peng, et al. Real-time optimization of ship energy efficiency based on the prediction technology of working condition[J]. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2016, 46: 81-93. doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2016.03.014
    [65]
    WANG Kai, YAN Xin-ping, YUAN Yu-peng, et al. Dynamic optimization of ship energy efficiency considering time-varying environmental factors[J]. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2018, 62: 685-698. doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2018.04.005
    [66]
    DU Yu-quan, MENG Qiang, WANG Shuai-an, et al. Two-phase optimal solutions for ship speed and trim optimization over a voyage using voyage report data[J]. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 2019, 122: 88-114. doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2019.02.004
    [67]
    YAN Xin-ping, WANG Kai, YUAN Yu-peng, et al. Energy-efficient shipping: an application of big data analysis for optimizing engine speed of inland ships considering multiple environmental factors[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2018, 169: 457-468. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2018.08.050
    [68]
    LEE H, AYDIN N, CHOI Y, et al. A decision support system for vessel speed decision in maritime logistics using weather archive big data[J]. Computers and Operations Research, 2018, 98: 330-342. doi: 10.1016/j.cor.2017.06.005
    [69]
    European Commission. Regulation (EU) 2015/757 of the European parliament and of the council on the monitoring, reporting and verification of carbon dioxide emissions from maritime transport, and amending directive 2009/16/EC[R]. Brussels: European Commission, 2015.
    [70]
    IMO. Report of the marine environment protection committee on its 70th session[R]. London: IMO, 2016.
    [71]
    ACOMI N, ACOMI O C, STANCA C. The use of ECDIS equipment to achieve an optimum value for energy efficiency operation index[C]//IOP. 3rd International Conference on Modern Technologies in Industrial Engineering. Bristol: IOP, 2015: 12071-1-7.
    [72]
    马东芝, 严新平, 赵江滨, 等. 船舶能效信息采集与远程传输系统设计[J]. 交通信息与安全, 2014, 32(4): 92-96. doi: 10.3963/j.issn.1674-4861.2014.04.017

    MA Dong-zhi, YAN Xin-ping, ZHAO Jiang-bin, et al. Remote acquisition and transmission system of vessel energy efficiency information[J]. Journal of Transport Information and Safety, 2014, 32(4): 92-96. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3963/j.issn.1674-4861.2014.04.017
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (2818) PDF downloads(451) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return