Processing math: 100%
ZHOU Jia-liang, CHEN Bao-chun, MA Xi-lun, LUO Lu-lu, HUANG Qing-wei, SU Jia-zhan. Shear performance of ultra-high performance concrete deep beams[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2020, 20(6): 117-125. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2020.06.010
Citation: ZHOU Jia-liang, CHEN Bao-chun, MA Xi-lun, LUO Lu-lu, HUANG Qing-wei, SU Jia-zhan. Shear performance of ultra-high performance concrete deep beams[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2020, 20(6): 117-125. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2020.06.010

Shear performance of ultra-high performance concrete deep beams

doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2020.06.010
Funds:

National Key Research and Develo pment Program of China 2018YFC0705400

National Natural Science Foundation of China 51878178

Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province 2018J01772

More Information
  • Author Bio:

    ZHOU Jia-liang(1990-), male, doctoral student, 535453620@qq.com

    CHEN Bao-chun(1958-), male, professor, PhD, baochunchen@fzu.edu.cn

  • Received Date: 2020-07-16
  • Publish Date: 2020-06-25
  • To promote the application of ultra-high performance concrete(UHPC) deep beams, shear performance tests were conducted on four UHPC deep beams by taking the concrete strength as the main parameter, and the C40 and C80 concrete deep beams were tested for comparison. The load-deflection curves, failure modes, reinforcement strains, crack patterns and ultimate loads of UHPC deep beams were analyzed. The method specified in the Code for Design of Concrete Structures(GB 50010—2010) was used to determine the shear strengths of six deep beam specimens, to discuss whether the current method for calculating the shear capacity of ordinary concrete deep beams is applicable to UHPC deep beams. Research result shows that the greater the concrete strength is, the greater the stiffness of the deep beam under the same load is. The stiffness of UHPC specimen in its elastic stage before the cracking increases slightly with the increase of steel fiber content. Similar to the C40 and C80 concrete deep beams, the UHPC deep beams exhibit bending-shear and web-shear cracks. When the load reaches 13%-22% and 18%-34% of the ultimate load, the two types of cracks appear successively. Beam and arch stress mechanisms are both present during the loading of UHPC deep beams. The beam stress mechanism dominates the early phases of loading process, whereas the arch stress mechanism dominates the latter stages of this process. The UHPC deep beams exhibit a large number of densely and concentrated cracks and undergo shear-compression failure, without showing any cracks in the inverted arch area above their supports. In contrast, the C40 and C80 concrete deep beams undergo diagonal compression failure, and cracks appear in the inverted arch area above their supports. The shear bearing capacity of test beam increases in an approximately exponential manner with the increase of concrete strength. When the concrete strength increases from C40 to C80 and C190, the shear bearing capacity increase by 30.76% and 201.92%, respectively. When using the method specified in the Code for Design of Concrete Structures(GB 50010—2010) to calculate the shear bearing capacities of UHPC deep beams, the calculated and experimental shear bearing capacities show an average ratio of 0.89 and a mean squared error of 0.15. Therefore, this method can be temporally used to calculate the shear bearing capacity of UHPC deep beams, until a more accurate calculation method is available.

     

  • FullText

    Disclaimer: The English version of this article is automatically generated by Baidu Translation and only for reference. We therefore are not responsible for its reasonableness, correctness and completeness, and will not bear any commercial and legal responsibilities for the relevant consequences arising from the English translation.

    Ultra High Performance Concrete (UHPC) has ultra-high compressive strength, certain tensile strength, and good durability, and has great application prospects in civil engineering structures. A large amount of research on the stress performance of UHPC structures has been carried out[1-4]In terms of the shear performance of beams, previous research has mainly focused on UHPC short beams and shallow beams[5, 6-12]Some UHPC structural design specifications or guidelines, such as France (AFGC 2013), Switzerland (SIA 2052), Japan (JSCE 2006), etc., have provided relevant design calculation methods[13-14].

    Deep beams have a wide range of applications in engineering, such as shear wall bottom conversion beams, basement wall foundation beams, and transverse diaphragm beams in bridge structures. Extensive research has been conducted on the shear performance of ordinary concrete and high-performance concrete deep beams[15-22]With the continuous deepening of research and application of UHPC structures[23]Recently, people have begun to pay attention to the application of UHPC in deep beams, and corresponding research has also begun on its shear performance. Aziz et al[24]Shear performance tests were conducted on 9 UHPC deep beams, 3 C40 concrete deep beams, and 3 C60 concrete deep beams. The results showed that the concrete strength and shear span ratio had a significant impact on the shear bearing capacity of the beams. When the concrete strength changed from C40 to C60 and C140, the shear bearing capacity of the beams increased by 40% and 150%, respectively. The shear span ratio had a more significant impact on the shear diagonal cracks of the beams than on the bending cracks; Fahmi et al[25]By changing the shear span ratio and silica fume content, shear performance tests were conducted on 7 UHPC beams. The results showed that the shear span ratio not only affects the shear bearing capacity of the beams, but also the failure mode of the beams. When the shear span ratio exceeds 1.75, the beams will undergo bending failure. The increase in silica fume content is beneficial for the accumulation of UHPC matrix particles and improves the microstructure of the matrix, thereby increasing the shear bearing capacity of the beams; Muhaison et al[26]Shear performance tests were conducted on six UHPC deep beams with different steel fiber contents and hole sizes using monotonic and repetitive loading methods. The results showed that under monotonic and repetitive loading, there was little difference in the ultimate load of different types of deep beams, and the influence of steel fibers on the shear strength of beams was significant. Under repetitive loading, the ultimate load of 1% steel fiber perforated deep beams was 2.27 times smaller than that of un perforated deep beams.

    Figure  1.  Details of deep beam specimen (unit: mm)

    Cement is made of P O 42.5 cement; SiO in silica fume2The content is greater than 90%, and the specific surface area is 1.89 × 104m2·kg-1Fine sand particle size not exceeding 0.63 mm, with an average density of 2600 kg · m-3The water reduction rate of CX-8 polycarboxylate superplasticizer is over 25%; Adopting straight drawn SSF ultra strong steel fibers, with a nominal diameter of about 0.2 mm, a nominal length of about 13.0 mm, a length to diameter ratio of about 65.0, an elastic modulus of 200 GPa, and a tensile strength of 2200~2350 MPa.

    Table  1.  Mix proportion of UHPC
    材料 水泥 硅灰 石英砂 石英粉400目 减水剂 钢纤维/%
    40~70目 20~40目 10~20目
    配合比 1.00 0.30 0.14 0.41 0.53 0.09 0.03 0.21 0.5~3
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Table  2.  Mechanical properties of UHPC
    试件编号 v/% fc/MPa fu/MPa ft/MPa E/GPa fs/MPa
    L1-1 0.5 113.4 132.3 6.18 44.9 14.1
    L1-2 1.0 125.6 145.5 7.19 45.6 15.1
    L1-3 2.0 151.4 175.2 9.54 46.2 19.5
    L1-4 3.0 173.6 198.6 13.56 47.9 26.6
    L2-1 0.0 46.9 53.3 3.24 38.5 7.4
    L2-2 0.0 86.5 98.3 4.23 41.7 9.8
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    The deep beam is loaded using a 10 MN electro-hydraulic servo long column pressure testing machine. The jack is lifted upwards from the bottom of the specimen, and a 100 mm × 150 mm × 90 mm steel pad is used to load the component through a steel reaction frame. The loading device is as follows:Figure 1As shown. Pre loading was carried out before formal loading to eliminate inelastic strain and to inspect the loading equipment. The preloading shall not exceed 5% of the calculated bearing capacity of the test beam.

    During the formal test, graded loading is used, with each level of load holding for 3-5 minutes. Load 20 kN per level before the specimen cracks. After the occurrence of abdominal shear cracks, load 50 kN per level. When the load reaches 80% of the ultimate load, load with displacement control.

    In the experiment, the DH3816 static strain testing system was used to automatically collect the vertical displacement, concrete strain, and steel bar strain in the middle of the mid span and shear span sections. The strain of concrete includes the strain distributed along the inclined section of the shear compression zone and the height direction of the section, while the strain of steel bars includes the strain of longitudinal bars, horizontal web bars, and stirrups.

    Figure  2.  Layout of measuring points
    Figure  3.  Load to mid-span deflection curves of specimens
    Figure  4.  Cracks in specimens at failure

    For UHPC deep beams, when the load is 13% to 22% of the ultimate load, bending shear cracks first occur, and when the load reaches 18% to 34% of the ultimate load, belly shear diagonal cracks occur. For L1-1 and L1-2 beams with low steel fiber content, after the occurrence of diagonal cracks in the belly shear, the stiffness is weakened to a certain extent and the curve shows nonlinearity. However, for L1-3 and L1-4 beams with high steel fiber content, The tensile strength of UHPC is relatively high, and the bridging effect of steel fibers is obvious. Cracking has little effect on the stiffness of the beam, and the load deflection curve at mid span still develops approximately in a straight line. Subsequently, as the load increases, the bending shear crack extends upward from the bottom of the beam, and the web shear diagonal crack extends from the middle of the line connecting the loading point and the support to both ends. When the Type 2 crack extends to a depth of 100 mm below the loading point, the load reaches about 80% of the ultimate load, and the structural stiffness further decreases. When the ultimate load is reached, the widest diagonal crack develops into the main diagonal crack, the longitudinal reinforcement yields, the concrete in the shear compression zone reaches compressive strength, and the deep beam undergoes shear compression failure.

    For C40 and C80 concrete deep beams, when the load reaches 15% to 16% of the ultimate load, the first bending shear crack appears, but the development of the bending shear crack is not obvious. When the load reaches 43% to 49% of the ultimate load, diagonal shear cracks will occur. After the occurrence of diagonal cracks in the belly shear, the stiffness of the beam weakened significantly, and the curve showed a noticeable turning point. Subsequently, as the load increased, the diagonal cracks in the belly shear developed rapidly towards the loading point and the support. Finally, without yielding the longitudinal bars, the concrete in the compression zone was crushed and the specimen suffered from oblique compression failure. Due to the small diameter of the rollers on the supports, concrete cracking and peeling occurred at the supports of C40 and C80 concrete deep beams during the testFigure 4The main reason for the uneven deflection of the load span of L2-1 and L2-2 beams.

    By substituting equation (2) into equation (1) and organizing it, we can obtain

    Figure  5.  Shear transfer for each type of stress mechanism in beam

    For shallow beams, the force mechanism of the beam dominates, and the influence of the arch force mechanism can generally be ignored. For deep beams, the arch force mechanism dominates, so its influence cannot be ignored. Research has shown that shallow beams[27]Short beams[33]Generally, the assumption of a flat section is satisfied, while deep beams do not meet the assumption of a flat section, mainly due to the influence of the arch's stress mechanism.

    Figure  6.  Load-hoop strain curves of specimen L1-3
    Figure  7.  Forces of free body of deep beam

    InsulatorBCEDSimilar to applying a pair of prestress, the deep beamABCWhen the load is large, the concrete at a distance from the pressure line will experience tensile stress. When the tensile stress is greater than the ultimate tensile strength of the concrete, a reverse arch phenomenon will occurFigure 4 (e)(f)The cracks shown in. For four UHPC deep beams (L1-1~L1-4), Due to its high tensile strength, there were no tensile cracks present here.

    The ultimate load of all specimens and the incremental shear bearing capacity based on the L2-1 specimen are as follows:Table 3As shown.

    Table  3.  Results of shear bearing capacity tests on deep beams
    试验梁 fu/kN 受剪承载力Ve/kN 增量/% 破坏形态
    L2-1 53.3 466.07 斜压破坏
    L2-2 98.3 609.42 30.76 斜压破坏
    L1-1 132.3 873.31 87.38 剪压破坏
    L1-2 145.5 1 089.40 133.74 剪压破坏
    L1-3 175.2 1 356.96 191.15 剪压破坏
    L1-4 198.6 1 407.18 201.92 剪压破坏
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Figure  8.  Relationship curves between shear bearing capacity and concrete strength in deep beam

    According to the analysis in section 2.2, UHPC deep beams, like C40 and C80 concrete deep beams, have arch and beam effects when subjected to shear, so a tension compression bar model can be used for calculation. The calculation of shear bearing capacity of concrete deep beams in the "Code for Design of Concrete Structures" (GB 50010-2010) is based on the truss arch model and the span to height ratiol0/h(l0Calculate the span length for the beam,hTaking the beam height as a variable, the tension compression rod model of the deep beam is regarded as an extension of the shallow beam truss arch model, and the calculation method for the shear bearing capacity of shallow beams and deeply bent members is unified.

    The calculation of the shear bearing capacity of ordinary concrete deep beams in the "Code for Design of Concrete Structures" (GB 50010-2010) is based on the shear compression failure of specimens. The test results of UHPC deep beams in this paper are also shear compression failure. Therefore, it is feasible to refer to the calculation formula of the shear bearing capacity of ordinary concrete deep beams for the calculation of UHPC deep beams. The specific calculation formula is

    Ve1.75ftbh0λ+1+l0/h-23fvAvh0sh+5-l0/h6fhAhh0sv(4)

    In the formula:λCalculate the shear span ratio for the beam, whenl0/h< At 2 o'clock, takel0/h=2, λTaking 0.25, in order to prevent instability of the beam, the specifications have set it separatelyλThe upper and lower limits are 0.92l0/h-1.58 and 0.42l0/h-0.58, which means the span to height ratio range of deep beams is 1.38 ≤l0/h≤1.72;bThe width of the beam section;fvandfhThe design values of tensile strength for hoop reinforcement and web reinforcement respectively;AvandAhThe cross-sectional areas of the hoop reinforcement and web reinforcement are respectively;svandshThey are the spacing between the hoop reinforcement and the horizontal web reinforcement.

    Substituting the parameters of 6 deep beam specimens into equation (4), the average ratio of the calculated shear bearing capacity of UHPC deep beams to the experimental value is 0.89, with a mean square error of 0.15. Equation (4) is the design formula, whereftThe measured uniaxial tensile strength of concrete is used in the calculation of experimental beams. FromFigure 8It can be seen that the calculation results in the "Code for Design of Concrete Structures" (GB 50010-2010) also show an exponential growth relationship with concrete strength, similar to the experimental law, and most of the calculation results are smaller than the experimental values. Therefore, until a more accurate calculation method is available, it can be temporarily used for the shear bearing capacity calculation of UHPC deep beams.

    (2) During the entire stress process of UHPC deep beams, both beam and arch stress mechanisms coexist. When the load is less than 50%~70% of the ultimate load, the beam stress mechanism plays a dominant role, and then the arch stress mechanism plays a dominant role, and some stirrups in the shear span section change from tension to compression. Compared with C40 and C80 concrete deep beams, The cracks in UHPC deep beams are numerous and dense.

    (3) The shear bearing capacity of the test beam calculated using the method in the "Code for Design of Concrete Structures" (GB 50010-2010) is similar to the experimental value, and most of the calculated results are smaller than the experimental value. Therefore, until a more accurate calculation method is available, it can be temporarily used for the shear bearing capacity calculation of UHPC deep beams.

    (4) Due to the limited number of specimens in this article, The precise algorithm for the shear bearing capacity of UHPC deep beams still needs further development. At the same time, for the L1-4 beam with the highest concrete strength (198.6 MPa), the calculated value in the "Code for Design of Concrete Structures" (GB 50010-2010) is significantly higher than the experimental value, and the reasons for this need further research. Therefore, a thorough analysis of the shear stress mechanism of UHPC shallow beams, short beams, and deep beams, and the construction of compatible and continuous calculation formulas by considering various factors, are also the next steps that need to be studied.

  • [1]
    LARRARD F D, SEDRAN T. Optimization of ultra high performance concrete by the use of a packing model[J]. Cement and Concrete Research, 1994, 24(6): 997-1009. doi: 10.1016/0008-8846(94)90022-1
    [2]
    SHI Cai-jun, WU Ze-mei, XIAO Jian-fan, et al. A review on ultra high performance concrete: part Ⅰ. Raw materials and mixture design[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2015, 101: 741-751. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.10.088
    [3]
    XUE Jun-qing, BRISEGHELLA B, HUANG Fu-yun, et al. Review of ultra-high performance concrete and its application in bridge engineering[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2020, 260: 119844-1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119844
    [4]
    CHEN Bao-chun, JI Tao, HUANG Qing-wei, et al. Review of research on ultra-high performance concrete[J]. Journal of Architecture and Civil Engineering, 2014, 31(3): 1-24. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-2049.2014.03.002
    [5]
    MA Xi-lun, CHEN Bao-chun, YANG Yan, et al. Calculation method of shear bearing capacity of R-UHPC beam[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2017, 17(5): 16-26. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1637.2017.05.002
    [6]
    LIM W Y, HONG S G. Shear tests for ultra-high performance fiber reinforced concrete (UHPFRC) beams with shear reinforcement[J]. International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials, 2016, 10: 177-188. doi: 10.1007/s40069-016-0145-8
    [7]
    JIN Ling-zhi, WANG Long, ZHOU Jia-liang, et al. Study on shear resistance of partially prestressed UHPC thin-web beams without web reinforcement[J]. Journal of the China Railway Society, 2019, 41(2): 105-116. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDXB201902016.htm
    [8]
    MESZÖLY T, RANDL N. Shear behavior of fiber-reinforced ultra-high performance concrete beams[J]. Engineering Structures, 2018, 168: 119-127. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.04.075
    [9]
    JI Wen-yu, LI Wang-wang, AN Ming-zhe, et al. Shear capacity of T-section girders made of reactive powder concrete[J]. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2018, 23(7): 04018041. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001253
    [10]
    LIANG Xing-wen, WANG Zhao-yao, YU Jing, et al. Study on shear behavior and shear bearing capacity of UHPC beams with stirrups[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2018, 51(10): 56-67. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TMGC201810007.htm
    [11]
    THIEMICKE J, FEHLING E. Proposed model to predict the shear bearing capacity of UHPC-beams with combined reinforcement[C]∥FEHLING E, MIDDENDORF B, THIEMICKE J. 4th International Symposium on Ultra-High Performance Construction Materials. Kassel: Kassel University Press, 2016: 1-9.
    [12]
    VOO Y L, FOSTER S J, GILBERT R I. Shear strength of fibre reinforced reactive powder concrete girders without stirrups[J]. Journal of Advanced Concrete Technology, 2006, 4(1): 123-132. doi: 10.3151/jact.4.123
    [13]
    KODUR V, SOLHMIRZAEI R, AGRAWAL A, et al. Analysis of flexural and shear resistance of ultra high performance fiber reinforced concrete beams without stirrups[J]. Engineering Structures, 2018, 174: 873-884. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.08.010
    [14]
    RUIZ M F, MUTTONI A, SAGASETA J. Shear strength of concrete members without transverse reinforcement: a mechanical approach to consistently account for size and strain effects[J]. Engineering Structures, 2015, 99: 360-372. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.05.007
    [15]
    LIU Sheng-bing, XU Li-hua. Shear behavior of hybrid fiber reinforced high performance concrete deep beams[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2013, 46(3): 29-39. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TMGC201303006.htm
    [16]
    LENG Yu-bing, SONG Xiao-bing. Shear strength of steel-concrete-steel sandwich deep beams: a simplified approach[J]. Advances in Structural Engineering, 2018, 22(20): 1-12.
    [17]
    LEE D H, KIM K S, HAN Sun-jin, et al. Dual potential capacity model for reinforced concrete short and deep beams subjected to shear[J]. Structural Concrete, 2018, 19(3): 76-85.
    [18]
    DEVINE R D, BARBACHYN S M, THRALL A P, et al. Experimental evaluation of deep beams with high-strength concrete and high-strength reinforcing bar[J]. ACI Structural Journal, 2018, 115(4): 1023-1036.
    [19]
    FOSTER S J, GILBERT R I. Experimental studies on high-strength concrete deep beams[J]. ACI Structural Journal, 1998, 95(4): 382-390.
    [20]
    TUCHSCHERER R G, QUESADA A. Replacement of deformed side-face steel reinforcement in deep beams with steel fibers[J]. Structures, 2015, 3: 130-136. doi: 10.1016/j.istruc.2015.03.008
    [21]
    WU Tao, WEI Hui, LIU Xi. Experimental investigation of shear models for lightweight aggregate concrete deep beams[J]. Advances in Structural Engineering, 2017, 21(1): 1-16.
    [22]
    ZHANG Ning, TAN Kang-hai, LEONG C L. Single-span deep beams subjected to unsymmetrical loads[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2009, 135(3): 239-252. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2009)135:3(239)
    [23]
    CHEN Bao-chun, WEI Jian-gang, SU Jia-zhan, et al. State-of-the-art progress on application of ultra-high performance concrete[J]. Journal of Architecture and Civil Engineering, 2019, 36(2): 10-20. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-2049.2019.02.003
    [24]
    AZIZ O Q, ALI M H. Shear strength and behavior of ultra-high performance concrete fiber reinforced concrete (UHPC) deep beams without web reinforcement[J]. International Journal of Civil Engineering, 2013, 2(3): 85-96.
    [25]
    FAHMI H M, ALSHAARBAF I A S. Behavior of reactive powder concrete deep beams[C]∥Al-Nahrain University. Proceedings of 12th Scientific Conference. Baghdad: Al-Mansour Journal Press, 2013: 1-22.
    [26]
    MUHAISON S K, ABD W K, ALWAN M K. Behaviour of reactive powder rectangular deep beam with shear zone opening subjected to repeated load[J]. Journal of Engineering and Sustainable Development, 2018, 22(1): 77-94.
    [27]
    CHEN Hui, YI Wei-jian. Evaluation and modification of strut-and-tie model for simply-supported and continuous deep reinforced concrete beams without stirrups[J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2019, 40(7): 155-161. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JZJB201907017.htm
    [28]
    LIU Li-xin. An unified calculation method for shear capacity of R. C. deep beams, short beams and shallow beams[J]. Journal of Building Structures, 1995, 16(4): 13-21, 12. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6869.1995.04.008
    [29]
    YANG Jian, CHEN Bao-chun, SHEN Xiu-jiang, et al. The optimized design of dog-bones for tensile of ultra-high performance concrete[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2018, 35(10): 37-46, 55. (in Chinese). doi: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2017.06.0446
    [30]
    CHEN Bao-chun, LI Cong, HUANG Wei, et al. Review of ultra-high performance concrete shrinkage[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2018, 18(1): 13-28. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1637.2018.01.002
    [31]
    LI Cong, CHEN Bao-chun, WEI Jian-gang. Shrinkage and mechanical properties of UHPC with coarse aggregate[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2019, 19(5): 11-20. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1637.2019.05.003
    [32]
    JIN Ling-zhi, ZHOU Jia-liang, LI Yue-xia, et al. Experimental study on shear bearing capacity of RPC beams with high strength reinforcement[J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2015, 36(S2): 277-285. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JZJB2015S2041.htm
    [33]
    MA Xi-lun. Flexural, shear behavior and design method of prestressed UHPC box girders[D]. Fuzhou: Fuzhou University, 2019. (in Chinese).
    [34]
    XU Hai-bin, DENG Zong-cai, CHEN Chun-sheng, et al. Experimental study on shear strength of ultra-high performance fiber reinforced concrete beams[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2014, 47(12): 91-97. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TMGC201412015.htm
  • Relative Articles

    [1]LIN Shang-shun, JI Bang-chong, XIA Zhang-hua, LIU Jun-ping, LIN Jian-fan, ZHAO Jin-bing. Ultimate flexural capacity of steel reinforced concrete beams with rectangular section[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2024, 24(1): 146-157. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2024.01.009
    [2]WU Fang-wen, ZUO Jian, FAN Zhou, HE Run-bin, LIU Zhuang-zhuang, HE Lan-qing. Investigation on mechanical properties of steel-ECC/UHPC composite girders in negative moment regions[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2024, 24(1): 218-231. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2024.01.014
    [3]LIN Shang-shun, JI Bang-chong, LIU Jun-ping, LIN Jian-fan, ZHAO Jin-bing. Flexural capacity of steel reinforced ultra-high performance concrete beams with rectangular section[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2024, 24(3): 94-109. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2024.03.006
    [4]CHENG Gao, ZHANG Zhi-heng, XIE Liang, JI Zi-tian. Interfacial force transfer mechanism of concrete-filled steel tube based on field truss bridge test[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2022, 22(6): 158-168. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2022.06.010
    [5]HUANG Wan-kun, WU Qing-xiong, WANG Qu. Mechanical property of improved hinge joint junction surface in prefabricated voided slab bridge[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2022, 22(6): 169-181. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2022.06.011
    [6]CHEN Bao-chun, HUANG Fu-yun, XUE Jun-qing, LUO Xiao-ye, ZHUANG Yi-zhou, LIU Yong-jian, XU Ming, ZHAO Qiu-hong, BRISEGHELLA Bruno. Review on research of jointless bridges[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2022, 22(5): 1-40. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2022.05.001
    [7]HE Shao-hua, YANG Gang, FANG Teng-peng, YANG Jia-liang. Flexural performance of HSS-UHPC composite beams with perfobond strip connectors[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2022, 22(6): 143-157. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2022.06.009
    [8]WEI Jian-gang, XIE Zhi-tao, YANG Yan, WU Qing-xiong, CHEN Bao-chun, PING Jian-chun. Experiment on out-of-plan mechanical behavior of CFST X-type arches[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2022, 22(1): 58-69. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2022.01.004
    [9]QIU Ming-hong, SHAO Xu-dong, LIU Qiong-wei, YAN Ban-fu, LI Pan-pan, HUANG Zhong-lin. Calculation method of UHPC local compressive bearing capacity[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2021, 21(4): 116-129. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2021.04.008
    [10]LI Cong, CHEN Bao-chun, WEI Jian-gang. Shrinkage and mechanical properties of UHPC with coarse aggregate[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2019, 19(5): 11-20. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2019.05.002
    [11]WANG Shi-chao, WANG Chun-sheng, DUAN Lan, SHEN Jian-cheng, WANG Qian. Flexural behavior experiment of full-scale PC box girder strengthened by composite technique[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2018, 18(5): 56-65. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2018.05.006
    [12]ZHU Jing-wei, WANG Chun-sheng, ZHAI Xiao-liang, LIU Hao, CUI Zhi-qiang. Ultimate flexural strength and ductility of steel and concrete composite girder with circle tubular flange[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2018, 18(1): 29-41. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2018.01.003
    [13]CHEN Bao-chun, LI Cong, HUANG Wei, AN Ming-zhe, HAN Song, DING Qing-jun. Review of ultra-high performance concrete shrinkage[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2018, 18(1): 13-28. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2018.01.002
    [14]LIN Shang-shun, HUANG Qing-wei, CHEN Bao-chun, CHEN Yang-hong. Design of U-RC composite pier of sea-crossing bridge[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2017, 17(4): 55-65.
    [15]ZHOU Wang-bao, JIANG Li-zhong, LI Fang-fang, HUANG Zhi. Experiment of seismic performance for steel-concrete composite box-beam[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2014, 14(6): 1-9.
    [16]CHEN Bao-chun, LIN Shang-shun. Calculation methods of bearing capacities of eccentrically loaded concrete columns[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2014, 14(1): 18-25.
    [17]WANG Chun-sheng, YUAN Zhuo-ya, GUO Xiao-yu, GAO Shan, REN Teng-xian. Flexural behavior experiment of reinforced concrete T-beams with steel plate-concrete composite strengthening[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2010, 10(6): 32-40. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2010.06.006
    [18]WANG Yan-li, WANG Chun-sheng, ZHAI Xiao-liang, DUAN Lan, LI Bao-rui. Experimental research of bending capacity for steel and concrete composite girder with concrete filled tub[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2008, 8(6): 63-69.
    [19]Liu Ling-jia, He Shuan-hai, Zhao Xiao-xing. Effective prestress computation of existing PC simply-supported beam[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2005, 5(3): 47-51.
    [20]GE Zhe-sheng, HUANG Xiao-ming. Study on asphalt mixtures fatigue properties by testing[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2002, 2(1): 34-37.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(8)

    1. 林上顺,暨邦冲,刘君平,林建凡,赵锦冰. 矩形截面型钢超高性能混凝土梁抗弯承载力. 交通运输工程学报. 2024(03): 94-109 . 本站查看
    2. 余自若,夏文敏,安明喆,王月,韩松. 基于桁架-拱模型的钢筋UHPC矩形梁抗剪承载力计算方法. 铁道学报. 2023(03): 16-29 .
    3. 达娃扎西,李春良,张东淼. 超高性能混凝土对简支梁抗剪性能影响的模拟. 吉林建筑大学学报. 2023(02): 13-18 .
    4. 马煜东,马恺泽,刘伯权. 混合钢纤维混凝土深梁抗剪承载力分析. 哈尔滨工业大学学报. 2022(03): 95-104 .
    5. 占雪芳,王宪,刘凯乐,雷健,胡煜颉. 全无缝桥用新型路桥连接板拉伸变形性能试验. 长安大学学报(自然科学版). 2022(02): 68-78 .
    6. Jian Yang,Baochun Chen,Jiazhan Su,Gang Xu,Dong Zhang,Jialiang Zhou. Effects of fibers on the mechanical properties of UHPC:A review. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering(English Edition). 2022(03): 363-387 .
    7. 秦拥军,张逸飞,李向阳,杨雳鹏. 沙漠砂混凝土深梁裂缝试验. 中国科技论文. 2022(07): 759-763+769 .
    8. 罗敏,胡世翔,潘金龙. 基于拉压杆模型的ECC深梁受剪承载力分析. 东南大学学报(自然科学版). 2021(04): 551-558 .

    Other cited types(5)

Catalog

    Figures(8)  / Tables(3)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (1184) PDF downloads(261) Cited by(13)
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return