LU Jian, WANG Ke, JIANG Yu-ming. Real-time identification method of abnormal road driving behavior based on vehicle driving trajectory[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2020, 20(6): 227-235. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2020.06.020
Citation: LU Jian, WANG Ke, JIANG Yu-ming. Real-time identification method of abnormal road driving behavior based on vehicle driving trajectory[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2020, 20(6): 227-235. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2020.06.020

Real-time identification method of abnormal road driving behavior based on vehicle driving trajectory

doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2020.06.020
Funds:

National Key Research and Development Program of China 2017YFC0803902

National Natural Science Foundation of China 71871165

More Information
  • To improve the active prevention and control of road traffic safety, the driving trajectory data of cars were used as the research object and the real-time identification problem of abnormal driving behaviors was studied. A massive amount of vehicle driving trajectory data was extracted based on an unmanned aerial vehicle recorded traffic video. The theory of applying the measurement of risk to quantify the typical abnormal driving behaviors was proposed. A large-sample statistical distribution method was used to determine the characteristic value thresholds for abnormal driving behaviors. The abnormal driving behavior spectrum was established and combined with the traffic environment information. The characteristic value of the abnormal driving behavior spectrum was calculated. Based on the characteristic value of the vehicle's abnormal driving behavior spectrum, the abnormal vehicle samples were labeled. The driving behavior spectrum parameters were partially used as input and imbalanced class boosting artificial intelligence algorithms were used to establish an abnormal driving behavior identification model. To verify the effectiveness of the method, vehicle driving trajectory data were collected using an unmanned aerial vehicle traffic video in Shanghai, and the characteristics of car abnormal car-following behavior were analyzed. Research result shows that the threshold of the abnormal car-following characteristic parameter is 0.19 s-1 using the interquartile range method, most of the samples are in the normal car-following state, and about 2% of the samples are in the abnormal car-following state. Based on the ratio of the normal car-following state and the abnormal car-following state in the driving trajectory of each car, a 95% percentile is used to divide the examples of 8 917 cars into 445 abnormal car-following cars and 8 472 normal car-following cars. The imbalanced class boosting algorithm CUSBoost achieves a recall rate of 94.4% and a precision rate of 85.9% in identifying abnormal car-following vehicles. Its balanced score and the area under the precision-recall curve are the highest among all algorithms. As an objective and quantitative expression method of abnormal driving behavior, the abnormal driving behavior spectrum can be combined with the artificial intelligence method to generate a massive library of abnormal driving behaviors. The imbalanced class boosting algorithm can address the imbalance problem of abnormal driving behavior data and has a better ability to identify abnormal driving behaviors compared to conventional algorithms.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    丁雨蕾. 重特大交通事故特征及影响因素分析[D]. 南京: 东南大学, 2016.

    DING Yu-lei. Analyzing characteristics and influence factors of serious casualty traffic crashes in China[D]. Nanjing: Southeast University, 2016. (in Chinese).
    [2]
    WANG Ke, XUE Qing-wen, XING Ying-ying, et al. Improve aggressive driver recognition using collision surrogate measurement and imbalanced class boosting[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2020, 17(7): 2375-1-17.
    [3]
    SUN Wei, ZHANG Xiao-rui, PEETA S, et al. A real-time fatigue driving recognition method incorporating contextual features and two fusion levels[J]. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2017, 18(12): 3408-3420. doi: 10.1109/TITS.2017.2690914
    [4]
    LIU Tian-chi, YANG Yan, HUANG Guang-bin, et al. Driver distraction detection using semi-supervised machine learning[J]. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2016, 17(4): 1108-1120. doi: 10.1109/TITS.2015.2496157
    [5]
    CHANDRASIRI N P, NAWA K, ISHII A. Driving skill classification in curve driving scenes using machine learning[J]. Journal of Modern Transportation, 2016, 24(3): 196-206. doi: 10.1007/s40534-016-0098-2
    [6]
    MOLCHANOV P, GUPTA S, KIM K, et al. Multi-sensor system for driver's hand-gesture recognition[C]//IEEE. 11th International Conference and Workshops on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition. New York: IEEE, 2015: 1-8.
    [7]
    YAN Chao, COENEN F, YUE Yong, et al. Video-based classification of driving behavior using a hierarchal classification system with multiple features[J]. International Journal of Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence, 2016, 30(5): 1-33.
    [8]
    WANG Hong, ZHANG Chi, SHI Tian-wei, et al. Real-time EEG-based detection of fatigue driving danger for accident prediction[J]. International Journal of Neural Systems, 2015, 25(2): 1550002-1-14.
    [9]
    DENG Chao, WU Chao-zhong, LYU Neng-chao, et al. Driving style recognition method using braking characteristics based on hidden Markov model[J]. PLoS ONE, 2017, 12(8): e0182419-1-15.
    [10]
    XUE Qing-wen, WANG Ke, LU Jian-john, et al. Rapid driving style recognition in car-following using machine learning and vehicle trajectory data[J]. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 2019, 2019: 9085238-1-15.
    [11]
    LY M V, MARTIN S, TRIVEDI M M. Driver classification and driving style recognition using inertial sensors[C]//IEEE. 2013 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium. New York: IEEE, 2013: 1040-1045.
    [12]
    WU Ming-lin, ZHANG Sheng, DONG Yu-han. A novel model-based driving behavior recognition system using motion sensors[J]. Sensors, 2016, 16(10): 1-23. doi: 10.1109/JSEN.2016.2532220
    [13]
    FERNANDEZ S, ITO T. Driver classification for intelligent transportation systems using fuzzy logic[C]//IEEE. 19th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems. New York: IEEE, 2016: 1212-1216.
    [14]
    WANG Wen-shuo, XI Jun-qiang. A rapid pattern-recognition method for driving styles using clustering-based support vector machines[C]//IEEE. 2016 American Control Conference. New York: IEEE, 2016: 5270-5275.
    [15]
    AOUDE G S, DESARAJU V R, STEPHENS L H, et al. Driver behavior classification at intersections and validation on large naturalistic data set[J]. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2012, 13(2): 724-736. doi: 10.1109/TITS.2011.2179537
    [16]
    KLUGER R, SMITH B L, PARK H, et al. Identification of safety-critical events using kinematic vehicle data and the discrete fourier transform[J]. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 2016, 96: 162-168. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2016.08.006
    [17]
    BEJANI M M, GHATEE M. A context aware system for driving style evaluation by an ensemble learning on smartphone sensors data[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2018, 89: 303-320. doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2018.02.009
    [18]
    ZHAO Nan, MEHLER B, REIMER B, et al. An investigation of the relationship between the driving behavior questionnaire and objective measures of highway driving behavior[J]. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2012, 15(6): 676-685. doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2012.08.001
    [19]
    田飞. 基于驾驶风格的换道行为谱分析研究[D]. 武汉: 武汉理工大学, 2016.

    TIAN Fei. Research on lane change behavioral spectral analysis based on driving style classification[D]. Wuhan: Wuhan University of Technology, 2016. (in Chinese).
    [20]
    陈镜任, 吴业福, 吴冰. 基于车辆行驶数据的驾驶人行为谱分析方法[J]. 计算机应用, 2018, 38(7): 1916-1922, 1928. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JSJY201807017.htm

    CHEN Jing-ren, WU Ye-fu, WU Bing. Driver behavior spectrum analysis method based on vehicle driving data[J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2018, 38(7): 1916-1922, 1928. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JSJY201807017.htm
    [21]
    WANG Wen-shuo, XI Jun-qiang, ZHAO Ding. Driving style analysis using primitive driving patterns with Bayesian nonparametric approaches[J]. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2019, 20(8): 2986-2998. doi: 10.1109/TITS.2018.2870525
    [22]
    AKAI N, HIRAYAMA T, MORALES L Y, et al. Driving behavior modeling based on hidden markov models with driver's eye-gaze measurement and ego-vehicle localization[C]//IEEE. 2019 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium. New York: IEEE, 2019: 949-956.
    [23]
    LIANG Yu-lan, REYES M L, LEE J D. Real-time detection of driver cognitive distraction using support vector machines[J]. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2007, 8(2): 340-350. doi: 10.1109/TITS.2007.895298
    [24]
    LIU Yong-gang, WANG Ji-ming, ZHAO Pan, et al. Research on classification and recognition of driving styles based on feature engineering[J]. IEEE Access, 2019, 7: 89245-89255. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2926593
    [25]
    CHEN Zhi-jun, WU Chao-zhong, HUANG Zhen, et al. Dangerous driving behavior detection using video-extracted vehicle trajectory histograms[J]. Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2017, 21(5): 409-421. doi: 10.1080/15472450.2017.1305271
    [26]
    HASHEMI A, SABA V, RESALAT S N. Real time driver's drowsiness detection by processing the EEG signals stimulated with external flickering light[J]. Basic and Clinical Neuroscience, 2014, 5(1): 22-27.
    [27]
    BEJANI M M, GHATEE M. Convolutional neural network with adaptive regularization to classify driving styles on smartphones[J]. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2020, 21(2): 543-552. doi: 10.1109/TITS.2019.2896672
    [28]
    MOUKAFIH Y, HAFIDI H, GHOGHO M. Aggressive driving detection using deep learning-based time series classification[C]//IEEE. IEEE International Symposium on Innovations in Intelligent Systems and Applications. New York: IEEE, 2019: 1-5.
    [29]
    SHI Xiu-peng, WONG Y D, LI M Z F, et al. A feature learning approach based on XGBoost for driving assessment and risk prediction[J]. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 2019, 129: 170-179. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2019.05.005
    [30]
    CHAWLA N V, BOWYER K W, HALL L O, et al. SMOTE: synthetic minority over-sampling technique[J]. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 2002, 16: 321-357. doi: 10.1613/jair.953
    [31]
    FREUND Y, SCHAPIRE R E. A decision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting[J]. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 1997, 55(1): 119-139. doi: 10.1006/jcss.1997.1504
    [32]
    CHAWLA N V, LAZAREVIC A, HALL L O, et al. SMOTEBoost: improving prediction of the minority class in boosting[C]∥Springer. 7th European Conference on Principles of Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery in Databases. Berlin: Springer, 2003: 107-119.
    [33]
    SEIFFERT C, KHOSHGOFTAAR T M, HULSE J V, et al. Rusboost: a hybrid approach to alleviating class imbalance[J]. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics—Part A: Systems and Humans, 2010, 40(1): 185-197. doi: 10.1109/TSMCA.2009.2029559
    [34]
    RAYHAN F, AHMED S, MAHBUB A, et al. CUSBoost: cluster-based under-sampling with boosting for imbalanced classification[C]∥IEEE. 2nd International Conference on Computational Systems and Information Technology for Sustainable Solution. New York: IEEE, 2017: 1-6.
    [35]
    SAITO T, REHMSMEIER M. The precision-recall plot is more informative than the roc plot when evaluating binary classifiers on imbalanced datasets[J]. PloS ONE, 2015, 10(3): e0118432-1-21.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (1151) PDF downloads(516) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return