Citation: | LI Yi-nong, ZHU Zhe-wei, ZHENG Ling, HU Yi-ming. Multi-objective control and optimization of active energy-regenerative suspension based on road recognition[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2021, 21(2): 129-137. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2021.02.011 |
As an important component of the automotive chassis system, the suspension system mainly functions to reduce body vibration, improve driving safety and comfort. Compared with traditional passive suspension, active suspension can improve the smoothness and handling stability of vehicles, thereby achieving the best dynamic performance of vehicles under different road conditions, which is one of the main research issues for future intelligent electric vehicles.
Figure 1For the 1/4 vehicle active suspension model, where:zrInput for road surface;ztDisplacement of the mass under the spring;zsDisplacement of the mass on the spring;ktFor tire stiffness;ksFor suspension stiffness;CsFor suspension damping coefficient;msFor spring quality;mtFor the quality under the spring;FProvide electromagnetic power for the motor.
The damping force of the shock absorber isFcThe speed damping force characteristic can be expressed as
Fc=C1(˙zs−˙zt)+C2|˙zs−˙zt|+C3√|˙zs−˙zt|sgn(˙zs−˙zt) | (1) |
In the formula:C1andC2They are linear and nonlinear damping coefficients, respectively;C3The coefficient related to the asymmetry of the damper[29]Sgn (·) is a step function.
Fk=k1(zs−zt)+k2(zs−zt)3 | (2) |
In the formula:k1andk2They are the linear and nonlinear coefficients of spring stiffness, respectively.
This article uses filtered white noise to obtain the time-domain signal of the road surface. Based on the nonlinear characteristics of a two degree of freedom suspension, the vibration differential equation of a 1/4 vehicle active suspension nonlinear system is obtained
{ms¨zs+Fc+Fk+F=0mt¨zt−Fc−Fk−F+kt(zt−zr)=0 | (3) |
The electromagnetic active suspension actuator structure is a linear actuator that senses electromotive forceU0And induced currentI0Can be expressed as
{U0=Ke(˙zs−˙zt)I0=U0/R0 | (4) |
In the formula:KeThe coefficient of back electromotive force for linear motors;R0The internal resistance of the motor.
Electric motor electromagnetic actuation forceFIt can be expressed as
F=KfI0 | (5) |
In the formula:KfFor thrust coefficient.
When a linear motor is used as a generator, its equivalent damping isCedo
Ce=KfKe/R0 | (6) |
I1=(U1−U0)/R0 | (7) |
When a linear motor is used as a generator, the energy feeding circuit is as followsFigure 2As shown, where:RlFor load resistance;L0For internal inductance;L1For external inductance, inductance can be ignored in calculation.
参数 | 数值 |
ms/kg | 285 |
mt/kg | 40 |
k1/(N·m-1) | 15 680 |
k2/(N·m-3) | 1 568 |
C1/(N·s·m-1) | 1 780 |
C2/(N·s·m-2) | 100 |
C3/(N·s·m-1) | 1 000 |
kt/(N·m-1) | 180 000 |
Ke/(V·s·m-1) | 69 |
Kf/(V·s·m-1) | 78 |
R0/Ω | 5 |
Rl/Ω | 0~1 000 |
Due to the nonlinear characteristics of the suspension model in this article, a sliding mode controller can be used to control the active suspension. At the same time, considering that in the actual driving process of vehicles, the spring-loaded mass has a certain degree of uncertainty due to differences in fuel consumption, passenger quantity, and cargo situation, this paper designs an adaptive sliding mode controller to eliminate the influence of the uncertainty of spring-loaded mass on the control effect of the controller.
Define Parameterse1、e2ande3respectively
{e1=zs−zte2=zse3=zt−zr | (8) |
set upc1, c2, c3> 0, all are controller parameters, design sliding mode functionsdo
s=c1e1+c2e2+c3e3+˙e2 | (9) |
Define Lyapunov functionVdo
V=12mss2+12γm2s | (10) |
˙V=s(msc1˙e1+msc2˙e2+msc3˙e3−Fc−Fk−F)+1γ˜ms˙ˆms | (11) |
F=ˆms(c1˙e1+c2˙e2+c3˙e3)−Fc−Fk−ε1s−ε2sgn(s) | (12) |
Then there are
˙V=s[ˆms(c1˙e1+c2˙e2+c3˙e3)−ε1s−ε2sgn(s)−ms(c1˙e1+c2˙e2+c3˙e3)]+1γ˜ms˙ˆms=−ε1s2−ε2|s|+˜ms[s(c1˙e1+c2˙e2+c3˙e3)+1γ˙ˆms] | (13) |
Taken from the fitness rate as
˙ˆms=−γs(c1˙e1+c2˙e2+c3˙e3) | (14) |
˙V=−ε1s2−ε2|s|⩽−ε1s2⩽0 | (15) |
According to the LaSalle invariance principle[30]The closed-loop system is asymptotically stable, that is, whent→+∞,sAt 0 o'clock, due toV≥0,$\dot{V}$≤ 0, then whentWhen →+∞,VBounded, therefore, it can be proven$\hat{m}$sThere is a boundary, but it cannot be guaranteed$\hat{m}$sconverges tomsIn order to prevent$\hat{m}$sExcessive electromagnetic force inputFToo large or$\hat{m}$sIn the case of ≤ 0, it is necessary to design an adaptive rate to$\hat{m}$sThe changes are[ms, min, ms, max]Within the scope, this article adopts a mapping adaptive algorithm to correct the adaptive rate
˙ˆms={ˆms⩾ms,max | (16) |
This article uses an adaptive fuzzy neural network algorithm to identify road surface grades. This algorithm uses Takagi Sugeno fuzzy model and weighted sum method to calculate the final output. Compared with the centroid method of traditional fuzzy systems, it simplifies data processing and greatly reduces computation time. The structure of adaptive fuzzy neural network is as followsFigure 3As shown.
Figure 3The functions of each layer in the middle are: the first layer will input variablesx1、x2Fuzzy processing is performed using fuzzy rules A1, A2, B1, and B2; The second layer multiplies the fuzzified input signal algebraically to obtain the outputω1、ω2The third layer handles the triggering strength of each ruleNObtain standardized trigger strengthω1、ω2The fourth layer calculates the output through the defuzzification rules C1 and C2; The fifth layer sums up all signals to obtain the total outputy.
z_{\mathrm{r}}=f\left[\ddot{z}_{\mathrm{t}}, z_{\mathrm{t}},\left(z_{\mathrm{s}}-z_{\mathrm{t}}\right),\left(\dot{z}_{\mathrm{s}}-\dot{z}_{\mathrm{t}}\right)\right] | (17) |
路面等级 | 识别误差均方根/mm | 识别误差率/% |
A | 8.3×10-6 | 0.26 |
B | 3.2×10-4 | 1.37 |
C | 3.6×10-3 | 4.65 |
D | 9.4×10-3 | 8.12 |
路面等级 | q1 | q2 | q3 |
良好(A、B级) | 0.80 | 0.80 | 1.20 |
一般(C、D级) | 0.90 | 0.90 | 1.10 |
较差(E、F级) | 0.95 | 0.95 | 1.05 |
\left\{\begin{array}{l} \ddot{z}_{\mathrm{s}}<0.9 \ddot{z}_{\mathrm{s} 0} \\ z_{\mathrm{s}}-z_{\mathrm{t}}<0.9\left(z_{\mathrm{s}}-z_{\mathrm{t}}\right)_{0} \\ z_{\mathrm{t}}-z_{\mathrm{r}}<1.1\left(z_{\mathrm{t}}-z_{\mathrm{r}}\right)_{0} \end{array}\right. | (18) |
P_{\mathrm{c}}=C_{\mathrm{s}}\left(\dot{\dot{z}_{\mathrm{s}}}-\dot{z}_{\mathrm{t}}\right)^{2} | (19) |
P_{\circ}=\frac{1}{T} \int_{0}^{T} U_{1} I_{1} \mathrm{~d} t | (20) |
Average energy feeding efficiencyηdo
\eta=\frac{1}{T} \int_{0}^{T} P_{0} / P_{\mathrm{c}} \mathrm{d} t | (21) |
Whether the active suspension is in active mode or feedback mode depends on the actual working conditions and corresponding control switching strategies. The traditional feedback suspension control switching strategy is:$\dot{\dot{z}}_{\mathrm{s}}\left(\dot{z}_{\mathrm{s}}-\dot{z}_{\mathrm{t}}\right)>0$When the mass on the spring is aligned with the direction of motion of the actuator, the active suspension is in energy feeding mode; equal$\dot{z}_{\mathrm{s}}\left(\dot{z}_{\mathrm{s}}-\dot{z}_{\mathrm{t}}\right)<0$When the mass on the spring is opposite to the direction of motion of the actuator, the motor is in active mode to suppress the vibration of the suspension.
路面等级 | 切换控制策略 |
良好(A、B级) | 馈能模式 |
一般(C、D级) | 馈能-主动模式 |
较差(E、F级) | 主动模式 |
The structure of the active suspension controller described in this article is as followsFigure 5As shown, it is mainly divided into three parts: road recognition, suspension control, and multi-objective optimization of feedback suspension. Road surface recognition identifies the current road surface level based on the quality signal on the spring, and inputs the road surface level into the control section and the feedback section; Select control target coefficients and energy feeding switching strategies based on road surface grade to achieve coordinated optimization of active energy feeding suspension comfort, safety, and energy efficiency; Considering that the suspension system is not only affected by the control parameters of the actuators, but also by the structural parameters of the suspension itself and the current vehicle speed, with safety, comfort, and energy-saving indicators as the control objectives, the particle swarm algorithm is used to perform multi-objective optimization on the overall model of the active feedback suspension in the feedback active mode.
The constraint conditions for design variables need to be analyzed and selected in conjunction with the actual vehicle structure. Considering that the full load offset frequency is generally 1.00-1.45Hz, the range of suspension stiffness values for this model is 75% to 1.25 times the passive suspension reference value. The damping and size of the dampers are closely related and cannot vary within a large range. Therefore, 75% to 1.25 times the reference value is also selected.c1、c2andc3The selection range is from 0 to 100.
Because the suspension structure parameters cannot be changed after the vehicle is manufactured, considering that the main roads in China are mainly B and C grade roads, and B grade roads are relatively flat, with low requirements for comfort and safety, the design of suspension structure parameters takes into account the driving conditions of the vehicle on C grade roads, where the active feedback suspension is in feedback active mode.
The tire travel in the optimization objective mainly affects driving safety, the spring-loaded mass acceleration affects driving comfort, and the energy feeding efficiency affects energy saving. After optimization, the local optimal solution set is obtained as follows:Figure 6As shown in the figure, it can be seen that when the ride comfort and safety reach the comprehensive optimal dynamic performance, the energy feedback efficiency is the lowest, and increasing the energy feedback efficiency will inevitably result in a certain loss of comfort or safety. Therefore, in order to achieve the comprehensive optimization of suspension dynamic performance and energy feedback performance, it is necessary to have reasonable decision-making conditions to select the optimal solution.
s_{i, j}=\left\{\begin{array}{ll} 1 & f_{i, j} \leqslant f_{i, \min } \\ \frac{f_{i, \max }-f_{i, j}}{f_{i, \max }-f_{i, \min }} & f_{i, \min }<f_{i, j}<f_{i, \max } \\ 0 & f_{i, j} \geqslant f_{i, \max } \end{array}\right. | (22) |
\varphi_{k}=\sum\limits_{i=1}^{n} s_{i, k} / \sum\limits_{j=1}^{l} \sum\limits_{i=1}^{n} s_{i, j} | (23) |
Select the solution with the highest dominance value according to equations (24) and (25) as the typical solution of the Pareto solution set. The optimal solution isk1=13 979 N·m-1, C1=1 323 N·s·mm-1,c1=78,c2=28,c3=44.
Compare the original parameters and optimize the active suspension in both time and frequency domains on a C-class road surface at a speed of 60 km · h-1The dynamic performance and energy feedback performance during vehicle speed are shown inFigure 7~9.
参数 | 优化后主动悬架 | 原悬架 | 被动悬架 |
簧上质量加速度/(m·s-2) | 0.726 1 | 0.844 4 | 1.123 0 |
变化量百分比/% | -35.0 | -24.0 | 0.0 |
悬架动挠度/m | 0.011 8 | 0.010 0 | 0.010 7 |
变化量百分比/% | 10.0 | -6.5 | 0.0 |
车轮动行程/m | 0.002 8 | 0.002 7 | 0.002 6 |
变化量百分比/% | 7.7 | 3.8 | 0.0 |
馈能效率/% | 7.10 | 5.44 | 0.00 |
The simulation results show that by using multi-objective particle swarm optimization algorithm and fuzzy set theory to select optimized structural parameters and control parameters, active feedback suspension can better achieve the comprehensive optimization of vehicle suspension system safety, comfort, and energy saving.
(2) Designed an adaptive sliding mode controller to control active suspension, and proposed a strategy for selecting active suspension control parameters under different road surface levels, combined with road recognition algorithms.
(3) Compared with traditional active suspension, the optimized active suspension reduces the spring-loaded mass acceleration by 10.5% and increases the energy feedback efficiency by 1.7%. At the same time, it can control the increase in tire travel within a safe range of 10%, improving the comfort and energy efficiency of the active suspension system while ensuring safety.
(4) Future research will address the issue of unstable control effects caused by the switching between active and feedback modes in practical circuits, and further improve the feedback circuit to design a more robust active feedback suspension controller.
[1] |
KARNOPP D, CROSBY M J, HARWOOD R A. Vibration control using semi-active force generators[J]. Journal of Engineering for Industry, 1974, 96(2): 619-626. doi: 10.1115/1.3438373
|
[2] |
HONG K S, SOHN H C, HEDRICK J K. Modified skyhook control of semi-active suspensions: a new model, gain scheduling, and hardware-in-the-loop tuning[J]. Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, 2002, 124(1): 158-167. doi: 10.1115/1.1434265
|
[3] |
VALÁŠEK M, NOVÁK M, ŠIKA Z, et al. Extended ground-hook-new concept of semi-active control of truck's suspension[J]. Vehicle System Dynamics, 1997, 27(5/6): 289-303. doi: 10.1080/00423119708969333
|
[4] |
AHMADIAN M, PARE C A. A quarter-car experimental analysis of alternative semiactive control methods[J]. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 2000, 11(8): 604-612. doi: 10.1106/MR3W-5D8W-0LPL-WGUQ
|
[5] |
THOMPSON A. An active suspension with optimal linear state feedback[J]. Vehicle System Dynamics, 1976, 5(4): 187-203. doi: 10.1080/00423117608968414
|
[6] |
RIZVI S M H, ABID M, KHAN A Q, et al. H∞ control of 8 degrees of freedom vehicle active suspension system[J]. Journal of King Saud University—Engineering Sciences, 2016, 30(2): 161-169. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1018-3639(16)00016-7
|
[7] |
ZHENG Ling, DENG Zhao-xiang, LI Yi-nong. Sliding mode control for semi-active suspension systems and its robustness[J]. Automotive Engineering, 2004, 26(6): 678-682. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-680X.2004.06.014
|
[8] |
CHEN Xin-bo, WU Li-xin, YIN Jun, et al. Robust H∞ control design of an electromagnetic actuated active suspension considering the structure non-linearity[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part D: Journal of Automobile Engineering, 2018, 233(3): 095440701775323. http://www.researchgate.net/publication/323176580_Robust_H_control_design_of_an_electromagnetic_actuated_active_suspension_considering_the_structure_non-linearity
|
[9] |
LUO Hong, CHEN Xing, DENG Zhao-xiang, et al. Research on control system of linear motor actuator used in active suspension[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2012, 24(7): 1537-1542. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XTFZ201207034.htm
|
[10] |
KUMAR V, RANA K, KUMAR J, et al. Self-tuned robust fractional order fuzzy PD controller for uncertain and nonlinear active suspension system[J]. Neural Computing and Applications, 2018, 30(6): 1827-1843. doi: 10.1007/s00521-016-2774-x
|
[11] |
BOUOUDEN S, CHADLI M, KARIMI R H. A robust predictive control design for nonlinear active suspension systems[J]. Asian Journal of Control, 2016, 18(1): 122-132. doi: 10.1002/asjc.1180
|
[12] |
LIU H, NONAMI K, HAGIWARA T. Active following fuzzy output feedback sliding mode control of real-vehicle semi-active suspensions[J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2008, 314(1/2): 39-52. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022460X08000242
|
[13] |
LIN Jiong-kang, CHENG Ka-wai, ZHANG Zhu, et al. Adaptive sliding mode technique-based electromagnetic suspension system with linear switched reluctance actuator[J]. IET Electric Power Applications, 2015, 9(1): 50-59. doi: 10.1049/iet-epa.2014.0115
|
[14] |
SUN Hao, LI Yong-ming, XU Kun, et al. Fuzzy adaptive backstepping control for a class of active suspension systems[J]. IFAC-Papers OnLine, 2018, 51(31): 136-141. doi: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.10.025
|
[15] |
LIU Bing, SAIF M, FAN Hui-jin, et al. Adaptive fault tolerant control of a half-car active suspension systems subject to random actuator failures[J]. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 2016, 21(6): 2847-2857. doi: 10.1109/TMECH.2016.2587159
|
[16] |
WANG Jun-cheng, HE Ren. Nonlinear optimal sliding mode fuzzy control for in-wheel active vibration damper of electric wheel[J]. Automotive Engineering, 2018, 40(6): 719-725. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QCGC201806015.htm
|
[17] |
YAN Shu-ai, SUN Wei-chao. Self-powered suspension criterion and energy regeneration implementation scheme of motor-driven active suspension[J]. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2017, 94: 297-311. doi: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2017.03.006
|
[18] |
NAKANO K, SUDA Y, NAKADAI S. Self-powered active vibration control using a single electric actuator[J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2003, 260(2): 213-235. doi: 10.1016/S0022-460X(02)00980-X
|
[19] |
ABOUELNOUR A, HAMMAD N. Electric utilization of vehicle damper dissipated energy[J]. Electronics Research Institute, 2003, 25(6): 245-253.
|
[20] |
CHEN S A, LI X, ZHAO L J, et al. Development of a control method for an electromagnetic semi-active suspension reclaiming energy with varying charge voltage in steps[J]. International Journal of Automotive Technology, 2015, 16(5): 765-773. doi: 10.1007/s12239-015-0077-3
|
[21] |
GAO Ze-peng, CHEN Si-zhong, ZHAO Yu-zhuang, et al. Numerical evaluation of compatibility between comfort and energy recovery based on energy flow mechanism inside electromagnetic active suspension[J]. Energy, 2019, 170: 521-536. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2018.12.193
|
[22] |
HUANG Kun, ZHANG Yong-chao, YU Fan, et al. Coordinate optimization for synthetical performance of electrical energy-regenerative active suspension[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University, 2009, 43(2): 226-230. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1006-2467.2009.02.015
|
[23] |
YU Fan, ZHANG Yong-chao. Technology of regenerative vehicle active suspensions[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2010, 41(1): 1-6. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1298.2010.01.001
|
[24] |
QIN Ye-chen, DONG Ming-ming, ZHAO Feng, et al. Suspension semi-active control of vehicles based on road profile classification[J]. Journal of Northeastern University (Natural Science), 2016, 37(8): 1138-1143. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-3026.2016.08.016
|
[25] |
WANG Ruo-chen, DING Ren-kai, CHEN Long. Application of hybrid electromagnetic suspension in vibration energy regeneration and active control[J]. Journal of Vibration and Control, 2016, 24(1): 223-233. http://smartsearch.nstl.gov.cn/paper_detail.html?id=c0b5118299933bb1b4bbead842c20fc9
|
[26] |
CHEN Shi-an, WANG Jun-cheng, YAO Ming, et al. Improved optimal sliding mode control for a non-linear vehicle active suspension system[J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2017, 395: 1-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jsv.2017.02.017
|
[27] |
ATAEI M, ASADI E, GOODARZI A, et al. Multi-objective optimization of a hybrid electromagnetic suspension system for ride comfort, road holding and regenerated power[J]. Journal of Vibration and Control, 2017, 23(5): 782-793. doi: 10.1177/1077546315585219
|
[28] |
KILICASLAN S. Control of active suspension system considering nonlinear actuator dynamics[J]. Nonlinear Dynamics, 2018, 91(1): 1383-1394. doi: 10.1007/s11071-017-3951-x/email/correspondent/c1/new
|
[29] |
KOSHKOUEI A J, BURNHAM K J. Sliding mode controllers for active suspensions[C]//IFAC. Proceedings of the 17th World Congress of the International Federation of Automatic Control. Seoul: IFAC, 2008: 3416-3421.
|
[30] |
LIU Jin-kun, SUN Fu-chun. Research and development on theory and algorithms of sliding mode control[J]. Control Theory and Applications, 2007, 24(3): 407-418. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8152.2007.03.015
|
[1] | WANG Jun-cheng, LYU Lin-feng, WANG Fa-hui. Anti-lock braking control based on interval type-2 fuzzy logic[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2024, 24(3): 238-250. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2024.03.017 |
[2] | WU Chao-zhong, YANG Xin-wei, HE Yi, LU Xiao-yun. Cooperative control system of truck platoon with heterogeneous dynamics under feedforward multi-source information[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2023, 23(1): 256-266. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2023.01.019 |
[3] | WANG Ya-xiong, YU Qing-gang, WANG Xue-chao, SUN Feng-chun. Adaptive optimal energy management strategy of fuel cell vehicle by considering fuel cell performance degradation[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2022, 22(1): 190-204. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2022.01.016 |
[4] | CHEN Shi-an, GUAN Yu-liang, REN Jie-yu, YAO Ming, JIANG Dong. Mechanical characteristics test and nonlinear active controller design of energy-regenerative actuator for suspension[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2022, 22(4): 232-243. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2022.04.018 |
[5] | ZHAO Shu-en, LENG Yao, SHAO Yi-ming. Explicit model predictive control of multi-objective adaptive cruise of vehicle[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2020, 20(3): 206-216. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2020.03.019 |
[6] | LI Zhong-xing, TANG Wei, HUANG Jian-yu, LU Ying. Game control of multi-agent damper system for laterally interconnected air suspension[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2018, 18(5): 130-139. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2018.05.013 |
[7] | CHEN Shi-an, SUN Wen-qiang, WANG Jian, CAI Yu-meng, WANG Jun-cheng. Control of energy-reclaiming semi-active suspension with linear motor based on varying charge voltage method[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2018, 18(2): 90-100. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2018.02.010 |
[8] | WANG Wei-hua, WANG Wen-kai, FENG Bo, FAN Yong-kai. Dynamic coordinated control method of driving mode switch of parallel hybrid electric vehicle[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2017, 17(2): 90-97. |
[9] | WANG Ya-xiong, CAI Yu-meng, WANG Jian, YAO Ming, CHEN Shi-an. Design method of active suspension LQG controller for rolling motion safety of vehicle[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2017, 17(5): 138-148. |
[10] | QIN Da-tong, HUANG Jing-ying, LIU Yong-gang, HU Ming-hui. Weighted PID control of battery temperature for electric vehicle[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2016, 16(1): 73-79. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2016.01.009 |
[11] | SANG Nan, WEI Min-xiang. Adaptive control of active front steering and direct yaw moment for vehicle[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2016, 16(3): 91-99. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2016.03.011 |
[12] | CHEN Shi-an, WANG Jun-cheng, YAO Ming. Design method of holographic optimal sliding mode controller for semi-active suspension of vehicle[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2016, 16(3): 72-83. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2016.03.009 |
[13] | LI Zhi-peng, PENG Tao, WANG Qian, ZHAN Zhang-shu. Calculation model of automobile braking distance on pavement with deicing salt[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2012, 12(1): 50-54. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2012.01.009 |
[14] | XIA Guang, TANG Xi-wen, SUN Bao-qun, CHEN Wu-wei. Automotive automatic transmission shift control based on layered coordination[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2012, 12(4): 50-58. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2012.04.007 |
[15] | ZHENG Tai-xiong, MA Fu-lei. Automotive ABS control strategy based on logic threshold[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2010, 10(2): 69-74. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2010.02.013 |
[16] | DU Feng, WEI Lang, ZHAO Jian-you. Design of variable structure controller for active steering vehicle[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2009, 9(1): 35-39. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2009.01.008 |
[17] | ZHENG Zhong-lang, LU: Peng-min. Optimization method of suspension parameters for articulated vehicle based on ride comfort and road-friendliness[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2009, 9(5): 49-54. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2009.05.009 |
[18] | BEI Shao-yi, YUAN Chuan-yi, FENG Jun-ping. Control and test of vehicle semi-active suspension based on wheelbase preview[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2009, 9(5): 44-48. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2009.05.008 |
[19] | ZHAO Xiang-mo, GUO Xiao-fen, XU Zhi-gang, MA Jian. Network Communication Technology of Vehicle Inspection Control System[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2006, 6(1): 98-102. |
[20] | YU Qiang, MA Jian. Stability improvement of vehicle's anti-overturn with semi-active suspension system[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2005, 5(1): 53-56. |
参数 | 数值 |
ms/kg | 285 |
mt/kg | 40 |
k1/(N·m-1) | 15 680 |
k2/(N·m-3) | 1 568 |
C1/(N·s·m-1) | 1 780 |
C2/(N·s·m-2) | 100 |
C3/(N·s·m-1) | 1 000 |
kt/(N·m-1) | 180 000 |
Ke/(V·s·m-1) | 69 |
Kf/(V·s·m-1) | 78 |
R0/Ω | 5 |
Rl/Ω | 0~1 000 |
路面等级 | 识别误差均方根/mm | 识别误差率/% |
A | 8.3×10-6 | 0.26 |
B | 3.2×10-4 | 1.37 |
C | 3.6×10-3 | 4.65 |
D | 9.4×10-3 | 8.12 |
路面等级 | q1 | q2 | q3 |
良好(A、B级) | 0.80 | 0.80 | 1.20 |
一般(C、D级) | 0.90 | 0.90 | 1.10 |
较差(E、F级) | 0.95 | 0.95 | 1.05 |
路面等级 | 切换控制策略 |
良好(A、B级) | 馈能模式 |
一般(C、D级) | 馈能-主动模式 |
较差(E、F级) | 主动模式 |
参数 | 优化后主动悬架 | 原悬架 | 被动悬架 |
簧上质量加速度/(m·s-2) | 0.726 1 | 0.844 4 | 1.123 0 |
变化量百分比/% | -35.0 | -24.0 | 0.0 |
悬架动挠度/m | 0.011 8 | 0.010 0 | 0.010 7 |
变化量百分比/% | 10.0 | -6.5 | 0.0 |
车轮动行程/m | 0.002 8 | 0.002 7 | 0.002 6 |
变化量百分比/% | 7.7 | 3.8 | 0.0 |
馈能效率/% | 7.10 | 5.44 | 0.00 |
参数 | 数值 |
ms/kg | 285 |
mt/kg | 40 |
k1/(N·m-1) | 15 680 |
k2/(N·m-3) | 1 568 |
C1/(N·s·m-1) | 1 780 |
C2/(N·s·m-2) | 100 |
C3/(N·s·m-1) | 1 000 |
kt/(N·m-1) | 180 000 |
Ke/(V·s·m-1) | 69 |
Kf/(V·s·m-1) | 78 |
R0/Ω | 5 |
Rl/Ω | 0~1 000 |
路面等级 | 识别误差均方根/mm | 识别误差率/% |
A | 8.3×10-6 | 0.26 |
B | 3.2×10-4 | 1.37 |
C | 3.6×10-3 | 4.65 |
D | 9.4×10-3 | 8.12 |
路面等级 | q1 | q2 | q3 |
良好(A、B级) | 0.80 | 0.80 | 1.20 |
一般(C、D级) | 0.90 | 0.90 | 1.10 |
较差(E、F级) | 0.95 | 0.95 | 1.05 |
路面等级 | 切换控制策略 |
良好(A、B级) | 馈能模式 |
一般(C、D级) | 馈能-主动模式 |
较差(E、F级) | 主动模式 |
参数 | 优化后主动悬架 | 原悬架 | 被动悬架 |
簧上质量加速度/(m·s-2) | 0.726 1 | 0.844 4 | 1.123 0 |
变化量百分比/% | -35.0 | -24.0 | 0.0 |
悬架动挠度/m | 0.011 8 | 0.010 0 | 0.010 7 |
变化量百分比/% | 10.0 | -6.5 | 0.0 |
车轮动行程/m | 0.002 8 | 0.002 7 | 0.002 6 |
变化量百分比/% | 7.7 | 3.8 | 0.0 |
馈能效率/% | 7.10 | 5.44 | 0.00 |