Volume 25 Issue 1
Feb.  2025
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
LIU Ke-zhong, YU Yue-rong, ZHUANG Su-jie, ZHOU Yang, YUAN Zhi-tao, YANG Xing, XIN Xu-ri. Collision risk assessment for complex navigable waters based on ship dynamic cluster[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2025, 25(1): 145-159. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2025.01.010
Citation: LIU Ke-zhong, YU Yue-rong, ZHUANG Su-jie, ZHOU Yang, YUAN Zhi-tao, YANG Xing, XIN Xu-ri. Collision risk assessment for complex navigable waters based on ship dynamic cluster[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2025, 25(1): 145-159. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2025.01.010

Collision risk assessment for complex navigable waters based on ship dynamic cluster

doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2025.01.010
Funds:

National Natural Science Foundation of China 52031009

More Information
  • Corresponding author: LIU Ke-zhong(1976-), male, professor, PhD, kzliu@whut.edu.cn
  • Received Date: 2023-08-20
  • Publish Date: 2025-02-25
  • To address the challenges of insufficient spatial-temporal granularity and limited real-time dynamics in perceiving collision risk within complex navigable waters, a collision risk assessment framework based on ship dynamic clusters was developed. After preprocessing of ship trajectory data, a ship traffic topology network model for complex navigable waters was constructed to depict the interplay of ship collision risk within the region. By taking into account the dynamic spatial-temporal characteristics of ships, the spectral clustering algorithm was introduced for traffic segmentation, defining ship dynamic clusters. Further optimization of the ship dynamic cluster partitioning strategy was performed through the Davies-Bouldin index. Based on the graph theory, measures for ship interference complexity were introduced to establish a ship dynamic cluster risk assessment method, discerning high-risk collision areas within the complex navigable waters. A study was conducted on a representative complex navigable waters, the core port area of Ningbo-Zhoushan Port, where one-month ship traffic flow data was collected to assess ship collision risk under multi-ship encounter scenarios. Research results show that the proposed adaptive method for ship dynamic cluster partitioning effectively divides ships within navigable waters into several clusters. This approach simplifies ship-to-ship collision risk relationship, while retaining the most critical collision risk across the entire spatial scope. The proposed ship collision risk assesment method preserves 84.98% of the global risk. Compared to traditional distance-based clustering algorithm and other classical clustering algorithms such as K-means, hierarchical clustering, and density-based spatial clustering of applications with noise (DBSCAN), the proposed method has a larger retained risk value and can reduce unnecessary risk relationships. It achieves optimal comprehensive performance in terms of accuracy, cluster compactness, and scale balance, effectively reducing false positive rates and discretizing the overall regional risk. By further utilizing the proposed risk assessment model, the risk states of 8 640 multi-ship encounter scenarios are computed through superimposition, identifying high-risk areas within the port area and align with actual survey results.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    CHAI Tian, WENG Jin-xian, XIONG De-qi. Development of a quantitative risk assessment model for ship collisions in fairways[J]. Safety Science, 2017, 91: 71-83. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2016.07.018
    [2]
    FANG Zhi-xiang, YU Hong-chu, KE Ran-xuan, et al. Automatic identification system-based approach for assessing the near-miss collision risk dynamics of ships in ports[J]. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2019, 20(2): 534-543. doi: 10.1109/TITS.2018.2816122
    [3]
    CAI Ming-you, ZHANG Jin-fen, ZHANG Di, et al. Collision risk analysis on ferry ships in Jiangsu Section of the Yangtze River based on AIS data[J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2021, 215: 107901. doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2021.107901
    [4]
    LEI Jin-yu, CHU Xiu-min, JIANG Zhong-lian, et al. Situation awareness system for vessel navigation based on visual analytics[J]. Navigation of China, 2018, 41(3): 47-52. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-4653.2018.03.010
    [5]
    CHEN Peng-fei, HUANG Ya-min, MOU Jun-min, et al. Probabilistic risk analysis for ship-ship collision: state-of-the-art[J]. Safety Science, 2019, 117: 108-122. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2019.04.014
    [6]
    HUANG Ya-min, CHEN Lin-yin, CHEN Peng-fei, et al. Ship collision avoidance methods: state-of-the-art[J]. Safety Science, 2020, 121: 451-473. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2019.09.018
    [7]
    DU Lei, GOERLANDT F, KUJALA P. Review and analysis of methods for assessing maritime waterway risk based on non-accident critical events detected from AIS data[J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2020, 200: 106933. doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2020.106933
    [8]
    GOERLANDT F, MONTEWKA J. Maritime transportation risk analysis: review and analysis in light of some foundational issues[J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2015, 138: 115-134. doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2015.01.025
    [9]
    CHEN Peng-fei, HUANG Ya-min, MOU Jun-min, et al. Ship collision candidate detection method: a velocity obstacle approach[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2018, 170: 186-198. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2018.10.023
    [10]
    DEBNATH A K, CHIN H C. Navigational traffic conflict technique: a proactive approach to quantitative measurement of collision risks in port waters[J]. The Journal of Navigation, 2010, 63(1): 137-152. doi: 10.1017/S0373463309990233
    [11]
    ZHU Qing-hua, HU Shen-ping, WU Jian-jun, et al. Inference method for overtaking-related collision risk analysis based on accident scenario inversion[J]. Navigation of China, 2023, 46(3): 29-35. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-4653.2023.03.005
    [12]
    LIU Zhao, ZHANG Bo-yuan, ZHANG Ming-yang, et al. A quantitative method for the analysis of ship collision risk using AIS data[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2023, 272: 113906.
    [13]
    LIU Ke-zhong, WU Xiao-lie, ZHOU Yang, et al. A conflict cluster-based method for collision avoidance decision-making in multi-ship encounter situations[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2023, 288: 116038. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.116038
    [14]
    WANG Miao-miao, WANG Yan-fu, CUI Er-hua, et al. A novel multi-ship collision probability estimation method considering data-driven quantification of trajectory uncertainty[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2023, 272: 113825.
    [15]
    XIN Xu-ri, YANG Zai-li, LIU Ke-zhong, et al. Multi-stage and multi-topology analysis of ship traffic complexity for probabilistic collision detection[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2023, 213: 118890.
    [16]
    KUNDAKÇI B, NAS S, GUCMA L. Prediction of ship domain on coastal waters by using AIS data[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2023, 273: 113921. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.113921
    [17]
    SUI Bo-wen, ZHANG Jian-qiang, LIU Zhong. A real-time ship encounter collision risk detection approach in close-quarters situation[J]. Measurement and Control, 2023, 56(9/10): 1613-1625.
    [18]
    LIU Zi-hao, WU Zhao-lin, ZHENG Zhong-yi. A cooperative game approach for assessing the collision risk in multi-vessel encountering[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2019, 187: 106175. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.106175
    [19]
    ZHEN Rong, SHI Zi-qiang, SHAO Zhe-ping, et al. A novel regional collision risk assessment method considering aggregation density under multi-ship encounter situations[J]. The Journal of Navigation, 2022, 75(1): 76-94. doi: 10.1017/S0373463321000849
    [20]
    WEN Yuan-qiao, HUANG Ya-min, ZHOU Chun-hui, et al. Modelling of marine traffic flow complexity[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2015, 104: 500-510. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.04.051
    [21]
    ZHANG Fan, LIU Yi-hao, DU Lei, et al. A rule-based maritime traffic situation complex network approach for enhancing situation awareness of vessel traffic service operators[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2023, 284: 115203. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.115203
    [22]
    SUI Zhong-yi, WEN Yuan-qiao, HUANG Ya-min, et al. Empirical analysis of complex network for marine traffic situation[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2020, 214: 107848. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.107848
    [23]
    LIU Zi-hao, WU Zhao-lin, ZHENG Zhong-yi. A molecular dynamics approach for modeling the geographical distribution of ship collision risk[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2020, 217: 107991.
    [24]
    LUONG T N, HWANG S, IM N. Harbour Traffic Hazard Map for real-time assessing waterway risk using Marine Traffic Hazard Index[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2021, 239: 109884. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.109884
    [25]
    ZHEN R, RIVERIRO M, JIN Y X. A novel analytic framework of real-time multi-vessel collision risk assessment for maritime traffic surveillance[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2017, 145: 492-501. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2017.09.015
    [26]
    TONG Yan-ting, ZHEN Rong, DONG Han, et al. Identifying influential ships in multi-ship encounter situation complex network based on improved WVoteRank approach[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2023, 284: 115192. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.115192
    [27]
    ZHEN Rong, SHI Zi-qiang, LIU Jia-lun, et al. A novel arena-based regional collision risk assessment method of multi-ship encounter situation in complex waters[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2022, 246: 110531. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.110531
    [28]
    VU D T, JEONG J Y. Collision risk assessment by using hierarchical clustering method and real-time data[J]. Journal of the Korean Society of Marine Environment and Safety, 2021, 27(4): 483-491. doi: 10.7837/kosomes.2021.27.4.483
    [29]
    ORUC M F, ALTAN Y C. Risky maritime encounter patterns via clustering[J]. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 2023, 11(5): 11050950.
    [30]
    PAVLIDIS T, ALI F. Computer recognition of handwritten numerals by polygonal approximations[J]. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 1975, 5(6): 610-614.
    [31]
    LI Jun-jie, LIU Peng-cheng, DUNYU Duo-ji. Method to extract the center line of a complex road based on walking trajectory[J]. Journal of Central China Normal University (Natural Sciences), 2020, 54(1): 89-95.
    [32]
    HU Jing-feng, HAO Jiang-ling, TONG Chen-tao. Research on calculated reckoning in ECDIS[J]. Journal of Dalian Maritime University, 2005, 31(4): 24-26.
    [33]
    MOU Jun-min, VAN DER TAK C, LIGTERINGEN H. Study on collision avoidance in busy waterways by using AIS data[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2010, 37(5/6): 483-490.
    [34]
    JIANG Xu-rui, WEN Xiang-xi, WU Ming-gong, et al. A complex network analysis approach for identifying air traffic congestion based on independent component analysis[J]. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 2019, 523: 364-381.
    [35]
    LIU Hong-lu, TIAN Zhi-hong, HUANG An-qiang, et al. Analysis of vulnerabilities in maritime supply chains[J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2018, 169: 475-484.
    [36]
    SHI J B, MALIK J. Normalized cuts and image segmentation[J]. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2000, 22(8): 888-905.
    [37]
    YIN Chen-kun, FANG Ru, LI Tuo. NCut partitioning algorithm for urban road networks based on similarity of traffic flow time series[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2021, 21(5): 238-250. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2021.05.020
    [38]
    BACH F R, JORDAN M I. Learning spectral clustering, with application to speech separation[J]. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 2006, 7: 1963-2001.
    [39]
    BIAN Tian, HU Jian-tao, DENG Yong. Identifying influential nodes in complex networks based on AHP[J]. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 2017, 479: 422-436.
    [40]
    DU Yu-xian, GAO Cai, HU Yong, et al. A new method of identifying influential nodes in complex networks based on TOPSIS[J]. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 2014, 399: 57-69.
    [41]
    PARAND F A, RAHIMI H, GORZIN M. Combining fuzzy logic and eigenvector centrality measure in social network analysis[J]. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 2016, 459: 24-31.
    [42]
    WEN Xiang-xi, TU Cong-liang, WU Ming-gong, et al. Fast ranking nodes importance in complex networks based on LS-SVM method[J]. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 2018, 506: 11-23.
    [43]
    FRIEDMAN J H, TUKEY J W. A projection pursuit algorithm for exploratory data analysis[J]. IEEE Transactions on Computers, 1974, 23(9): 881-890.
    [44]
    MIRJALILI S. Moth-flame optimization algorithm: a novel nature-inspired heuristic paradigm[J]. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2015, 89: 228-249.

Catalog

    Article Metrics

    Article views (20) PDF downloads(7) Cited by()
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return