Volume 25 Issue 1
Feb.  2025
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
WANG Zhuang, LIU Yong-jian, GONG Bo-xu, CHEN Sha, LIU Jiang, LIU Mao-yi, WANG Zhi-qiang. Analysis method of steel bridge surface relative humidity[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2025, 25(1): 234-247. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2025.01.017
Citation: WANG Zhuang, LIU Yong-jian, GONG Bo-xu, CHEN Sha, LIU Jiang, LIU Mao-yi, WANG Zhi-qiang. Analysis method of steel bridge surface relative humidity[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2025, 25(1): 234-247. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2025.01.017

Analysis method of steel bridge surface relative humidity

doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2025.01.017
Funds:

National Natural Science Foundation of China 52478126

Scientific Research Program of Chongqing City Construction Investment Corporation CQCT-J5-SC-GC-222-008

More Information
  • Corresponding author: LIU Yong-jian(1966-), male, professor, PhD, lyj.chd@gmail.com
  • Received Date: 2024-06-27
  • Publish Date: 2025-02-25
  • To explore the temporal variation and distribution characteristics of surface relative humidity, the concept of the relative humidity boundary layer was introduced. The difference between surface relative humidity and environment relative humidity was clarified. Based on the physical relationship between air temperature and humidity, a method for calculating the surface relative humidity of steel bridges was proposed. The accuracy of the method was verified. The surface relative humidity of a steel arch bridge was calculated using this method. The difference between surface relative humidity and environmental relative humidity was quantified. The results show that the variation pattern of surface relative humidity in steel arch bridges is consistent with that of environment relative humidity. Both annual and daily variations exhibit distinct sinusoidal characteristics. The amplitude of surface relative humidity variation is larger. Surface relative humidity commonly exceeds environmental relative humidity. In high-humidity environments, this condition can persist for several days. The longitudinal distribution of surface relative humidity on the arch ribs is highly uneven. The maximum difference in surface relative humidity between the top plate at the arch crown and the arch foot is 16%. The maximum difference in surface relative humidity between the bottom plate at the arch crown and the arch foot is also 10%. The surface relative humidity in the middle of the tie beam is evenly distributed. Significant differences exist between the ends and the middle. The maximum difference exceeds 30%. During the testing period, the environmental wetting time is 1 191.5 hours. The surface wetting time is 2 016 hours, 1.71 times the environmental wetting time. The wetting time of the top plate of the arch rib is greater than that of the bottom plate. The maximum difference reaches 17.5%. The surface wetting time of the top plate of the tie beam is less than that of the bottom plate. The maximum difference reaches 25.5%. Both the difference coefficient in relative humidity and the difference coefficient in wetting time represent the differences between the surface environment of the steel bridge and the atmospheric environment. Two types of the distribution pattern of different coefficients are consistent. The difference coefficients near the arch crown are higher than that near the arch foot. The difference coefficients for the tie beams in the middle are higher than that at the ends. At the same cross-section, the difference coefficients for the top plates of the arch rib are higher than that for the bottom plates. The difference coefficients for the top plates of the tie beam are lower than that for the bottom plates.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    QIAO Wen-jing, YANG Fan, HU Qi-han, et al. Experiment on mechanical property degradation of Q345 steel after strong corrosion[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2022, 22(5): 231-246. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2022.05.014
    [2]
    WANG Chun-sheng, ZHANG Jing-wen, DUAN Lan, et al. Research progress and engineering application of long lasting high performance weathering steel bridges[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2020, 20(1): 1-26. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2020.01.001
    [3]
    ZHU Jin-song, GUO Xiao-yu, KANG Jing-fu, et al. Research on corrosion behavior, mechanical property, and application of weathering steel in bridges[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2019, 32(5): 1-16.
    [4]
    JIA Chen, SHAO Yong-song, GUO Lan-hui, et al. A review of atmospheric corrosion models of building structural steel[J]. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology, 2020, 52(8): 1-9.
    [5]
    LIU Yong-jian, CHEN Sha, WANG Zhuang. Atmospheric corrosion micro-environment and longevity genes of steel bridges[J]. Journal of Architecture and Civil Engineering. 2023, 40(5): 1-19.
    [6]
    OSHIKAWA W, SHINOHARA T, MOTODA S. Estimation of chemical composition and thickness of water film of moist strong electrolyte solution[J]. Zairyo-to-Kankyo, 2003, 52(6): 293-298. doi: 10.3323/jcorr1991.52.293
    [7]
    COLE I S, GANTHER W D. Experimental determination of duration of wetness on metal surfaces[J]. Corrosion Engineering Science and Technology, 2008, 43(2): 156-162. doi: 10.1179/174327807X214554
    [8]
    JIANG Shao-fei, LIN Jin-xing, SONG Hua-lin, et al. Evolution and rate prediction model of pitting of carbon steel in atmospheric environment based on multiphysical fields[J]. Materials Reports, 2024, 38(19): 231-237.
    [9]
    XIA Chen-han, YANG Xiao-jia, LI Qing, et al. Big data analysis of atmospheric corrosion of carbon steel[J]. Corrosion and Protection, 2024, 45(2): 75-84.
    [10]
    MA Shi-dong, YAO Fa-reng, LIU Qi-chang, et al. Big data-based analysis of environmental corrosivity in offshore wind turbines[J]. Ship Engineering, 2024, 46(S1): 123-127, 183.
    [11]
    COSABOOM B, MEHALCHICK G, ZOCCOLA J C. Bridge construction with unpainted high-strength low-alloy steel, eight year progress report[R]. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, 1979.
    [12]
    ZOCCOLA J. Eight-year corrosion test report - 8-mile road interchange[R]. Bethlehem: Bethlehem Steel Corporation, 1976.
    [13]
    LARRABEE C P. The effect of specimen position on atmospheric corrosion testing of steel[J]. Transactions of the Electrochemical Society, 1944, 85(1): 297. doi: 10.1149/1.3071601
    [14]
    WANG Xian-dong. Study on details of corrosion-prone structure of steel bridge[D]. Xi'an: Chang'an University, 2023.
    [15]
    HEIDERSBACH R. Corrosion performance of weathering steel structures[J]. Transportation Research Record, 1978(1113): 24-29.
    [16]
    JIN Y, KAZUTOSHI N. Considering the surrounding environment of the bridge and the dew condensation condition[C]//KAWASAKI M. Japan Society of Civil Engineers 2011 Annual Meeting. Takamatsu: Japan Society of Civil Engineers National Convention Executive Committee Shikoku Branch of Society of Civil Engineers, 2011: 1177-1178.
    [17]
    OHSHIMA M, TAKOH J, SUZUMURA K, et al. Economical dehumidification design and actual proof examination of box girder bridge[J]. Doboku Gakkai Ronbunshuu F, 2007, 63(1): 119-130. doi: 10.2208/jscejf.63.119
    [18]
    KAZUTOSHI N, RYOSUKE N, CHISATO Y, et al. Evaluation methods of dew condensation of steel girders using weather data[J]. Construction Engineering Papers A, 2016(62): 796-803.
    [19]
    MOTODA S, SUZUKI Y, SHINOHARA T, et al. Corrosive factors of a marine atmosphere analyzed by ACM sensor for 1 year[J]. Zairyo-to-Kankyo, 1995, 44(4): 218-225. doi: 10.3323/jcorr1991.44.218
    [20]
    JIN Y H, HA M G, JEON S H, et al. Evaluation of corrosion conditions for the steel box members by corrosion monitoring exposure test[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2020, 258: 120195. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120195
    [21]
    JIN Y, HA M, JEONG Y, et al. Relative corrosion environment conditions of steel box members examined by corrosion current measurement[J]. Journal of the Korea Institute for Structural Maintenance and Inspection, 2020, 24(6): 171-179.
    [22]
    HA M G, HEO C J, AHN J H. Correlation evaluation of time of wetness and mean corrosion depth depending on corrosive environment[J]. Journal of Korean Society of Steel Construction, 2022, 34(3): 119-127. doi: 10.7781/kjoss.2022.34.3.119
    [23]
    HA M G, JEON S H, JEONG Y S, et al. Corrosion environment monitoring of local structural members of a steel truss bridge under a marine environment[J]. International Journal of Steel Structures, 2021, 21(1): 167-177. doi: 10.1007/s13296-020-00424-3
    [24]
    LIU C, MIYASHITA T, NAGAI M. Analytical study on shear capacity of steel I-girders with local corrosion nearby supports[J]. Procedia Engineering, 2011(14): 2276-2284.
    [25]
    JEON S H, HA M G, JEONG Y S, et al. Evaluation of corrosion damage of structural steel depending on atmospheric exposure test[J]. Journal of Korean Society of Steel Construction, 2019, 31(4): 245-252. doi: 10.7781/kjoss.2019.31.4.245
    [26]
    HA M G, JEONG Y S, AHN J H. Evaluation of relative corrosion rate depending on local location and installation of structural member in steel water gate[J]. Journal of the Korea Institute for Structural Maintenance and Inspection, 2019, 23(7): 16-24.
    [27]
    TOMOMI I, YASUO H, KOSUTO F, et al. Study on soundness assessment techniques for aged transmission tower: research results in a first phase[R]. Yokosu: Central Research Institute of Electric Power Industry, 2016.
    [28]
    WANG Zhuang, LIU Yong-jian, TANG Zhi-wei, et al. Three-dimensional temperature field simulation method of truss arch rib based on sunlight shadow recognition[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2022, 35(12): 91-105.
    [29]
    CHEN Bao-chun, LIU Zhen-yu. Research on thermal field test of concrete filled steel tubular truss arch under solar radiation[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2011, 24(3): 72-79.
    [30]
    LIU Yong-jian, LIU Jiang, ZHANG Ning, et al. Review on solar thermal actions of bridge structures[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2019, 52(5): 59-78.
    [31]
    CUI Chuang, ZHANG Qing-hua, ZHANG Deng-ke, et al. Monitoring and detection of steel bridge diseases: a review[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English Edition), 2024, 11(2): 188-208.
    [32]
    YANG Song, LI Wen-qiang, HUANG Xu, et al. Study on temperature field of steel box girder based on modified convective heat transfer coefficient[J]. Journal of South China University of Technology (Natural Science Edition), 2021, 49(4): 47-58, 64.
    [33]
    CHEN Sha, LIU Yong-jian, WANG Zhuang, et al. Calculation methods for boundary conditions of relative humidity on steel bridge surface[J]. Journal of Architecture and Civil Engineering, 2024, 41(2): 85-95.
    [34]
    HOSEINPOOR M, PROŠEK T, BABUSIAUX L. Toward more realistic time of wetness measurement by means of surface relative humidity[J]. Corrosion Science, 2020, 177: 108999.
    [35]
    LIU Yong-jian, Liu Jiang, Zhou Xu-hong, et al. Review on long-life design theory for bridges[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2024, 24(3): 1-24. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2024.03.001
    [36]
    KLINESMITH D E, MCCUEN R H, ALBRECHT P. Effect of environmental conditions on corrosion rates[J]. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 2007, 19(2): 121-129.
    [37]
    GUO Yang-yang, WU Xian, ZHAO Yuan-hui, et al. Bulkhead condensation for cabin temperature regulation and dehumidification of deep-sea manned platform[J]. Ship Engineering, 2024(46): 247-252.
    [38]
    PRUSACZYK W K. Precise water vapor pressure value calculations[J]. Computers in Biology and Medicine, 1989: 19(2): 129-130.
    [39]
    YOSHIHIRO I. Study on the decaying eclipse environment of steel equipment[D]. Fukuoka: Kyushu University, 2013.
    [40]
    UCHIUMI Y, A Study on the environment in the bridge girder of the inner environment of the box girders[J]. Kawada Technical Report, 2002(21): 92-93.

Catalog

    Article Metrics

    Article views (12) PDF downloads(4) Cited by()
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return