Volume 25 Issue 1
Feb.  2025
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
WANG Yi-bing, HU Ran, YU Hong-xin, LI Jia-heng, ZHANG Yu-jie, XU Zhi-gang, HE Zhao-cheng, LU Qi-rong. Global traffic state prediction method for non-sensing locations on freeways[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2025, 25(1): 274-294. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2025.01.020
Citation: WANG Yi-bing, HU Ran, YU Hong-xin, LI Jia-heng, ZHANG Yu-jie, XU Zhi-gang, HE Zhao-cheng, LU Qi-rong. Global traffic state prediction method for non-sensing locations on freeways[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2025, 25(1): 274-294. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2025.01.020

Global traffic state prediction method for non-sensing locations on freeways

doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2025.01.020
Funds:

National Natural Science Foundation of China 52272315

Key Research and Development Program of Zhejiang Province 2024C01180

Key Research and Development Program of Zhejiang Province 2022C01129

International Science and Technology Cooperation Project of Ningbo 2023H020

More Information
  • Corresponding author: WANG Yi-bing(1968-), male, professor, PhD, wangyibing@zju.edu.cn
  • Received Date: 2024-05-19
  • Publish Date: 2025-02-25
  • In view of the problem that existing research on traffic state prediction of freeways rarely considers non-sensing locations or road topology changes, the limitations of existing research methods were analyzed. A traffic state prediction method combining macroscopic traffic flow model, extended Kalman filtering, and data-driven long short-term memory (LSTM) was proposed, aiming to fully leverage the advantages of machine learning in temporal feature expression and trustworthy traffic flow models in spatial dynamic tracking. Based on the flow and speed data of limited sensing locations, a model of ecoulement of traffic autoroute for networks (METANET) was constructed, and the global model parameters and fundamental diagram parameters were calibrated. A traffic state estimator based on METANET and extended Kalman filtering was designed. The machine learning model was trained to predict the traffic state of all sensing points, and the traffic state estimator was driven to predict the global traffic state. Research results show that the proposed traffic state prediction method can significantly improve the prediction accuracy of flow and speed of freeways. The mean absolute percentage errors of 5-minute flow and speed predictions are 6.92% and 5.29%, which perform 29.62% and 24.28% better than baseline method, respectively, and those of 30-minute flow and speed predictions are 10.02% and 8.62%, which perform 24.84% and 15.87% better than baseline method, respectively. In addition, the proposed method fully considers the impact of on/off ramp flow on the mainline traffic state, so the performance of mainline traffic flow prediction is significantly improved.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    Editorial Department of China Journal of Highway and Transport. Review on China's traffic engineering research progress: 2016[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2016, 29(6): 1-161. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7372.2016.06.001
    [2]
    HOBEIKA A G, KIM C K. Traffic-flow-prediction systems based on upstream traffic[C]//IEEE. Proceedings of VNIS'94—1994 Vehicle Navigation and Information Systems Conference. New York: IEEE, 1994: 345-350.
    [3]
    SMITH B L, DEMETSKY M J. Traffic flow forecasting: comparison of modeling approaches[J]. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 1997, 123(4): 261-266. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1997)123:4(261)
    [4]
    WILLIAMS B M, DURVASULA P K, BROWN D E. Urban freeway traffic flow prediction: application of seasonal autoregressive integrated moving average and exponential smoothing models[J]. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1998, 1644(1): 132-141. doi: 10.3141/1644-14
    [5]
    SUN Shi-liang, ZHANG Chang-shui, YU Guo-qiang. A Bayesian network approach to traffic flow forecasting[J]. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2006, 7(1): 124-132. doi: 10.1109/TITS.2006.869623
    [6]
    ZHU Zheng-yu, LIU Lin, CUI Ming. Short-term traffic flow forecasting model combining SVM and Kalman filtering[J]. Computer Science, 2013, 40(10): 248-251, 278. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-137X.2013.10.052
    [7]
    YANG Yi-jiao, DUAN Zheng-yu. A novel prediction method of traffic flow: least squares support vector machines based on spatial relation[C]//ASCE. 14th COTA International Conference of Transportation Professionals: Safe, Smart, and Sustainable Multimodal Transportation Systems. Reston: ASCE, 2014: 1807-1818.
    [8]
    LI Yuan-yuan, XU Wei-xiang. Short-term traffic flow forecasting based on SVR[C]//AMCCE. Proceedings of the 2018 3rd International Conference on Automation, Mechanical Control and Computational Engineering (AMCCE 2018). Paris: Atlantis Press, 2018: 57-61.
    [9]
    HUANG Wen-hao, SONG Guo-jie, HONG Hai-kun, et al. Deep architecture for traffic flow prediction: deep belief networks with multitask learning[J]. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2014, 15(5): 2191-2201. doi: 10.1109/TITS.2014.2311123
    [10]
    LYU Yi-sheng, DUAN Yan-jie, KANG Wen-wen, et al. Traffic flow prediction with big data: a deep learning approach[J]. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2015, 16(2): 865-873.
    [11]
    WANG Jing-yuan, GU Qian, WU Jun-jie, et al. Traffic speed prediction and congestion source exploration: a deep learning method[C]//IEEE. 2016 IEEE 16th International Conference on Data Mining. New York: IEEE, 2016: 499-508.
    [12]
    WANG Jing-yuan, HU Fei, LI Li, et al. Deep Bi-directional long short-term memory model for short-term traffic flow prediction[C]//Springer. 24th International Conference on Neural Information Processing. Berlin: Springer, 2017: 306-316.
    [13]
    LIU Bo-yi, CHENG Jie-ren, CAI Kuan-qi, et al. Singular point probability improve LSTM network performance for long-term traffic flow prediction[C]//Springer. 35th National Conference on Theoretical Computer Science. Berlin: Springer, 2017: 328-340.
    [14]
    YU Bing, YIN Hao-teng, ZHU Zhan-xing. Spatio-temporal graph convolutional networks: a deep learning framework for traffic forecasting[C]//International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence. Proceedings of the 27th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJGAI-18). California: International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence, 2018: 3634-3640.
    [15]
    KUMAR N, RAUBAL M. Applications of deep learning in congestion detection, prediction and alleviation: a survey[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2021, 133: 103432. doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2021.103432
    [16]
    CUI H P, MENG Q, TENG T H, et al. Spatiotemporal correlation modelling for machine learning-based traffic state predictions: state-of-the-art and beyond[J]. Transport Reviews, 2023, 43(4): 780-804. doi: 10.1080/01441647.2023.2171151
    [17]
    LIU Qi-dong, LIU Chao-yue, QIU Zi-xin, et al. Time-aware transformer for traffic flow forecasting[J]. Computer Science, 2023, 50(11): 88-96. doi: 10.11896/jsjkx.221000201
    [18]
    YANG Han-yi, DU Li-li, ZHANG Guo-hui, et al. A traffic flow dependency and dynamics based deep learning aided approach for network-wide traffic speed propagation prediction[J]. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 2023, 167: 99-117. doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2022.11.009
    [19]
    YANG Han-yi, YU Wan-xin, ZHANG Guo-hui, et al. Network-wide traffic flow dynamics prediction leveraging macroscopic traffic flow model and deep neural networks[J]. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2024, 25(5): 4443-4457. doi: 10.1109/TITS.2023.3329489
    [20]
    FOULADGAR M, PARCHAMI M, ELMASRI R, et al. Scalable deep traffic flow neural networks for urban traffic congestion prediction[C]//IEEE. 2017 Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN). New York: IEEE, 2017: 2251-2258.
    [21]
    KAN Yu-heng, WANG Yi-bing, WANG Dian-hai, et al. A novel approach to estimating missing pairs of on/off ramp flows[J]. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2021, 22(2): 1287-1305. doi: 10.1109/TITS.2020.2989365
    [22]
    YAO Jun-feng, HE Rui, SHI Tong-tong, et al. Review on machine learning-based traffic flow prediction methods[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2023, 23(3): 44-67. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2023.03.003
    [23]
    CUI Jian-xun, YAO Jia, ZHAO Bo-yuan. Review on short-term traffic flow prediction methods based on deep learning[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2024, 24(2): 50-64. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2024.02.003
    [24]
    VLAHOGIANNI E I, KARLAFTIS M G, GOLIAS J C. Short-term traffic forecasting: where we are and where we're going[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2014, 43: 3-19.
    [25]
    LI Ya-guang, SHAHABI C. A brief overview of machine learning methods for short-term traffic forecasting and future directions[J]. SIGSPATIAL Special, 2018, 10(1): 3-9.
    [26]
    TEDJOPURNOMO D A, BAO Z F, ZHENG B H, et al. A survey on modern deep neural network for traffic prediction: trends, methods and challenges[J]. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 2022, 34(4): 1544-1561.
    [27]
    LIGHTHILL M J, WHITHAM G B. On kinematic waves Ⅱ. A theory of traffic flow on long crowded roads[J]. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 1955, 229(1178): 317-345.
    [28]
    RICHARDS P I. Shock waves on the highway[J]. Operations Research, 1956, 4(1): 42-51. doi: 10.1287/opre.4.1.42
    [29]
    DAGANZO C F. The cell transmission model: a dynamic representation of highway traffic consistent with the hydrodynamic theory[J]. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 1994, 28(4): 269-287. doi: 10.1016/0191-2615(94)90002-7
    [30]
    PAPAGEORGIOU M, SCHMIDT G. Freeway traffic modelling and control[J]. IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 1983, 16(4): 195-202. doi: 10.1016/S1474-6670(17)62562-X
    [31]
    TREIBER M, HENNECKE A, HELBING D. Derivation, properties, and simulation of a gas-kinetic-based, nonlocal traffic model[J]. Physical Review E, 1999, 59(1): 239-253. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.59.239
    [32]
    AW A, RASCLE M. Resurrection of "second order" models of traffic flow[J]. SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, 2000, 60(3): 916-938.
    [33]
    ZHANG H M. A non-equilibrium traffic model devoid of gas-like behavior[J]. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 2002, 36(3): 275-290.
    [34]
    PAPAGEORGIOU M, BLOSSEVILLE J M, HADJ-SALEM H. Macroscopic modelling of traffic flow on the boulevard Périphérique in Paris[J]. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 1989, 23(1): 29-47.
    [35]
    PAPAGEORGIOU M, BLOSSEVILLE J M, HADJ-SALEM H. Modelling and real-time control of traffic flow on the southern part of Boulevard Peripherique in Paris, part Ⅰ: modelling[J]. Transportation Research Part A: General, 1990, 24(5): 345-359.
    [36]
    KONTORINAKI M, SPILIOPOULOU A, RONCOLI C, et al. First-order traffic flow models incorporating capacity drop: overview and real-data validation[J]. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 2017, 106: 52-75.
    [37]
    MOHAMMADIAN S, ZHENG Z D, HAQUE M M, et al. Performance of continuum models for realworld traffic flows: comprehensive benchmarking[J]. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 2021, 147: 132-167.
    [38]
    KOTSIALOS A, PAPAGEORGIOU M, DIAKAKI C, et al. Traffic flow modeling of large-scale motorway networks using the macroscopic modeling tool METANET[J]. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2002, 3(4): 282-292.
    [39]
    WANG Yi-bing, YU Xiang-hua, GUO Jing-qiu, et al. Macroscopic traffic flow modelling of large-scale freeway networks with field data verification: state-of-the-art review, benchmarking framework, and case studies using METANET[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2022, 145: 103904.
    [40]
    ZHAO Ming-ming, RONCOLI C, WANG Yi-bing, et al. Generic approaches to estimating freeway traffic state and percentage of connected vehicles with fixed and mobile sensing[J]. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2022, 23(8): 13155-13177.
    [41]
    WANG Yi-bing, ZHAO Ming-ming, YU Xiang-hua, et al. Real-time joint traffic state and model parameter estimation on freeways with fixed sensors and connected vehicles: state-of-the-art overview, methods, and case studies[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2022, 134: 103444.
    [42]
    CARLSON R C, PAPAMICHAIL I, PAPAGEORGIOU M, et al. Optimal motorway traffic flow control involving variable speed limits and ramp metering[J]. Transportation Science, 2010, 44(2): 238-253.
    [43]
    WANG Yi-bing, YU Xiang-hua, ZHANG Si-yu, et al. Freeway traffic control in presence of capacity drop[J]. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2021, 22(3): 1497-1516.
    [44]
    DERVISOGLU G, GOMES G, KWON J, et al. Automatic calibration of the fundamental diagram and empirical observations on capacity[C]//TRB. Transportation Research Board 88th Annual Meeting. Washington DC: TRB, 2009: 1-14.
    [45]
    QU Xiang-bo, WANG Shuai-an, ZHANG Jin. On the fundamental diagram for freeway traffic: a novel calibration approach for single-regime models[J]. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 2015, 73: 91-102.
    [46]
    WANG Yi-bing, PAPAGEORGIOU M. Real-time freeway traffic state estimation based on extended Kalman filter: a general approach[J]. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 2005, 39(2): 141-167.
    [47]
    WANG Yi-bing, PAPAGEORGIOU M, MESSMER A. RENAISSANCE—A unified macroscopic model-based approach to real-time freeway network traffic surveillance[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2006, 14(3): 190-212.
    [48]
    WANG Yi-bing, PAPAGEORGIOU M, MESSMER A. Real-time freeway traffic state estimation based on extended Kalman filter: adaptive capabilities and real data testing[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2008, 42(10): 1340-1358.
    [49]
    RAISSI M, PERDIKARIS P, KARNIADAKIS G E. Physics-informed neural networks: a deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2019, 378: 686-707.
    [50]
    DI Xuan, SHI Rong-ye, MO Zhao-bin, et al. Physics-informed deep learning for traffic state estimation: a survey and the outlook[J]. Algorithms, 2023, 16(6): 305.

Catalog

    Article Metrics

    Article views (19) PDF downloads(7) Cited by()
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return