Volume 25 Issue 4
Aug.  2025
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
BAI Tao, AN Yi-ming, JIN Guang-lai, ZHANG Wei-guang, LIN Jie. Improved algorithm for lightweight identification of 3D GPR images of hidden road defects[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2025, 25(4): 42-57. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2025.04.003
Citation: BAI Tao, AN Yi-ming, JIN Guang-lai, ZHANG Wei-guang, LIN Jie. Improved algorithm for lightweight identification of 3D GPR images of hidden road defects[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2025, 25(4): 42-57. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2025.04.003

Improved algorithm for lightweight identification of 3D GPR images of hidden road defects

doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2025.04.003
Funds:

National Natural Science Foundation of China 52278443

Key Project Supported by Transport Department of Hubei Province 2023-121-Z-3-3

More Information
  • Corresponding author: JIN Guang-lai (1987-), male, senior engineer, PhD, jgl@sinoroad.com
  • Received Date: 2024-12-09
  • Accepted Date: 2025-05-06
  • Rev Recd Date: 2025-03-17
  • Publish Date: 2025-08-28
  • To address the problems of small real data scale, difficulty in manual interpretation, and insufficient accuracy and efficiency of traditional algorithms in real-time detection of hidden road defects using three-dimensional ground penetrating radar (3D GPR), a lightweight improved algorithm based on the YOLOv8 algorithm YOLOv8-CES was proposed. Based on the collected 3D GPR images of hidden road defects, defect information was annotated and classified to establish a dataset. A Cut_SimAM attention mechanism was proposed based on the parameter-free SimAM attention mechanism to improve small target detection, and it was added to the backbone network to enhance focus on target regions and improve small object detection ability. Based on the C2f structure, a C2f_EFAttention feature extraction module was introduced into the neck network to optimize the feature fusion process, reduce the number of parameters, and improve detection efficiency. The Slide Loss sliding weighted loss function was used in combination with the D-IoU bounding box loss function to accelerate model convergence and improve detection accuracy for difficult samples. Ablation experiments were conducted to verify the effect of each module on model performance, using mean average precision (mAP), number of parameters, floating point operations per second (FLOPs), and frames per second (FPS) as indicators. The detection accuracy and efficiency of the improved algorithm compared with other algorithms were evaluated through comparative experiments. Test results show that in the collected 3D GPR image dataset of defects, the mAP of YOLOv8-CES reaches 61.5%, increasing by 3.6% compared with the baseline model. The number of parameters reduces from 3.0×106 to 2.5×106, and FLOPs reduces from 8.1 GFLOPs to 7.1 GFLOPs; FPS increases by 16.7%. The improved model achieves higher accuracy and lower computational demand in the recognition and classification of hidden road defects. The high accuracy and lightweight design of the YOLOv8-CES algorithm make it more suitable for embedding in 3D GPR detection devices and achieving real-time detection, indicating its potential application value in road detection.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    Ministry of Transport of China. Statistical bulletin on the development of transportation industry in 2024[N]. China Communications News, 2025-06-12(002).
    [2]
    HOU Fei-fei, SHI Rong-hua, LEI Wen-tai, et al. A review of target detection algorithm for GPR B-scan processing[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology, 2020, 42(1): 191-200.
    [3]
    LI Shi-nian, WANG Xiu-rong, LIN Tian, et al. Numerical simulation of 3D ground penetrating radar based on GprMax for the road cavity[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control, 2020, 31(3): 132-138.
    [4]
    ZHU Hong-zhou, YANG Xu-yuan. Review of non-destructive testing techniques for internal defects in asphalt pavements[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2024, 24(25): 10588-10604.
    [5]
    LEI W T, HOU F F, XI J C, et al. Automatic hyperbola detection and fitting in GPR B-scan image[J]. Automation in Construction, 2019, 106: 102839. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2019.102839
    [6]
    GIRSHICK R, DONAHUE J, DARRELL T, et al. Rich feature hierarchies for accurate object detection and semantic segmentation[C]//IEEE. 2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. New York: IEEE, 2014: 580-587.
    [7]
    GIRSHICK R. Fast R-CNN[C]//IEEE. 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV). New York: IEEE, 2015: 1440-1448.
    [8]
    REN S Q, HE K M, GIRSHICK R, et al. Faster R-CNN: towards real-time object detection with region proposal networks[J]. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2017, 39(6): 1137-1149. doi: 10.1109/TPAMI.2016.2577031
    [9]
    HE K M, GKIOXARI G, DOLLÁR P, et al. Mask R-CNN[C]//IEEE. 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV). New York: IEEE, 2017: 2980-2988.
    [10]
    REDMON J, DIVVALA S, GIRSHICK R, et al. You only look once: unified, real-time object detection[C]//IEEE. 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). New York: IEEE, 2016: 779-788.
    [11]
    LIU W, ANGUELOV D, ERHAN D, et al. SSD: single shot MultiBox detector[C]//LEIBE B, MATA J, SEBE N, et al. Computer Vision-ECCV 2016. Berlin: Springer, 2016: 21-37.
    [12]
    DU Y C, PAN N, XU Z H, et al. Pavement distress detection and classification based on YOLO network[J]. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 2021, 22(13): 1659-1672. doi: 10.1080/10298436.2020.1714047
    [13]
    UKHWAH E N, YUNIARNO E M, SUPRAPTO Y K. Asphalt pavement pothole detection using deep learning method based on YOLO Neural Network[C]//IEEE. 2019 International Seminar on Intelligent Technology and Its Applications. New York: IEEE, 2019: 35-40.
    [14]
    LIU Z, WU W X, GU X Y, et al. Application of combining YOLO models and 3D GPR images in road detection and maintenance[J]. Remote Sensing, 2021, 13(6): 1081. doi: 10.3390/rs13061081
    [15]
    WANG Hui-qin, YANG Fa-dong, HE Yong-qiang, et al. Detection of common underground targets in ground penetrating radar Images using the GDS-YOLOv8n model[J]. Journal of Radars, 2024, 13(6): 1170-1183.
    [16]
    LIU Zhen, GU Xing-yu, LI Jun, et al. Deep learning-enhanced numerical simulation of ground penetrating radar and image detection of road cracks[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2024, 67(6): 2455-2471.
    [17]
    HOU F F, LIU X, FAN X Y, et al. DL-aided underground cavity morphology recognition based on 3D GPR data[J]. Mathematics, 2022, 10(15): 2806. doi: 10.3390/math10152806
    [18]
    QIN H, ZHANG D H, TANG Y, et al. Automatic recognition of tunnel lining elements from GPR images using deep convolutional networks with data augmentation[J]. Automation in Construction, 2021, 130: 103830. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103830
    [19]
    XIONG Hong-qiang. Research on object detection method and applications of ground penetrating radar based on generative adversarial networks[D]. Changchun: Jilin University, 2024.
    [20]
    ZHANG Jun, JIANG Wen-tao, ZHANG Yun, et al. Cement pavement void identification based on XGBoost and GPR time frequency features[J]. Journal of Tongji University (Natural Science), 2024, 52(1): 104-114, 121.
    [21]
    YANG L X, ZHANG R Y, LI L D, et al. SimAM: a simple, parameter-free attention module for convolutional neural networks[C]//PMLR. 38th International Conference on Machine Learning. Vancouver: PMLR, 2021: 11863-11874.
    [22]
    TANG Y, PERTSAU D, ZHAO D, et al. LANet: lightweight attention network for medical image segmentation[C]//MAMMADOVA G, ALIEV T, AIDA-ZADE K, et al. Communications in Computer and Information Science. Berlin: Springer, 2024: 2226.
    [23]
    YU Z P, HUANG H B, CHEN W J, et al. YOLO-FaceV2: a scale and occlusion aware face detector[J]. Pattern Recognition, 2024, 155: 110714. doi: 10.1016/j.patcog.2024.110714
    [24]
    GE Dao-hui, LI Hong-sheng, ZHANG Liang, et al. Survey of lightweight neural network[J]. Journal of Software, 2020, 31(9): 2627-2653.
    [25]
    XU Xiao-hua, ZHOU Zhang-bing, HU Zhong-xu, et al. Lightweight deep neural network models for edge intelligence: a survey[J]. Computer Science, 2024, 51(7): 257-271.
    [26]
    LIU Z, WANG S Q, GU X Y, et al. Non-destructive testing and intelligent evaluation of road structural conditions using GPR and FWD[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English Edition), 2025, 12(3): 462-476. doi: 10.1016/j.jtte.2023.09.006
    [27]
    GUAN Jin-chao, DING Ling, YANG Xu, et al. Pavement surface distress detection in complex scenarios driven by multi-dimensional image fusion[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2024, 24(3): 154-170. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2024.03.010
    [28]
    JIANG Shi-xin, ZOU Xiao-xue, YANG Jian-xi, et al. Concrete bridge crack detection method based on improved YOLO v8s in complex backgrounds[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2024, 24(6): 135-147. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2024.06.009
    [29]
    LI Ying, FEI Yi-xuan, AN Yi-sheng, et al. Review on map matching technologies in intelligent transportation scenarios[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2024, 24(5): 301-332. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2024.05.020
    [30]
    YU B, WANG Y C, CHEN Q H, et al. A review of road 3D modeling based on light detection and ranging point clouds[J]. Journal of Road Engineering, 2024, 4(4): 386-398. doi: 10.1016/j.jreng.2024.04.009
    [31]
    YANG X, ZHANG J Q, LIU W B, et al. Automation in road distress detection, diagnosis and treatment[J]. Journal of Road Engineering, 2024, 4(1): 1-26. doi: 10.1016/j.jreng.2024.01.005

Catalog

    Article Metrics

    Article views (335) PDF downloads(42) Cited by()
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return