ZHANG Hong-liang, HU Zhang-shun, LU Wen-jiang. Theoretical models of determining tolerable differential settlement at end of bridge[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2005, 5(1): 19-23.
Citation: ZHANG Hong-liang, HU Zhang-shun, LU Wen-jiang. Theoretical models of determining tolerable differential settlement at end of bridge[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2005, 5(1): 19-23.

Theoretical models of determining tolerable differential settlement at end of bridge

More Information
  • Author Bio:

    ZHANG Hong-liang(1974-), male, PhD, 86-29-82335826, zhliang0105@yahoo

  • Received Date: 2004-09-21
  • Publish Date: 2005-02-25
  • In order to determine the tolerable differential settlement between bridge abutment and approach embankment, taking into account the comfort and safety of riders, the paper put forward the riders' vibration frequency and maximum transient vibration value of acceleration as controlling indices, built-broken lines models and step models for bridge approaches with and without approach slabs respectively, suggested the tolerable differential movement of embankment/structure interface and the tolerable differential slope of approach slab as the tolerable differential settlements, selected three freedom degrees system and five freedom degrees system as the models for the roughness testing vehicle with only one wheel and the vehicle with two axles respectively, and emphasized that the inertia moment of vehicle body in five freedom degrees system couldn't be ignored. The allowable differential slope of approach slab [Δi] is (0.4%) to 0.5%. When the tolerable maximum transient vibration value was 1.0 m/s2, [Δi] is 0.42%. The result indicates that the models are reasonable.

     

  • loading
  • [1] 日本道路协会. 道路土工软土地基处理技术指南[M]. 北京: 人民交通出版社, 1984.
    [2]
    YE Jian-shu. Controlling criterion of bridge approach remaining settlement[J]. Journal of Southeast University, 1997, 27(3): 12-17. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DNDX703.002.htm
    [3]
    Wahls H E. NCHRP synthesis of highway practice 159: design and construction of bridge approaches[R]. Transportaion Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1990.
    [4] 赖国麟. 关于桥头搭板沉降坡差容许值的建议[R]. 南京: 东南大学, 1994.
    [5]
    ZHANG Hong-liang, HU Chang-shun. Paremeters's influence on determination of allowable differential slope of approach slab[J]. Journal of Chang'an University(Natural Science Edition), 2003, 23(3): 11-14. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XAGL200303002.htm
    [6]
    Thiele J, Maher K T, Joseph V B. State of the art for control of bridge approach settlement[A]. Bridge Evaluation Repair and Rehabilitation[C]. USA. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1990.
    [7]
    ZHONG Yang, LIU Ji. Theoretical analysis of random dynamic load between road and vehicle[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 1993, 10(4): 26-31. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GCLX199304003.htm
    [8]
    FENG Zhong-ju, FANG Yi-li, GONG Jian-cheng, et al. Analysis of the harmful effect of vehicle bump at bridge-head of the highway and its mechanism[J]. Journal of Xi'an Highway University, 1999, 19(4): 33-35. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XAGL199904008.htm
    [9]
    CAI Cheng-biao, ZHAI Wan-ming, ZHAO Tie-jun. Research on dynamic interaction of train and track on roadbed-bridge transition section[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2001, 1(1): 17-19. (in Chinese) http://transport.chd.edu.cn/article/id/200101004

Catalog

    Article Metrics

    Article views (415) PDF downloads(503) Cited by()
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return