WANG Xu-hui, HUANG Sheng-guo, SHI Ding-hao, SHU Ping. Gas path fault prognosis of aeroengine based on support vector machine[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2008, 8(5): 33-37.
Citation: WANG Xu-hui, HUANG Sheng-guo, SHI Ding-hao, SHU Ping. Gas path fault prognosis of aeroengine based on support vector machine[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2008, 8(5): 33-37.

Gas path fault prognosis of aeroengine based on support vector machine

More Information
  • Author Bio:

    WANG Xu-hui (1979-), male, doctoral student, +86-25-84892273, wxhui@nuaa.edu.cn

    HUANG Sheng-guo (1941-), male, professor, +86-25-84892273, huangsg@nuaa.edu.cn

  • Received Date: 2008-04-25
  • Publish Date: 2008-10-25
  • In order to reality the online forecast of aeroengine gas path fault, the protocol and content of the gas path parameters' report in aircraft communication addressing and reporting system(ACARS) were analyzed, and an online forecast model of the parameters based on support vector machine(SVM) algorithm was established.A real-time processing system of aeroengine report was built by using portable air-ground data link transceiver for obtaining the training samples of the model.Final prediction error(FPE) principle was suggested to optimize the embedding dimensions of the samples, and the phase spaces of the samples were reconstructed.An adaptive grid search algorithm was put forward to optimize the parameters of the model, and the model was linked to route plane by using ACARS.Forecast result shows that the relative forecast errors of low-pressure compressor rotor speed, high-pressure compressor rotor speed, exhaust gas temperature and fuel flow are 2.5%, 2.1%, 1.9% and 2.3% respectively, so the model is feasible.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    URBAN L A. Gas path analysis applied to turbine engine condition monitoring[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 1973, 10(7): 400-406. doi: 10.2514/3.60240
    [2]
    ROEMER MJ, KACPRZYNSKI G J. Advanced diagnosticsand prognostics for gas turbine engine risk assessment[C]∥ROBERT A W. Aerospace Conference Proceedings. Manhattan: IEEE, 2000: 345-353.
    [3]
    LUOJian-hui, NAMBURU M. Model-based prognostic tech-niques[C]∥SHEPPARDJ W. AUTOTESTCON 03 Future Sustainment for Military and Aerospace. Anahei : IEEE, 2003: 7803-7837.
    [4]
    CRAWFORD J A, TANNER G F. An integrated enginehealth monitoring systemfor gas turbine aero-engines[C]∥ALLEN G, THOMPSON H A, FLEMI NG P G. Aircraft Airborne Condition Monitoring, IEE Seminar. Gloucester: Michael Faraday House, 2003: 1-12.
    [5]
    SI MON D L. An overview of the nasa aviation safety program propulsion health monitoring element[R]. Ohio: AI AA, 2000.
    [6]
    MELISSA L C, NDAONA C. Engine monitoring using neural networks[R]. Cleveland: AI AA, 1998.
    [7]
    SUYKENS J, VANDEWALLW J. Least Squares Support Vector Machines[M]. Singapore: World Scientific, 2002.
    [8]
    CHAPELLE O, VAPNIK V N. Choosing multiple parameters for SVM[J]. Mach Learnning, 2002, 46: 131-159.
    [9]
    KODIYALAM S. Multidisciplinary aerospace systems optimization computational aero sciences(CAS)project[R]. Washington: NASA/CR, 2001.
    [10]
    ARINC 620, Data link ground system standard and interface specification[S].
    [11]
    HAO Ying, SUN Jian-guo, BAI Jie. State-of-the-art and prospect of aircraft engine fault diagnosis using gas path parameters[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2003, 18(6): 753-760. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8055.2003.06.009

Catalog

    Article Metrics

    Article views (322) PDF downloads(275) Cited by()
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return