WANG Yan-li, DONG Zhi, WU Bing, LI Lin-bo. Pre-examine method of traffic congestion under urban land redevelopment[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2014, 14(2): 82-89.
Citation: WANG Yan-li, DONG Zhi, WU Bing, LI Lin-bo. Pre-examine method of traffic congestion under urban land redevelopment[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2014, 14(2): 82-89.

Pre-examine method of traffic congestion under urban land redevelopment

More Information
  • Author Bio:

    WANG Yan-li (1985-), female, doctoral student, +86-21-69583007, wangyl2012@live.cn

    WU Bing (1960-), male, professor, PhD, +86-21-69588152, wubing@tongji.edu.cn

  • Received Date: 2013-11-22
  • Publish Date: 2014-04-25
  • Based on systematic analysis method, the evaluation index system of traffic condition and congestion level was set up.Two indexes including road network traffic congestion ratio and road network traffic congestion contribution were used to evaluate the impact level of traffic congestion, the judgement standard of traffic reasonability was determined, the pre-examine method of traffic congestion under urban land redevelopment was established, and example verification was carried out by using three development schemes of partial regions in Maryland including no-redevelopment scheme, housing redevelopment scheme, housing and employment redevelopment scheme.Analysis result shows that in the first scheme, car sharing ratio, average trip distance, total running mileage, total running time, total vehicle delay, congestion lane mileage, vehicle delay index and congestion lane mileage ratio are 93.70%, 24.98 km, 225 817 698 km, 5 369 291 h, 2 038 880 h, 4 686 km, 0.380 and 0.180 respectively.In the second scheme, these indexes are 92.48%, 24.78 km, 219 992 101 km, 5 227 303 h, 1 831 190 h, 4 320 km, 0.350 and 0.166 respectively.In the third scheme, these indexes are 92.22%, 24.82 km, 219 023 166 km, 5 342 457 h, 2 062 041 h, 4 422 km, 0.386 and 0.169 respectively.The road network traffic congestion ratios of these three schemes are 0.280, 0.258, 0.278 respectively.In the third scheme, vehicle delay and vehicle delay index both rise.It is clear that the second scheme is slightly helpful to reduce traffic congestion and better than the first and third schemes.

     

  • [1]
    GORDON D L A. Planning, design and managing change in urban waterfront redevelopment[J]. Town Planning Review, 1996, 67 (3): 261-265. doi: 10.3828/tpr.67.3.h7583x668821028u
    [2]
    WANG Yan-li, ZHU Xiao-yu, LI Lin-bo, et al. Reasons and countermeasures of traffic congestion under urban land redevelopment[J]. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2013, 96 (6): 2164-2172.
    [3]
    LU Hua-pu. Integrated planning of land-use and transportation systems[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University: Science and Technology, 2006, 46 (9): 1499-1504. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0054.2006.09.003
    [4]
    SU Hai-long, TAN Ying-hui, ZHOU Rui, et al. The prospect of China integrated planning research of land use and transportation systems based on the planning process[J]. Urban Development Studies, 2013, 20 (9): 65-71. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CSFY201309013.htm
    [5]
    WANG Shu-sheng. Land use and transportation integrated analysis technique and its application: a case study of Kunshan master plan[J]. City Planning Review, 2010, 34 (S): 130-135. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CSGH2010S1032.htm
    [6]
    PALMA A, LINDESEY R. Traffic congestion pricing methodologies and technologies[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2011, 19 (6): 1377-1399. doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2011.02.010
    [7]
    XIAO Feng, QIAN Zhen, ZHANG H M. Managing bottleneck congestion with tradable credits[J]. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 2013, 56 (1): 1-14.
    [8]
    TAYLOR B D. The politics of congestion mitigation[J]. Transport Policy, 2004, 11 (3): 299-302. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2004.04.001
    [9]
    BASSO L J, GUEVARA C A, GSCHWENDER A, et al. Congestion pricing, transit subsidies and dedicated bus lanes: efficient and practical solutions to congestion[J]. Transport Policy, 2011, 18 (5): 676-684. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2011.01.002
    [10]
    ANTIPOVA A, WILMOT C. Alternative approaches for reducing congestion in Baton Rouge, Louisiana[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 2012, 24 (3): 404-410.
    [11]
    LI Ying. Study on synergic development between urban land use and transportation system[D]. Dalian: Dalian Maritime University, 2011. (in Chinese).
    [12]
    RATNER K A, GOET A R. The reshaping of land use and urban form in Denver through transit-oriented development[J]. Cities, 2013, 30 (1): 31-46.
    [13]
    HURST N B, WEST S E. Public transit and urban redevelopment: the effect of light rail transit on land use in Minneapolis, Minnesota[J]. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 2014, 46 (1): 57-72.
    [14]
    KRABBEN E, JACOBS H M. Public land development as a strategic tool for redevelopment: reflections on the Dutch experience[J]. Land Use Policy, 2013, 30 (1): 774-783. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.06.002
    [15]
    CHENG Fang-fang, GEERTMAN S, KUFFER M, et al. An integrative methodology to improve brownfield redevelopment planning in Chinese cities: a case study of Futian, Shenzhen[J]. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 2011, 35 (5): 388-398. doi: 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2011.05.007
    [16]
    WANG Yan-li, ZHU Xiao-yu, LI Lin-bo, et al. Urban land redevelopment impact evaluation on non-motorized traffic: a case study in Shanghai[C]//TRB. TRB 92nd Annual Meeting Compendium of Papers. Washington DC: TRB, 2013: 1900-1923.
    [17]
    CHAPMAN J R, NOYCE D A. Influence of roadway geometric elements on driver behavior when overtaking bicycles on rural roads[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering: English Edition, 2014, 1 (1): 28-38. doi: 10.1016/S2095-7564(15)30086-6
    [18]
    WANG Yan-li, ZHU Xiao-yu, LI Lin-bo, et al. Integrated multimodal metropolitan transportation model[J]. ProcediaSocial and Behavioral Sciences, 2013, 96 (6): 2138-2146.
    [19]
    GRANGE L, FERNANDEZ E, CEA J. A consolidated model of trip distribution[J]. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 2010, 46 (1): 61-75.
    [20]
    MISHRA S, YE Xin, DUCCA F, et al. A functional integrated land use-transportation model for analyzing transportation impacts in the Maryland-Washington DC Region[J]. Sustainability: Science, Practice, and Policy, 2011, 7 (2): 60-69.

Catalog

    Article Metrics

    Article views (651) PDF downloads(690) Cited by()
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return