DEA model of land use and traffic coordination for regulatory detailed planning unit with preference constraints

YUAN Zhen-zhou; YAN Xin-xin; ZHANG Ye; WANG Jia-dong

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering > 2017 > 17(6): 86-96

YUAN Zhen-zhou, YAN Xin-xin, ZHANG Ye, WANG Jia-dong. DEA model of land use and traffic coordination for regulatory detailed planning unit with preference constraints[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2017, 17(6): 86-96.

Citation:

YUAN Zhen-zhou, YAN Xin-xin, ZHANG Ye, WANG Jia-dong. DEA model of land use and traffic coordination for regulatory detailed planning unit with preference constraints[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2017, 17(6): 86-96.

Citation:

PDF( 1700 KB)

DEA model of land use and traffic coordination for regulatory detailed planning unit with preference constraints

MOE Key Laboratory for Urban Transportation Complex Systems Theory and Technology, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China

More Information

Author Bio:
YUANZhen-zhou(1966-), male, professor, PhD, zzyuan@bjtu.edu.cn
Received Date: 2017-06-02
Publish Date: 2017-12-25

Abstract

Abstract

To quantitatively evaluate the coordination degree of traffic and land use in urban regulatory detailed planning stage, the mutual mechanism of land use and traffic coordination for urban regulatory detailed planning unit was analyzed.It was pointed out that the traditional data envelopment analysis (DEA) makes an undifferentiated treatment between input indexes and output indexes, which was not consistent with actual situation.In view of the characteristics of regulatory detailed planning unit and actual control demand, the index system of land use and traffic coordination was established. According to the constraint cone theory based on mathematical programming, using the aid of analytic hierarchy process (AHP), the constraint cone model responsing land index and traffic index preferences was constructed.The objective analysis of data envelopment evaluation was combined with the subjective judgment of analytichierarchy process.The mutual coordination degree of land use and traffic system in the cases of input and output was determined by using membership degree function.Therefore, the mutual coordination effects of the different planning schemes for the traffic and land use of regulatory detailed planning unit were quantitatively evaluated.Based on the No.3 management unit of Nanhu in Handan City, 22 external traffic zones and 68 internal traffic zones were set up.4 types of land use indicators and 9 types of urban traffic indicators were predicted.The preference constraints of the input index and output index of proposed model were calculated.Analysis result shows that the proposed model overcomes the limitation of too dependent on subjective intention in AHP, and makes up for the deficiency of ignoring the decision preference in DEA.The deviation between the results of land use and traffic coordination analysis and the actual situation reduces.The mutual coordination degrees of 6 blocks calculated by the original model are all more than 0.80, all of which are coordinated.After improvement, the mutual coordination degrees of 4 blocks are 0.32-0.57, all of which are incongruous.The mutual coordination degrees of the other 2 blocks are over 0.80, which is more consistent with the actual situation.
- traffic planning,
- urban traffic,
- land use,
- regulatory detailed planning unit,
- preference constrain,
- traffic coordination,
- data envelopment analysis,
- analytic hierarchy process

FullText(HTML)

References(26)

References

[1]	ZHANG Ye. Study on coordination method between land use and urban traffic for unit regulatory detailed planning[D]. Beijing: Beijing Jiaotong University, 2016. (in Chinese).
[2]	GWAMNA E S, YUSOFF W Z W, ISMAIL M F. Determinants of land use and property value[J]. Advanced Science Letters, 2015, 21 (5): 1150-1153. doi: 10.1166/asl.2015.6065
[3]	TIAN Li-jun, YU Ning, CAI Wu-gan. Impact of rail transit construction on residential location choice[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2017, 17 (4): 130-139. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1637.2017.04.014
[4]	MURPHY E. Urban spatial location advantage: the dual of the transportation problem and its implications for land-use and transport planning[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2012, 46 (1): 91-101. doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2011.09.017
[5]	CAO Xin-yu, PORTER-NELSON D. Real estate development in anticipation of the green line light rail transit in St. Paul[J]. Transport Policy, 2016, 51: 24-32. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2016.01.007
[6]	HU Pan, YANG Xiao-guang. Multiple-factor perceived features of traffic quality influencing trip decision[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2017, 17 (2): 117-125. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1637.2017.02.013
[7]	WANG Qiu-ping, HUA Zhen, SUN Hao. Share amount prediction method of slow transportation in historical district based on non-cooperation game[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2016, 29 (9): 128-135. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7372.2016.09.017
[8]	YING Jiang-qian. Optimization for multiclass residential location models with congestible transportation networks[J]. Transportation Science, 2015, 49 (3): 452-471. doi: 10.1287/trsc.2014.0522
[9]	CHANG T H, TSENG J S, YE Y H. Green safety index representing traffic levels of service for online application[J]. IET Intelligent Transport Systems, 2016, 10 (6): 421-427. doi: 10.1049/iet-its.2015.0086
[10]	AHMAD F, MAHMUD S A, YOUSAF F Z. Shortest processing time scheduling to reduce traffic congestion in dense urban areas[J]. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 2017, 47 (5): 838-855. doi: 10.1109/TSMC.2016.2521838
[11]	LUO Ming, CHEN Yan-yan, LIU Xiao-ming. Study on coordination degree model between urban transport and land use[J]. Journal of Wuhan University of Technology: Transportation Science and Engineering, 2008, 32 (4): 585-588. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3963/j.issn.2095-3844.2008.04.003
[12]	WANG Qiu-ping, DING Meng. Bi-level programming model of traffic microcirculation optimization for historical district[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2016, 16 (3): 125-132. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1637.2016.03.015
[13]	ZHENG Lu. Study on the coordinative relations of urban land use and traffic for unit regulatory detailed planning[D]. Beijing: Beijing Jiaotong University, 2011. (in Chinese).
[14]	GUO Yuan-yuan, LI Li, LI Gui-cai, et al. Overview of interaction between urban land use and transportation[J]. Urban Planning International, 2015, 30 (3): 29-36. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GWCG201503005.htm
[15]	ZHANG Bing, ZENG Ming-hua, HU Qi-zhou. Regional transportation network evaluating based on DEA Model with AHP restraint cone[J]. Highway Engineering, 2015, 40 (6): 59-63, 95. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-0610.2015.06.014
[16]	XIE Qi-wei, DAI Qiao-zhi, LI Yong-jun, et al. Increasing the discriminatory power of DEA using shannon's entropy[J]. Entropy, 2014, 16 (3): 1571-1585. doi: 10.3390/e16031571
[17]	GENNUSA M, FERRANTE P, CASTO B, et al. An integrated environmental indicator for urban transportation systems: description and application[J]. Energies, 2015, 8 (10): 11076-11094. doi: 10.3390/en81011076
[18]	LI Xia, SHAO Chun-fu, JIA Hong-fei. Land use and resident trip generation model and its parameter calibration[J]. Journal of Jilin University: Engineering and Technology Edition, 2007, 37 (6): 1300-1303. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JLGY200706015.htm
[19]	LI Mei-juan, CHEN Guo-hong. A review on the research and application of DEA[J]. Engineering Science, 2003, 5 (6): 88-94. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-1742.2003.06.016
[20]	ZHANG Yong, TU Ning-wen, YAO Lin-quan. Urban road traffic network vulnerability identification method[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2013, 26 (4): 154-161. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7372.2013.04.021
[21]	LI Xin, LIU Yue, WANG Yao-jun, et al. Evaluating transit operator efficiency: an enhanced DEA model with constrained fuzzy-AHP cones[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering: English Edition, 2016, 3 (3): 215-225. doi: 10.1016/j.jtte.2016.05.004
[22]	JIANG Qi-mi, CHEN Chun-hsien. A multi-dimensional fuzzy decision support strategy[J]. Decision Support Systems, 2005, 38 (4): 591-598. doi: 10.1016/j.dss.2003.08.003
[23]	OUYANG Yan-feng, GEROLIMINIS N, NIE Y M. Optimization of unban transportation service networks[J]. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 2015, 81: 331-332. doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2015.09.006
[24]	CHEN Hai-tao. A DEA model with factor of restraint cone[J]. Mathematics in Practice and Theory, 2010, 40 (4): 53-56. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SSJS201004010.htm
[25]	ZHU Qiao. Data envelopment analysis: a review and visions for future research[J]. Systems Engineering-Theory Methodology Applications, 1994, 3 (4): 1-9. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XTGL404.000.htm
[26]	SINUANY-STERN Z, FRIEDMAN L. DEA and the discriminant analysis of ratios for ranking units[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1998, 111 (3): 470-478. doi: 10.1016/S0377-2217(97)00313-5