浸水作用下二灰黄土的稳定性

张志权; 井彦林; 孔德泉; 赵洁

doi:10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2018.01.006

浸水作用下二灰黄土的稳定性

doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2018.01.006

张志权^1,,
井彦林¹,
孔德泉^{1, 2},
赵洁³

1.
长安大学建筑工程学院, 陕西西安 710061
2.
宾夕法尼亚州立大学工程学院, 宾夕法尼亚施泰特科利奇 16802
3.
陕西省高速公路建设集团公司, 陕西西安 710065

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目 41472267

详细信息

作者简介:
张志权(1973-), 男, 陕西岐山人, 长安大学高级工程师, 从事岩土工程研究

中图分类号: U412.222
计量
- 文章访问数: 900
- HTML全文浏览量: 188
- PDF下载量: 526
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2017-10-12
- 刊出日期: 2018-02-25

Stability of lime-fly ash loess under action of water immersion

1.
School of Civil Engineering, Chang'an University, Xi'an 710061, Shaanxi, China
2.
College of Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, State College 16802, Pennsylvania, USA
3.
Shaanxi Expressway Construction Group Co., Ltd., Xi'an 710065, Shaanxi, China

More Information

Author Bio:
ZHANG Zhiquan(1973-), male, seniorengineer, zzqca@163.com

Article Text (Baidu Translation)

摘要

摘要: 对二灰黄土进行了不同干湿循环次数和不同浸水时间2种浸水作用下的强度试验和压汞试验, 分析了二灰黄土水稳定性。分析结果表明: 二灰黄土强度较高, 7 d龄期无侧限抗压强度可以达到1.33 MPa; 随着干湿循环次数的增加, 二灰黄土强度出现衰减, 经过2次干湿循环后二灰黄土强度就大幅度降低, 并趋于稳定, 经过10次干湿循环后二灰黄土无侧限抗压强度和抗剪强度降低幅度分别为42.8%、47.4%; 随着干湿循环次数的增加, 二灰黄土的总孔隙体积呈线性增加, 经过10次干湿循环后二灰黄土的总孔隙体积从0.200 1 mL·g^-1增大到0.238 3 mL·g^-1, 增加了19%; 在干湿循环过程中, 不同孔径孔隙体积变化规律不同, 大孔隙体积呈线性增加, 小孔隙体积和微孔隙体积基本上没有发生变化; 随着浸水时间的延长, 二灰黄土强度出现衰减, 经过2 d浸水后强度产生大幅度降低, 并随着浸水时间继续延长强度逐渐趋于稳定, 经过4 d浸水后二灰黄土无侧限抗压强度和抗剪强度降低幅度分别为33.6%、54.7%。可见: 在石灰与粉煤灰掺量较小的情况下, 水对二灰黄土的强度有明显的弱化作用, 浸水作用可导致二灰黄土强度降低, 干密度略微减小, 总孔隙体积增大, 但相对于未改性黄土, 二灰黄土仍然具有较高的强度和较好的水稳定性, 可以在黄土地区作为道路的底基层推广使用。
- 路基工程 /
- 二灰黄土 /
- 水稳定性 /
- 强度试验 /
- 压汞试验
Abstract: The strength tests and mercury injection tests on lime-fly ash loess under 2 actions of water immersion with different times of wetting-drying cycle and different saturation times were conducted, and the stability of lime-fly ash loess was analyzed.Analysis result shows that the unconfined compressive strength of lime-fly ash loess at 7 dis higher and about 1.33 MPa.With the increase of the times of wetting-drying cycle, the strength of lime-fly ash loess decays.After2 times of wetting-drying cycle, the strength falls drastically and tends to be stable.After10 times of wetting-drying cycle, the unconfined compressive strength and shear strength of limefly ash loess decrease by 42.8% and 47.4%, respectively.With the increase of the times of drying-wetting cycle, the total void volume of lime-fly ash loess increases linearly.After 10 times of wetting-drying cycle, the total pore volume of lime-fly ash loess increases from 0.200 1 mL·g^-1 to 0.238 3 mL·g^-1, which is equivalent to 19%.During drying-wetting cycle, the pore diameter variation rules are different, the large void volume increases linearly, but the small and micro void volumes do not change basically.With the increase of saturation time, the strength of limefly ash loess decays, decreases significantly after 2 dwater immersion, and gradually stabilizes with the continuous immersion.After 4 dwater immersion, the unconfined compressive strength and shear strength of lime-fly ash loess decrease by 33.6% and 54.7%, respectively.The result indicates that when the contents of lime and fly ash are less, the water can weaken the strength of lime-fly ash loess obviously, the action of water immersion can lead to the decrease of strength, the dry density slightly decreases, and the total pore volume increases.But compared with the unmodified loess, the lime-fly ash loess has higher strength and better water stability, and can be used as road subgrade in loess area.
- subgrade engineering /
- lime-fly ash loess /
- water stability /
- strength test /
- mercury injection test

HTML全文

图 1 电动击实仪

Figure 1. Electric compaction instrument

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 无侧限强度测定仪

Figure 2. Unconfined compressive strength instrument

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 直剪仪

Figure 3. Direct shearing instrument

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 压汞仪

Figure 4. Mercury injection porosimeter

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 无侧限强度试验试样

Figure 5. Samples for unconfined strength experiment

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 直剪强度试验试样

Figure 6. Samples for direct shear strength experiment

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 压汞试验试样

Figure 7. Samples for mercury injection experiment

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 8 干湿循环作用下无侧限抗压强度

Figure 8. Unconfined compressive strengths under wetting-drying cycles

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 9 干湿循环作用下抗剪强度

Figure 9. Shearing strengths under wetting-drying cycles

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 10 干湿循环作用下内聚力

Figure 10. Cohesive forces under wetting-drying cycles

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 11 干湿循环作用下内摩擦角

Figure 11. Internal friction angles under wetting-drying cycles

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 12 干湿循环作用下干密度

Figure 12. Dry densities under wetting-drying cycles

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 13 干湿循环作用下总孔隙体积

Figure 13. Total void volumes under wetting-drying cycles

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 14 干湿循环作用下大孔隙体积

Figure 14. Large void volumes under wetting-drying cycles

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 15 干湿循环作用下中孔隙体积

Figure 15. Medium void volumes under wetting-drying cycles

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 16 干湿循环作用下小孔隙体积

Figure 16. Small void volumes under wetting-drying cycles

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 17 干湿循环作用下微孔隙体积

Figure 17. Micro void volumes under wetting-drying cycles

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 18 不同浸水时间的无侧限抗压强度

Figure 18. Unconfined compressive strengths with different immersion times

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 19 不同浸水时间的抗剪强度

Figure 19. Shearing strengths with different immersion times

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 20 不同浸水时间的内聚力

Figure 20. Cohesive forces with different immersion times

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 21 不同浸水时间的内摩擦角

Figure 21. Internal friction angles with different immersion times

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 土的物理性质

Table 1. Physical properties of soil

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 石灰的性质与化学成分

Table 2. Properties and chemical constitutions of white lime

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 粉煤灰的物理性质与化学成分

Table 3. Physical properties and chemical constitutions of fly ash

下载: 导出CSV

表 4 试件

Table 4. Specimens

下载: 导出CSV

表 5 干湿循环作用下强度试验结果

Table 5. Test results of strength under wetting-drying cycles

下载: 导出CSV

表 6 干湿循环作用下干密度与孔隙分布试验结果

Table 6. Test results of dry density and void distribution under wetting-drying cycles

下载: 导出CSV

表 7 不同浸水时间强度试验结果

Table 7. Test results of strength under different saturation times

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(26)

[1]	REZAEIMALEK S, NASOURI A, HUANG Jie, et al. Comparison of short-term and long-term performances for polymer-stabilized sand and clay[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering: English Edition, 2017, 4 (2): 145-155. doi: 10.1016/j.jtte.2017.01.003
[2]	MA L N, YAN S H, ZHANG R L. High-speed railway's roadbed consolidation with fracture grouting in collapsible loess area: mechanism and application[J]. Materials Research Innovations, 2015, 19 (S6): 111-115.
[3]	METELKOVA Z, BOHACJ, PRIKRYL R, et al. Maturation of loess treated with variable lime admixture: pores space textural evolution and related phase changes[J]. Applied Clay Science, 2012, 61: 37-43. doi: 10.1016/j.clay.2012.03.008
[4]	周建基, 梁收运, 张帆宇, 等. 石灰改良黄土的工程特性试验研究[J]. 铁道建筑, 2014 (9): 105-108. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-1995.2014.09.29 ZHOU Jian-ji, LIANG Shou-yun, ZHANG Fan-yu, et al. Experimental study on engineering performances of limestabilized loess[J]. Railway Engineering, 2014 (9): 105-108. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-1995.2014.09.29
[5]	ALDAOOD A, BOUASKER M, AL-MUKHTAR M. Impact of freeze-thaw cycles on mechanical behavior of lime stabilized gypseous soils[J]. Cold Regions Science and Technology, 2014, 99: 38-45. doi: 10.1016/j.coldregions.2013.12.003
[6]	米海珍, 王昊, 高春, 等. 灰土的浸水强度及残余强度的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2010, 31 (9): 2781-2785. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7598.2010.09.015 MI Hai-zhen, WANG Hao, GAO Chun, et al. Study of immersion strength and residual strength of lime-loess[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2010, 31 (9): 2781-2785. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7598.2010.09.015
[7]	ALDAOOD A, BOUASKER M, AL-MUKHTAR M. Effect of water during freeze-thaw cycles on the performance and durability of lime-treated gypseous soil[J]. Cold Regions Science and Technology, 2016, 123: 155-163. doi: 10.1016/j.coldregions.2015.12.008
[8]	LIU Zhen, CAI C S, LIU Feng-yin, et al. Feasibility study of loess stabilization with fly ash-based geopolymer[J]. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 2016, 28 (5): 04016003-1-8. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001490
[9]	温明星, 骆亚生, 刘紫韦, 等. 掺粉煤灰压实黄土环剪试验研究[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2016, 33 (3): 70-74. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CJKB201603017.htm WEN Ming-xing, LUO Ya-sheng, LIU Zi-wei, et al. Ring shear test of compacted loess blended with fly ash[J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, 2016, 33 (3): 70-74. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CJKB201603017.htm
[10]	王峻, 王谦, 王平, 等. 粉煤灰掺入量对改性黄土动本构关系的影响[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2013, 35 (S1): 156-160. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTGC2013S1025.htm WANG Jun, WANG Qian, WANG Ping, et al. Effect of adding amount of fly ash on dynamic constitutive relationship of modified loess[J]. Chinese Journal Geotechnical Engineering, 2013, 35 (S1): 156-160. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTGC2013S1025.htm
[11]	WANG Jun, WANG Qian, ZHONG Xiu-mei, et al. Research for dynamic modulus and damping ratio of fly ash modified loess[J]. Advanced Materials Research, 2013, 671-674: 94-100. doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.671-674.94
[12]	PEI Xiang-jun, ZHANG Fan-yu, WU Wan-jiong, et al. Physicochemical and index properties of loess stabilized with lime and fly ash piles[J]. Applied Clay Science, 2015, 114: 77-84. doi: 10.1016/j.clay.2015.05.007
[13]	SINGH D, GHABCHI R, LAGUROS J, et al. Laboratory performance evaluation of stabilized sulfate containing soil with lime and class C fly ash[J]. Geotechnical Special Publication, 2010 (199): 757-766.
[14]	胡志平, 丁亮进, 王宏旭, 等. 干湿循环下石灰黄土垫层透水性和强度变化试验[J]. 西安科技大学学报, 2011, 31 (1): 39-45. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9315.2011.01.009 HU Zhi-ping, DING Liang-jin, WANG Hong-xu, et al. Test study on permeability and strength variation of lime loess bedding under wetting and drying cycles[J]. Journal of Xi'an University of Science Technology, 2011, 31 (1): 39-45. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9315.2011.01.009
[15]	ZHANG Yu-fen, ZHANG Zhi-quan, ZHAO Jun-hai. Investigation on mechanical properties and constitutive model of lime-fly ash loess[C]//JIANG Ming-jing, LIU Fang, BOLTON M. International Symposium on Geomechanics and Geotechnics: From Micro to Macro. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2010: 145-150.
[16]	张志权, 胡志平, 赵洁. 冻融作用下二灰黄土强度特性[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2011, 11 (6): 24-30. http://transport.chd.edu.cn/article/id/201106004 ZHANG Zhi-quan, HU Zhi-ping, ZHAO Jie. Strength properties of lime-fly ash loess under freezing and thawing cycles[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2011, 11 (6): 24-30. (in Chinese). http://transport.chd.edu.cn/article/id/201106004
[17]	YAN Chang-gen, ZHANG Zhi-quan, JING Yan-lin. Characteristics of strength and pore distribution of lime-flyash loess under freeze-thaw cycles and dry-wet cycles[J]. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 2017, 10 (24): 1-10.
[18]	张平, 房营光, 闫小庆, 等. 不同干燥方法对重塑膨润土压汞试验用土样的影响试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2011, 32 (增1): 388-391. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTLX2011S1070.htm ZHANG Ping, FANG Ying-guang, YAN Xiao-qing, et al. Study of different dry methods for drying remolded bentonite sample with mercury intrusion test[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2011, 32 (S1): 388-391. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTLX2011S1070.htm
[19]	雷祥义. 中国黄土的孔隙类型与湿陷性[J]. 中国科学: B辑, 1987 (12): 1309-1316. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JBXK198712008.htm LEI Xiang-yi. Pore type and collapsibility property of loess in China[J]. Science in China: Series B, 1987 (12): 1309-1316. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JBXK198712008.htm
[20]	宋学庆. 石灰粉煤灰黄土工程性质试验研究[J]. 中外公路, 2017, 37 (5): 228-232. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GWGL201705050.htm SONG Xue-qing. Experimental study on engineering properties of lime-fly ash loess[J]. Journal of China and Foreign Highway, 2017, 37 (5): 228-232. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GWGL201705050.htm
[21]	程佳明, 王银梅, 苗世超, 等. 固化黄土的干湿循环特性研究[J]. 工程地质学报, 2014, 22 (2): 226-232. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9665.2014.02.008 CHENG Jia-ming, WANG Yin-mei, MIAO Shi-chao, et al. Property study of solidified loess under wet-dry cycles[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology, 2014, 22 (2): 226-232. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9665.2014.02.008
[22]	LI Zhi-qing, CUI Zhen-dong, WANG Yan-ping, et al. Experimental study on the engineering characteristics of improved soil[J]. Advanced Materials Research, 2011, 168-170: 1426-1431.
[23]	HUANGJING S, GASALUCK W. The stabilization of loess by chemical additives for road base[J]. Electronic Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2010, 15: 1651-1668.
[24]	MUNOZ-CASTELBLANCO J, DELAGE P, PEREIRA J M, et al. Some aspects of the compression and collapse behavior of an unsaturated natural loess[J]. Geotechnique Letters, 2011, 1: 17-22. doi: 10.1680/geolett.11.00003
[25]	冯美果, 陈善雄, 余颂, 等. 粉煤灰改性膨胀土水稳定性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2007, 28 (9): 1889-1893. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7598.2007.09.022 FENG Mei-guo, CHEN Shan-xiong, YU Song, et al. Laboratory study on water stability of flyash-treated expansive soil[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2007, 28 (9): 1889-1893. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7598.2007.09.022
[26]	PEDARLA A, CHITTOORI S, PUPPALA A J, et al. Influence of lime dosage on stabilization effectiveness of montmorillonite dominant clays[J]. Geotechnical Special Publication, 2010, 199: 767-776.