Influence of dynamics effect on safety of cable in wreck up-righting project
-
摘要: 为了研究动力学效应对沉船翻转作业安全性的影响, 将吊缆张力作为翻转作业安全性评估指标, 假设船体翻转作业时起重臂吊点固定不动, 研究区域水底为刚性底, 不计上层建筑影响和建立沉船翻转准静态模型时只考虑回复力与外载荷, 分别以船体质量、吊缆刚度、收缆速度与波浪载荷为变量, 应用时域分析方法, 计算了考虑动力学效应的吊缆张力, 基于最大吊缆张力分析了沉船质量、吊缆刚度、收缆速度与波浪载荷对翻转作业中吊缆张力的影响, 评估了沉船整船翻转作业的安全性。计算结果表明: 在沉船船体翻转作业中, 吊缆张力最大值将随沉船质量、吊缆刚度与收缆速度增大而增大, 且吊缆张力最大值与收缆速度呈线性关系, 与船体质量呈近似线性关系, 与吊缆刚度呈非线性关系; 当收缆速度由0.001m·s-1增加至0.020m·s-1时, 吊缆张力最大值较初始值增量增大了约22倍, 可见, 在沉船翻转作业中, 不可忽略动力学效应对作业安全性的影响。Abstract: In order to study the influence of dynamics effect on the safety of wreck up-righting project, cable tension was introduced as the evaluation index of the safety.Four hypotheses were made, including that the hanging point of lifting arm was be fixed, the seabed in research area was rigid, the effect of superstructure was ignored, and restoring force and external loads were only considered in establishing the quasi-static model of up-righting wreck.Cable tensions, ship weight, cable stiffness, cable-winded velocity and wave loads were taken as variables.Cable tensions in wreck up-righting project were calculated by using the time-domain analysis method while considering dynamics effect.Based on the maximum calculated cable tensions, the influences of ship weight, cable stiffness, cable-winded velocity and wave loads on cable tensions were analyzed, and the safety of up-righting project was evaluated.Calculation result shows that in wreck up-righting project, the maximum cable tension increases when ship weight, cable stiffness and cable-winded velocity increase, and has linear relationship with cable-winded velocity, approximate linear relationship with ship weight, and nonlinear relationship with cable stiffness.When cable-winded velocity increases from 0.001 m·s-1 to 0.020 m·s-1, theincrement of the maximum cable tension increases by 22 times, so the dynamics effect cannot be ignored in the safety evaluation of wreck up-righting project.
-
图 4 吊缆张力-船体角位移关系曲线
Figure 4. Relation curve of cable tension and angular displacement of wrecked ship
图 5 不同收缆速度下的吊缆张力-时间曲线
Figure 5. Cable tension-time curves under different winding-in velocities
图 6 G为9.800 0~9.829 4 MN时吊缆张力-时间曲线
Figure 6. Cable tension-time curves when G is 9.800 0-9.829 4 MN
图 7 G为9.839 2~9.868 6 MN时吊缆张力-时间曲线
Figure 7. Cable tension-time curves when G is 9.839 2-9.868 6 MN
图 8 G为9.878 4~9.898 0 MN时吊缆张力-时间曲线
Figure 8. Cable tension-time curves when G is 9.878 4-9.898 0 MN
图 9 不同G值对应的吊缆张力最大值曲线
Figure 9. Maximum cable tension curve under different values of G
图 10 k为80~110 MN·m-1时吊缆张力-时间曲线
Figure 10. Cable tension-time curves when k is80-110 MN·m-1
图 11 k为120~150 MN·m-1时吊缆张力-时间曲线
Figure 11. Cable tension-time curves when k is 120-150 MN·m-1
图 12 k为160~190 MN·m-1时吊缆张力-时间曲线
Figure 12. Cable tension-time curves when k is 160-190 MN·m-1
图 13 不同k值对应的吊缆张力最大值曲线
Figure 13. Maximum cable tension curve under different values of k
图 14 V为0.001~0.004m·s-1时吊缆张力-时间曲线
Figure 14. Cable tension-time curves when V is0.001-0.004m·s-1
图 15 V为0.005~0.008m·s-1时吊缆张力-时间曲线
Figure 15. Cable tension-time curves when V is0.005-0.008m·s-1
图 16 V为0.009~0.012m·s-1时吊缆张力-时间曲线
Figure 16. Cable tension-time curves when V is0.009-0.012m·s-1
图 17 V为0.013~0.016m·s-1时吊缆张力-时间曲线
Figure 17. Cable tension-time curves when V is0.013-0.016m·s-1
图 18 V为0.017~0.020m·s-1时吊缆张力-时间曲线
Figure 18. Cable tension-time curves when V is 0.017-0.020m·s-1
图 19 不同V值对应的吊缆张力最大值曲线
Figure 19. Maximum cable tension curve under different values of V
图 21 吊缆张力-时间曲线(波浪幅值为0.3m)
Figure 21. Cable tension-time curve (wave amplitude is 0.3m)
表 2 不同G值时吊缆张力最大值较初始值增量百分比
Table 2. Increment percentages of maximum cable tensions to initial values under different values of G
下载: 导出CSV
表 3 不同k值时吊缆张力最大值较初始值增量百分比
Table 3. Increment percentages of maximum cable tensions to initial values under different values of k
下载: 导出CSV
表 4 不同V值时吊缆张力最大值较初始值增量百分比
Table 4. Increment percentages of maximum cable tensions to initial values under different values of V
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] 潘德位, 孙德平, 林成新, 等. 起重机械打捞沉船的计算与分析[J]. 大连海事大学学报, 2014, 40 (4): 7-12. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7736.2014.04.002PAN De-wei, SUN De-ping, LIN Cheng-xin, et al. Analysis and computation for salvaging wrecked ship by hoisting machinery[J]. Journal of Dalian Maritime University, 2014, 40 (4): 7-12. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7736.2014.04.002 [2] 潘德位, 林成新, 孙德平, 等. 大倾角搁浅船舶扳正过程分析[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2015, 15 (2): 50-58. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1637.2015.02.008PAN De-wei, LIN Cheng-xin, SUN De-ping, et al. Uprighting process analysis of big-angle tilted aground ship[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2015, 15 (2): 50-58. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1637.2015.02.008 [3] 潘德位, 林成新, 孙德平, 等. 搁浅船舶扳正过程计算方法[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2014, 14 (4): 53-63. http://transport.chd.edu.cn/article/id/201404007PAN De-wei, LIN Cheng-xin, SUN De-ping, et al. Calculation method of grounding ship during righting process[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2014, 14 (4): 53-63. (in Chinese). http://transport.chd.edu.cn/article/id/201404007 [4] 潘德位, 林成新, 孙德平, 等. 基于GHS软件的倾覆船舶扳正计算与分析[J]. 水利水运工程学报, 2014 (6): 78-83. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-640X.2014.06.012PAN De-wei, LIN Cheng-xin, SUN De-ping, et al. Calculation and analysis of righting capsized vessel based on GHSsoftware[J]. Hydro-Science and Engineering, 2014 (6): 78-83. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-640X.2014.06.012 [5] DROBYSHEVSKI Y. A note on uprighting of a ship floating upside-down[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2004, 31 (11/12): 1447-1467. [6] GONZALEZ M M, SOBRINO P C, ALVAREZ R T, et al. Fishing vessel stability assessment system[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2012, 41 (1): 67-78. [7] 王道能, 毕远涛. GHS软件在救助打捞工程中的应用[C]//中国国际救捞论坛组委会. 第六届中国国际救捞论坛论文集. 北京: 海洋出版社, 2010: 169-171. WANG Dao-neng, BI Yuan-tao. A brief introduction on GHSsoftware in wreck removal operation[C]//China International Rescue and Salvage Committee. Proceedings of the 6th China International Rescue and Salvage Conference. Beijing: China Ocean Press, 2010: 169-171. (in Chinese). [8] VARELA J M, RODRIGUES J M, SOARES C G. On-board decision support system for ship flooding emergency response[J]. Procedia Computer Science, 2014, 29: 1688-1700. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2014.05.154 [9] ZHANG Sheng-ming. Plate tearing and bottom damage in ship grounding[J]. Marine Structures, 2002, 15 (2): 101-117. doi: 10.1016/S0951-8339(01)00021-1 [10] WIESLAW G. The ships impact in ground of port water area[J]. R and RATA, 2008, 1 (2): 61-67. [11] NGUYEN T H, AMDAHL J, LEIRA B J, et al. Understanding ship-grounding events[J]. Marine Structures, 2011, 24 (4): 551-569. doi: 10.1016/j.marstruc.2011.07.001 [12] GALOR W. The model of ship movement while touching the sea-bed[J]. International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, 2007, 1 (4): 413-418. [13] WANG Ge, ARITA K, LIU D. Behavior of a double hull in a variety of standing or collision scenarios[J]. Marine Structures, 2000, 13 (2): 147-187. [14] NAM M, KIM J, LEE J, et al. Cooperative control system of the floating cranes for the dual lifting[J]. International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, 2018, 10 (4): 95-102. [15] REHN C F, PETTERSEN S S, ERIKSTAD S O, et al. Investigating tradeoffs between performance, cost and flexibility for reconfigurable offshore ships[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2018, 147 (10): 546-555. [16] PATERSON J, D'AMICO F, THIES P R, et al. Offshore wind installation vessels-a comparative assessment for UKoffshore rounds 1and 2[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2018, 148 (11): 637-649. [17] HARIS S, AMDAHL J. Analysis of ship-ship collision damage accounting for bow and side deformation interaction[J]. Marine Structures, 2013, 32 (1): 18-48. [18] SUN Bin, HU Zhi-qiang, WANG Ge. An analytical method for predicting the ship side structure response in raked bow collisions[J]. Marine Structures, 2015, 41 (4): 288-311. [19] OZGUC O, DAS P K, BARLTROP N. A comparative study on the structural integrity of single and double side skin bulk carriers under collision damage[J]. Marine Structures, 2005, 18 (7/8): 511-547. [20] TIKHONOV V S, LEBEDEV V I, KOTOV A V. Numerical simulation of longitudinal tackle oscillations when salvaging sunken vessels from deep water[J]. Ocean Engineering, 1997, 24 (7): 605-621. [21] CUMMINS W E. The impulse response function and ship motions[R]. Hamburg: Department of the Navy David Taylor Model Basin, 1962. [22] 马小剑. 开敞式码头系泊船运动响应及缆绳张力研究[D]. 大连: 大连理工大学, 2012.MA Xiao-jian. Motion responses of a moored ship and mooring line force in open pier[D]. Dalian: Dalian University of Technology, 2012. (in Chinese). [23] LIU C L. Ocean sediment holding strength against breakout of partially embedded objects[C]//ASCE. Proceedings of 2nd Conference on Civil Engineering in Oceans. Reston: ASCE, 1969: 105-117. [24] 罗高贵. 三峡库区趸船系泊仿真计算研究[D]. 重庆: 重庆交通大学, 2014.LUO Gao-gui. Study on mooring simulation and calculation of pontoon in Three Gorges Reservoir Area[D]. Chongqing: Chongqing Jiaotong University, 2014. (in Chinese). [25] ALSOS H S, AMDAHL J. On the resistance of tanker bottom structures during standing[J]. Marine Structures, 2007, 20 (4): 218-237. [26] NGUYEN T H, GARRE L, AMDAHL J, et al. Monitoring of ship damage condition during standing[J]. Marine Structures, 2011, 24 (3): 261-274. [27] PEDERSEN P T, ZHANG Sheng-ming. Effect of ship structure and size on grounding and collision damage distributions[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2000, 27 (11): 1161-1179. -
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 676
- HTML全文浏览量: 118
- PDF下载量: 347
- 被引次数: 0
