留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

桥台后高填方路堤工后沉降影响因素分析

刘萌成 黄晓明 陶向华

刘萌成, 黄晓明, 陶向华. 桥台后高填方路堤工后沉降影响因素分析[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2005, 5(3): 36-40.
引用本文: 刘萌成, 黄晓明, 陶向华. 桥台后高填方路堤工后沉降影响因素分析[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2005, 5(3): 36-40.
Liu Meng-cheng, Huang Xiao-ming, Tao Xiang-hua. Influence factors on post-construction settlement of high backfills adjacent to abutment[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2005, 5(3): 36-40.
Citation: Liu Meng-cheng, Huang Xiao-ming, Tao Xiang-hua. Influence factors on post-construction settlement of high backfills adjacent to abutment[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2005, 5(3): 36-40.

桥台后高填方路堤工后沉降影响因素分析

基金项目: 

国家西部交通建设科技项目 2002 318 000 32

详细信息
    作者简介:

    刘萌成(1972-), 男, 江西樟树人, 东南大学博士研究生, 从事路基路面材料研究

  • 中图分类号: U416.1

Influence factors on post-construction settlement of high backfills adjacent to abutment

More Information
    Author Bio:

    Liu Meng-cheng(1972-), male, doctoral student, 86-25-83791654, mcliu2002@163.com

  • 摘要: 为了揭示桥台后高填方路堤工后沉降的影响因素, 应用ABAQUS有限元程序建立了沿桥台纵向的平面应变计算模型, 对回填材料进行了相关参数的沉降敏感性分析。高等级公路沉降实测结果与数值计算结果的对比分析表明, 模型的计算结果能反映实际工况下路堤沉降的变化规律, 可合理预测高填土路堤实际变形特征, 弹性模量、渗透系数、容重、施工间歇期是影响近桥台处路堤工后沉降的主要因素, 建议回填设计中应通过综合提高回填材料力学性能与改善施工方法的手段来达到减轻桥台后跳车的目的。

     

  • 图  1  加载历时曲线

    Figure  1.  History curve of load case

    图  2  高填土路堤FEM网格剖分图/m

    Figure  2.  FEM mesh of high backfills

    图  3  有效应力与压力历时曲线

    Figure  3.  History curves of effective stress and pressure

    图  4  固结度与时间关系曲线

    Figure  4.  History curve of consolidation degree

    图  5  计算结果与实测结果对比

    Figure  5.  Comparison of predicted and measured results

    图  6  容重与工后沉降曲线

    Figure  6.  Curves of unit weight and post-construction settlement

    图  7  参数β与工后沉降曲线

    Figure  7.  Curves of β and settlement

    图  8  弹性模量与工后沉降曲线

    Figure  8.  Curves of elastic modulus and settlement

    图  9  泊松比与工后沉降曲线

    Figure  9.  Curves of Poisson ratio and settlement

    图  10  施工间歇时间与工后沉降曲线

    Figure  10.  Curves of preloading time and settlement

    图  11  渗透系数与工后沉降曲线

    Figure  11.  Curves of permeability coefficient and settlement

    图  12  摩擦系数与工后沉降曲线

    Figure  12.  Curves of friction coefficient and settlement

    表  1  Clay Plasticity模型参数

    Table  1.   Parameters of Clay Plasticity model

    材料类型 γd/(kN·m-3) c′/kPa φ′/(°) κ υ λ M α0 β K e1 k/(m·d-1)
    粉质粘土 17.8 22.4 31.6 0.04 0.31 0.07 1.27 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.02 2.31×10-4
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  Drucker-Prager模型参数

    Table  2.   Parameters of Drucker-Prager model

    材料类型 γd/(kN·m-3) c′/kPa φ′/(°) E υ β K ψ k/(m·d-1)
    圆砾 19.8 0.0 41.3 50000 0.21 34.7 1.00 34.7 1.0
    粘性土 18.3 29.3 36.5 28000 0.24 28.7 1.00 28.7 3.63×10-4
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  3  Drucker-Prager模型硬化参数

    Table  3.   Tabular parameters of Drucker-Prager hardening curves

    粘性土 圆砾
    σ1-σ3 εp σ1-σ3 εp
    170.1 0.000 204.9 0.000
    649.9 0.035 352.9 0.039
    740.3 0.050 919.7 0.045
    801.4 0.073 1 059.8 0.073
    848.0 0.091 1 124.5 0.092
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  4  线弹性模型参数

    Table  4.   Parameters of elastic model

    材料类型 γd/(kN·m-3) c′/kPa φ′/(°) E/kPa υ k/(m·d-1)
    沥青混凝土 21.4 2.86×106 0.16 1.00×10-7
    水泥混凝土 24.3 3.54×107 0.15 2.00×10-8
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] Zhang Xing-qiang, Yan Shu-wang, Zhao Cheng-gang. Analysis of soil deformation due to bridge abutment under automobile loading[J]. Highway, 2002, 47(5): 31-35. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGGL202205008.htm
    [2] Chen Shao-ping. Subgrade settlement fitting between small bridge abutment and bridge culvert in soft soil areas[J]. Journal of China University of Geosciences(Earcth Science Edition), 2001, 26(4): 365-367. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NJNS202105005.htm
    [3] Liu Dai-quan, Liu Xiao-ming, Long Zheng-cong. Mechanical analysis of bump at bridge-head and discussion of rigid-flexibility transition design parameters of abutment back[J]. Highway, 2002, 47(6): 81-84. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGGL202004009.htm
    [4] Gregory J M. Tensile reinforcement effects on bridge approach settlement[J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE, 1993, 112(4): 749-761. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JYGC202001006.htm
    [5] Weng Xing-zhong, Du Jian, Hong Jian-jun, et al. A settlement stabilization analysis of airfield pavement great area high filling [J]. Journal of Air Force Engineering University(Natural Science Edition), 2001, 2(5): 7-10. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NJNS202105005.htm
    [6] 钱家欢. 土力学[M]. 南京: 河海大学出版社, 1990.
    [7] Kim J S, Barker R M. Effect of live load surcharge on retaining walls and abutments[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2002, 128(10): 803-813. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GLGU201903009.htm
    [8] Kutara K, Miki H, Mashita Y, et al. Settlement and countermeasures of the road with low embankment on soft ground [J]. Technical Reports of Civil Engineering, 1980, 22(8): 12-16. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TMGC2020S1003.htm
    [9] Yin Zong-ze, Zhu Hong, Wu Yu. Finite element analysis of foundation settlement of Shanghai-Nanjing expressway embankment[J]. Advances in Science and Technology of Water Resources, 1998, 18(2): 22-26. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKXJ202005012.htm
  • 加载中
图(12) / 表(4)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  306
  • HTML全文浏览量:  135
  • PDF下载量:  365
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2005-01-12
  • 刊出日期:  2005-09-25

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回