Influences of buffer impedance characteristics on dynamics performances for heavy haul train
-
摘要: 研究了重载列车缓冲器的特性, 分析了弹性胶泥型缓冲器和摩擦胶泥型缓冲器的结构及工作原理, 以HXD1型机车、13A型车钩以及2种类型缓冲器为基础, 建立了4节编组机车万吨级牵引列车动力学模型, 研究了2种缓冲器静态与动态阻抗特性对重载列车相关动力学性能的影响。仿真结果表明: 重载列车在长大下坡道进行循环制动时, 摩擦胶泥型缓冲器无穷大的静态阻抗特性有利于发挥缓冲作用, 在受到900 kN静态压力的情况下, 能够保持100%的缓冲器行程和容量, 且能满足进一步缓冲1 000 kN动态压力的需要, 此时缓冲器的行程不超过20 mm; 在900 kN静态压力与400 kN动态压力的复合作用下, 弹性胶泥型缓冲器行程就已经达到60 mm, 难以满足缓冲更大冲击压力的需要; 在动态阻抗特性方面, 2种缓冲器均能满足万吨级重载列车的正常运行要求。Abstract: The buffer characteristics of heavy haul train were studied, and the structures and working principles of elastic clay buffer and friction clay buffer were analyzed. On the basis of HXD1 type locomotive, 13A type coupler and two buffers, a dynamics model of 104 t grade traction train with four marshalling locomotives was established, and the influences of the static and dynamic impedance characteristics of two buffers on the dynamics performances of heavy haul train were researched. Simulation result indicates that when heavy haul train conducts cycle braking on long downgrade, the infinite static impedance characteristic of friction clay buffer is beneficial to play buffer action, and the stroke and capacity of friction clay buffer can keep 100% under the static pressure of 900 kN. Friction clay buffer also can satisfy the demand of further dynamic pressure of 1 000 kN, while the buffer stroke is no more than 20 mm. Under the compound effect of static pressure of 900 kN and dynamic pressure of 400 kN, the stroke of elastic clay buffer has reached 60 mm, so elastic clay buffer can't satisfy the demand of more greater impact pressure. On the aspect of dynamic impendence characteristic, two buffers all can satisfy the normal running demand of 104 t grade heavy haul train.
-
[1] 常崇义, 王成国, 王永菲, 等. 基于响应面方法的车钩缓冲器特性曲线优化分析[J]. 中国铁道科学, 2007, 28 (6): 84-90. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-4632.2007.06.016CHANG Chong-yi, WANG Cheng-guo, WANG Yong-fei, et al. Optimal analysis of the hysteretic characteristic curve for draft gear based on response surface method[J]. China Railway Science, 2007, 28 (6): 84-90. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-4632.2007.06.016 [2] 任玉君, 陈凯, 宋国文, 等. 关于机车车辆车钩缓冲装置的选型分析[J]. 铁道车辆, 2009, 47 (5): 1-7. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDCL200905000.htmREN Yu-jun, CHEN Kai, SONG Guo-wen, et al. The analysis model selection of coupler draft gear for locomotive and rolling stock[J]. Rolling Stock, 2009, 47 (5): 1-7. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDCL200905000.htm [3] 贾九红, 华宏星. 新型胶泥缓冲器的试验研究[J]. 噪声与振动控制, 2010, 30 (1): 99-101. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-1355.2010.01.099JIA Jiu-hong, HUA Hong-xing. Experimental research of a new silicon-based elastomer damper[J]. Noise and Vibration Control, 2010, 30 (1): 99-101. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-1355.2010.01.099 [4] KAHLE V E. Failure Analysis of three reconditioned rail car couplers[J]. Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention, 2006, 6 (4): 23-28. doi: 10.1361/154770206X117496 [5] 杨俊杰, 刘建新, 罗世辉, 等. 重载组合列车机车车钩稳定控制试验[J]. 西南交通大学学报, 2009, 44 (6): 882-886. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2009.06.015YANG Jun-jie, LIU Jian-xin, LUO Shi-hui, et al. Test study on stability control of locomotive coupler in heavy haul combined train[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2009, 44 (6): 882-886. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2009.06.015 [6] BELFORTE P, CHELI F, DIANA G, et al. Numerical and experimental approach for the evaluation of severe longitudinal dynamics of heavy freight trains[J]. Vehicle System Dynamics, 2008, 46 (S): 937-955. [7] COLE C, SUN Y Q. Simulated comparisons of wagon coupler systems in heavy haul trains[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, 2006, 220 (3): 247-256. doi: 10.1243/09544097JRRT35 [8] GEIKE T. Understanding high coupler forces at metro vehicles[J]. Vehicle System Dynamics, 2007, 45 (4): 389-396. doi: 10.1080/00423110701215085 [9] 李瑞淳. 高速列车及提速列车车钩缓冲装置研究[J]. 铁道机车车辆, 2004, 24 (6): 15-21. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-7842.2004.06.003LI Rui-chun. Research on high-speedtrain and raising speedtrain vehicle hook buffer mechanism[J]. Railway Locomotive and Car, 2004, 24 (6): 15-21. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-7842.2004.06.003 [10] 马卫华, 杨俊杰, 罗世辉, 等. SS3B电力机车长大下坡道稳钩能力分析[J]. 铁道学报, 2010, 32 (2): 109-113. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDXB201002021.htmMA Wei-hua, YANGJun-jie, LUO Shi-hui, et al. Study on the coupler stability of locomotive running SS3B on the longheavy down grade[J]. Journal of the China railway Society, 2010, 32 (2): 109-113. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDXB201002021.htm [11] 王开云, 翟婉明, 封全保, 等. 重载机车车钩自由角对轮轨动态安全性能的影响[J]. 中国铁道科学, 2009, 30 (6): 72-76. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-4632.2009.06.012WANG Kai-yun, ZHAI Wan-ming, FENG Quan-bao, et al. Effect of the coupler free angle on wheel/rail dynamic safety performance of heavy haul locomotive[J]. China Railway Science, 2009, 30 (6): 72-76. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-4632.2009.06.012 [12] 王成国, 马大炜, 王雪军, 等. 重载货车缓冲器的数字试验研究[J]. 铁道机车车辆, 2009, 29 (5): 1-4. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-6042.2009.05.001WANG Cheng-guo, MA Da-wei, WANG Xue-jun, et al. Research on structures and performances of heavy haul buffer by numerical simulation[J]. Railway Locomotive and Car, 2009, 29 (5): 1-4. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-6042.2009.05.001 [13] 杨俊杰, 常崇义, 封全保, 等. 重载组合列车机车缓冲器关键技术参数研究[J]. 中国铁道科学, 2010, 31 (3): 76-81. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGTK201003015.htmYANG Jun-jie, CHANG Chong-yi, FENG Quan-bao, et al. Study on the key technical parameter of the locomotive draft gear in a heavy haul combined train[J]. China Railway Science, 2010, 31 (3): 76-81. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGTK201003015.htm [14] 刘伶. HXD2机车车钩大容量缓冲器存在的问题及解决措施[J]. 铁道机车车辆, 2009, 29 (5): 66-68. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDJC200905021.htmLIU Ling. Failure and treat ment measure of HXD2 locomotive's big capacity buffer with coupler[J]. Railway Locomotive and Car, 2009, 29 (5): 66-68. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDJC200905021.htm [15] 周光强, 杨丽娜, 杨爱军, 等. 弹性胶泥特性及其缓冲器的研究进展[J]. 有机硅材料, 2011, 25 (1): 40-43. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YJGC201101014.htmZHOU Guang-qiang, YANG Li-na, YANG Ai-jun, et al. Research progress on characteristics of elastic rubber and its buffer[J]. Silicone Material, 2011, 25 (1): 40-43. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YJGC201101014.htm [16] COLE C. 昆士兰和COALlink重载煤炭运输列车动力学仿真的比较[J]. 国外铁道车辆, 2003, 40 (2): 33-39. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GWTD200302008.htmCOLE C. Heavy haul coal train dynamics simulation comparisons of the COAL link and central Queensland systems[J]. Foreign Rolling Stock, 2003, 40 (2): 33-39. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GWTD200302008.htm -
下载:
点击查看大图
图(9)
计量
- 文章访问数: 784
- HTML全文浏览量: 100
- PDF下载量: 616
- 被引次数: 0
