Multi-objective lattice-order decision-making method of scheme selection for rail transit network
-
摘要: 针对实际中决策者决策理性的有限性缺陷, 将多目标格序决策方法引入到轨道交通线网方案比选中, 构建了轨道交通线网方案多目标格序决策评价指标体系, 依据指标类型对指标进行无量纲化处理, 综合决策者主观权与数据离散度客观权去计算评价指标的相对权重。结合决策矩阵, 通过对各方案综合差异值的计算, 实现备选方案的格序化排序, 应用该决策方法对某市4套备选轨道交通线网方案进行评价。分析结果表明: 4套方案的综合差异值分别为0.66、0.56、0.24、0.83, 相应排序结果与实际情况一致, 该决策方法合理。Abstract: Aimed for the rational limitation of decision-maker, the multi-objective lattice-order decision-making method was introduced into the scheme selection of rail transit network.The evaluation index system of multi-objective lattice-order decision-making for urban rail transit network was constructed.Each index was turned into dimensionless number according to its type.The relative weights of evaluation indexes were worked out by synthesizing the subjective ones of decision-makers and the objective ones of data discrete degrees.Combining with decision matrix, the comprehensive difference degree of each scheme was calculated in order to achieve the lattice order of alternative schemes, and the decision-making method was applied to evaluate four rail transit network plans of some city.Analysis result shows that the comprehensive difference values of four plans are 0.66, 0.56, 0.24, 0.83 respectively, and the order result is consistent with actual situation, so the method is rational.
-
[1] 苏朝霞. 城市轨道交通线网规划综合评价的模型和方法[J]. 物流科技, 2010(6): 143-145. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LTKJ201006054.htmSU Zhao-xia. The model and method on evaluating of the line-net planning for urban rail transit[J]. Logistics Sci-Tech, 2010(6): 143-145. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LTKJ201006054.htm [2] 纪嘉伦, 李福志. 城市轨道交通线网规划方案综合评价指标体系研究[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2004, 24(3): 129-133. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6788.2004.03.023JI Jia-lun, LI Fu-zhi. A study on the synthetic evaluation index system of urbanrail transitline network planning scheme[J]. Systems Engineering—Theory & Practice, 2004, 24(3): 129-133. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6788.2004.03.023 [3] 李俊芳, 吴小萍. 基于AHP-FUZZY多层次评判的城市轨道交通线网规划方案综合评价[J]. 武汉理工大学学报: 交通科学与工程版, 2007, 31(2): 206-208 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JTKJ200702005.htmLI Jun-fang, WU Xiao-ping. Synthetic evaluation for urbanrail transit line network planning scheme based on AHP-fuzzy method[J]. Journal of Wuhan University of Technology: Transportation Science & Engineering, 2007, 31(2): 206-208. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JTKJ200702005.htm [4] 马超群, 王玉萍, 陈宽民, 等. 基于灰色加权关联度的城市轨道线网方案评价[J]. 长安大学学报: 自然科学版, 2007, 27(3): 84-87, 110. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1671-8879.2007.03.019MA Chao-qun, WANG Yu-ping, CHEN Kuan-min, et al. Comprehensive evaluation for urban rail transit network based on grey weight relation[J]. Journal of Changan University: Natural Science Edition, 2007, 27(3): 84-87, 110. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1671-8879.2007.03.019 [5] 刘海宁, 王明生, 温少芳. 基于灰色关联度法的轨道交通线网评价[J]. 石家庄铁道学院学报: 自然科学版, 2007, 20(4): 101-103. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0373.2007.04.026LIU Hai-ning, WANG Ming-sheng, WEN Shao-fang. Evaluation of urban mass transit network based on grey correlation degree method[J]. Journal of Shijiazhuang Rail way Institute: Natural Science, 2007, 20(4): 101-103. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0373.2007.04.026 [6] 郭强, 郭春香, 郭耀煌. 基于格序偏好距离的群决策方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2010, 32(2): 298-302. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XTYD201002021.htmGUO Qiang, GUO Chun-xiang, GUO Yao-huang. Method of group decision-making based on the distance of lattice order preferences[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2010, 32(2): 298-302. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XTYD201002021.htm [7] 郝光, 牟奇峰, 张殿业, 等. 基于格序偏好的模糊多目标决策方法[J]. 西南交通大学学报, 2006, 41(4): 517-521. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XNJT200604022.htmHAO Guang, MOU Qi-feng, ZHANG Dian-ye, et al. Approach of fuzzy multi-objective decision-making based on lattice-order preference[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong Univesity, 2006, 41(4): 517-521. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XNJT200604022.htm [8] COOK WD. Distance-based and ad hoc consensus models in ordinal preference ranking[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2006, 172(2): 369-385. [9] MOTA C M D M, ALMEIDA A T D, ALENCAR L H. Amultiple criteria decision model for assigning priorities to activities in project management[J]. International Journal of Project Management, 2009, 27(2): 175-181. [10] 陈旭梅, 李凤军, 马林涛. 城市轨道交通线网方案综合评价指标体系研究[J]. 城市规划, 2001, 25(10): 61-64. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CSGH200110011.htmCHEN Xu-mei, LI Feng-jun, MA Lin-tao. The study on the criterion system for comprehensive evaluation of the urban rail network[J]. City Planning Review, 2001, 25(10): 61-64. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CSGH200110011.htm [11] 郭春香, 郭耀煌. 格序决策的格序化研究[J]. 系统工程理论方法应用, 2004, 13(5): 463-466. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XTGL200405018.htmGUO Chun-xiang, GUO Yao-huang. The study of lattice ordering under lattice order decision making theory[J]. Systems Engineering—Theory Methodology Applications, 2004, 13(5): 463-466. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XTGL200405018.htm [12] OLCER AI, ODABASI A Y. A new fuzzy multiple attributive group decision making methodology and its application to propulsion/manoeuvring system selection problem[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2005, 166(1): 93-114. [13] KAO C. Weight determination for consistently ranking alternatives in multiple criteria decision analysis[J]. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2010, 34(7): 1779-1787. [14] CHEN Y, MARCKILGOUR D, HIPEL K W. An extreme-distance approachto multiple criteria ranking[J]. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 2011, 53(5/6): 646-658. [15] JABEUR K, MARTEL J M. A collective choice method based on individual preferences relational systems[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2007, 177(3): 1549-1565. -
下载:
点击查看大图
图(5) / 表(4)
计量
- 文章访问数: 665
- HTML全文浏览量: 99
- PDF下载量: 339
- 被引次数: 0
