留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

均质非饱和黏土地层盾构隧道极限支护力计算方法

王道远 张高翔 贺少辉 武薇 陈宇博 刘承宏 马济文 宋宝禄 袁金秀 刘勇

王道远, 张高翔, 贺少辉, 武薇, 陈宇博, 刘承宏, 马济文, 宋宝禄, 袁金秀, 刘勇. 均质非饱和黏土地层盾构隧道极限支护力计算方法[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2026, 26(1): 247-256. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2026.052
引用本文: 王道远, 张高翔, 贺少辉, 武薇, 陈宇博, 刘承宏, 马济文, 宋宝禄, 袁金秀, 刘勇. 均质非饱和黏土地层盾构隧道极限支护力计算方法[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2026, 26(1): 247-256. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2026.052
WANG Dao-yuan, ZHANG Gao-xiang, HE Shao-hui, WU Wei, CHEN Yu-bo, LIU Cheng-hong, MA Ji-wen, SONG Bao-lu, YUAN Jin-xiu, LIU Yong. Calculation method for ultimate support force of shield tunnel in homogeneous unsaturated clay strata[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2026, 26(1): 247-256. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2026.052
Citation: WANG Dao-yuan, ZHANG Gao-xiang, HE Shao-hui, WU Wei, CHEN Yu-bo, LIU Cheng-hong, MA Ji-wen, SONG Bao-lu, YUAN Jin-xiu, LIU Yong. Calculation method for ultimate support force of shield tunnel in homogeneous unsaturated clay strata[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2026, 26(1): 247-256. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2026.052

均质非饱和黏土地层盾构隧道极限支护力计算方法

doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2026.052
基金项目: 

国家自然科学基金项目 52178378

河北省高等学校科学研究青年基金项目 QN2025302

详细信息
    作者简介:

    王道远(1982-),男,湖北枝江人,教授,北京交通大学工学博士研究生,E-mail: wtg-888@163.com

    通讯作者:

    张高翔(1995-),男,河北石家庄人,助理教授,E-mail: 3246332383@qq.com

  • 中图分类号: U451

Calculation method for ultimate support force of shield tunnel in homogeneous unsaturated clay strata

Funds: 

National Natural Science Foundation of China 52178378

Youth Funds of Scientific Research Projects for Higher Schools in Hebei Province QN2025302

More Information
    Corresponding author: ZHANG Gao-xiang, assistant professor, E-mail: 3246332383@qq.com
Article Text (Baidu Translation)
  • 摘要: 针对非饱和黏土地层盾构隧道极限支护力不易准确确定的难题,采用理论推导和工程算例分析相结合的方法系统研究了均质非饱和黏土地层盾构隧道开挖面支护力计算方法。考虑地层非垂直滑裂面形态、土体基质吸力作用、不完全土拱效应及主应力偏转特性,构建了考虑多因素耦合的竖向土压力解析模型;基于极限平衡楔形体模型,进一步推演构建了开挖面支护力计算方法;结合工程算例探讨了关键参数对支护力的影响规律。研究结果表明:土拱效应引发土体竖向应力非线性演化,随埋深增加呈现先陡增后增速趋缓规律;隧顶土体竖向应力与滑裂面角度、饱和度正相关,与黏聚力、拱顶位移负相关;高饱和度条件下,推荐计算方法与规范计算结果具有高度一致性,且二者所得结果均明显高于太沙基理论预测值,偏差幅度最高可达50%;随饱和度降低,推荐解渐趋接近太沙基理论解,饱和度变化引发的松动土压力波动幅度可达30%;开挖面极限支护力受内摩擦角、黏聚力及饱和度多参数耦合影响,其中地层饱和度为关键控制因素,其差异可导致支护力变化幅度超50%。

     

  • 图  1  位移破坏模式

    Figure  1.  Displacement failure mode

    图  2  土拱效应中土的应力示意

    Figure  2.  Schematic of stress in soil layer under soil arching effect

    图  3  坐标平移后J点应力状态

    Figure  3.  Stress state at point J after coordinate translation

    图  4  黏土地层水平薄层单元受力

    Figure  4.  Horizontal thin layer unit stress in clay layer

    图  5  楔形体计算模型

    Figure  5.  Wedge calculation model

    图  6  不同理论计算方法对比

    Figure  6.  Comparison of different theoretical calculation methods

    图  7  不同黏聚力下土体竖向应力变化曲线

    Figure  7.  Vertical stress variation curves of soil under different cohesive forces

    图  8  不同破裂面倾角下土体竖向应力变化曲线

    Figure  8.  Vertical stress variation curves of soil under different angles of fracture surface

    图  9  不同拱顶位移下土体竖向应力变化曲线

    Figure  9.  Vertical stress variation curves of soil under different arch displacements

    图  10  不同饱和度下竖向应力变化曲线

    Figure  10.  Vertical stress variation curves under different saturation levels

    图  11  极限支护力对比

    Figure  11.  Comparison of ultimate support forces

    图  12  不同黏聚力下极限支护力变化曲线

    Figure  12.  Variation curve of ultimate support force under different cohesive forces

    图  13  不同饱和度下极限支护力变化曲线

    Figure  13.  Variation curve of ultimate support force under different saturation levels

  • [1] 梁荣柱, 康成, 王森勇, 等. 地表加卸载引起端部受限盾构隧道结构响应模型试验[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2025, 25(3): 178-191. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2025.03.011

    LIANG Rong-zhu, KANG Cheng, WANG Sen-yong, et al. Model test of structural response of end-restricted shield tunnel induced by surface loading and unloading[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2025, 25(3): 178-191. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2025.03.011
    [2] 刘小锋, 李晓龙, 段盛龙, 等. 隧道结构对其联络通道顶管施工破洞过程的力学响应[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2025, 25(4): 94-108. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2025.04.007

    LIU Xiao-feng, LI Xiao-long, DUAN Sheng-long, et al. Mechanical response of tunnel structure to hole-breaking process of cross passage pipe jacking construction[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2025, 25(4): 94-108. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2025.04.007
    [3] 陈丽俊, 陈建勋, 高剑峰, 等. 软岩隧道初期支护主动补强加固原理与工程实践[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2025, 25(4): 80-93. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2025.04.006

    CHEN Li-jun, CHEN Jian-xun, GAO Jian-feng, et al. Principle and engineering practice of active reinforcement for initial support of soft rock tunnels[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2025, 25(4): 80-93. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2025.04.006
    [4] CHAMBON P, CORTÉ J F. Shallow tunnels in cohesionless soil: Stability of tunnel face[J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1994, 120(7): 1148-1165. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1994)120:7(1148)
    [5] LI Y, EMERIAULT F, KASTNER R, et al. Stability analysis of large slurry shield-driven tunnel in soft clay[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2009, 24(4): 472-481. doi: 10.1016/j.tust.2008.10.007
    [6] 付亚雄, 贺雷, 马险峰, 等. 软黏土地层盾构隧道开挖面稳定性离心试验研究[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2019, 15(2): 387-393.

    FU Ya-xiong, HE Lei, MA Xian-feng, et al. Centrifuge model tests on face stability of shield tunneling in soft clay[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2019, 15(2): 387-393.
    [7] 雷华阳, 刘敏, 程泽宇, 等. 透明黏土盾构隧道开挖面失稳扩展过程和失稳特征研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2022, 41(6): 1235-1245.

    LEI Hua-yang, LIU Min, CHENG Ze-yu, et al. Instability process and characteristics of the excavation face of shield tunnels using transparent clays[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2022, 41(6): 1235-1245.
    [8] TERZAGHI K. Theoretical soil mechanics[M]. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1943.
    [9] HANDY R L. The arch in soil arching[J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1985, 111(3): 302-318. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1985)111:3(302)
    [10] 陈若曦, 朱斌, 陈云敏, 等. 基于主应力轴旋转理论的修正Terzaghi松动土压力[J]. 岩土力学, 2010, 31(5): 1402-1406.

    CHEN Ruo-xi, ZHU Bin, CHEN Yun-min, et al. Modified Terzaghi loozening earth pressure based on theory of main stress axes rotation[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2010, 31(5): 1402-1406.
    [11] 黎春林. 盾构隧道施工松动土压力计算方法研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2014, 36(9): 1714-1720.

    LI Chun-lin. Method for calculating loosening earth pressure during construction of shield tunnels[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2014, 36(9): 1714-1720.
    [12] CHEN R P, TANG L J, YIN X S, et al. An improved 3D wedge-prism model for the face stability analysis of the shield tunnel in cohesionless soils[J]. Acta Geotechnica, 2015, 10(5): 683-692. doi: 10.1007/s11440-014-0304-5
    [13] 蔺港, 孔令刚, 詹良通, 等. 基于太沙基土拱效应考虑基质吸力影响的松动土压力计算模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2015, 36(7): 2095-2104.

    LIN Gang, KONG Ling-gang, ZHAN Liang-tong, et al. An analytical model for loosening earth pressure considering matric suction based on Terzaghi soil arch effect[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2015, 36(7): 2095-2104.
    [14] 叶飞, 樊康佳, 宋京, 等. 基于不完全拱效应的隧道预处理机制与计算方法[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2017, 36(6): 1469-1478.

    YE Fei, FAN Kang-jia, SONG Jing, et al. The pretreatment mechanism of tunnels and its calculation method based on the incomplete arch effect[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2017, 36(6): 1469-1478.
    [15] 宫全美, 张润来, 周顺华, 等. 基于颗粒椭球体理论的隧道松动土压力计算方法[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2017, 39(1): 99-105.

    GONG Quan-mei, ZHANG Run-lai, ZHOU Shun-hua, et al. Method for calculating loosening earth pressure around tunnels based on ellipsoid theory of particle flows[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2017, 39(1): 99-105.
    [16] JI X B, NI P P, BARLA M, et al. Earth pressure on shield excavation face for pipe jacking considering arching effect[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2018, 72: 17-27. doi: 10.1016/j.tust.2017.11.010
    [17] 汪大海, 贺少辉, 刘夏冰, 等. 基于主应力旋转特征的浅埋隧道上覆土压力计算及不完全拱效应分析门[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2019, 38(6): 1284-1296.

    WANG Da-hai, HE Shao-hui, LIU Xia-bing, et al. A modified method for determining the overburden pressure above shallow tunnels considering the distribution of the principal stress rotation and the partially mobilized arching effect[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2019, 38(6): 1284-1296.
    [18] WAN T, LI P F, ZHENG H, et al. An analytical model of loosening earth pressure in front of tunnel face for deep-buried shield tunnels in sand[J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2019, 115: 103170. doi: 10.1016/j.compgeo.2019.103170
    [19] LIN X T, SU D, SHEN X, et al. Effect of tunnelling-induced ground loss on the distribution of earth pressure on a deep underground structure[J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2022, 147: 104781. doi: 10.1016/j.compgeo.2022.104781
    [20] LIN X T, CHEN R P, WU H N, et al. Calculation of earth pressure distribution on the deep circular tunnel considering stress-transfer mechanisms in different zones[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2022, 119: 104211. doi: 10.1016/j.tust.2021.104211
    [21] 崔蓬勃, 朱永全, 刘勇, 等. 考虑土拱发挥过程的非饱和砂土盾构隧道极限支护力计算方法研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2020, 42(5): 873-881.

    CUI Peng-bo, ZHU Yong-quan, LIU Yong, et al. Calculation of ultimate supporting forces of shield tunnels in unsaturated sandy soils considering soil arching effects[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2020, 42(5): 873-881.
    [22] 崔蓬勃, 朱永全, 刘勇, 等. 非饱和砂土隧道土拱效应模型试验及颗粒流数值模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(12): 3451-3466.

    CUI Peng-bo, ZHU Yong-quan, LIU Yong, et al. Model test and particle flow numerical simulation of soil arch effect for unsaturated sandy soil tunnel[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2021, 42(12): 3451-3466.
    [23] FREDLUND D G, MORGENSTERN N R, WIDGER R A. The shear strength of unsaturated soils[J]. Canadian Geotech-nical Journal, 1978, 15(3): 313-321. doi: 10.1139/t78-029
    [24] VANAPALLI S K, FREDLUND D G, PUFAHL D E, et al. Model for the prediction of shear strength with respect to soil suction[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 1996, 33(3): 379-392. doi: 10.1139/t96-060
    [25] 汪成兵, 朱合华. 埋深对软弱隧道围岩破坏影响机制试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2010, 29(12): 2442-2448.

    WANG Cheng-bing, ZHU He-hua. Experimental study of influence mechanism of buried depth on surrounding rock failure of tunnel constructed in soft rock[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2010, 29(12): 2442-2448.
    [26] 刘燕鹏. 软弱破碎隧道围岩压力拱动态特性研究[D]. 西安: 长安大学, 2013.

    LIU Yan-peng. Study on the dynamic pressure arching characteristics of the tunnel constructed in soft surrounding rock[D]. Xi'an: Chang'an University, 2013.
    [27] HORN L S. A quantitative study of the geometry of dilatation and of faulting in a uniformly strained body[J]. Journal of Geology, 1961, 69(3): 265-280.
    [28] TB 10003—2016, 铁路隧道设计规范[S].

    TB 10003—2016, Code for design of railway tunnel[S].
    [29] LU N, LIKOS W J. Unsaturated soil mechanics[M]. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2004.
    [30] JANCSECZ S, STEINER W. Face support for a large mix-shield in heterogeneous ground conditions[C]//Elsevier. Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Tunnelling. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1994: 531-550.
    [31] 李奥, 张顶立, 孙振宇, 等. 黏性土地层中盾构隧道开挖面极限支护力理论解[J]. 铁道建筑, 2019, 59(4): 71-75.

    LI Ao, ZHANG Ding-li, SUN Zhen-yu, et al. Analytical solution of limit support pressure at shield tunnel working face in clay layer[J]. Railway Engineering, 2019, 59(4): 71-75.
    [32] 许敬叔, 刘俊, 路德春, 等. 基于多对数螺旋曲线破坏机构的富水软岩隧道开挖面支护应力分析[J]. 北京工业大学学报, 2024, 50(5): 571-582.

    XU Jing-shu, LIU Jun, LU De-chun, et al. Supporting pressure for tunnel face in water-rich weathered rock masses based on a multi-log spiral failure mechanism[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Technology, 2024, 50(5): 571-582.
    [33] 蒋民. 浅埋隧道掌子面支护反力上限计算方法的研究[D]. 长沙: 中南大学, 2014.

    JIANG Min. Study on upper bound method for supporting force of shallow tunnel face[D]. Changsha: Central South University, 2014.
  • 加载中
图(13)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  11
  • HTML全文浏览量:  4
  • PDF下载量:  5
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2025-01-03
  • 录用日期:  2025-09-26
  • 修回日期:  2025-07-28
  • 刊出日期:  2026-01-28

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回