留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

无人机引导的狭窄弯曲路段多车协同通行控制

张茜 郭戈 王永川

张茜, 郭戈, 王永川. 无人机引导的狭窄弯曲路段多车协同通行控制[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2026, 26(3): 60-74. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2026.152
引用本文: 张茜, 郭戈, 王永川. 无人机引导的狭窄弯曲路段多车协同通行控制[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2026, 26(3): 60-74. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2026.152
ZHANG Qian, GUO Ge, WANG Yong-chuan. UAV-guided multi-vehicle cooperative passage control on narrow and curved roads[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2026, 26(3): 60-74. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2026.152
Citation: ZHANG Qian, GUO Ge, WANG Yong-chuan. UAV-guided multi-vehicle cooperative passage control on narrow and curved roads[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2026, 26(3): 60-74. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2026.152

无人机引导的狭窄弯曲路段多车协同通行控制

doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2026.152
基金项目: 

国家自然科学基金项目 62173079

国家自然科学基金项目 U1808205

国家自然科学基金项目 62573104

河北省自然科学基金项目 F2025501051

详细信息
    作者简介:

    张茜(1997-),女,辽宁鞍山人,工学博士研究生,E-mail:zhangqian1901909@163.com

    通讯作者:

    郭戈(1972-),男,甘肃庄浪人,教授,博士生导师,工学博士,E-mail:geguo@yeah.net

  • 中图分类号: U491

UAV-guided multi-vehicle cooperative passage control on narrow and curved roads

Funds: 

National Natural Science Foundation of China 62173079

National Natural Science Foundation of China U1808205

National Natural Science Foundation of China 62573104

Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province F2025501051

More Information
    Corresponding author: GUO Ge, professor, PhD, E-mail: geguo@yeah.net
Article Text (Baidu Translation)
  • 摘要: 针对含密集车流与狭窄车道等灾害应急运输场景中地面车辆感知能力不足、路径规划困难及协同响应不及时等问题,提出了一种基于无人机引导的地面车辆预设时间协同控制方法。以无人机广域感知与路径规划能力为依托,获取了可引导地面交通的路径信息,并将其通过无线通信传输至地面领航车辆,再由车队内部双向通信实现信息互联;设计了基于指数间距策略的扩展前瞻零初始耦合误差动态,以在消除协同算法设计限制的同时,有效避免误差累积与弯道切角行为;基于该误差动态,结合反演控制技术与预设时间引理,构造了分布式车辆控制器,其可保证预设时间单载具稳定性、队列网格稳定性与交通流稳定性存在,实现对响应效率及交通平滑等的综合提升。结果表明:提出的控制方法在狭窄道路与弯曲路径等多种复杂情况下,均可于预设时间(5 s)内实现路径的精确跟踪及协同误差的快速收敛,并通过队列网格稳定性和交通流稳定性评判指标可得其能有效抑制因信息传递造成的波动扩散与交通拥堵,显著提升交通安全与流畅性。综上,该方法具有良好的工程适用性和推广价值,可为智能交通系统中灾害应急运输等场景提供理论与技术支持。

     

  • 图  1  基于无人机引导的车辆协同

    Figure  1.  UAV-guided vehicle collaboration

    图  2  切角行为

    Figure  2.  Cutting-corner behavior

    图  3  运行轨迹

    Figure  3.  Motion trajectories

    图  4  纵向误差

    Figure  4.  Longitudinal errors

    图  5  横向误差

    Figure  5.  Lateral errors

    图  6  T1=10 s时的纵向误差

    Figure  6.  Longitudinal errors at T1=10 s

    图  7  T1=10 s时的横向误差

    Figure  7.  Lateral errors at T1=10 s

    图  8  系统在前瞻零初始耦合误差动态下的运行轨迹

    Figure  8.  Motion trajectories of the system under the look-ahead zero-initial coupled error dynamics

    图  9  扩展前瞻零初始误差动态下的纵向误差

    Figure  9.  Longitudinal errors under the extended look-ahead zero-initial error dynamics

    图  10  扩展前瞻零初始误差动态下的横向误差

    Figure  10.  Lateral errors under the extended look-ahead zero-initial error dynamics

    图  11  误差动态公式(23)、(24)下采用文献[25]方法的纵向误差

    Figure  11.  Longitudinal errors under error dynamic equations (23), (24) using the method in Ref.[25]

    图  12  误差动态公式(23)、(24)下采用文献[25]方法的横向误差

    Figure  12.  Lateral errors under error dynamic equations (23), (24) using the method in Ref.[25]

    图  13  误差动态公式(23)、(24)下采用文献[38]方法的纵向误差

    Figure  13.  Longitudinal errors under error dynamic equations (23), (24) using the method in Ref.[38]

    图  14  误差动态公式(23)、(24)下采用文献[38]方法的横向误差

    Figure  14.  Lateral errors under error dynamic equations (23), (24) using the method in Ref.[38]

    图  15  采用文献[25]间距策略和方法的纵向误差

    Figure  15.  Longitudinal errors using the spacing policy and method in Ref.[25]

    图  16  采用文献[25]间距策略和方法的横向误差

    Figure  16.  Lateral errors using the spacing policy and method in Ref.[25]

    图  17  采用文献[38]间距策略和方法的纵向误差

    Figure  17.  Longitudinal errors using the spacing policy and method in Ref.[38]

    图  18  采用文献[38]间距策略和方法的横向误差

    Figure  18.  Lateral errors using the spacing policy and method in Ref.[38]

    图  19  扩展规模载具群的运行轨迹

    Figure  19.  Motion trajectories of expanded-scale vehicle group

    图  20  扩展规模载具群的纵向误差

    Figure  20.  Longitudinal errors of expanded-scale vehicle group

    图  21  扩展规模载具群的横向误差

    Figure  21.  Lateral errors of expanded-scale vehicle group

    图  22  交通流速率关于交通密度的梯度

    Figure  22.  Gradient of traffic flow rate with respect to traffic density

    图  23  Δ=1 m时的纵向误差

    Figure  23.  Longitudinal errors under Δ=1 m

    图  24  Δ=1 m时的横向误差

    Figure  24.  Lateral errors under Δ=1 m

    图  25  Δ=1 m时交通流速率关于交通密度的梯度

    Figure  25.  Gradient of traffic flow rate with respect to traffic density under Δ=1 m

    图  26  新设定初始条件下的纵向误差

    Figure  26.  Longitudinal errors under newly set initial conditions

    图  27  新设定初始条件下的横向误差

    Figure  27.  Lateral errors under newly set initial conditions

    图  28  新设定初始条件下的交通流速率关于交通密度的梯度

    Figure  28.  Gradient of traffic flow rate with respect to traffic density under newly set initial conditions

    图  29  大规模载具群的纵向误差

    Figure  29.  Longitudinal errors of large-scale vehicle group

    图  30  大规模载具群的横向误差

    Figure  30.  Lateral errors of large-scale vehicle group

    图  31  大规模载具群的交通流速率关于交通密度的梯度

    Figure  31.  Gradient of traffic flow rate with respect to traffic density for large-scale vehicle groups

    图  32  新场景1下的运行轨迹

    Figure  32.  Motion trajectories under a new scenario 1

    图  33  新场景1下的纵向误差

    Figure  33.  Longitudinal errors under a new scenario 1

    图  34  新场景1下的横向误差

    Figure  34.  Lateral errors under a new scenario 1

    图  35  新场景1下的交通流速率关于交通密度的梯度

    Figure  35.  Gradient of traffic flow rate with respect to traffic density under a new scenario 1

    图  36  新场景2下的运行轨迹

    Figure  36.  Motion trajectories under a new scenario 2

    图  37  新场景2下的纵向误差

    Figure  37.  Longitudinal errors under a new scenario 2

    图  38  新场景2下的横向误差

    Figure  38.  Lateral errors under a new scenario 2

    图  39  新场景2下的交通流速率关于交通密度的梯度

    Figure  39.  Gradient of traffic flow rate with respect to traffic density under a new scenario 2

    表  1  本文方法与典型协同控制方法的对比

    Table  1.   Comparison of the proposed method and typical cooperative control methods

    方法 实际收敛时间/s 控制精度 队列网格稳定性 交通流稳定性
    本文方法 2.50 0.000 05
    文献[25]方法 13.82 0.002 80 没有 没有
    文献[38]方法 11.66 0.014 00 没有 没有
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] YANMAZ E, BALANJI H M, GÜVEN İ. Dynamic multi-UAV path planning for multi-target search and connectivity[J]. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 2024, 73(7): 10516-10528. doi: 10.1109/TVT.2024.3363840
    [2] WU D, ZHANG Y B, WU W T, et al. Tunnel prescribed performance control for distributed path maneuvering of multi-UAV swarms via distributed neural predictor[J]. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems Ⅱ: Express Briefs, 2024, 71(8): 3830-3834. doi: 10.1109/TCSII.2024.3371981
    [3] TALUKDAR N, RAGHAV A, HAZRA A, et al. A deep deterministic policy gradient method for optimizing task completion time and energy efficiency in UAV-assisted IoT networks[J]. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 2025, 12(15): 31907-31917. doi: 10.1109/JIOT.2025.3575714
    [4] ZHAO M X, ZHANG R Q, HE Z L, et al. Joint optimization of trajectory, offloading, caching, and migration for UAV-assisted MEC[J]. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 2025, 24(3): 1981-1998. doi: 10.1109/TMC.2024.3486995
    [5] 李德仁, 李明. 无人机遥感系统的研究进展与应用前景[J]. 武汉大学学报(信息科学版), 2014, 39(5): 505-513, 540.

    LI De-ren, LI Ming. Research advance and application prospect of unmanned aerial vehicle remote sensing system[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2014, 39(5): 505-513, 540.
    [6] ZHANG Q, GUO G. Improved spacing policy-based predefined- time cooperative control of vehicles[J]. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 2025, 74(8): 11929-11938. doi: 10.1109/TVT.2025.3554200
    [7] ZHANG Q, GUO G. Prescribed-time cooperative control of connected and autonomous vehicles on rough roads[J]. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 2025, 74(1): 140-151. doi: 10.1109/TVT.2024.3454969
    [8] KHAN R, MEHMOOD A, SONG H B, et al. A decentralized, secure, and reliable vehicle platoon formation with privacy protection for autonomous vehicles[J]. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2025, 26(5): 6441-6450. doi: 10.1109/TITS.2025.3537765
    [9] KEIJZER T, CHANFREUT P, MARÍA MAESTRE J, et al. Collaborative vehicle platoons with guaranteed safety against cyber-attacks[J]. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2025, 26(1): 295-308. doi: 10.1109/TITS.2024.3503370
    [10] 郭景华, 李克强, 罗禹贡. 智能车辆运动控制研究综述[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2016, 7(2): 151-159.

    GUO Jing-hua, LI Ke-qiang, LUO Yu-gong. Review on the research of motion control for intelligent vehicles[J]. Journal of Automotive Safety and Energy, 2016, 7(2): 151-159.
    [11] YU H L, MEIER K, ARGYLE M, et al. Cooperative path planning for target tracking in urban environments using unmanned air and ground vehicles[J]. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 2015, 20(2): 541-552. doi: 10.1109/TMECH.2014.2301459
    [12] GROCHOLSKY B, KELLER J, KUMAR V, et al. Cooperative air and ground surveillance[J]. IEEE Robotics and Automation Magazine, 2006, 13(3): 16-25. doi: 10.1109/MRA.2006.1678135
    [13] ZHANG L L, GAO F, DENG F, et al. Distributed estimation of a layered architecture for collaborative air-ground target geolocation in outdoor environments[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2023, 70(3): 2822-2832. doi: 10.1109/TIE.2022.3165245
    [14] LIAO H J, JIA Z H, ZHOU Z Y, et al. Cloud-edge-end collaboration in air-ground integrated power IoT: A semi-distributed learning approach[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 2022, 18(11): 8047-8057. doi: 10.1109/TII.2022.3164395
    [15] TANG H, CHEN Y, ALI I. Cross-dimensional distributed control for heterogeneous UAV-UGV systems with nonzero leader input[J]. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles, 2024, 9(10): 6354-6368. doi: 10.1109/TIV.2024.3366932
    [16] MU C X, YAO J Y, YANG H J, et al. Cooperative control for air-ground systems via bidirectional signal connection in complex environment[J]. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 2024, 54(9): 5680-5691. doi: 10.1109/TSMC.2024.3408152
    [17] WANG G D, WANG X Y, LI S H. Node task expansion based finite-time formation-containment control for ground-air collaboration systems[J]. IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering, 2024, 11(4): 3346-3357. doi: 10.1109/TNSE.2024.3370932
    [18] KWON J W, CHWA D. Adaptive bidirectional platoon control using a coupled sliding mode control method[J]. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2014, 15(5): 2040-2048. doi: 10.1109/TITS.2014.2308535
    [19] ZHENG X Q, LI S B, LUO X Y, et al. Fast distributed platooning of connected vehicular systems with inaccurate velocity measurement[J]. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 2023, 53(10): 5996-6006. doi: 10.1109/TSMC.2023.3279368
    [20] MA G Q, GE S S. Robust string stabilization of connected vehicles with jerk feedforward[J]. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 2025, 70(6): 3992-3999. doi: 10.1109/TAC.2024.3519638
    [21] QIU M, LIU D, WANG H, et al. A cooperative implementation of mesh stability in vehicular platoons[J]. IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering, 2023, 10(3): 1537-1550. doi: 10.1109/TNSE.2022.3227905
    [22] BOO J, CHWA D. Robust bidirectional platoon control for mesh stability of vehicular systems with uncertain kinematics and dynamics[J]. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles, 2025, 10(4): 2304-2318. doi: 10.1109/TIV.2024.3373766
    [23] 史昕, 胡欣倩, 赵祥模, 等. 基于神经常微分方程的自适应图时空同步交通流预测方法[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2025, 25(2): 170-188. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2025.02.011

    SHI Xin, HU Xin-qian, ZHAO Xiang-mo, et al. Adaptive graph spatio-temporal synchronization for traffic flow prediction based on NODEs[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2025, 25(2): 170-188. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2025.02.011
    [24] 周靓, 夏金凤, 李中奇. 改进的动车组速度跟踪系统的无模型自适应控制[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2024, 24(2): 267-280. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2024.02.019

    ZHOU Liang, XIA Jin-feng, LI Zhong-qi. Improved model-free adaptive control for EMUs velocity tracking system[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2024, 24(2): 267-280. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2024.02.019
    [25] BAYUWINDRA A, PLOEG J, LEFEBER E, et al. Combined longitudinal and lateral control of car-like vehicle platooning with extended look-ahead[J]. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 2020, 28(3): 790-803. doi: 10.1109/TCST.2019.2893830
    [26] RAJAMANI R, TAN H S, LAW B K, et al. Demonstration of integrated longitudinal and lateral control for the operation of automated vehicles in platoons[J]. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 2000, 8(4): 695-708. doi: 10.1109/87.852914
    [27] CHEN L M, XIAO J P, WEI RUI TEO C, et al. Air-ground collaborative control for angle-specified heterogeneous formations[J]. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles, 2025, 10(3): 1483-1497. doi: 10.1109/TIV.2024.3420408
    [28] DOMINGUEZ S, ALI A, GARCIA G, et al. Comparison of lateral controllers for autonomous vehicle: Experimental results[C]//IEEE. 2016 IEEE 19th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC). New York: IEEE, 2016: 1418-1423.
    [29] 高一凡, 马小平, 陈小英, 等. 空天车地一体化技术在列车群车联网中的应用框架研究[J]. 现代城市轨道交通, 2020(5): 86-91.

    GAO Yi-fan, MA Xiao-ping, CHEN Xiao-ying, et al. Research on application framework of integration of rail systemwide technology in the train group network[J]. Modern Urban Transit, 2020(5): 86-91.
    [30] AL-HOURANI A, KANDEEPAN S, LARDNER S. Optimal LAP altitude for maximum coverage[J]. IEEE Wireless Communications Letters, 2014, 3(6): 569-572. doi: 10.1109/LWC.2014.2342736
    [31] PLOEG J, VAN DE WOUW N, NIJMEIJER H. Lp string stability of cascaded systems: Application to vehicle platooning[J]. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 2014, 22(2): 786-793. doi: 10.1109/TCST.2013.2258346
    [32] GUO G, LI P, HAO L Y. A new quadratic spacing policy and adaptive fault-tolerant platooning with actuator saturation[J]. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2022, 23(2): 1200-1212. doi: 10.1109/TITS.2020.3023453
    [33] GUO G, ZHANG Q, ZHOU Z D. Fixed-time cooperative control of vehicles with connectivity preservation[J]. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 2025, 74(10): 15109-15119. doi: 10.1109/TVT.2025.3569317
    [34] GAO Z Y, SUN Z C, GUO G. Adaptive predefined-time tracking control for vehicular platoons with finite-time global prescribed performance independent of initial conditions[J]. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 2024, 73(11): 16254-16267. doi: 10.1109/TVT.2024.3420906
    [35] XIE S Z, CHEN Q. Adaptive nonsingular predefined-time control for attitude stabilization of rigid spacecrafts[J]. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems Ⅱ: Express Briefs, 2022, 69(1): 189-193. doi: 10.1109/TCSII.2021.3078708
    [36] SUNGU H E, INOUE M, IMURA J I. Nonlinear spacing policy based vehicle platoon control for local string stability and global traffic flow stability[C]//IEEE. 2015 European Control Conference (ECC). New York: IEEE, 2015: 3396-3401.
    [37] 陈妍妍, 田大新, 林椿眄, 等. 端到端自动驾驶系统研究综述[J]. 中国图象图形学报, 2024, 29(11): 3216-3237.

    CHEN Yan-yan, TIAN Da-xin, LIN Chun-mian, et al. Survey of end-to-end autonomous driving systems[J]. Journal of Image and Graphics, 2024, 29(11): 3216-3237.
    [38] GAO Z Y, WEI Z Y, LIU W, et al. Adaptive finite-time prescribed performance control with small overshoot for uncertain 2-D plane vehicular platoons[J]. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 2025, 74(1): 587-598. doi: 10.1109/TVT.2024.3463635
  • 加载中
图(39) / 表(1)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  31
  • HTML全文浏览量:  22
  • PDF下载量:  5
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2025-07-29
  • 录用日期:  2026-01-23
  • 修回日期:  2026-01-04
  • 刊出日期:  2026-03-28

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回