-
摘要: 为了比较不同级配类型的沥青混和料在施工过程中产生集料离析的差异程度, 通过调整拌和楼热料仓比例生产出具有代表性的7种级配类型沥青混和料, 分析了其摊铺后在横断面上不同位置的颗粒组成状况, 混和料经碾压成型后, 测定其在横断面上不同位置的构造深度, 并评价其数值特征。研究结果表明: 在相同条件下, 产生集料离析程度由大到小的沥青混和料级配为: 反S型、间断级配、最大密度曲线之上微弓型、S型、0.45次方最大密度曲线、含中间粒径较多的级配、最大密度曲线之下微弓型。Abstract: In order to compare the different degrees of the aggregate segregations for asphalt mixtures with different gradation types during construction, seven kinds of asphalt mixtures with typical gradation types were produced by adjusting the scale of hot bunker at mixer plant, and the granulometric composition conditions at different positions on cross section after spreading were analyzed.After the mixtures were rolled and molded, their construct depthes were measured at different positions on cross section, and their numerical characteristics were evaluated.Analysis result shows that, on the same condition, the gradations that influence the degrees of the aggregate segregations from large to small were in the following order: counter S type, discontinuous type, the micro bow type that is over the ultimate density curve, S type, 0.45 capital ultimate density curve, the gradation with superior middle particle size, the micro bow type that is below the ultimate density curve.
-
Key words:
- pavement engineering /
- asphalt mixture /
- aggregate segregation /
- gradation adjustment
-
表 1 级配筛分结果
Table 1. Screening result of gradations
级配编号 筛孔尺寸/mm 31.5 26.5 19 16 13.2 9.5 4.75 2.36 1.18 0.6 0.3 0.15 0.075 0# 质量通过百分率/% 100 99.2 86.8 80.7 72.2 59.5 34.5 22.4 17.7 11.5 7.3 4.7 3.8 1# 100 98.7 79.6 72.1 64.5 53.8 36.1 20.7 16.4 10.8 7.0 4.6 3.7 2# 100 98.6 78.8 70.3 61.4 50.0 44.4 27.1 21.2 13.4 8.2 4.9 3.8 3# 100 99.2 87.7 82.1 74.9 64.2 43.8 29.7 23.2 14.5 8.7 5.0 3.9 4# 100 98.5 77.2 68.8 60.6 49.3 36.2 26.8 21.1 13.4 8.2 4.9 3.8 5# 100 98.5 77.2 68.8 60.5 49.0 33.5 22.4 17.7 11.5 7.3 4.7 3.8 6# 100 99.4 90.0 83.5 72.6 56.4 29.4 19.6 15.7 10.4 6.8 4.6 3.7 规范上限 100 100.0 90.0 83.0 76.0 65.0 52.0 42.0 33.0 24.0 17.0 13.0 7.0 规范下限 100 90.0 75.0 65.0 57.0 45.0 24.0 16.0 12.0 8.0 5.0 4.0 3.0 表 2 油石比
Table 2. Bitumen aggregate ratios
级配编号 0# 1# 2# 3# 4# 5# 6# 沥青膜厚度/μm 10.47 10.47 10.47 10.47 10.47 10.47 10.47 比表面积/(kg·m-2) 3.62 3.53 3.91 4.06 3.87 3.61 3.45 油石比/% 3.90 3.80 4.22 4.37 4.17 3.89 3.71 表 3 级配分析结果
Table 3. Analysis result of different gradations
筛孔/mm 26.5 19 16 13.2 9.5 4.75 2.36 1.18 0.6 0.3 0.15 0.075 级配编号 点位 质量通过百分率差值/% 0# a -0.8 -1.1 0.2 0.5 -0.6 0.6 1.4 1.2 0.7 -0.3 0.2 0.8 b -0.8 0.9 1.7 0.6 1.5 3.7 2.8 2.2 1.3 0.1 0.1 0.5 c 3.9 7.3 11.1 12.8 13.7 9.0 5.1 3.7 2.2 0.9 0.8 1.1 1# a -1.5 -4.4 -3.3 -1.7 -2.0 0.4 -0.3 -1.2 -0.6 -1.0 -0.4 0.6 b 0.7 -5.5 -4.9 -2.6 -0.2 3.1 1.8 0.8 -0.3 -1.1 -1.0 0.0 c 1.7 -5.8 -4.9 0.3 3.1 3.4 1.6 -0.3 -1.7 -2.2 -1.6 -0.4 2# a -1.4 -11.6 -12.5 -12.3 -12.0 2.9 0.7 1.4 0.5 -0.9 -1.3 -0.7 b 5.1 -1.3 1.6 -1.4 -0.6 10.6 3.7 2.7 1.1 -0.3 -0.6 0.2 c 0.7 -6.6 -2.1 1.7 -5.9 6.5 1.9 1.8 1.1 0.3 0.1 1.3 3# a -0.8 3.0 2.9 2.2 4.1 0.5 -1.7 -0.1 0.3 0.2 -0.5 0.0 b -0.8 2.7 6.1 4.9 4.1 1.4 -0.6 -0.1 -0.2 -0.1 -0.3 -0.1 c -0.8 3.5 5.8 8.8 9.5 3.5 2.0 3.6 0.2 -0.2 -0.6 0.2 4# a -1.3 -10.0 -8.8 -6.6 -2.1 4.2 -0.7 -0.3 0.2 -0.3 -0.1 0.4 b -1.3 -7.2 -0.4 -1.1 0.4 4.9 -0.2 -0.2 -0.2 -0.6 -0.7 -0.1 c 5.8 -0.3 -2.1 -4.6 0.4 4.3 -0.1 0.3 0.3 -0.3 -0.2 0.2 5# a -1.5 -6.4 -6.2 -5.3 -3.3 -2.0 -1.6 -1.5 -1.9 -2.2 -1.8 -0.8 b 0.9 -4.1 -2.1 1.7 5.2 5.9 2.4 1.7 0.6 -0.3 -0.4 0.4 c 2.4 -3.1 -2.9 0.4 3.4 3.7 1.5 0.5 -0.4 -0.9 -1.0 0.0 6# a -0.6 -5.9 -5.1 -3.7 0.8 2.0 2.5 2.3 1.6 0.6 0.1 0.4 b -0.6 4.8 5.9 4.5 5.0 4.1 2.8 2.2 1.5 0.3 -0.1 0.1 c -0.6 -1.2 2.8 1.3 2.9 4.1 3.2 2.5 1.9 0.7 0.3 0.5 表 4 现场测试结果
Table 4. Test result in field
级配编号 试验项目 构造深度(铺砂直径/cm) 级配编号 试验项目 构造深度(铺砂直径/cm) 桩号 点位a 点位b 点位c 桩号 点位a 点位b 点位c 0# K16+827 20.95 20.55 16.65 3# K18+592 27.75 28.50 23.25 837 21.25 19.90 16.35 602 28.20 27.75 23.25 847 23.00 21.25 18.75 4# K19+100 25.36 24.90 19.70 857 22.40 20.20 17.25 120 26.35 25.40 18.65 1# K17+580 20.35 21.45 17.25 140 24.80 25.80 18.85 600 20.10 20.20 16.65 160 25.10 25.10 19.20 620 19.25 20.00 17.60 5# K20+500 18.40 16.75 17.75 640 19.30 20.30 18.15 510 18.20 17.59 16.00 2# K17+730 20.80 21.85 16.00 520 18.10 17.90 17.70 750 24.10 24.80 15.80 530 16.55 16.95 16.25 770 24.50 25.30 21.10 6# K21+300 18.15 18.50 16.25 790 25.30 25.65 21.10 320 17.25 17.90 16.75 3# K18+572 27.60 27.50 22.25 340 16.75 17.75 14.75 582 27.85 26.85 21.55 360 16.75 17.50 14.25 表 5 横向方差分析结果
Table 5. Analysis result of transverse variances
级配编号 极差 M 0# 20.90 20.48 17.25 19.54 3.65 15.95 1# 19.75 20.49 17.41 19.22 2.34 10.34 2# 23.70 24.40 18.50 22.20 5.20 41.56 3# 27.85 27.65 22.58 26.03 5.27 35.68 4# 25.40 25.30 19.10 23.27 6.30 52.09 5# 17.82 17.29 16.92 17.34 0.90 0.82 6# 17.23 17.91 15.56 16.90 1.67 5.85 -
[1] 李艳春, 孟岩, 周骊巍, 等. 沥青混合料空隙率影响因素的灰关联分析[J]. 中国公路学报, 2007, 20(1): 30-34. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGGL200701005.htmLI Yan-chun, MENG Yan, ZHOU Li-wei, et al. Grey relation degree analysis of influence factors on asphalt mixtures voids[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2007, 20(1): 30-34. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGGL200701005.htm [2] 赵战利, 张争奇, 胡长顺. 集料级配对沥青路面抗滑性能的影响[J]. 长安大学学报: 自然科学版, 2005, 25(1): 6-9. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XAGL200501002.htmZHAO Zhan-li, ZHANG Zheng-qi, HU Chang-shun. Influence of gradation on anti-skidding performance of asphalt pavement[J]. Journal of Chang an University: NaturalScience Edition, 2005, 25(1): 6-9. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XAGL200501002.htm [3] Transportation Research Board National Research Council. Segregationin Hot-Mix Asphalt Pavements[M]. Washington DC: Na-tional Academy Press, 2000. [4] NUNN M E, BROWN A, WESTON D, et al. Design of long-life flexible pavements for heavy traffic[R]. Berkshire: Transport Research Laboratory, 1997. [5] Transportation Research Board National Research Coucil. Guidefor mechanistic-empirical design of new and rehabilitated pavement structures[R]. Washington DC: Transportation Research Board National Research Coucil, 2004. [6] 彭余华. 沥青混合料离析特征判别与控制方法的研究[D]. 西安: 长安大学, 2006. [7] 彭勇, 孙立军. 沥青混合料均匀性与性能变异性的关系[J]. 中国公路学报, 2006, 19(6): 30-34. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGGL200606005.htmPENG Yong, SUN Li-jun. Relation of homogeneity and performance variation of asphalt mixture[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2006, 19(6): 30-34. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGGL200606005.htm [8] 张争奇, 赵战利, 张卫平. 矿料级配对沥青混合料低温性能的影响[J]. 长安大学学报: 自然科学版, 2005, 25(2): 1-5. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XAGL200502000.htmZHANG Zheng-qi, ZHAO Zhan-li, ZHANG Wei-ping. Effect of aggregate gradation on performance of asphalt mix at low temperature[J]. Journal of Chang an University: Natural Science Edition, 2005, 25(2): 1-5. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XAGL200502000.htm [9] 冯忠绪, 姚运仕, 冯建生. 热沥青混合料碾压过程的离析现象[J]. 长安大学学报: 自然科学版, 2006, 26(3): 96-99. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XAGL200603025.htmFENG Zhong-xu, YAO Yun-shi, FENG Jian-sheng. Rolling segregation of hot asphalt mixture[J]. Journal of Chang'an University: Natural Science Edition, 2006, 26(3): 96-99. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XAGL200603025.htm [10] 朱洪洲, 黄晓明. 沥青混合料疲劳性能关键影响因素分析[J]. 东南大学学报: 自然科学版, 2004, 34(2): 260-263. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DNDX201601032.htmZHU Hong-zhou, HUANG Xiao-ming. Analysis of key influential factors of asphalt-mixture fatigue property[J]. Journal of Southeast University: Natural Science Edition, 2004, 34(2): 260-263. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DNDX201601032.htm