Seismic performance of prefabricated assembled pier with grouted sleeve and prestressed reinforcements
-
摘要: 针对轨道交通预制拼装桥墩的受力特点, 提出了采用灌浆套筒和预应力筋连接的拼装方案; 设计了3种不同类型桥墩, 包括整体现浇试件(RC)、预应力钢绞线和灌浆套筒连接的预制拼装试件(PCSS) 与精轧螺纹钢筋和灌浆套筒连接的预制拼装试件(PCTS), 采用拟静力试验方法分析了各种桥墩的各种拟静力指标, 比较了桥墩的抗震性能。试验结果表明: PCSS和PCTS试件的各指标非常接近, 最大误差为2.2%;灌浆套筒会使传统塑性铰区上移至套筒顶部, 说明灌浆套筒对传统塑性铰区域具有局部增强作用, 建议对塑性铰的箍筋加密区高度应额外增加1个套筒高度; 采用预应力筋使试件的混凝土轴压力增大了1倍, 相应的开裂荷载也增大了约1倍; PCSS试件的屈服荷载和极限荷载正负向均值比RC试件分别提高了31%和34%, 等效屈服位移、极限位移和偏移率均值分别比RC试件提高了17%、13%、13%, 但是PCSS试件的延性系数平均降低了10%;在偏移率为6%时, PCSS试件的残余位移均值是RC试件的61%, 显示了较好的自复位能力; 与RC试件相比, PCSS试件的刚度提高了13%。相比于精轧螺纹钢筋, 钢绞线可以适当弯曲与成束, 面积调整灵活, 因此, 采用无黏结预应力筋和灌浆套筒连接的桥墩试件具有良好的使用性能和抗震性能, 可作为预制拼装轨道桥墩的推荐方案。Abstract: According to the mechanical characteristics of prefabricated assembled piers for rail transit, the assembly scheme of grouted sleeve and prestressed reinforcements was put forward.Three different types of piers were designed, including the integral cast-in-place reinforced concrete specimen (RC), the prefabricated and prestressed concrete specimen with strands andgrouted sleeves (PCSS), and the prefabricated and prestressed concrete specimen with screw thread steel bar and grouted sleeve (PCTS).The evaluation results of various pseudo-static evaluation indicators for each type of bridge pier were analyzed by using pseudo-static test method.The seismic performances of various kinds of piers were compared.Test result shows that the indexes of PCSS and PCTS are very similar, and the maximum error is 2.2%.The grouted sleeve shifts the traditional area of plastic hinge up to the top of grouted sleeve, so it shows that the grouted sleeve has local reinforcing effect on the traditional plastic hinge region, and the height of plastic hinge stirrup is advised to add extra one height of grouted sleeve.The concrete axial pressure of specimen increases by 1 time when using prestressed reinforcements, and the corresponding cracking load also increases by approximate 1 time.The mean values of yield load and ultimate load of PCSS are 31% and 34% higher than those of RC, respectively.The average equivalent yield displacement, ultimate displacement and drift ratio are 17%, 13%and 13% higher than those of RC, respectively, but the ductility factors of PCSS decreases by10%.At the same drift ratio of 6%, the mean residual displacement of PCSS is 61% of RC, which shows better re-centering capacity.Compared with RC, the stiffness of PCSS increases by13%.Compared to screw thread steel bar, steel strands can be bent and bundled, and the area is flexible to adjust.So the bridge pier specimens with unbonded prestressed reinforcements and grouted sleeve have better operation and seismic performance, and can be served as the recommended scheme for prefabricated assembled rail pier.
-
表 1 试件的配筋指标
Table 1. Reinforcement indexes of specimens
表 2 预应力筋参数
Table 2. Parameters of prestressed reinforcements
表 3 钢筋力学特性
Table 3. Mechanical properties of reinforcements
表 4 灌浆套筒的拉伸试验结果
Table 4. Tensile test results of grouted sleeves
表 5 强度和变形特征数值
Table 5. Characteristic values of strength and deformation
表 6 试件初始刚度
Table 6. Initial stiffnesses of specimens
-
[1] 林上顺, 黄卿维, 陈宝春, 等. 跨海大桥U-RC组合桥墩设计[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2017, 17 (4): 55-65. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1637.2017.04.006LIN Shang-shun, HUANG Qing-wei, CHEN Bao-chun, et al. Design of U-RC composite pier of sea-crossing bridge[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2017, 17 (4): 55-65. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1637.2017.04.006 [2] 黄国斌, 查义强. 上海公路桥梁桥墩预制拼装建造技术[J]. 上海公路, 2014 (4): 1-5. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-0109.2014.04.001HUANG Guo-bin, ZHA Yi-qiang. The construction technique of prefabricated and assembled highway bridge piers in Shanghai[J]. Shanghai Highways, 2014 (4): 1-5. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-0109.2014.04.001 [3] AMELI M J, PARKS J E, BROWN D N, et al. Seismic evaluation of grouted splice sleeve connections for reinforced precast concrete column-to-cap beam joints in accelerated bridge construction[J]. PCI Journal, 2015, 60 (2): 80-103. doi: 10.15554/pcij.03012015.80.103 [4] YEE A A, ENG H D. Structural and economic benefits of precast/prestressed concrete construction[J]. PCI Journal, 2001, 46 (4): 34-42. doi: 10.15554/pcij.07012001.34.42 [5] 韩超, 郑毅敏, 赵勇. 钢筋套筒灌浆连接技术研究与应用进展[J]. 施工技术, 2013, 42 (21): 113-117. doi: 10.7672/sgjs2013210113HAN Chao, ZHENG Yi-min, ZHAO Yong. Research and application development of grout sleeve splicing for reinforcement[J]. Construction Technology, 2013, 42 (21): 113-117. (in Chinese). doi: 10.7672/sgjs2013210113 [6] 吴涛, 刘全威, 成然, 等. 钢筋套筒灌浆连接性能试验研究及筒壁应力分析[J]. 工程力学, 2017, 34 (10): 68-75. doi: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2016.05.0357WU Tao, LIU Quan-wei, CHENG Ran, et al. Experimental study and stress analysis of mechanical performance of grouted sleeve splice[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2017, 34 (10): 68-75. (in Chinese). doi: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2016.05.0357 [7] 黄远, 朱正庚, 黄登, 等. 钢筋半套筒灌浆连接的静力拉抻试验研究[J]. 华南理工大学学报: 自然科学版, 2016, 44 (2): 26-32. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-565X.2016.02.005HUANG Yuan, ZHU Zheng-geng, HUANG Deng, et al. Investigation into half grout sleeve splicing for rebars via static tensile test[J]. Journal of South China University of Technology: Natural Science Edition, 2016, 44 (2): 26-32. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-565X.2016.02.005 [8] LING J H, RAHMAN A B A, IBRAHIM I S, et al. Behaviour of grouted pipe splice under incremental tensile load[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2012, 33: 90-98. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.02.001 [9] KIM Y. A study of pipe splice sleeves for use in precast beam-column connections[D]. Austin: University of Texas at Austin, 2000. [10] 陈项南. 新型灌浆变形钢套筒连接技术研究[D]. 南京: 东南大学, 2015.CHEN Xiang-nan. Study on a new-type grouted deformed pipe splice[D]. Nanjing: Southeast University, 2015. (in Chinese). [11] 郑永峰. GDPS灌浆套筒钢筋连接技术研究[D]. 南京: 东南大学, 2016.ZHENG Yong-feng. Research on rebar splicing system by GDPS grout-filled coupling sleeve[D]. Nanjing: Southeast University, 2016. (in Chinese). [12] SAYADI A A, RAHMAN A B A, SAYADI A, et al. Effective of elastic and inelastic zone on behavior of glass fiber reinforced polymer splice sleeve[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2015, 80: 38-47. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.01.064 [13] HENIN E, MORCOUS G. Non-proprietary bar splice sleeve for precast concrete construction[J]. Engineering Structures, 2015, 83: 154-162. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.10.045 [14] 刘洪涛, 闫秋实, 杜修力. 钢筋混凝土框架梁柱节点灌浆套筒连接抗震性能研究[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2017, 38 (9): 54-61. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JZJB201709007.htmLIU Hong-tao, YAN Qiu-shi, DU Xiu-li. Study of seismic performance of reinforced concrete frame beam-column joints connected with grouted sleeves[J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2017, 38 (9): 54-61. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JZJB201709007.htm [15] 赵勇, 李锐, 王晓锋, 等. 大直径高强钢筋套筒灌浆连接预制柱抗震性能试验研究[J]. 土木工程学报, 2017, 50 (5): 27-35, 71. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TMGC201705004.htmZHAO Yong, LI Rui, WANG Xiao-feng, et al. Experimental research on seismic behaviors of precast concrete columns with large-diameter and high-yield strength reinforcements splicing by grout-filled coupling sleeves[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2017, 50 (5): 27-35, 71. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TMGC201705004.htm [16] 魏红一, 肖纬, 王志强, 等. 采用套筒连接的预制桥墩抗震性能试验研究[J]. 同济大学学报: 自然科学版, 2016, 44 (7): 1010-1016. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TJDZ201607005.htmWEI Hong-yi, XIAO Wei, WANG Zhi-qiang, et al. Experimental study on seismic performance of precast bridge pier with grouted splice sleeve[J]. Journal of Tongji Universiy: Natural Science, 2016, 44 (7): 1010-1016. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TJDZ201607005.htm [17] 张臻. 高层钢筋混凝土结构中预制拼装柱的抗震性能研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工业大学, 2013.ZHANG Zhen. Seismic performance research of precast concrete columns in high-rise buildings[D]. Harbin: Harbin Institute of Technology, 2013. (in Chinese). [18] 章一萍, 冯波, 熊峰, 等. 套筒灌浆连接纵筋的预制钢筋混凝土短柱抗震性能试验研究[J]. 建筑结构, 2015, 45 (15): 81-86. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JCJG201515017.htmZHANG Yi-ping, FENG Bo, XIONG Feng, et al. Experimental study on seismic behavior of precast reinforced concrete short columns with grouted sleeves connecting longitudinal reinforcements[J]. Building Structure, 2015, 45 (15): 81-86. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JCJG201515017.htm [19] PANTELIDES C P, AMELI M J, REAVELEY L D. Evaluation of grouted splice sleeve connections for precast reinforced concrete bridge piers[R]. Fargo: Mountain-Plains Consortium, 2017. [20] HABER Z B, SAIIDI M S, SANDERS D H. Seismic performance of precast columns with mechanically spliced column-footing connections[J]. ACI Structural Journal, 2014, 111 (3): 639-650. [21] TAZARV M, SAIIDI M S. Seismic design of bridge columns incorporating mechanical bar splices in plastic hinge regions[J]. Engineering Structures, 2016, 124: 507-520. [22] 王志强, 卫张震, 魏红一, 等. 预制拼装联接件形式对桥墩抗震性能的影响[J]. 中国公路学报, 2017, 30 (5): 74-80. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGGL201705010.htmWANG Zhi-qiang, WEI Zhang-zhen, WEI Hong-yi, et al. Influences of precast segmental connector forms on seismic performance of bridge pier[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2017, 30 (5): 74-80. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGGL201705010.htm [23] 李锐, 郑毅敏, 赵勇. 配置500MPa钢筋套筒灌浆连接预制混凝土柱抗震性能试验研究[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2016, 37 (5): 255-263. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JZJB201605030.htmLI Rui, ZHENG Yi-min, ZHAO Yong. Experimental research on seismic performance of precast concrete columns with 500MPa reinforcements splicing by grout-filled coupling sleeves[J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2016, 37 (5): 255-263. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JZJB201605030.htm [24] BU Zhan-yu, OU Yu-chen, SONG Jian-wei, et al. Cyclic loading test of unbounded and bonded posttensioned precast segmental bridge columns with circular section[J]. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2016, 21 (2): 1-17. [25] 葛继平, 闫兴非, 王志强. 2段式预制拼装预应力混凝土桥墩的抗震性能[J]. 铁道科学与工程学报, 2017, 14 (11): 2390-2398. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CSTD201711017.htmGE Ji-ping, YAN Xing-fei, WANG Zhi-qiang. Seismic performance analysis of two-segment bridge columns with prestressing bars[J]. Journal of Railway Science and Engineering, 2017, 14 (11): 2390-2398. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CSTD201711017.htm [26] HOSE Y, SILVA P, SEIBLE F. Development of a performance evaluation database for concrete bridge components and systems under simulated seismic loads[J]. Earthquake Spectra, 2000, 16 (2): 413-442.