EBBR试验下沥青结合料低温性能评价指标

冯德成; 崔世彤; 易军艳; 王东升

doi:10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2021.05.008

EBBR试验下沥青结合料低温性能评价指标

doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2021.05.008

1.
哈尔滨工业大学交通科学与工程学院，黑龙江哈尔滨 150090
2.
中铁二院工程集团有限责任公司，四川成都 610031

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目 51878229

详细信息

作者简介:
冯德成(1967-), 男, 河南新县人, 哈尔滨工业大学教授, 工学博士，从事路面材料与结构研究

中图分类号: U416.217
计量
- 文章访问数: 797
- HTML全文浏览量: 356
- PDF下载量: 95
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2021-05-09
- 网络出版日期: 2021-11-13
- 刊出日期: 2021-10-01

Low temperature performance evaluation indexes of asphalt binder based on EBBR test

1.
School of Transportation Science and Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150090, Heilongjiang, China
2.
China Railway Eryuan Engineering Group Co., Ltd., Chengdu 610031, Sichuan, China

Funds:

National Natural Science Foundation of China 51878229

More Information

Author Bio:
FENG De-cheng(1967-), male, professor, PhD, fengdecheng@hit.edu.cn

摘要

摘要: 聚焦沥青结合料低温性能评价指标，基于流变学的弯曲梁流变仪试验、改进弯曲梁流变仪试验，分别分析了实际路面回收沥青、老化后的基质沥青、改性沥青低温流变性能规律；利用传统劲度模量及模量变化率指标展开了沥青的低温性能评价，提出了等效低温设计温度指标与温度差异值指标；在不同养护环境下进行模拟，利用低温等级损失指标对新制备、回收沥青展开了低温物理硬化影响因素研究；利用不同来源、不同品种沥青试验结果相互验证，从抗干扰能力、稳定性、评价准确度、直观性与指标获取难易程度等方面对上述指标进行分析，确立了4类指标对沥青低温性能的区分与评价能力。研究结果表明：回收沥青的实验室流变分析能够反映路面结构的低温抗裂水平，开裂严重路段沥青的模量明显高于其他路段，其数值差异可达130 MPa；新制备的SBS改性沥青与回收沥青低温加载规律一致性高，模量偏差低于15%，可有效搭建起实验室研究同实际路面病害处理需要的关系；传统指标数据稳定性偏弱，置信度仅为64.7%~82.3%，难以满足研究需要，温度差异值指标及低温等级损失指标在应用方面同样受到制约，对此仍需开展更多深入的研究。
- 道路工程 /
- 评价指标 /
- 弯曲梁流变仪试验 /
- 改进BBR试验 /
- 沥青结合料 /
- 低温抗裂性能
Abstract: Focusing on the evaluation indexes of the low temperature performance of asphalt binders, based on rheological bending beam rheometer (BBR) and extended bending beam rheometer (EBBR) tests, the low temperature rheological properties of the extracted asphalt, aging base asphalt and modified asphalt on actual pavements were analyzed. The low temperature performance evaluations of the asphalts were carried out using the traditional stiffness modulus and modulus changing rate. The equivalent low temperature design temperature index and the temperature difference value index were proposed. Simulations in different curing environments were conducted, and the influencing factors of physical hardening of newly prepared and extracted asphalt at low temperature were studied using low temperature grade loss index. Different sources and types of asphalt test results were used to verify each other, the above indexes were compared and analyzed in terms of anti-interference ability, stability, evaluation accuracy, intuitiveness, and difficulty in obtaining indexes. The abilities of four indexes in distinguishing and evaluating the low temperature performance of asphalt were established. Research results show that the laboratory rheological analysis of the extracted asphalt can reflect the low temperature crack resistance level of the pavement structure. The modulus of the asphalt in the severely cracked section is significantly higher than those in the other sections, and the value difference can reach about 130 MPa. The newly prepared SBS modified asphalt and the extracted asphalt have a high consistency at low temperature loads, and the modulus deviation is lower than 15%. It can effectively establishes the relationship between laboratory research and actual pavement disease treatment needs. The stability of traditional index data is weak, and the confidence is only 64.7%-82.3%, which is difficult to satisfy the research needs. The applications of temperature difference value index and low temperature grade loss index is also restricted, which still needs more in-depth research. 4 tabs, 10 figs, 32 refs.
- road engineering /
- evaluation index /
- bending beam rheometer test /
- extended bending beam rheometer test /
- asphalt binder /
- low temperature crack resistance

HTML全文

图 1 各老化状态下PG低温等级

Figure 1. Low temperature grades of PG in various aging states

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 EBBR养护加载条件

Figure 2. EBBR maintenance loading conditions

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 EBBR试验养护过程

Figure 3. EBBR test maintenance process

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 回收沥青劲度模量及其变化率

Figure 4. Stiffness moduli of extracted asphalt and its changing rates

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 新制备沥青劲度模量变化规律

Figure 5. Variation rules of stiffness modulus of newly prepared asphalt

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 新制备沥青劲度模量变化率规律

Figure 6. Changing rate rules of stiffness modulus of newly prepared asphalt

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 新制备沥青等效低温等级分布

Figure 7. Equivalent low temperature grade distributions of newly prepared asphalts

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 8 新制备沥青的ΔT_c

Figure 8. ΔT_c of newly prepared asphalt

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 9 回收沥青的低温等级损失

Figure 9. Low temperature grade losses of extracted asphalts

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 10 新制备沥青的低温等级损失

Figure 10. Low temperature grade losses of newly prepared asphalts

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 新制备沥青老化前后针入度及软化点

Table 1. Penetrations and softening points of newly prepared asphalt before and after aging

沥青品种	针入度/0.1 mm		软化点/℃
沥青品种	老化前	老化后	老化前	老化后
盘锦70^#	62.4	55.5	49.5	69.8
大连70^#	77.3	48.7	49.7	54.3
中大90^#	86.3	80.2	45.3	56.2
SBS改性	75.6	55.5	75.0	69.8
橡胶粉改性	58.6	43.1	75.8	79.9
SBS橡胶	54.0	22.4	81.6	89.7

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 新制备沥青分类

Table 2. Newly prepared asphalt classification

沥青品种	未老化	短期老化	紫外老化	压力老化
盘锦70^#	P70-	P70-T	P70-Z	P70-P
大连70^#	D70-	D70-T	D70-Z	D70-P
中大90^#	Z90-	Z90-T	Z90-Z	Z90-P
SBS改性	SBS-	SBS-T	SBS-Z	SBS-P
橡胶粉改性	R-	R-T	R-Z	R-P
SBS橡胶	SR-	SR-T	SR-Z	SR-P

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 回收沥青的当量低温设计温度

Table 3. Equivalent low temperature design temperatures of extracted asphalt

开裂间距/m	5~10	10~20	20~30	30~50
T_dx/℃	-23.3	-23.6	-26.1	-27.8

下载: 导出CSV

表 4 回收沥青的ΔT_c

Table 4. ΔT_c of extracted asphalt

开裂间距/m	5~10	10~20	20~30	30~50
ΔT_c/℃	3.2	3.4	0.5	-0.8

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(32)

[1]	权戈冰. 沥青混合料低温抗裂性能评价方法研究[J]. 绿色环保建材, 2017(8): 1-2. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HBJC201708005.htm QUAN Ge-bing. Research on evaluation method of asphalt mixture's low temperature anti-cracking performance[J]. Green Building Materials, 2017(8): 1-2. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HBJC201708005.htm
[2]	汲平, 徐朝. 沥青混合料低温抗裂性能评价方法的验证研究[J]. 石油沥青, 2017, 31(4): 50-54. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-OILE201704022.htm JI Ping, XU Chao. Validation of evaluation methods for low-temperature anti-cracking performance of asphalt mixture[J]. Petroleum Asphalt, 2017, 31(4): 50-54. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-OILE201704022.htm
[3]	刘贵应, 戴俊巍, 刘勇, 等. 集料均匀性对沥青混合料低温劈裂强度影响数值研究[J]. 低温建筑技术, 2018, 40(11): 12-16. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DRAW201811005.htm LIU Gui-ying, DAI Jun-wei, LIU Yong, et al. Numerical study on the influence of aggregate uniformity on the low-temperature splitting strength of asphalt mixture[J]. Low Temperature Construction Technology, 2018, 40(11): 12-16. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DRAW201811005.htm
[4]	杨光, 王旭东, 张晨晨. 一种基于实时温度-应变采集的沥青混合料温缩特性测试方法[J]. 中外公路, 2015, 35(1): 259-262. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2579.2015.01.057 YANG Guang, WANG Xu-dong, ZHANG Chen-chen. A test method for temperature shrinkage characteristics of asphalt mixture based on real-time temperature-strain acquisition[J]. China and Foreign Highway, 2015, 35(1): 259-262. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2579.2015.01.057
[5]	MATASTEAN M, VEALSQUEZ R, FALCHETTO, et al. Development of a simple test to determine the low temperature creep compliance of asphalt mixtures[R]. Washington DC: TRB, 2009.
[6]	马宏岩. AASHTO沥青路面低温开裂预估模型的验证与改进[D]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工业大学, 2011. MA Hong-yan. Verification and improvement of AASHTO asphalt pavement low temperature cracking prediction model[D]. Harbin: Harbin Institute of Technology, 2011. (in Chinese)
[7]	董雨明. 硬质沥青及其混合料流变特性与低温性能研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工业大学, 2015. DONG Yu-ming. Research on rheological properties and low temperature performance of hard asphalt and its mixture[D]. Harbin: Harbin Institute of Technology, 2015. (in Chinese)
[8]	ZHAO M O, HESP S A M. Performance grading of the Lamont, Alberta C-SHRP pavement trial binders[J]. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 2006, 7(3): 199-211. doi: 10.1080/10298430600715667
[9]	冯德成, 崔世彤, 易军艳, 等. 基于SCB试验的沥青混合料低温性能评价指标研究[J]. 中国公路学报, 2020, 33(7): 50-57. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGGL202007005.htm FENG De-cheng, CUI Shi-tong, YI Jun-yan, et al. Research on evaluation index of low temperature performance of asphalt mixture based on SCB test[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2020, 33(7): 50-57. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGGL202007005.htm
[10]	袁迎捷. 基于Superpave的沥青胶浆流变特性与集配优化研究[D]. 西安: 长安大学, 2004. YUAN Ying-jie. Research on rheological properties and optimization of asphalt mortar based on Superpave system[D]. Xi'an: Chang'an University, 2004. (in Chinese)
[11]	张兴友, 胡光艳, 谭忆秋. 硅藻土改性沥青混合料低温抗裂性能研究[J]. 公路交通科技, 2006(4): 11-13. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GLJK200604002.htm ZHANG Xing-you, HU Guang-yan, TAN Yi-qiu. Research on low temperature anti-cracking performance of diatomite modified asphalt mixture[J]. Highway and Transportation Science and Technology, 2006(4): 11-13. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GLJK200604002.htm
[12]	冯中良, 曹荣吉, 贾渝, 等. 采用特征温度指标评价沥青胶结料低温性能的研究[J]. 中外公路, 2009, 29(1): 245-247. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GWGL200901072.htm FENG Zhong-liang, CAO Rong-ji, JIA Yu, et al. Research on evaluation the low-temperature performance of asphalt binder using characteristic temperature index[J]. China and Foreign Highway, 2009, 29(1): 245-247. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GWGL200901072.htm
[13]	谭忆秋, 符永康, 纪伦, 等. 橡胶沥青低温评价指标[J]. 哈尔滨工业大学学报, 2016, 48(3): 66-70. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HEBX201603011.htm TAN Yi-qiu, FU Yong-kang, JI Lun, et al. Low temperature evaluation index of rubber asphalt[J]. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology, 2016, 48(3): 66-70. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HEBX201603011.htm
[14]	FROMM H J. Study of temperature cracking of bituminous pavements[J]. Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, 1972, 36(5): 255-258.
[15]	READSHOW E E. Asphalt specifications in British Columbia for low temperature performance[J]. Asphalt Paving Technologists, 1980, 43(15): 562-581.
[16]	HEUKELOM W. An improved method of characterizing asphaltic bitumens with the aid of their mechanical properties[J]. Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, 1973, 42(3): 252-260.
[17]	KANDHAL P S. Past, present, and future of asphalt binder rheological parameters[C]//TRB. The 96th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board. Washington DC: TRB, 2019: 15-21.
[18]	ANDERSON R M, KING G N, HANSON D I, et al. Evaluation of the relationship between asphalt binder properties and non-load related cracking[J]. Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, 2011, 80: 40-45.
[19]	聂忆华, 孙世恒, 丁海波, 等. 沥青胶结料低温物理硬化及结晶动力学分析[J]. 建筑材料学报, 2018, 21(4): 683-688. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JZCX201804027.htm NIE Yi-hua, SUN Shi-heng, DING Hai-bo, et al. Low-temperature physical hardening and crystallization kinetic analysis of asphalt binder[J]. Journal of Building Materials, 2018, 21(4): 683-688. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JZCX201804027.htm
[20]	HESP S A M, LLIUTA S. Reversible aging in asphalt binders[J]. Energy and Fuels, 2007, 21(2): 1112-1121.
[21]	ALAVI M Z, HE Y, JONES D. Investigation of the effect of reclaimed asphalt pavement and reclaimed asphalt shingles on the performance properties of asphalt binders: interim report[R]. Davis: University of California, 2017.
[22]	布海玲, 刘涛, 杨三强. 新疆地区常用沥青短期老化低温性能的评价[J]. 重庆交通大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 34(2): 50-53. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CQJT201502011.htm BU Hai-ling, LIU Tao, YANG San-qiang. Evaluation of short-term aging and low temperature performance of common asphalt in Xinjiang[J]. Journal of Chongqing Jiaotong University (Natural Science Edition), 2015, 34(2): 50-53. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CQJT201502011.htm
[23]	刘明鹏. 物理硬化对沥青材料低温性能影响机理研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工业大学, 2019. LIU Ming-peng. Research on the mechanism of physical hardening on the low-temperature performance of asphalt materials[D]. Harbin: Harbin Institute of Technology, 2019. (in Chinese)
[24]	聂忆华, 胡静轩. 加拿大改进的沥青弯曲梁流变试验(EBBR)介绍[J]. 中外公路, 2017, 37(5): 242-247. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GWGL201705053.htm NIE Yi-hua, HU Jing-xuan. Introduction to Canada's improved asphalt bending beam rheological test (EBBR)[J]. China and Foreign Highway, 2017, 37(5): 242-247. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GWGL201705053.htm
[25]	BUNCHER M. Use of the Delta T_c parameter to characterize asphalt binder behavior[R]. New York: Asphalt Institute Technical Advisory Committee, 2019.
[26]	KLUTTZ R Q. Prepared discussion on relationships between mixture fatigue performance and asphalt binder properties[J]. Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, 2019, 88: 108-112.
[27]	CHRISTENSEN D W, TRAN N. Relationships between mixture fatigue performance and asphalt binder properties[C]// Association of Asphalt Paving Technology. Asphalt Paving Technology 2019. Washington DC: Association of Asphalt Paving Technology, 2019: 431-473.
[28]	LI Xin-jun, GIBSON X N, ANDRIESCU A, et al. Performance evaluation of REOB-modified asphalt binders and mixtures[J]. Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, 2016, 85: 92-95.
[29]	LIU Y, SU P, LI M, et al. Review on evolution and evaluation of asphalt pavement structures and materials[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English Edition), 2020, 7(5): 573-599.
[30]	KANABAR A. Physical and chemical aging behavior of asphalt cements from two northern Ontario pavement[D]. Kingston: Queen's University, 2010.
[31]	ILIUTA S, ANDRICSCU A, HESP S A M. Improved approach to low temperature and fatigue fracture performance grading of asphalt cements[C]//CTAA. 2004 Annual Conference of the Canadian Technical Asphalt Association. Kelowna: CTAA, 2004: 589-594.
[32]	HESP S A M, ILIUTA S. Reversible ageing in asphalt at low temperatures[J]. Energy and Fuels, 2007, 21: 1112-1121.