CAO Ming-ming, LU Yang, HUANG Wan-qing, LI Yi-ming, WU Zhi-yong. Interlaminar interface shear slip characteristics of composite pavement[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2018, 18(4): 1-11. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2018.04.001
Citation: CAO Ming-ming, LU Yang, HUANG Wan-qing, LI Yi-ming, WU Zhi-yong. Interlaminar interface shear slip characteristics of composite pavement[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2018, 18(4): 1-11. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2018.04.001

Interlaminar interface shear slip characteristics of composite pavement

doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2018.04.001
More Information
  • Author Bio:

    CAO Ming-ming(1987-), male, doctoral student, 707360021@qq.com

    LU Yang(1957-), male, professor, PhD, luyljm@sina.com

  • Received Date: 2018-02-18
  • Publish Date: 2018-08-25
  • Based on the composite pavement test section of Nandaliang Expressway, the exposed bone ratios and texture depths of different roughened interfaces were tested, and 45°shear tests were carried out with core samples drilling in the field test section. Combined with 45°shear test results and the mechanical properties in the interlaminar shear process, the interlaminar shear and deformation curve was divided into four stages: elastic stage, failure stage, shear strength reduction phase, and residual phase. The interlaminar shear and deformation behavior was evaluated by using the texture depth, peak shear strength, relative interlaminar slip displacement corresponding to the peak shear strength, and residual shear strength. The effects of interface roughness mode, types and amounts of waterproof cohesive materials, temperature, and loading rates on the interlaminar shear and deformation characteristics of composite pavement wereanalyzed. Test result shows that the texture depth of the chiseling interface (1.17 mm) is greater than that of the sand-blasting interface (0.37 mm). Combined with the interlaminar mechanical property differences of different roughened interfaces in the shearing process, the composite specimen formed at the chiseling interface has better shear resistance performance than that formed at the sand-blasting interface. The relative interlaminar sliding displacement corresponding to the peak shear strength of the chiseling interface (0.19-0.79 mm) is larger than that of the sandblasting interface (0.16-0.33 mm) with the same waterproof cohesive materials. Moreover, the effect of waterproof cohesive materials on the peak shear strength and residual shear strength is greater than that of the interlaminar relative slip displacement corresponding to the peak shear strength. As a whole, the effect of temperature on interlaminar shear and deformation characteristics is remarkable, and the peak shear strength at 5℃is 7.0-10.0 times of the value at40℃. The test conditions have a great influence on the interlaminar shear strength, and the interlaminar peak shear strength measured at 50 mm·min-1 loading rate is 1.9-3.5 times of the value measured at 5 mm·min-1 loading rate. Thus, the chiseling roughened method is more helpful to improve the interlaminar shear strength of the composite pavement, and the multiindex should be used to evaluate the interlaminar shear and deformation characteristics of the composite pavement.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    LI Ming-guo. Structure analysis and material optimization for concrete beam bridge asphalt mixture deck[D]. Xi'an: Chang'an University, 2010. (in Chinese).
    [2]
    KHWEIR K, FORDYCE D. Influence of layer bonding on the prediction of pavement life[J]. Transport, 2003, 156 (2): 73-83.
    [3]
    HUANG You, LIU Zhao-hui, LI Sheng, et al. Analysis of shear stress of rigid-flexible composite pavement under different interlaminar bonding conditions[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2015, 32 (6): 32-38, 61. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0268.2015.06.006
    [4]
    QIAO Zhi, WANG Xuan-cang, ZHANG Zhi-fang, et al. Interlayer combination state of double-layer continuous paving semi-rigid base[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2016, 16 (3): 28-34. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1637.2016.03.004
    [5]
    CASTRO M. Structural design of asphalt pavement on concrete bridges[J]. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 2004, 31 (4): 695-702. doi: 10.1139/l04-032
    [6]
    KRUNTCHEVA M R, COLLOP A C, THOM N H. Effect of bond condition on flexible pavement performance[J]. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 2005, 131 (11): 880-888. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2005)131:11(880)
    [7]
    RAAB C, PARTL M N. Interlayer bonding of binder, base and subbase layers of asphalt pavements: long-term performance[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2009, 23 (8): 2926-2931. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.02.025
    [8]
    WEST R C, ZHANG Jing-na, MOORE J. Evaluation of bond strength between pavement layers[R]. Auburn: Auburn University, 2005.
    [9]
    ZHANG Juan. Study on the waterproofing and bonding layer of concrete bridge deck[D]. Xi'an: Chang'an University, 2008. (in Chinese).
    [10]
    WANG Huo-ming. Research on strength characteristics of the interface layer of rigid-flexible pavement[D]. Chongqing: Chongqing Jiaotong University, 2008. (in Chinese).
    [11]
    ZHEN Leng, AL-QADI I L, CARPENTER S H, et al. Interface bonding between hot-mix asphalt and various Portland cement concrete surfaces: assessment of accelerated pavement testing and measurement of interface strain[J]. Transportation Research Record, 2009 (2127): 20-28.
    [12]
    ZHEN Leng, OZER H, AL-QADI I L, et al. Interface bonding between hot-mix asphalt and various Portland cement concrete surfaces: laboratory assessment[J]. Transportation Research Record, 2008 (2057): 46-53.
    [13]
    MOHAMMAD L N, BAE A, ELSEIFI M A, et al. Effects of pavement surface type and sample preparation method on tack coat interface shear strength[J]. Transportation Research Record, 2010 (2180): 93-101.
    [14]
    LUO Zhi-gang, ZENG Jun, WANG Sui-yuan. Experiment and study on influence of interface pollution on interlaminar bonding performance between semi-rigid base and asphalt concrete course[J]. Highway, 2011 (1): 109-113. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GLGL201101021.htm
    [15]
    CAO Ming-ming, HUANG Wan-qing, LU Yang, et al. Test and evaluation method of interlaminar shear property of composite pavement[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2018, 35 (4): 40-48. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GLJK201804006.htm
    [16]
    LI Zhong-lin. Research on cement concrete bridge deck interface layer structure and mechanical properties[D]. Chongqing: Chongqing Jiaotong University, 2009. (in Chinese).
    [17]
    PEI Jian-zhong. Study on technical performance of flexible waterproof material for bridge deck[D]. Xi'an: Chang'an University, 2001. (in Chinese).
    [18]
    LIU Li. Study on the technology performance of asphalt pavement layer interfaces[D]. Xi'an: Chang'an University, 2008. (in Chinese).
    [19]
    TIAN Shuai, ZHANG Tie-zhi, LI Ye, et al. Research on shear test of the interface between bridge deck wit carbon fiber and deck pavement[J]. Journal of Wuhan University of Technology, 2011, 33 (6): 80-84. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3963/j.issn.1671-4431.2011.06.019
    [20]
    CHEN J S, HUANG C C. Effect of surface characteristics on bonding properties of bituminous tack coat[J]. Transportation Research Record, 2010 (2180): 142-149.
    [21]
    ZHANG Jin-rong. Study on technology of interlayer treatment for perpetual asphalt pavement[D]. Xi'an: Chang'an University, 2008. (in Chinese).
    [22]
    SANTAGATA F A, FERROTTI G, PARTL M N, et al. Statistical investigation of two different interlayer shear test methods[J]. Materials and Structures, 2009, 42 (6): 705-714. doi: 10.1617/s11527-008-9414-6
    [23]
    UZAN J, LIVNEH M, ESHED Y. Investigation of adhesion properties betweenasphaltic-concretelayers[C]∥TRB. Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists Proceedings. Washington DC: TRB, 1978: 495-521.
    [24]
    XU Ou-ming, HAN Sen, YU Jing-tao. Effect of interlayer interface on structural performance of concrete bridge deck pavement[J]. Journal of Chang'an University: Natural Science Edition, 2009, 29 (5): 17-20, 53. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XAGL200905005.htm
    [25]
    XU Qin-wu, ZHOU Qing-hua, MEDINA C, et al. Experimental and numerical analysis of a waterproofing adhesive layer used on concrete-bridge decks[J]. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, 2009, 29 (5): 525-534. doi: 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2008.12.001
    [26]
    YILDIRIM Y, SMIT A F, KORKMAZ A. Development of a laboratory test procedure to evaluate tack coat performance[J]. Turkish Journal of Engineering and Environmental Sciences, 2005, 29 (4): 195-205.
    [27]
    FENG De-cheng, SONG Yu. Study of test and evaluation method on interfacial combining state of asphalt pavement[J]. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology, 2007, 39 (4): 627-631. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HEBX200704027.htm
    [28]
    MO Lian-tong, HUURMAN M, WU Shao-peng, et al. Ravelling investigation of porous asphalt concrete based on fatigue characteristics of bitumen-stone adhesion and mortar[J]. Materials and Design, 2009, 30 (1): 170-179.
    [29]
    LI Sheng, LIU Zhao-hui, ZHANG Jing-yi, et al. Test evaluation of pavement performance of interlaminar asphalt material for rigid-flexible composite pavement[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2013, 30 (11): 7-12, 67. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GLJK201311002.htm
    [30]
    JI Lun, LI Yun-liang, REN Jun-da, et al. Method of determining the spraying amount of waterproof binder for bridge deck pavement[J]. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology, 2014, 46 (4): 57-62. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HEBX201404010.htm

Catalog

    Article Metrics

    Article views (1223) PDF downloads(575) Cited by()
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return