MU Dong-sheng, ZHOU Yu, HAN Yan-bin, ZHENG Xiao-feng, KUANG Di-feng. Effect of track comprehensive maintenance on geometry irregularity improvement of ballast track in high-speed railway[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2018, 18(5): 90-99. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2018.05.009
Citation: MU Dong-sheng, ZHOU Yu, HAN Yan-bin, ZHENG Xiao-feng, KUANG Di-feng. Effect of track comprehensive maintenance on geometry irregularity improvement of ballast track in high-speed railway[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2018, 18(5): 90-99. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2018.05.009

Effect of track comprehensive maintenance on geometry irregularity improvement of ballast track in high-speed railway

doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2018.05.009
More Information
  • Author Bio:

    MU Dong-sheng(1992-), male, graduate student, 2279024353@qq.com

    ZHOU Yu(1977-), male, associateprofessor, PhD, wqhuo2785@163.com

  • Received Date: 2018-04-27
  • Publish Date: 2018-10-25
  • According to the track geometry inspection data captured before and after comprehensive maintenance of ballast track in a high-speed railway, the improvements in the geometric irregularity of comprehensive maintenance that consists of large machinery work, artificial fine adjustment, and rail grinding were analyzed.Analyses result shows that the large machinery work, artificial fine adjustment, and rail grinding can improve track geometric irregularity effectively.Among them, the improvement rates of large machinery work on track vertical, cross, and twist irregularities are 20.95%, 12.90%, and 13.16%, respectively, the improvement rates of artificial fine adjustment on track vertical, cross, twist, and gaugeirregularities are 11.97%, 5.56%, 7.43%, and 6.12%, respectively, and the rail grinding can improve the track vertical and alignment irregularities by 4.85% and 3.88%, respectively.The track quality index (TQI) improves by 11.54%, 6.91%, and 1.10%after large machinery work, artificial fine adjustment, and rail grinding, respectively.Large machinery work and artificial fine adjustment have obvious effects on the improvement of single irregularities.The contribution of large machinery work is the largest, whereas the artificial fine adjustment can improve the track gauge irregularity to a certain extent, and the rail grinding can further improve the track vertical irregularity and track alignment irregularity, but have no obvious effects on the track cross irregularity, track gauge irregularity, or track twist irregularity.Through the comprehensive maintenance, the single irregularity and TQI both decrease, in which the TQI, track vertical irregularity, track cross irregularity, and right track alignment irregularity decrease approximately as power functions, the left track alignment irregularity decreases approximately as a linear function, and the track twist irregularity decreases approximately as a logarithmic function.The geometrical state of the track irregularities improves effectively after large machinery work, and the artificial fine adjustment and rail grinding can further improve some single irregularities.

     

  • FullText

    Disclaimer: The English version of this article is automatically generated by Baidu Translation and only for reference. We therefore are not responsible for its reasonableness, correctness and completeness, and will not bear any commercial and legal responsibilities for the relevant consequences arising from the English translation.

    At present, most of the ballasted tracks on high-speed railways at home and abroad use large-scale maintenance machinery (referred to as large machines) for comprehensive maintenance operations mainly focused on compaction. By quantifying the effectiveness of large machine operations using the Track Quality Index (TQI), large machine operations can effectively improve the geometric irregularities of the track[10, 11, 12, 13]Li et al. attempted to evaluate the geometric quality of the track using dynamic simulation and wavelength spectrum analysis using GENSYS, and proposed measures for track maintenance and repair[14]Woodward et al. proposed using geogrids and organic geosynthetic materials to reinforce ballasted track beds[15]Ionescu proposed a prediction method for evaluating the deterioration index and track bed cleaning cycle of ballasted track under on-site working conditions[16]Nurmikolu analyzed the geometric irregularities of ballasted tracks on Finnish high-speed railways and concluded that efficient track maintenance and repair methods are superior to constructing high-quality track forms[17]Lichtberger proposed reducing the workload of track maintenance and maximizing economic benefits through efficient large-scale machine maintenance operations and track maintenance strategies[18].

    China has gained certain experience and methods in evaluating, analyzing, and maintaining the geometric state of ballasted tracks. For example, dynamic inspection vehicles are used to dynamically detect and evaluate track geometric irregularities, guiding the development of maintenance and repair plans; Using large-scale road maintenance machinery such as compaction vehicles, power stabilization vehicles, and ballast shaping vehicles to restore geometric irregularities; Design a reasonable rail profile based on the wheel tread profile, and use new rail pre grinding and repair grinding to improve the wheel rail relationship; Through manual line fine-tuning, the rate of change in track geometry unevenness, especially track gauge unevenness, has been solved, achieving high-quality control of high-speed railway ballasted track smoothness and efficient management of geometric unevenness. However, the above work still lacks quantitative analysis and systematic summary and evaluation.

    High speed railways require high smoothness in track geometry, which is evaluated and controlled using a single geometric roughness standard deviation and TQI. When the wavelength range is 1.5~42.0m and the single standard deviation calculation length is 200m, 200~350km·h-1The standard deviation and TQI management value of the single track geometric roughness of the line are shown inTable 1.

    Table  1.  Single geometry irregularity standard deviations and TQIs
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    At present, a comprehensive track maintenance method is adopted for the ballasted track of high-speed railways, which combines large machine operation, manual fine-tuning, and rail grinding. Firstly, large-scale road maintenance machinery is used to comprehensively compact the line, mainly to solve the main diseases such as high and low, horizontal, and triangular pits. After the line compaction operation, a 0-level track inspection instrument is used to measure and formulate a rectification plan. The line is further fine tuned manually according to the operation plan to solve the high and low, horizontal, triangular pits and other diseases that still exist after the large machine operation. Personnel are also arranged to rectify the track gauge, track orientation, and some structural diseases of the line. Finally, rail polishing operation is arranged to polish the main line rails. For special mainline turnouts, manual precision adjustment operations are mainly carried out, using small machine groups for comprehensive compaction and small polishing machines for polishing.

    The main problem of large machine operation is to solve the main diseases such as high and low, horizontal, and triangular pits. A continuous compaction scheme is adopted by inserting the pickaxe twice, hole by hole, using a compaction operation mode of the first precise method and the second flat method for a total of two times. The construction direction of the large machine operation is determined according to the actual situation on site, and the construction process is as follows.

    (1) Before construction, use maintenance skylights to pre load ballast, measure the longitudinal section of the track, and mark the starting amount of the track in the operation area of the large machinery.

    (2) Consolidate the large machinery within the blockade point, cooperate with personnel to inspect and maintain the geometric dimensions and structural status, and tidy up the appearance.

    (3) Acceptance handover.

    The precise method operation adopts a high-precision track absolute coordinate measurement system. In response to the shortcomings of traditional measurement and pitch calculation methods, the advantages of the absolute coordinate method are as follows[25, 26].

    (2) The coordinate data obtained from the survey is transferred to the computer, and through the computer program, the line shape is automatically distinguished, eliminating the need for manual preliminary identification of curve feature points and greatly improving work efficiency.

    (3) The absolute coordinate method is used to derive formulas rigorously, with high calculation accuracy and small errors.

    (2) After replacing parts in areas with track gauge blocks that do not fall into the groove or have gaps, the track gauge must be checked with a ruler first. For those that do not meet the standards, rework must be done first.

    (3) After the precision adjustment operation is completed, the 0-level track inspection instrument is used again to check the precision adjusted line equipment, and the geometric dimensions of the obviously defective sections are corrected again to ensure the quality of the line.

    Figure  1.  Construction process of rail grinding operation

    According to the above operation method, a comprehensive track operation method of large machine operation, manual precision adjustment, and rail grinding is adopted to operate the 50.2km long ballasted track section of the high-speed railway. Before and after the operation, a track inspection vehicle was used for dynamic detection. The comparison data of single track geometric roughness and TQI before and after the operation of the large machine are shown inTable 2.

    Table  2.  Statistical analysis of test data before and after large machinery work  mm
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    followTable 2The following conclusion can be drawn from it.

    Table  3.  Improvement effects of track geometry irregularity before and after different maintenance modes mm
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    combineTable 3The data shows the improvement trend of single geometric roughness of the trackFigure 2The four stages of homework (i.e. before the machine, before manual labor, after the machine, before manual labor, after the machine, after manual labor, and after comprehensive homework) are defined as homework stages 1-4.

    Figure  2.  Improvement trend of single irregularity at each stage

    causeFigure 2It can be seen that the comprehensive track operation, which includes large machine operation, manual precision adjustment, and rail polishing, can effectively improve the geometric roughness of the track. Among them, large machine operation and manual precision adjustment have a significant effect on improving the geometric roughness of each individual item, and large machine operation has the largest improvement amplitude on individual irregularities, indicating that mechanized operation has the most important and significant effect on improving the geometric state of the track; The overall improvement of track gauge unevenness by comprehensive operations is not significant, and manual fine-tuning operations can improve track gauge unevenness to a certain extent; The rail grinding operation has further improved the unevenness of the rail direction and height, but the improvement effect on unevenness such as horizontal, gauge, and triangular pits is not significant.

    Figure  3.  Improvement amounts and improvement rates of track alignment irregularity
    Figure  4.  Improvement amounts and improvement rates of track vertical irregularity

    The improvement amount and improvement rate of uneven levels in each homework stage are shown inFigure 5.

    Figure  5.  Improvement amounts and improvement rates of track cross irregularity

    causeFigure 5It can be seen that after the operation of the large machine, the horizontal unevenness decreased from 0.62mm to 0.54mm, with a reduction of 0.08mm and an improvement rate of 12.90%; After manual fine-tuning, the horizontal unevenness decreased from 0.54mm to 0.51mm, with a reduction of 0.03mm and an improvement rate of 5.56%; After polishing the steel rail, the horizontal unevenness is still 0.51mm; After comprehensive homework, the horizontal unevenness was reduced by 0.11mm, with an improvement rate of 17.74%. It can be seen that large machine operation has the best effect on improving horizontal unevenness, and comprehensive operation can effectively improve the horizontal unevenness of ballasted tracks.

    The improvement amount and improvement rate of uneven track gauge in each stage of operation are shown inFigure 6.

    causeFigure 6It can be seen that after the operation of the large machine, the unevenness of the track gauge shows a slight increase trend, with an increment of 0.02mm, indicating that the overall impact of comprehensive operation on the unevenness of the track gauge is not significant.

    Figure  6.  Improvement amounts and improvement rates of track gauge irregularity

    The improvement amount and improvement rate of the unevenness of the triangular pit in each homework stage are shown inFigure 7.

    causeFigure 7It can be seen that after the operation of the large machine, the unevenness of the triangular pit decreased from 0.76mm to 0.66mm, with a reduction of 0.10mm and an improvement rate of 13.16%; After manual fine-tuning, the unevenness of the triangular pit decreased from 0.66mm to 0.61mm, with a reduction of 0.05mm and an improvement rate of 7.43%; After polishing the steel rail, the unevenness of the triangular groove increased from 0.61mm to 0.66mm, with an increase of 0.05mm and an incremental percentage of 7.73% (deterioration of the unevenness of the triangular groove). It can be seen that the large machine operation has the best improvement effect on the unevenness of the triangular pit.

    The improvement amount and improvement rate of the track quality index TQI in each stage of the operation are shown inFigure 8It can be seen that after the large-scale operation, TQI decreased from 4.42mm to 3.91mm, with a decrease of 0.51mm and an improvement rate of 11.54%; After manual fine-tuning, TQI decreased from 3.91mm to 3.64mm, with a decrease of 0.27mm and an improvement rate of 6.91%; After polishing the steel rail, TQI decreased from 3.64mm to 3.60mm, with a decrease of 0.04 mm and an improvement rate of 1.10%; After comprehensive homework, the reduction is 0.82mm and the improvement rate is 18.55%. It can be seen that comprehensive homework can significantly improve the geometric unevenness of the track.

    Figure  7.  Improvement amounts and improvement rates of track twist irregularity

    causeFigure 9It can be seen that after the comprehensive operation of large machine operation, manual precision adjustment, and rail polishing, the overall unevenness of the rail direction shows a significant downward trend, with the unevenness of the left rail direction decreasing linearly and the unevenness of the right rail direction decreasing exponentially.

    Figure  8.  Improvement amounts and improvement rates of TQI
    Figure  9.  Fitting of improvement trend of track alignment irregularity at each stage of operation
    Figure  10.  Fitting of improvement trend of track vertical irregularity at each stage of operation

    causeFigure 10It can be seen that after the comprehensive operation of large machine operation, manual precision adjustment, and rail polishing, the overall unevenness of the height shows a significant downward trend, with both the left and right unevenness decreasing in a power function trend.

    Figure  11.  Fitting of improvement trend of track cross irregularity at each stage of operation
    Figure  12.  Improvement trend of track gauge irregularity at each stage of operation
    Figure  13.  Fitting of improvement trend of track twist irregularity at each stage of operation

    causeFigure 11It can be seen that through the comprehensive operation of large machine operation, manual precision adjustment, and rail polishing, the overall horizontal unevenness shows a power function trend of decreasing.

    causeFigure 12It can be seen that the comprehensive operation has little overall impact on the unevenness of the track gauge, so no fitting will be performed.

    Figure  14.  Fitting of improvement trend of TQI at each stage of operation

    causeFigure 13It can be seen that after the comprehensive operation of large machine operation, manual precision adjustment, and rail polishing, the unevenness of the triangular pit shows a logarithmic function trend of overall reduction, and the improvement effect of rail polishing on the unevenness of the triangular pit is not significant.

    causeFigure 14It can be seen that after the comprehensive operation of large machine operation, manual precision adjustment, and rail polishing, the track quality index TQI shows an overall downward trend, and approximately decreases in a power function trend.

    (1) Based on the precise method, large-scale machine operation can improve the overall geometric roughness of ballasted tracks on high-speed railways. The average TQI of each section has decreased from 4.42mm before operation to 3.91mm after operation, with an improvement rate of 11.54%; Among them, the operation of large machines has a significant improvement effect on vertical unevenness (height, level, triangular pits), for example, the height unevenness has decreased from 0.74mm before operation to 0.59mm after operation, with an improvement rate of 20.27%, while the improvement degree of track unevenness and gauge unevenness is not significant.

    (2) The comprehensive operation of large machine operation, manual precision adjustment, and rail polishing can jointly improve the geometric roughness of the track. Among them, large machine operation and manual precision adjustment have a significant effect on improving various individual irregularities, with the contribution of large machine operation being the greatest. Manual precision adjustment can improve the unevenness of the track gauge to a certain extent, and rail polishing can further improve the unevenness of the track direction and height, but the improvement effect on unevenness such as horizontal, track gauge, and triangular pits is not significant.

    (3) From the contribution of the three types of operation methods to the improvement of various individual geometric irregularities, the improvement rate of high and low, horizontal, and triangular unevenness by large machine operation is 12.90%~22.22%, while the improvement rate of track unevenness is only 3.64%~3.70%; The improvement rate of manual fine-tuning on high and low, horizontal, triangular pits, and uneven track gauge is 5.56% to 12.50%; The improvement rate of rail grinding on unevenness in height and track direction is 1.00% to 9.26%.

    (4) The improvement rates of the track quality index TQI after large machine operation, manual precision adjustment, and rail grinding are 11.54%, 6.91%, and 1.10%, respectively.

    (5) After comprehensive operation of ballasted tracks on high-speed railways, the single track roughness and track quality index TQI showed an overall downward trend, among which, The TQI decreases approximately in a power function trend, while the unevenness of the track direction decreases approximately in a power function or linear trend. The horizontal unevenness decreases in a power function trend, and the overall roughness of the triangular pit decreases in a logarithmic function trend, reflecting the high degree of improvement in the geometric state of the track by large machine operations. Manual fine-tuning and rail polishing operations further improve some individual irregularities.

  • [1]
    ZHAO Li-ning. Study on the effect of TQI key parameters of ballasted track on high-speed train running state[D]. Beijing: Beijing Jiaotong University, 2015. (in Chinese).
    [2]
    ZHANG Zi-ling. Prediction of high-speed railway track maintenance cycle based on track quality state[D]. Beijing: Beijing Jiaotong University, 2013. (in Chinese).
    [3]
    XU Wei-chang. Maintenance decision model based on large machinery tamping work[J]. Journal of Railway Science and Engineering, 2016, 13 (1): 152-157. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CSTD201601023.htm
    [4]
    LIU Chang. Study on operation mechanism and technology of large-scale maintenance machine used in high-speed railway ballast bed[D]. Beijing: Beijing Jiaotong University, 2016. (in Chinese).
    [5]
    MIAO Xiao-hong. Operating principle and performance of large track maintenance machinery[J]. High Speed Railway Technology, 2013, 4 (1): 98-100. (in Chinese).
    [6]
    YANG De-ming. Research on high speed railway track maintenance[D]. Chengdu: Southwest Jiaotong University, 2014. (in Chinese).
    [7]
    HU Chuan-liang. Evaluations of the quality of comprehensive maintenance on large track maintenance machinery by AHP[D]. Beijing: Tsinghua University, 2008. (in Chinese).
    [8]
    XU Wei-chang. Study on track quality evaluation index for tamping operation of large-type maintenance machine[J]. Railway Engineering, 2014 (7): 139-142. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-1995.2014.07.41
    [9]
    SUN Jian-feng, CHI Mao-ru, WU Xing-wen, et al. Hunting motion stability of wheelset based on energy method[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2018, 18 (2): 82-89. (in Chinese). http://transport.chd.edu.cn/article/id/201802009
    [10]
    AUDLEY M, ANDREWS J D. The effects of tamping on railway track geometry degradation[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, 2013, 227 (4): 376-391. doi: 10.1177/0954409713480439
    [11]
    ZHANG Guo-quan. Correlation analysis on how to reduce the TQI index of high-speed railway[J]. Railway Construction Technology, 2016 (2): 75-78. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDJS201602018.htm
    [12]
    CHEN Xun. Research on distribution rule of track quality index of Shanghai-Nanjing Intercity High-speed Railway[J]. Railway Standard Design, 2013 (7): 1-5. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDBS201307002.htm
    [13]
    MAO Shuai. Analysis and forecast of the Beijing Kowloon Line Bozhou to Fubei Section of track quality index[D]. Beijing: China Academy of Railway Sciences, 2014. (in Chinese).
    [14]
    LI M X D, BERGGREN E G, BERG M, et al. Assessing track geometry quality based on wavelength spectra and track-vehicle dynamic interaction[J]. Vehicle System Dynamics, 2008, 46 (S1): 261-276.
    [15]
    WOODWARD P K, EL KACIMI A, LAGHROUCHE O, et al. Application of polyurethane geocomposites to help maintain track geometry for high-speed ballasted railway tracks[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University—Science A: Applied Physics and Engineering, 2012, 13 (11): 836-849.
    [16]
    IONESCU D. Evaluation of the engineering behaviour of railway ballast[D]. Wollongong: University of Wollongong, 2004.
    [17]
    NURMIKOLU A. Key aspects on the behaviour of the ballast and substructure of a modern railway track: researchbased practical observations in Finland[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University—Science A: Applied Physics and Engineering, 2012, 13 (11): 825-835.
    [18]
    LICHTBERGER B W. Railway track optimisation by efficient track maintenance machinery and strategies[J]. Rail Engineering International, 2007, 36 (4): 3-6.
    [19]
    MAGEL E E, KALOUSEK J. The application of contact mechanics to rail profile design and rail grinding[J]. Wear, 2002, 253 (1/2): 308-316.
    [20]
    PERSSON I, NILSSON R, BIK U, et al. Use of a genetic algorithm to improve the rail profile on Stockholm underground[J]. Vehicle System Dynamics, 2010, 48 (S1): 89-104.
    [21]
    ZAKHAROV S, GORYACHEVA I, BOGDANOV V, et al. Problems with wheel and rail profiles selection and optimization[J]. Wear, 2008, 265 (9/10): 1266-1272.
    [22]
    CHOI H Y, LEE D H, SONG C Y, et al. Optimization of rail profile to reduce wear on curved track[J]. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, 2013, 14 (4): 619-625.
    [23]
    TORSTENSSON P T, PIERINGER A, NIELSEN J C O. Simulation of rail roughness growth on small radius curves using a non-Hertzian and non-steady wheel-rail contact model[J]. Wear, 2014, 314 (1/2): 241-253.
    [24]
    SHIMIZU A, IIDA T. Analyzing effect of profile change of top surface of 60kg rail upon vehicle dynamics[J]. Quarterly Report of RTRI, 2015, 56 (1): 21-25.
    [25]
    WU Qing-hua. A study of track line realignment method based on absolute coordinates[D]. Changsha: Central South University, 2012. (in Chinese).
    [26]
    CAI Jie, YING Li-jun, ZHOU Jian. Discussion on the application of high-precision railway absolute coordinate measure system[J]. Technological Development of Enterprise, 2009, 28 (3): 61-62. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QYJK200903021.htm
    [27]
    JIN Xue-song, DU Xing, GUO Jun, et al. State of arts of research on rail grinding[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2010, 45 (1): 1-11. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XNJT201001002.htm
    [28]
    LIU Yue-ming, LI Jian-yong, CAI Yong-lin, et al. Current state and development trend of rail grinding technology[J]. China Railway Science, 2014, 35 (4): 29-37. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGTK201404005.htm
    [29]
    MEGEL E, RONEY M, KALOUSEK J. The blending of theory and practice in modern rail grinding[J]. Fatigue and Fracture of Engineering Materials and Structures, 2010, 26 (10): 921-929.
    [30]
    GERLICI J, LACK T. Contact geometry influence on the rail/wheel surface stress distribution[J]. Procedia Engineering, 2010, 2 (1): 2249-2257.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]YANG Xiao-hua, WANG Dong-qing, ZHANG Sha-sha, KONG Xiang-xin, LI An-hong, ZHAO Yan-hu. Deformation characteristics of long-short pile composite foundation for high-speed railway in salt lake region[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2024, 24(3): 181-192. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2024.03.012
    [2]YU Jian, ZHOU Wang-bao, JIANG Li-zhong, FENG Yu-lin, LIU Xiang. Equivalent method for designed earthquake-induced track geometric irregularities on high-speed railway bridges[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2024, 24(3): 110-123. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2024.03.007
    [3]WANG Pu, ZENG Rui-dong, WANG Shu-guo. Control method for insufficient displacement of switch rail in high-speed railway turnout[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2022, 22(2): 87-98. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2022.02.006
    [4]CHEN Zhao-wei, ZHAI Wan-ming. Control threshold of pier settlement in high-speed railways based on train vibrations[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2022, 22(2): 136-147. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2022.02.010
    [5]ZHENG Jing, Li Xiao-zhen, BI Ran, ZHANG Xiao-bang, HE Hao-nan, HU Zhe. Structure-borne noise characteristics of fully-enclosed sound barriers on high-speed railway bridges[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2021, 21(3): 179-192. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2021.03.011
    [6]SHEN Ming-xue, QIN Tao, LI Sheng-xin, PENG Jin-fang, XIONG Guang-yao, ZHU Min-hao. High-speed wheel-rail interfacial adhesion and surface damage behavior of wheel in wide temperature range[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2021, 21(3): 269-278. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2021.03.019
    [7]FENG Yu-lin, JIANG Li-zhong, CHEN Meng-cheng, NIE Lei-xin, YU Jian, WU ling-xu. Corresponding relationship between track-bridge system damage and track irregularity under seismic action[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2021, 21(3): 203-214. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2021.03.013
    [8]ZHAO Xin, WEN Ze-feng, WANG Heng-yu, TAO Gong-quan, JIN Xue-song. Research progress on wheel/rail rolling contact fatigue of rail transit in China[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2021, 21(1): 1-35. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2021.01.001
    [9]SU Miao, ZHU Qi-zhi, DAI Gong-lian, PENG Hui. Temperature deformation of CRTSⅡslab ballastless track considering interfacial initial bond defects[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2020, 20(5): 73-81. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2020.05.005
    [10]ZHANG Peng-fei, LIAN Xi-ni, GUI Hao, LEI Xiao-yan. Effect of pier temperature gradient on longitudinal force of CRTSⅡslab ballastless track on bridge[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2020, 20(4): 80-90. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2020.04.006
    [11]SHEN Jian-feng. Temporal-spatial features of probability distribution of vertical irregularity in ballasted track[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2019, 19(6): 45-53. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2019.06.005
    [12]ZHANG Peng-fei, GUI Hao, LEI Xiao-yan, GAO Liang. Deflection force and displacement of CRTS Ⅲ slab track on bridge under train load[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2018, 18(6): 61-72. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2018.06.007
    [13]LIU Jin-chao, LI Guo-qing, SUN Shan-chao, ZHAO Gang, GUO Jian-feng. Improved fuzzy method of removing abnormal spike data from track's geometric irregularity of high-speed railway[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2016, 16(2): 37-45. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2016.02.005
    [14]FENG Xu-jie, SUN Quan-xin, FENG Jia, WU Ke-qi. Optimization model of existing stop schedule for high-speed railway[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2013, 13(1): 84-90. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2013.01.013
    [15]WU Lei, ZHONG Shuo-qiao, JIN Xue-song, LI Ling. Influence of polygonal wheel on running safety of vehicle[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2011, 11(3): 47-54. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2011.03.009
    [16]WANG Bo, WU Guang-ning, ZHOU Li-jun, DONG An-ping, GAO Guo-qiang, FAN Jian-bin. Evaluating system of integrated grounding effectiveness on high-speed railway[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2011, 11(5): 28-34. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2011.05.005
    [17]ZHAO Huai-yun, LIU Jian-xin, ZHAI Wan-ming. Analysis method of dynamic responses on slab track[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2007, 7(5): 19-23.
    [18]Qiu Yan-jun, Zhang Xiao-jing, Wei Yong-xing. Influenced of train speed on dynamic characteristics of ballastless track subgrade[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2007, 7(2): 1-5.
    [19]XU Zhi-sheng, ZHAI Wan-ming. Structure parameter influence of slab track for high speed railway on wheel-rail noise[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2006, 6(4): 23-26.
    [20]PENG Wen-sheng, PENG Hui. Passenger station layout of high-speed railway existing terminal[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2004, 4(2): 62-65.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(19)

    1. 马琛琛. 地铁车辆段有砟道床曲线整正技术研究. 现代城市轨道交通. 2024(01): 113-118 .
    2. 丁有康,王晓凯,楼梁伟,杨立光,张也. 不同约束条件下普速铁路平面线形重构效果对比分析. 铁道建筑. 2024(02): 30-35 .
    3. 王宏昌,时瑾,张雨潇. 新建有砟高速铁路精捣各阶段轨道平顺性改善区间回归分析. 铁道建筑. 2024(07): 17-22 .
    4. 刘攀,王志波,曹红伟,刘锦龙,李连东,龙亦语. 杭温高铁联调联试中轨道精调与钢轨打磨作业效果. 铁路技术创新. 2024(05): 47-55 .
    5. 肖致明,王晓凯,马战国,张雨潇,时瑾. 朔黄铁路区间数字化捣固技术及效果分析. 中国铁路. 2024(09): 173-179 .
    6. 胡伟豪,林凤涛,李昊. 精调高速铁路无砟轨道几何状态对车辆动力学性能影响分析. 铁道技术监督. 2023(07): 48-52 .
    7. 乔成,李得军,蒋富根,宋松. 动态检测数据在高铁有砟轨道线路维修中的应用. 铁道技术监督. 2023(08): 30-33+39 .
    8. 丁有康,张阳,王晓凯,王英杰,贾斌. 京九线轨距精改与大机精捣组合作业效果分析. 铁道建筑. 2023(09): 23-27 .
    9. 张雨潇,时瑾,倪国华,王英杰. 有砟轨道捣固作业起道方案的综合修正方法. 西南交通大学学报. 2023(06): 1347-1356 .
    10. 齐春雨,黄大中,安然,谭兆. 里程定位偏差对大机捣固作业效果的影响. 铁道建筑. 2023(12): 57-62 .
    11. 戴宗林. 高铁有砟线路几何状态维修效果动力学评估. 华东交通大学学报. 2022(02): 102-109 .
    12. 时瑾,张雨潇,陈云峰,王晓凯,王英杰. 有砟高铁捣固作业轨向平顺性控制方法. 交通运输工程学报. 2022(02): 76-86 . 本站查看
    13. 陆敬松. 铁路D型便梁错位布置的架空体系分析. 安徽建筑. 2022(10): 150-151+167 .
    14. 王英杰,楚杭,时瑾,陈云峰,康彦波. 有砟高铁大机捣固质量相关性及敏感波长研究. 铁道工程学报. 2021(01): 37-41+108 .
    15. 张皓然,何越磊,李再帏,陈云峰. 考虑波长因素的提速线路捣固作业质量评价方法研究. 铁道科学与工程学报. 2021(03): 653-661 .
    16. 时瑾,张雨潇,楼梁伟,王英杰. 新建高速铁路有砟轨道精捣作业环节改进及效果. 中国铁道科学. 2021(06): 8-17 .
    17. 温宇星. 铁路线路轨道几何尺寸不平顺养护维修方法. 现代制造技术与装备. 2020(12): 146-147 .
    18. 陆晨旭,时瑾,段其炎,文俊逸. 紧急制动条件下地铁车辆与钢弹簧浮置板轨道动力相互作用. 交通运输工程学报. 2019(01): 96-107 . 本站查看
    19. 沈坚锋. 有砟轨道高低不平顺概率分布的时空特征. 交通运输工程学报. 2019(06): 45-53 . 本站查看

    Other cited types(11)

Catalog

    Figures(14)  / Tables(3)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (760) PDF downloads(619) Cited by(30)
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return