ZHAO Wu-chao, QIAN Jiang, WANG Juan. Simplified impact force model of pier under heavy vehicle collision[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2019, 19(4): 47-58. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2019.04.005
Citation: ZHAO Wu-chao, QIAN Jiang, WANG Juan. Simplified impact force model of pier under heavy vehicle collision[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2019, 19(4): 47-58. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2019.04.005

Simplified impact force model of pier under heavy vehicle collision

doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2019.04.005
More Information
  • Author Bio:

    ZHAO Wu-chao(1992-), male, doctoral student, zwuchao219@126.com

    QIAN Jiang(1960-), male, professor, PhD, jqian@tongji.edu.cn

  • Received Date: 2019-03-01
  • Publish Date: 2019-08-25
  • To explore the safety of reinforced concrete piers under heavy vehicle collision, a refined finite element (FE) model of heavy vehicle-pier collision was established. The effects of impact velocity, pier diameter, superstructure boundary condition and cargo height on the failure mode and internal force distribution of pier were investigated. The characteristics of vehicle impact force under different conditions were analyzed, and a simplified impact force model was proposed based on the dissipation characteristics of vehicle initial kinetic energy. Analysis result shows that the heavy vehicle collision process can be divided into three stages such as the bumper, engine and cargo collide the pier. The impact force is mainly concentrated at the elevation of 0.9 m in the first two collision stages, and is distributed at the elevation of 2.7 m in the third collision stage. Under the heavy vehicle collision, not only will there be serious damage at the end of pier, but also there may be serious local punching shear damage near the collision site. Due to the neglection to the dynamic effect of impact load and the coupling effect of vehicle and pier, the equivalent static design approach recommended by the General Code for Design of Highway Bridges and Culverts (JTG D60—2015) is difficult to obtain an actual impact response of pier. The impact velocity has the most significant influence on the internal force and impact force of pier. The difference of cargo height changes the spatial distribution of impact force, but will not affect the maximum internal force response of pier. A threshold of 6.5 MJ exists in the initial kinetic energy of heavy vehicle. When the initial kinetic energy is less than the threshold, the impact actions from the vehicle engine and bumper play dominant roles in the dynamic response of pier. On the contrary, the impact action of cargo at the back determines the peak impact force. The relative error of the predicted maximum internal force responses of pier between the simplified impact force model and the refined vehicle model is less than 8%, and the computation time shortens from 6-7 h to 4 min.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    YI Ren-yan, ZHOU Rui-feng, HUANG Qian. Reason and risk of bridge collapse in recent 15 year[J]. Transportation Science and Technology, 2015 (5): 61-64. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKQB201505020.htm
    [2]
    COOK W, BARR P J, HALLING M W. Bridge failure rate[J]. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 2015, 29 (3): 04014080-1-8. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000571
    [3]
    DO T V, PHAM T M, HAO H. Dynamic responses and failure modes of bridge columns under vehicle collision[J]. Engineering Structures, 2018, 156: 243-259. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.11.053
    [4]
    ZHAO Wu-chao, QIAN Jiang, WANG Juan. Performance of bridge structures under heavy goods vehicle impact[J]. Computers and Concrete, 2018, 22 (6): 515-525.
    [5]
    XU Liang-jin, LU Xin-zheng, GUAN Hong, et al. Finite-element and simplified models for collision simulation between overheight trucks and bridge superstructures[J]. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2013, 18 (11): 1140-1151. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000472
    [6]
    HU Bo, LI Guo-qiang. Maximum impact force of truck frontal crashing into antiram bollard systems[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2016, 142 (12): 04016125-1-13.
    [7]
    XIAO Yan, CHEN Lin, XIAO Guo, et al. Tests for anti-ram bollards based on truck collision[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2013, 32 (11): 1-6. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3835.2013.11.001
    [8]
    THILAKARATHNA H M I, THAMBIRATNAM D P, DHANASEKAR M, et al. Numerical simulation of axially loaded concrete columns under transverse impact and vulnerability assessment[J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2010, 37 (11): 1100-1112. doi: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2010.06.003
    [9]
    STEEL K, SORENSEN A D. Reliability analysis of a circular bridge pier subject to intentional vehicular impact[C]//BEER M, AU S K, HALL J W. Second International Conference on Vulnerability and Risk Analysis and Management (ICVRAM) and the Sixth International Symposium on Uncertainty, Modeling, and Analysis (ISUMA). Reston: ASCE, 2014: 2702-2709.
    [10]
    WANG Juan, QIAN Jiang, ZHOU De-yuan. Numerical simulation of urban bridge substructures impacted by heavy vehicles[J]. Journal of Hunan University (Natural Sciences), 2016, 43 (7): 88-95. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-2974.2016.07.012
    [11]
    WANG Juan, QIAN Jiang, ZHOU De-yuan. Parametric study on peak impact force for the bridge pier impacted by heavy vehicles[J]. Chinese Quarterly of Mechanics, 2016, 37 (2): 337-344. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SHLX201602023.htm
    [12]
    ABDELKARIM O I, ELGAWADY M A. Performance of hollow-core FRP-concrete-steel bridge columns subjected to vehicle collision[J]. Engineering Structures, 2016, 123: 517-531. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.05.048
    [13]
    ABDELKARIM O I, ELGAWADY M A. Performance of bridge piers under vehicle collision[J]. Engineering Structures, 2017, 140: 337-352. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.02.054
    [14]
    CUI Kun-peng, XIA He, XIA Chao-yi, et al. Equivalent static force calculation methods for transient impact force of a vehicle in collision with piers[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2014, 33 (4): 48-53, 69. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3835.2014.04.011
    [15]
    MENG Yi, HUANG Fang-lin. Discussion on research of vehicle lateral collision with RC columns[J]. Journal of Railway Science and Engineering, 2017, 14 (2): 342-348. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7029.2017.02.020
    [16]
    DO T V, PHAM T M, HAO H. Impact force profile and failure classification of reinforced concrete bridge columns against vehicle impact[J]. Engineering Structures, 2019, 183: 443-458. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.01.040
    [17]
    XU X, CAO R, EL-TAWIL S, et al. Loading definition and design of bridge piers impacted by medium-weight trucks[J]. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2019, 24 (6): 04019042-1-13.
    [18]
    AUYEUNG S, ALIPOUR A. Evaluation of AASHTO suggested design values for reinforced concrete bridge piers under vehicle collisions[J]. Transportation Research Record, 2016 (2592): 1-8.
    [19]
    FAN Wei, XU Xin, ZHANG Zhi-yong, et al. Performance and sensitivity analysis of UHPFRC-strengthened bridge columns subjected to vehicle collisions[J]. Engineering Structures, 2018, 173: 251-268. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.06.113
    [20]
    BUTH C E, WILLIAMS W F, BRACKIN M S, et al. Analysis of large truck collisions with bridge piers: phase 1. Report of guidelines for designing bridge piers and abutments for vehicle collisions[R]. Austin: Texas Transportation Institute, 2010.
    [21]
    TEO W, YIN H, MAHARUN M N, et al. Research on HGV collisions with concrete bridge piers[J]. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 2014, 567: 648-653. doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.567.648
    [22]
    ZHAO Wu-chao, QIAN Jiang. Failure mode and impact performance of bridge piers subjected to heavy vehicle collision[J]. Journal of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation Engineering, 2019, 39 (1): 67-74, 88. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZXK201901010.htm
    [23]
    MADURAPPERUMA M A K M, WIJEYEWICKREMA A C. Response of reinforced concrete columns impacted by tsunami dispersed 20' and 40' shipping containers[J]. Engineering Structures, 2013, 56: 1631-1644. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.07.034
    [24]
    CHEN L, EL-TAWIL S, XIAO Y. Reduced models for simulating collisions between trucks and bridge piers[J]. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2016, 21 (6): 04016020-1-14. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000810
    [25]
    SHA Yan-yan, HAO Hong. Laboratory tests and numerical simulations of barge impact on circular reinforced concrete piers[J]. Engineering Structures, 2013, 46: 593-605. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.09.002
    [26]
    SHARMA H, HURLEBAUS S, GARDONI P. Performance-based response evaluation of reinforced concrete columns subject to vehicle impact[J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2012, 43: 52-62. doi: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2011.11.007
    [27]
    MURRAY Y D. Users manual for LS-DYNA concrete material model 159[R]. McLean: U. S. Federal Highway Adminstration, 2007.
    [28]
    COWPER G R, SYMONDS P S. Strain-hardening and strain-rate effects in the impact loading of cantilever beams[R]. Providence: Brown University, 1957.
    [29]
    EL-TAWIL S, SEVERINO E, FONSECA P. Vehicle collision with bridge piers[J]. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2005, 10 (3): 345-353. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2005)10:3(345)
    [30]
    YI N H, CHOI J H, KIM S J, et al. Collision capacity evaluation of RC columns by impact simulation and probabilistic evaluation[J]. Journal of Advanced Concrete Technology, 2015, 13: 67-81. doi: 10.3151/jact.13.67
    [31]
    SHA Yan-yan, HAO Hong. Nonlinear finite element analysis of barge collision with a single bridge pier[J]. Engineering Structures, 2012, 41: 63-76. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.03.026

Catalog

    Article Metrics

    Article views (2472) PDF downloads(1349) Cited by()
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return