Volume 21 Issue 5
Nov.  2021
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
LIU Ji-xin, DONG Xin-fang, XU Chen, YANG Guang, JIANG Hao. Aircraft trajectory clustering in terminal area and anomaly recognition based on density peak[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2021, 21(5): 214-226. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2021.05.018
Citation: LIU Ji-xin, DONG Xin-fang, XU Chen, YANG Guang, JIANG Hao. Aircraft trajectory clustering in terminal area and anomaly recognition based on density peak[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2021, 21(5): 214-226. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2021.05.018

Aircraft trajectory clustering in terminal area and anomaly recognition based on density peak

doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2021.05.018
Funds:

National Natural Science Foundation of China 61903187

More Information
  • Author Bio:

    LIU Ji-xin(1966-), male, associate professor, larryljx@163.com

  • Corresponding author: DONG Xin-fang(1996-), male, graduate student, dongxf_email@nuaa.edu.cn
  • Received Date: 2021-04-05
    Available Online: 2021-11-13
  • Publish Date: 2021-10-01
  • To effectively solve the problem that it is difficult to automatically separate the standard flight, non-standard flight and anomalous flight patterns in high-traffic terminal areas, an aircraft trajectory clustering model was established based on the robust deep auto-encoder (RDAE) and clustering by fast search and find of density peaks (CFSFDP) using the widely recorded automatic dependent surveillance-broadcast (ADS-B) data. The RDAE was designed to reduce the dimensionality and extract nonlinear features from the aircraft trajectory dataset of terminal areas, while various regularization methods were adopted to constrain the internal low-dimensional manifolds to reconstruct a denser aircraft trajectory, and the aircraft trajectory was input to the CFSFDP algorithm. The silhouette coefficient was used to select the cluster centers for flight patterns with different densities and recognize anomalous trajectories by adjusting the edge density parameter. Two widely used aircraft trajectory clustering models, namely principal component analysis (PCA) combined with density-based spatial clustering of applications with noise (DBSCAN) as well as dynamic time wrapping (DTW) combined with DBSCAN, were taken as comparisons. Experiments were conducted on a small data of 1 d and a large data of 45 d of Guangzhou Baiyun Airport. Analysis results demonstrate that the model combining DTW and CFSFDP provides the best aircraft trajectory clustering performance on the small data, and the silhouette coefficient is 62% and 28% higher than those of comparisons, respectively. The DTW/CFSFDP model can automatically recognize standard flights following the area navigation procedures and non-standard flights that reflect controllers' preferences in specific environments, and the accuracies for identifying anomalous aircraft trajectories also improve by 57% and 10%, respectively. For the large data, the clustering performance of the proposed RDAE/CFSFDP model improves by 13% compared to that of the classical PCA/DBSCAN algorithm. Further, the proposed model exhibits acceptable time complexity. In summary, the established flight pattern discrimination model for terminal areas can provide a data extraction platform for the airspace-level traffic flow performance evaluation and the flight-level aircraft trajectory prediction and optimization. 2 tabs, 10 figs, 31 refs.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    EUROCONTRO L. EUROCONTRO L Specification for trajectory prediction[R]. Brussels: EUROCONTROL, 2017.
    [2]
    BASORA L, OLIVE X, DUBOT T. Recent advances in anomaly detection methods applied to aviation[J]. Aerospace, 2019, 6(11): 117. doi: 10.3390/aerospace6110117
    [3]
    MURÇA M C R, HANSMAN R J. Predicting and planning airport acceptance rates in metroplex systems for improved traffic flow management decision support[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2018, 97: 301-323. doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2018.10.020
    [4]
    ECKSTEIN A. Automated flight track taxonomy for measuring benefits from performance based navigation[C]//CLARK R. 2009 Integrated Communications, Navigation and Surveillance Conference. New York: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, 2009: 1-12.
    [5]
    REHM F. Clustering of flight tracks[C]//ERIC J. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Infotech at Aerospace 2010. Atlanta: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2010: 1-9.
    [6]
    ENRIQUEZ M. Identifying temporally persistent flows in the terminal airspace via spectral clustering[C]// SAUNDERS-HODGE A. Proceedings of the 10th USA/Europe Air Traffic Management Research and Development Seminar. Chicago: Federal Aviation Administration, 2013: 10-13.
    [7]
    GARIEL M, SRIVASTAVA A N, FERON E. Trajectory clustering and an application to airspace monitoring[J]. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2011, 12(4): 1511-1524. doi: 10.1109/TITS.2011.2160628
    [8]
    GARIEL M. Toward a graceful degradation of air traffic management systems[D]. Atlanta: Georgia Institute of Technology, 2010.
    [9]
    ARNESON H, BOMBELLI A, SEGARRA-TORNE A, et al. Analysis of convective-weather impact on pre-departure routing decisions for flights traveling between Fort Worth Center and New York Air Center[C]//HANSMAN R J. 17th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference. Richmond: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2017: 3084-3096.
    [10]
    MARZUOLI A, GARIEL M, VELA A, et al. Data-based modeling and optimization of en-route traffic[J]. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2014, 37(6): 1930-1945. doi: 10.2514/1.G000010
    [11]
    BOMBELLI A, SOLER L, TRUMBAUER E, et al. Strategic air traffic planning with Fréchet distance aggregation and rerouting[J]. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2017, 40(5): 1117-1129. doi: 10.2514/1.G002308
    [12]
    ANDRIENKO G, ANDRIENKO N, FUCHS G, et al. Clustering trajectories by relevant parts for air traffic analysis[J]. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 2018, 24(1): 34-44. doi: 10.1109/TVCG.2017.2744322
    [13]
    LI Li-shuai, GARIEL M, HANSMAN R J, et al. Anomaly detection in onboard-recorded flight data using cluster analysis[C]//ELLIS H. IEEE/AIAA 30th Digital Avionics Systems Conference. Norfolk: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. 2011: 4A4-1-11.
    [14]
    LI Li-shuai, HANSMAN R J, PALACIOS R, et al. Anomaly detection via a Gaussian mixture model for flight operation and safety monitoring[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2016, 64: 45-57. doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2016.01.007
    [15]
    HONG S, LEE K. Trajectory prediction for vectored area navigation arrivals[J]. Journal of Aerospace Information Systems, 2015, 12(7): 490-502. doi: 10.2514/1.I010245
    [16]
    DELAHAYE D, PUECHMOREL S, ALAM S, et al. Trajectory mathematical distance applied to airspace major flows extraction[C]//ABBUD J. Electronic Navigation Research Institute Air Traffic Management and Systems Ⅲ. Berlin: Springer, 2019: 51-66.
    [17]
    王超, 韩邦村, 王飞. 基于轨迹谱聚类的终端区盛行交通流识别方法[J]. 西南交通大学学报, 2014, 49(3): 546-552. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2014.03.027

    WANG Chao, HAN Bang-cun, WANG Fei. Identification of prevalent air traffic flow in terminal airspace based on trajectory spectral clustering[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2014, 49(3): 546-552. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2014.03.027
    [18]
    熊伟, 顾祥岐, 徐从安, 等. 基于高斯混合EM聚类的多编队航迹起始方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2019, 41(11): 2424-2430. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XTYD201911004.htm

    XIONG Wei, GU Xiang-qi, XU Cong-an, et al. Multi-formation track initiation method based on Gaussian mixture EM clustering[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2019, 41(11): 2424-2430. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XTYD201911004.htm
    [19]
    王超, 徐肖豪, 王飞. 基于航迹聚类的终端区进场程序管制适用性分析[J]. 南京航空航天大学学报, 2013, 45(1): 130-139. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-2615.2013.01.022

    WANG Chao, XU Xiao-hao, WANG Fei. ATC serviceability analysis of terminal arrival procedures using trajectory clustering[J]. Journal of Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2013, 45(1): 130-139. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-2615.2013.01.022
    [20]
    徐涛, 陈雪蕊, 吕宗平. 基于航迹聚类的终端区飞行程序轨迹表示[J]. 四川大学学报(工程科学版), 2016, 48(6): 188-196. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SCLH201606026.htm

    XU Tao, CHEN Xue-rui, LYU Zong-ping. Flight procedure representation of terminal area based on flight tracks clustering[J]. Advanced Engineering Sciences, 2016, 48(6): 188-196. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SCLH201606026.htm
    [21]
    SABHNANI G R, YOUSEFI A, KOSTITSYNA I, et al. Algorithmic traffic abstraction and its application to NextGen generic airspace[C]//BALAKRISHINAN H. 10th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration and Operations Conference 2010, Richmond: AIAA, 2010: 9335-9345
    [22]
    MAHBOUBI Z, KOCHENDERFER M J. Learning traffic patterns at small airports from flight tracks[J]. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2017, 18(4): 917-926. doi: 10.1109/TITS.2016.2598064
    [23]
    MURÇA M C R, HANSMAN R J, LI L, et al. Flight trajectory data analytics for characterization of air traffic flows: a comparative analysis of terminal area operations between New York, Hong Kong and Sao Paulo[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2018, 97: 324-347. doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2018.10.021
    [24]
    OLIVE X, GRIGNARD J, DUBOT T, et al. Detecting controllers' actions in past mode S data by autoencoder-based anomaly detection[C]//DIRK S. SESAR Innovation Days 2018. Brussels: EUROCONTROL, 2018: 1-9.
    [25]
    GALLEGO C E V, GOMEZ COMENDADOR V F, SAEZ NIETO F J, et al. Discussion on density-based clustering methods applied for automated identification of airspace flows[C]//GEORGE A. IEEE/AIAA 37th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC). London: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, 2018: 1-10.
    [26]
    ZHANG W, TAN X. Combining outlier detection and reconstruction error minimization for label noise reduction[C]// MASATOSHI A. 2019 IEEE International Conference on Big Data and Smart Computing. New York: IEEE, 2019: 1-4.
    [27]
    HINTON G E, SALAKHUTDINOV R R. Reducing the dimensionality of data with neural networks[J]. Science, 2006, 313(5786): 504-507. doi: 10.1126/science.1127647
    [28]
    ZHOU Chong, PAFFENROTH R C. Anomaly detection with robust deep autoencoders[C]//YU Shi-peng. Proceedings of the 23rd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. Halifax: Association for Computing Machinery, 2017: 665-674.
    [29]
    PAFFENROTH R, TOIT P, NONG R, et al. Space-time signal processing for distributed pattern detection in sensor networks[J]. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing, 2013, 7(1): 38-49. doi: 10.1109/JSTSP.2012.2237381
    [30]
    RODRIGUEZ A, LAIO A. Clustering by fast search and find of density peaks[J]. Science, 2014, 344(6191): 1492. doi: 10.1126/science.1242072
    [31]
    SCHUBERT E, SANDER J, ESTER M, et al. DBSCAN revisited, revisited: why and how you should (still) use DBSCAN[J]. ACM Transactions on Database Systems, 2017, 42(3): 19.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (678) PDF downloads(80) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return