Volume 22 Issue 6
Dec.  2022
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
JIA Jun-feng, WEI Bo, DU Xiu-li, GUO Bin-li, GUO He. Research progress of seismic resilient girder bridges at home and abroad from WCEE[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2022, 22(6): 25-45. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2022.06.002
Citation: JIA Jun-feng, WEI Bo, DU Xiu-li, GUO Bin-li, GUO He. Research progress of seismic resilient girder bridges at home and abroad from WCEE[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2022, 22(6): 25-45. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2022.06.002

Research progress of seismic resilient girder bridges at home and abroad from WCEE

doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2022.06.002
Funds:

National Natural Science Foundation of China 52178449

More Information
  • Author Bio:

    JIA Jun-feng (1982–), male, born in Fugou, Henan Province, professor at Beijing University of Technology, PhD in engineering. He is engaged in research on bridge seismic resistance. E-mail: jiajunfeng@bjut.edu.cn

    DU Xiu-li (1962–), male, born in Guang'an, Sichuan Province, academician of the Chinese Academy of Engineering, professor of Beijing University of Technology, PhD in engineering. E-mail: duxiuli@bjut.edu.cn

  • Received Date: 2022-07-28
  • Publish Date: 2022-12-25
  • The relevant research progress of seismic resilient girder bridges presented on the 16th and 17th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering (WCEE) was sorted and summarized. Specifically, the latest research progress of post-tensioned prestressed rocking self-centering girder bridges and other novel seismic resilient girder bridge systems was analyzed. The research on the application of high-performance materials in resilient girder bridges was summarized, and the engineering application of self-centering girder bridges at home and abroad was outlined. The research on the replaceable devices, such as self-centering energy dissipation devices and displacement-limiting devices, in seismic resilient girder bridge structures was presented. The seismic performance of girder bridge structures with additional replaceable devices was discussed. The evaluation methods for the seismic resilience of a single girder bridge and that of a bridge network were reviewed. The research orientation and development trend of seismic resilient girder bridge structures were explored. Research results show that, the post-tensioned prestressed self-centering girder bridges with additional replaceable energy dissipation devices are the most widely studied seismic resilient girder bridge structures, and a number of demonstration projects have been completed. The performance of this type of structure in strong earthquakes remains to be verified by actual earthquakes. In terms of replaceable devices, new structures and new configurations of replaceable devices should be developed by availing high-performance materials. On this basis, reasonable technologies for connecting such devices with bridges and seismic design methods can be investigated. In addition, the completed girder bridges in China are faced with outstanding issues in developing seismic resilience evaluation methods, capacity enhancement technologies, and design theories for existing girder bridge structures under consideration of the influences of multiple factors, such as performance degradation and demand increase.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    庄卫林, 刘振宇, 蒋劲松. 汶川大地震公路桥梁震害分析及对策[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2009, 28(7): 1377-1387. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6915.2009.07.011

    ZHUANG Wei-lin, LIU Zhen-yu, JIANG Jin-song. Earthquake-induced damage analysis of highway bridges in Wenchuan earthquake and countermeasures[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2009, 28(7): 1377-1387. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6915.2009.07.011
    [2]
    HAN Q, DU X L, LIU J B, et al. Seismic damage of highway bridges during the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2009, 8(2): 263-273. doi: 10.1007/s11803-009-8162-0
    [3]
    KAWASHIMA K, MACRAE G A, HOSHIKUMA J, et al. Residual displacement response spectrum[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 1998, 124(5): 523-530. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1998)124:5(523)
    [4]
    吕西林, 陈云, 毛苑君. 结构抗震设计的新概念——可恢复功能结构[J]. 同济大学学报(自然科学版), 2011, 39(7): 941-948. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TJDZ201107002.htm

    LYU Xi-lin, CHEN Yun, MAO Yuan-jun. New concept of structural seismic design: earthquake resilient structures[J]. Journal of Tongji University (Natural Science), 2011, 39(7): 941-948. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TJDZ201107002.htm
    [5]
    袁万城, 王思杰, 李怀峰, 等. 桥梁抗震智能与韧性的发展[J]. 中国公路学报, 2021, 34(2): 98-117. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGGL202102003.htm

    YUAN Wan-cheng, WANG Si-jie, LI Huai-feng, et al. Development of intelligence and resilience for bridge seismic design[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2021, 34(2): 98-117. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGGL202102003.htm
    [6]
    BRUNEAU M, CHANG S E, EGUCHI R T, et al. A framework to quantitatively assess and enhance the seismic resilience of communities[J]. Earthquake Spectra, 2003, 19(4): 733-752. doi: 10.1193/1.1623497
    [7]
    吕西林, 全柳萌, 蒋欢军. 从16届世界地震工程大会看可恢复功能抗震结构研究趋势[J]. 地震工程与工程振动, 2017, 37(3): 1-9. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DGGC201703001.htm

    LYU Xi-lin, QUAN Liu-meng, JIANG Huan-jun. Research trend of earthquake resilient structures seen from 16WCEE[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Dynamics, 2017, 37(3): 1-9. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DGGC201703001.htm
    [8]
    QU Z, TAMURA K, WADA A. Synthetic seismic design strategy for building structures in urban areas[C]//IAEE. 16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Tokyo: IAEE, 2017: 1017.
    [9]
    IKEDA M, ASAI K, GALLARDO R M. Study on residents' disaster prevention awareness for tsunami in Valparaíso, Chile[C]//IAEE. 16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Tokyo: IAEE, 2017: 2671.
    [10]
    MAHIN S. Resilience by design: a structural engineering perspective[C]//IAEE. 16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Tokyo: IAEE, 2017: Keynote-7.
    [11]
    ROJAHN C, JOHNSON L, O'ROURKE T D, et al. Community resilience of lifeline systems: Societal needs and performance assessment[C]//IAEE. 16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Tokyo: IAEE, 2017: 2686.
    [12]
    CIMELLARO G. New trends on resiliency research[C]//IAEE. 16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Tokyo: IAEE, 2017: Keynote-5.
    [13]
    AHMADI E, KASHANI M M. Seismic performance of post-tensioned precast segmental columns using incremental dynamic analysis[C]//IAEE. 17th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Tokyo: IAEE, 2021: 2d-0006.
    [14]
    ALAM M S, TREMBLAY R, ISLAM K, et al. Use of rocking steel piers for enhanced bridge seismic performance[C]//IAEE. 17th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Tokyo: IAEE, 2021: 2g-0247.
    [15]
    YEN P, AREF A. Development of seismic design details for accelerated bridge constructions[C]//IAEE. 16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Tokyo: IAEE, 2017: 4044.
    [16]
    OU Y C, PRATIWI A Y, BU Z Y, et al. Equivalent viscous damping for self-centering precast concrete segmental bridge columns[C]//IAEE. 16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Tokyo: IAEE, 2017: 4907.
    [17]
    LEE C L. Force-based beam-column element with multispring models for modelling post-tensioned rocking members[C]//IAEE. 16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Tokyo: IAEE, 2017: 1284.
    [18]
    LI C, HAO H, ZHANG X. Cyclic tests of precast segmental concrete columns with unbonded post-tensioned tendons[C]//IAEE. 16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Tokyo: IAEE, 2017: 1747.
    [19]
    LI C, HAO H, ZHANG X. Analysis of precast segmental concrete columns with unbonded post-tensioned tendons under cyclic loading[C]//IAEE. 16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Tokyo: IAEE, 2017: 1769.
    [20]
    TITIRLA M, ZARKADOULAS N, MITOULIS S, et al. Rocking isolation of bridge piers using elastomeric pads[C]//IAEE. 16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Tokyo: IAEE, 2017: 4040.
    [21]
    MASHAL M, PALERMO A. Experimental testing of emulative and post-tensioned earthquake damage resistant technologies for accelerated bridge construction[C]//IAEE. 16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Tokyo: IAEE, 2017: 641.
    [22]
    PANTELIDES C P, THAPA D. Self-centering bent with stretch length anchors for accelerated bridge construction in high seismic regions[C]//IAEE. 17th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Tokyo: IAEE, 2021: 2g-0300.
    [23]
    JIA J F, WEI B, OU J P, et al. Seismic performance of self-centering precast RC bridge columns with replaceable energy dissipation devices[C]//IAEE. 17th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Tokyo: IAEE, 2021: 2d-0091.
    [24]
    CHEN X, LI C. Seismic assessment of tall pier bridges using rocking foundation retrofitted with inerter system[C]//IAEE. 17th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Tokyo: IAEE, 2021: 3c-0004.
    [25]
    ANDISHEH K, SCOTT A, PALERMO A. Low cycle fatigue behavior of corroded fuse-type dissipaters for post-tensioned rocking bridge piers[C]//IAEE. 16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Tokyo: IAEE, 2017: 2605.
    [26]
    RAHMZADEH A, ALAM M S, TREMBLAY R, et al. Experimental and finite element studies on the cyclic response of post-tensioned rocking steel bridge piers[C]//IAEE. 17th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Tokyo: IAEE, 2021: 2d-0094.
    [27]
    SHEN Y, LI J, LI Y, et al. Numerical study on the seismic performance of post-tensioned CFST hybrid bridge columns[C]//IAEE. 17th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Tokyo: IAEE, 2021: 2d-0027.
    [28]
    GUERRINI G, RESTREPO J I, SCHOETTLER M J. Self-centering, low-damage, precast post-tensioned columns for accelerated bridge construction in seismic regions[C]//IAEE. 16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Tokyo: IAEE, 2017: 3921.
    [29]
    DELLA CORTE G, SARRACCO G, LANDOLFO R. Seismic response of compound steel columns with partially-restrained exposed base-plate connections[C]//IAEE. 16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Tokyo: IAEE, 2017: 346.
    [30]
    MANZO REGGIANI N, VASSILIOU M F. Quasi-static tests of negative stiffness columns for resilient seismic design[C]//IAEE. 17th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Tokyo: IAEE, 2021: 2g-0311.
    [31]
    YANG C, OKUMUS P. Impact of connections on seismic performances of precast concrete bridge piers[C]//IAEE. 17th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Tokyo: IAEE, 2021: 2d-0106.
    [32]
    ZHANG Q, ALAM M S. Performance-based seismic design of hybrid rocking bridge column[C]//IAEE. 17th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Tokyo: IAEE, 2021: 2d-0001.
    [33]
    THOMAIDIS I M, KAPPOS A J, CAMARA A. Rocking vs. conventional seismic isolation: comparative assessment of asymmetric bridges in a design context[C]//IAEE. 17th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Tokyo: IAEE, 2021: 2d-0037.
    [34]
    INOUE T. Vibration control system combining rocking isolation with seismic dampers for bridge structures subjected to strong ground motions[C]//IAEE. 17th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Tokyo: IAEE, 2021: 2g-0081.
    [35]
    LIU Y Q, YI J, LIANG F, et al. Numerical simulation of partially debonded tendon system in resettable sliding joint under earthquake[C]//IAEE. 17th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Tokyo: IAEE, 2021: 2d-0010.
    [36]
    LIANG F, LIU Y Q, YUAN Y, et al. Evaluation of non-emulative seismic-resistant precast segmental bridge columns[C]//IAEE. 17th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Tokyo: IAEE, 2021: 2d-0108.
    [37]
    TAKAHASHI Y, H. MAEDA H, HAYASHI M. Development of metabolic seismic columns to be able to replace plastic hinge under gravity load[C]//IAEE. 17th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Tokyo: IAEE, 2021: 2d-0097.
    [38]
    DOIT, TOYOOKA A, MURONO Y, et al. Proposal of dead weight compensation structures and application to railway viaduct[C]//IAEE. 17th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Tokyo: IAEE, 2021: 2b-0066.
    [39]
    BRITO M, AKIYAMA M, YAMAGUCHI H, et al. Improving the seismic resilience of RC bridge piers through the use of a low-cost friction sliding system[C]//IAEE. 17th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Tokyo: IAEE, 2021: 2g-0006.
    [40]
    CHEGINI Z, PALERMO A. Quasi-static testing of a large-scale bridge with dissipative controlled rocking connections in the superstructure[C]//IAEE. 16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Tokyo: IAEE, 2017: 1372.
    [41]
    LIU R, PALERMO A. Quasi-static testing of a 1/3 scale precast concrete bridge utilising a post-tensioned dissipative controlled rocking[C]//IAEE. 16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Tokyo: IAEE, 2017: 806.
    [42]
    OBARA T, WATANABE H, KONO S, et al. Damage controlling performance of a full scale unbonded post-tensioned precast concrete beam[C]//IAEE. 16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Tokyo: IAEE, 2017: 1882.
    [43]
    CHENG C T, KANG W Z. Seismic performance of rocking base-isolated structures subjected to biaxial earthquake loads[C]//IAEE. 16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Tokyo: IAEE, 2017: 248.
    [44]
    LVDERS C, CRIADO M. A new design philosophy of seismic anchor elements for bridges[C]//IAEE. 16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Tokyo: IAEE, 2017: 4562.
    [45]
    LI J, SHEN Y. Precast self-centering bridge columns: quasi-static and shake table testing[C]//IAEE. 17th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Tokyo: IAEE, 2021: SOS-O28B06-4.
    [46]
    PALACIOS G, LIU X, CHAO S H, et al. Seismic performance of a highly damage-tolerant ultrahigh performance fiber-reinforced concrete column[C]//IAEE. 16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Tokyo: IAEE, 2017: 2833.
    [47]
    CHAO S H, SHAMSHIRI M, KARMACHARYA A. A seismic resilient concrete column using ultra-high-performance fiber-reinforced concrete[C]//IAEE. 17th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Tokyo: IAEE, 2021: 2i-0156.
    [48]
    NGUYEN W, SHAO Y, BILLINGTON S L, et al. High-performance fiber-reinforced cementitious composites for seismic design: a review of columns[C]//IAEE. 17th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Tokyo: IAEE, 2021: 2d-0012.
    [49]
    SHIM C S, SONG H H, KOEM C, et al. Cyclic behavior of post-earthquake repaired post_tensioned percast columns with HPFRCC[C]//IAEE. 16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Tokyo: IAEE, 2017: 184.
    [50]
    HAO H, LI C, BI K. Shake table tests of precast columns with geopolymer concrete segments reinforced with BFRP bars[C]//IAEE. 17th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Tokyo: IAEE, 2021: 2d-0023.
    [51]
    TAKEUCHI T, SUN Y, SHING P B. Seismic behavior of concrete column reinforced with ultra-high strength rebars under dynamic loading[C]//IAEE. 17th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Tokyo: IAEE, 2021: 2c-0084.
    [52]
    SARGSYAN G, CAI G, TAKEUCHI T, et al. Seismic behavior and assessment of drift-hardening concrete columns[C]//IAEE. 16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Tokyo: IAEE, 2017: 664.
    [53]
    BILLAH A H M M, TODOROV B. Mainshock-aftershock damage assessment of concrete bridge reinforced with shape memory alloy rebar[C]//IAEE. 17th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Tokyo: IAEE, 2021: 2d-0051.
    [54]
    LI S, WANG J Q, ALAM M S. Seismic performance assessment of an innovative highway bridge using steel-SMA reinforced piers and self-centering restraining devices[C]//IAEE. 17th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Tokyo: IAEE, 2021: 3b-0009.
    [55]
    ZHU S Y, WANG B. Towards earthquake resilience: using superelastic SMA for high-performance seismic-resistant structures[C]//IAEE. 17th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Tokyo: IAEE, 2021: SOS-O27A06-9.
    [56]
    MCCARTHY E, PADGETT J E. Fragility modeling and cost benefit analysis of an SMA enhanced bridge expansion joint[C]//IAEE. 16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Tokyo: IAEE, 2017: 4329.
    [57]
    JUNG D, ANDRAWES B. Dyngmic testing on circular RC bridge columns retrofitted and repaired with shape memory alloys[C]//IAEE. 16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Tokyo: IAEE, 2017: 976.
    [58]
    PALERMO A. Resilient technologies and materials for bridges: research and applications in New Zealand[C]//IAEE. 17th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Tokyo: IAEE, 2021: SOS-O27A06-4.
    [59]
    韩强, 贾振雷, 何维利, 等. 自复位双柱式摇摆桥梁抗震设计方法及工程应用[J]. 中国公路学报, 2017, 30(12): 169-177. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGGL201712019.htm

    HAN Qiang, JIA Zhen-lei, HE Wei-li, et al. Seismic design method and its engineering application of self-centering double-column rocking bridge[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2017, 30(12): 169-177. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGGL201712019.htm
    [60]
    HAN Q, JIA Z, XU K, et al. Hysteretic behavior investigation of self-centering double-column rocking piers for seismic resilience[J]. Engineering Structures, 2019, 188: 218-232. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.03.024
    [61]
    TAKEUCHI T, MATSUI R, SITLER B, et al. State-of-art stability assessment of buckling-restrained braces including connections[C]//IAEE. 16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Tokyo: IAEE, 2017: 602.
    [62]
    SITLER B, MACRAE G, TAKEUCHI T, et al. Buckling restrained brace connection and stability performance issues[C]//IAEE. 16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Tokyo: IAEE, 2017: 1380.
    [63]
    WEI X, BRUNEAU M. Experimental performance of buckling restrained braces subjected to bidirectional displacement histories[C]//IAEE. 16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Tokyo: IAEE, 2017: 819.
    [64]
    WANG Y, IBARRA L, PANTELIDES C. Seismic assessment for retrofitted skewed reinforced concrete bridges with buckling restrained braces[C]//IAEE. 16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Tokyo: IAEE, 2017: 2531.
    [65]
    BAZAEZ R, DUSICKA P. Seismic retrofitting of reinforced concrete bridge bents utilizing hysteretic dampers[C]//IAEE. 16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Tokyo: IAEE, 2017: 2703.
    [66]
    CHENG X, EROCHKO J, LAU D T. Improving the seismic performance of existing bridge structures using self-centering dampers[C]//IAEE. 16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Tokyo: IAEE, 2017: 3465.
    [67]
    ATASEVER K, INANAGA S, TERAZAWA Y, et al. Experimental study on buckling restrained braces (BRBs) with post-tensioned carbon fiber composite cables[C]//IAEE. 17th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Tokyo: IAEE, 2021: 2g-0025.
    [68]
    XIE Q, ZHOU Z. Behavior of BFRP tendon systems under cyclic loading and its influence on the dual-tube SC-BRB hysteretic performance[C]//IAEE. 17th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Tokyo: IAEE, 2021: 2c-0202.
    [69]
    YOUSEF-BEIK M, VEISMORADI S, ZARNANI P, et al. Full scale quasi-static testing of a new self-centering damage-avoidant timber brace[C]//IAEE. 17th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Tokyo: IAEE, 2021: 2i-0123.
    [70]
    WANG Y, ZHOU Z, ZHAO K. Experimental investigation of hysteretic performance of self-centering variable friction damper brace[C]//IAEE. 17th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Tokyo: IAEE, 2021: 2c-0136.
    [71]
    XU L H, FAN X W, LI Z X. Hysteretic performance study on a pre-pressed spring self-centering energy dissipation brace[C]//IAEE. 16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Tokyo: IAEE, 2017: 4130.
    [72]
    WANG B, ZHU S Y. Self-centering energy dissipation devices enabled by superelastic SMAs[C]//IAEE. 17th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Tokyo: IAEE, 2021: SOS-O27A06-6.
    [73]
    ASFAW A, OZBULUT O. Development and testing of resilient damping devices for seismic protection of mass-timber structures[C]//IAEE. 17th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Tokyo: IAEE, 2021: 2i-0177.
    [74]
    KOLAY C, KUMAR A. A shape memory alloy based self-centring damping device for seismic applications[C]//IAEE. 17th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Tokyo: IAEE, 2021: 2g-0251.
    [75]
    XIAO Y, EBERHARD M O, ZHOU Y, et al. A self-centering energy dissipative brace with low prestressing[C]//IAEE. 17th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Tokyo: IAEE, 2021: 2g-0175.
    [76]
    YUAN W C, GU Y T, LI H, et al. Shake table test of a cable restrainer for continuous girder bridges[C]//IAEE. 17th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Tokyo: IAEE, 2021: 2d-0021.
    [77]
    HUBER P, ROOS P, ARRANZ R. Damper, isolator and joint system for seismic protection of Toluca viaduct for Mexico city intercity train[C]//IAEE. 17th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Tokyo: IAEE, 2021: 2d-0022.
    [78]
    LIANG D, ZHENG Y, FANG C. A novel SMA-cable-based pure friction sliding bearing for seismic resilient improvement of highway bridges[C]//IAEE. 17th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Tokyo: IAEE, 2021: 2d-0052.
    [79]
    ALMUTAIRI A, LU J, ELGAMAL A. Implementation of a multi-span bridge-ground PBEE framework for seismic and liquefaction scenarios[C]//IAEE. 17th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Tokyo: IAEE, 2021: 2d-0070.
    [80]
    LAI Z, JIANG L, GVNAY S. Seismic evaluation of the high-speed railway track-bridge system using performance-based engineering[C]//IAEE. 17th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Tokyo: IAEE, 2021: 2b-0154.
    [81]
    GIDARIS I, PADGETT J E. Probabilistic fragility analysis and resilience assessment of bridges subjected to earthquake mainshocks and aftershocks[C]//IAEE. 16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Tokyo: IAEE, 2017: 4346.
    [82]
    WU X T, GUO A X. Reliability-based life-cycle cost optimization of bridge piers exposed to earthquake and non-uniform corrosion[C]//IAEE. 17th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Tokyo: IAEE, 2021: 7j-0001.
    [83]
    NOLLET M J, FARZAM A, ABO EL EZZ A, et al. A tool for seismic impact assessment on municipal highway bridges network[C]//IAEE. 17th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Tokyo: IAEE, 2021: 8c-0055.
    [84]
    CAPACCI L, BIONDINI F, KIREMIDJIAN A S. Damage disaggregation for seismic resilience assessment of aging bridge networks[C]//IAEE. 17th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Tokyo: IAEE, 2021: 2d-0087.
    [85]
    ISHIBASHI H, KOJIMA T, AKIYAMA M, et al. Framework to assess risk and resilience of road networks under seismic and subsequent tsunami hazards[C]//IAEE. 17th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Tokyo: IAEE, 2021: 7d-0002.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (1267) PDF downloads(141) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return