Volume 23 Issue 3
Jun.  2023
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
LU Qing-chang, LIU Peng, XU Biao, CUI Xin. Resilience-based protection decision optimization for metro network under operational incidents[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2023, 23(3): 209-220. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2023.03.016
Citation: LU Qing-chang, LIU Peng, XU Biao, CUI Xin. Resilience-based protection decision optimization for metro network under operational incidents[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2023, 23(3): 209-220. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2023.03.016

Resilience-based protection decision optimization for metro network under operational incidents

doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2023.03.016
Funds:

National Natural Science Foundation of China 71971029

Fok Ying-Tong Education Foundation for Young Teachers in the Higher Education Institutions of China 171069

Natural Science Basic Research Program of Shaanxi 2021JC-28

More Information
  • Author Bio:

    LU Qing-chang(1984-), male, professor, PhD, qclu@chd.edu.cn

  • Received Date: 2022-12-28
    Available Online: 2023-07-07
  • Publish Date: 2023-06-25
  • The protection decision optimization problem for metro networks was studied to alleviate the negative impacts triggered by operational incidents and improve the capability of metro networks to tackle these incidents. For the network resilience, the variation characteristics of the resilience curve and cumulative loss of the performance in the degradation and recovery of network performance were considered, and a two-layer optimization model for metro network protection decisions was constructed. The upper model was a stochastic integer programming model for identifying the optimal choice of the stations to be protected in the scenarios of uncertain operational incidents. The lower model was a user equilibrium assignment problem, and the variations in the queueing passenger flow and waiting time for recovery at the stations with limited capacity were prioritized to accurately estimate the delay time for passenger travel under operational incidents. The genetic algorithm and Frank-Wolfe algorithm were used to solve the upper and lower models, respectively. The metro network in the central area of Xi'an was taken as an example to verify and analyze the proposed models and algorithms. Analysis results show that the resilience-based protection decision is capable of reducing the loss of network performance by more than 50% by protecting 37.5% of the stations in the research region. It is superior to the vulnerability-based protection decision and the one without considering the substitution role of the bus network. Compared to the situation of the vulnerability-based one, the losses of network performance and passenger flow time reduce by 6.18% and 582 h, respectively, when half of the metro stations in the network are protected by the resilience-based protection decision. The protection priorities of more than two-thirds of stations in the metro network alter due to the substitution role of the bus network. For the same type of stations, their dependence on the substitution role of the bus network enhances with the increase in the passenger flow. The protection priority of a metro station is dependent mainly on the passing passenger flow and transportation capacity. A larger passenger flow is accompanied by a lower transportation capacity and higher protection priority of corresponding stations. The station type is also a factor determining the protection priority, especially for the stations with large passenger flows, and higher protection priorities are required for the non-transfer stations.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    LU Qing-chang. Modeling network resilience of rail transit under operational incidents[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2018, 117: 227-237. doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2018.08.015
    [2]
    LIU Kai, ZHU Jia-tong, WANG Ming. An event-based probabilistic model of disruption risk to urban metro networks[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2021, 147: 93-105. doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2021.03.010
    [3]
    ZHANG Shu-yang, LO H K, NG K F, et al. Metro system disruption management and substitute bus service: a systematic review and future directions[J]. Transport Reviews, 2021, 41(2): 230-251. doi: 10.1080/01441647.2020.1834468
    [4]
    MA Chao-qun, ZHANG Shuang, CHEN Quan, et al. Characteristics and vulnerability of rail transit network based on perspective of passenger flow characteristics[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2020, 20(5): 208-216. (in Chinese) doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2020.05.017
    [5]
    LU Qing-chang, ZHANG Lei, XU Peng-cheng, et al. Modeling network vulnerability of urban rail transit under cascading failures: a coupled map lattices approach[J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2022, 221: 108320. doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2022.108320
    [6]
    YAN Yong-ze, HONG Liu, HE Xiao-zheng, et al. Pre-disaster investment decisions for strengthening the Chinese railway system under earthquakes[J]. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 2017, 105: 39-59. doi: 10.1016/j.tre.2017.07.001
    [7]
    CHEN Xue-wei, QIN Jin, ZHOU Ying-liang. Optimization of transportation network emergency prevention in uncertain environments[J]. Journal of Railway Science and Engineering, 2021, 18(5): 1307-1315. (in Chinese) doi: 10.19713/j.cnki.43-1423/u.T20200623
    [8]
    JIN Jian-gang, LU Lin-jun, SUN Li-jun, et al. Optimal allocation of protective resources in urban rail transit networks against intentional attacks[J]. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 2015, 84: 73-87. doi: 10.1016/j.tre.2015.10.008
    [9]
    STARITA S, SCAPARRA M P. Optimizing dynamic investment decisions for railway systems protection[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2016, 248(2): 543-557. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2015.07.025
    [10]
    STARITA S, SCAPARRA M P. Passenger railway network protection: a model with variable post-disruption demand service[J]. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 2017, 64(4): 603-618.
    [11]
    SARHADI H, TULETT D M, VERMA M. An analytical approach to the protection planning of a rail intermodal terminal network[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2017, 257(2): 511-525. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2016.07.036
    [12]
    SONG Hong-yu, SHANGGUAN Wei, SHENG Zhao, et al. Optimization method of dynamic trajectory for high-speed train group based on resilience adjustment[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2020, 21(4): 235-250. (in Chinese) doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2021.04.018
    [13]
    LI Zhao-long, JIN Chun, HU Pan, et al. Resilience-based recovery strategy optimization in emergency recovery phase for transportation networks[J]. Systems Engineering—Theory and Practice, 2019, 39(11): 2828-2841. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XTLL201911010.htm
    [14]
    BEŠINOVIĆ N. Resilience in railway transport systems: a literature review and research agenda[J]. Transport Reviews, 2020, 40(4): 457-478. doi: 10.1080/01441647.2020.1728419
    [15]
    ZHANG Dong-ming, DU Fei, HUANG Hong-wei, et al. Resiliency assessment of urban rail transit networks: Shanghai Metro as an example[J]. Safety Science, 2018, 106: 230-243. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2018.03.023
    [16]
    ZHANG Jie-fei, REN Gang, MA Jing-feng, et al. Decision-making method of repair sequence for metro network based on resilience evaluation[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2020, 20(4): 14-20. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXT202004003.htm
    [17]
    YIN Yong, CHEN Jin-qu, ZHU Man, et al. Repair strategies for failure of urban rail transit stations[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2020, 55(4): 865-872. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XNJT202004024.htm
    [18]
    HUANG Ying, LIU Meng-ru, WEI Jin-guo, et al. Research on urban metro network recovery strategy based on resilience curve[J]. Journal of Catastrophology, 2021, 36(1): 32-36. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZHXU202101007.htm
    [19]
    LYU Biao, GUAN Xin-yi, GAO Zi-qiang. Evaluation and optimal recovery strategy of metro network service resilience[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2021, 21(5): 198-205, 221. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXT202105021.htm
    [20]
    CHEN Jin-qu, ZHANG Fan, PENG Qi-yuan, et al. Resilience assessment and partition of an urban rail transit station under large passenger flow[J]. Journal of Safety and Environment, 2022, 22(6): 2994-3002. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-AQHJ202206008.htm
    [21]
    WANG J Y T, EHRGOTT M, CHEN A. A bi-objective user equilibrium model of travel time reliability in a road network[J]. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 2014, 66: 4-15.
    [22]
    CAI Hong, ZHU Jin-fu, YANG Cheng, et al. Vulnerability analysis of metro network incorporating flow impact and capacity constraint after a disaster[J]. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 2017, 143(2): 04016031.
    [23]
    CHEN Jin-qu, LIU Jie, PENG Qi-yuan, et al. Resilience assessment of an urban rail transit network: a case study of Chengdu Subway[J]. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 2022, 586: 126517.
    [24]
    NOGAL M, O'CONNOR A, CAULFIELD B, et al. Resilience of traffic networks: from perturbation to recovery via a dynamic restricted equilibrium model[J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2016, 156: 84-96.
    [25]
    HOU Ben-wei, LI Xiao-jun, HAN Qiang, et al. Post-earthquake connectivity and travel time analysis of highway networks based on Monte Carlo simulation[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2017, 30(6): 287-296. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGGL201706012.htm
    [26]
    AYDIN N Y, DUZGUN H S, HEINIMANN H R, et al. Framework for improving the resilience and recovery of transportation networks under geohazard risks[J]. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 2018, 31: 832-843.
    [27]
    LI Shu-qing, LI Zhe, ZHU Wen-ying. Equilibrium assignment model of integrated transit network[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2013, 13(1): 62-69. (in Chinese) doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2013.01.010
    [28]
    KATO H, KANEKO Y, INOUE M. Comparative analysis of transit assignment: evidence from urban railway system in the Tokyo Metropolitan Area[J]. Transportation, 2010, 37: 775-799.
    [29]
    JUN M J, CHOI K, JEONG J E, et al. Land use characteristics of subway catchment areas and their influence on subway ridership in Seoul[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 2015, 48: 30-40.
    [30]
    GORDON J B, KOUTSOPOULOS H N, WILSON N H M. Estimation of population origin-interchange-destination flows on multimodal transit networks[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2018, 90: 350-365.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    Article Metrics

    Article views (884) PDF downloads(121) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return