Mechanical property of hinged voided slab with perforated steel plates at bottom of junction surface
-
摘要: 针对现有铰接空心板桥的薄弱部位——铰缝, 提出一种在空心板与铰缝结合面底部设开孔钢板的空心板构造, 通过开孔钢板改变结合面裂缝开展的路径, 达到延缓空心板与铰缝结合面通缝形成的目的, 并进行了8m跨径的铰接空心板足尺模型试验。在试验和非线性有限元分析的基础上, 与结合面底部带钢筋的铰接空心板试验进行了对比。分析结果表明: 当试验荷载为100kN (1.43倍车辆荷载) 时, 空心板跨中出现横向裂缝, 空心板梁整体刚度降低, 空心板受力状态由弹性阶段进入弹塑性阶段; 在试验荷载加至300kN (4.29倍车辆荷载) 为止的整个加载过程, 未观察到空心板与铰缝结合面底部出现裂缝; 当结合面底部设门式钢筋时, 裂缝沿结合面从下向上扩展, 最终形成通缝, 然而, 当结合面底部设开孔钢板后, 铰缝沿结合面开裂至开孔钢板下方后, 裂缝的扩展需要绕过开孔钢板, 使得开孔钢板下方铰缝混凝土开裂后, 再沿开孔钢板上方结合面向上扩展, 形成通缝; 铰缝开裂荷载由结合面设置钢筋的69kN (0.99倍车辆荷载) 提高到314kN (4.49倍车辆荷载), 提高了3.50倍; 铰缝形成通缝时的荷载由结合面设置钢筋的199kN (2.84倍车辆荷载) 提高到489kN (6.99倍车辆荷载), 提高了4.51倍。可见, 在结合面底部设开孔钢板后, 铰缝裂缝开展路径发生变化, 延缓了空心板与铰缝结合面的开裂。Abstract: In view of the weakest point of hinged voided slab bridge, namely hinged joint, a kind of voided slab with perforated steel plates at the bottom of hinged joint-to-voided slab interface was put forward, the perforated steel plates were used to change the crack propagating path at the interface, so as to delay the formation of through crack at the hinged joint-to-voided slab interface, and the full-scale model experiment on 8 m-span hinged voided slab was conducted. Based on the experiment and nonlinear finite element (FE) analysis, the result was compared with the experiment result of hinged voided slab with gate-type steel bars at the bottom of interface. Analysis result shows that when the experiment load is 100 kN (1.43 times vehicle load), the lateral crack emerges in the mid-span of voided slab, the integral rigidity of voided slabdecreases, and the stress state of voided slab comes into elastoplastic stage from elastic stage. The test load is applied up to 300 kN (4.29 times vehicle load), no crack is detected at the bottom of hinged joint-to-voided slab interface during the entire loading process. For hinged voided slab with gate-type steel bars at the bottom of hinged joint-to-voided slab interface, the crack extends from the bottom to the top along the interface, and then forms a through crack. However, for the hinged joint-to-voided slab interface with perforated steel plates, after the crack propagates along the interface to the bottom of perforated steel plate, the expansion of the crack needs to bypass the perforated steel plate, so that the joint concrete below the perforated steel plate cracks, and then the crack expands upward along the junction surface above the perforated steel plate until the formation of through crack. The joint cracking load increases from 69 kN (0.99 times vehicle load) for the interface with gate-type steel bars to 314 kN (4.49 times vehicle load), and increases by 3.50 times. The through-crack-formation load increases from 199 kN (2.84 times vehicle load) for the junction surface with gate-type steel bars to 489 kN (6.99 times vehicle load), and increases by 4.51 times. It can be seen that the extension path of crack changes after the perforated steel plate is set at the bottom of junction surface, which slows down the cracking of the junction surface between the voided slab and the hinged joint.
-
表 1 混凝土参数
Table 1. Parameters of concretes
表 2 铰缝破坏模式与对应荷载
Table 2. Failure modes of hinged joint and corresponding loads
-
[1] HANNA K, MORCOUS G, TADROS M K. Adjacent box girders without internal diaphragms or posttensioned joints[J]. PCI Journal, 2011, 56 (4): 51-64. doi: 10.15554/pcij.09012011.51.64 [2] YAMANE T, TADROS M K, ARUMUGASAMY P. Short to medium span precast prestressed concrete bridges in Japan[J]. PCI Journal, 1994, 49 (2): 74-100. [3] PISANTY A. The shear strength of extruded hollow-core slabs[J]. Materials and Structures, 1992, 25 (4): 224-230. doi: 10.1007/BF02473067 [4] HANNA K E. Behavior of adjacent precast prestressed concrete box girder bridges[D]. Lincoln: University of Nebraska, 2008. [5] BARAN E. Effects of cast-in-place concrete topping on flexural response of precast concrete hollow-core slabs[J]. Engineering Structures, 2015, 98: 109-117. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.04.017 [6] DONG X H. Traffic forces and temperature effects on shear key connection for adjacent box girder bridge[D]. Cincinnati: University of Cincinnati, 2002. [7] ELGABBAS F, EL-GHANDOUR A A, ABDELRAHMAN A A, et al. Different CFRP strengthening techniques for prestressed hollow core concrete slabs: experimental study and analytical investigation[J]. Composite Structures, 2010, 92: 401-411. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2009.08.015 [8] AGUADO J V, ESPINOS A, HOSPITALER A, et al. Influence of reinforcement arrangement in flexural fire behavior of hollow core slabs[J]. Fire Safety Journal, 2012, 53: 72-84. doi: 10.1016/j.firesaf.2012.06.015 [9] CUENCA E, SERNA P. Failure modes and shear design of prestressed hollow core slabs made of fiber-reinforced concrete[J]. Composites Part B: Engineering, 2013, 45 (1): 952-964. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.06.005 [10] LI Hai-tao, DEEKS A J, LIU Li-xin, et al. Moment transfer factors for column-supported cast-in-situ hollow core slabs[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University—Science A, 2012, 13 (3): 165-173. doi: 10.1631/jzus.A1100170 [11] 姜云霞, 柴金义, 伍必庆, 等. 不中断交通实施铰接板桥加固的研究[J]. 内蒙古公路与运输, 2002 (2): 1-3. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-0574.2002.02.002JIANG Yun-xia, CHAI Jin-yi, WU Bi-qing, et al. Research on strengthening hinged slab bridge under uninterrupted traffic[J]. Highways and Transportation in Inner Mongolia, 2002 (2): 1-3. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-0574.2002.02.002 [12] 乔学礼. 空心板铰缝破坏机理及防治措施研究[D]. 西安: 长安大学, 2008.QIAO Xue-li. Failure mechanism and prevention measures on hinged joints in hinged voided slab[D]. Xi'an: Chang'an University, 2008. (in Chinese). [13] 杨继新. 装配式空心板桥铰缝受力性能研究[D]. 呼和浩特: 内蒙古工业大学, 2009.YANG Ji-xin. Study on mechanical properties of fabricated hollow slab bridge hinge joint under the load[D]. Hohhot: Inner Mongolia University of Technology, 2009. (in Chinese). [14] 王渠, 吴庆雄, 陈宝春. 装配式空心板桥铰缝破坏模式试验研究[J]. 工程力学, 2014, 31 (增1): 115-120. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GCLX2014S1022.htmWANG Qu, WU Qing-xiong, CHEN Bao-chun. Experimental study on failure mode of hinged joint in assembly voided slab bridge[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2014, 31 (S1): 115-120. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GCLX2014S1022.htm [15] 陈悦驰, 吴庆雄, 陈宝春. 装配式空心板桥铰缝破坏模式有限元分析[J]. 工程力学, 2014, 31 (增1): 51-58. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GCLX2014S1012.htmCHEN Yue-chi, WU Qing-xiong, CHEN Bao-chun. Failure mode of hinged joint in assembly voided slab by finite element analysis[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2014, 31 (S1): 51-58. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GCLX2014S1012.htm [16] 叶见曙, 刘九生, 俞博, 等. 空心板混凝土铰缝抗剪性能试验研究[J]. 公路交通科技, 2013, 30 (6): 33-39. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0268.2013.06.007YE Jian-shu, LIU Jiu-sheng, YU Bo, et al. Experiment on shear property of hinge joints of concrete hollow slab[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2013, 30 (6): 33-39. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0268.2013.06.007 [17] 吴庆雄, 陈悦驰, 陈康明. 结合面底部带门式钢筋的铰接空心板破坏模式分析[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2015, 15 (3): 15-25. http://transport.chd.edu.cn/article/id/201704005WU Qing-xiong, CHEN Yue-chi, CHEN Kang-ming. Failure mode analysis of hinged voided slab with gate-type steel rebars at bottom of junction surface[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2015, 15 (3): 15-25. (in Chinese). http://transport.chd.edu.cn/article/id/201704005 [18] 陈建华. 空心板梁桥单片梁受力分析及预防措施[J]. 中外公路, 2007 (3): 118-121. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2579.2007.03.030CHEN Jian-hua. Force analysis and prevention measures on the single beam of voided slab[J]. Journal of China and Foreign Highway, 2007 (3): 118-121. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2579.2007.03.030 [19] 张志. 空心板铰缝破坏机理及防治措施研究[J]. 山西建筑, 2009, 35 (2): 318-320. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6825.2009.02.201ZHANG Zhi. Hollow plate hinge seam failure mechanism and prevention measure research[J]. Shanxi Architecture, 2009, 35 (2): 318-320. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6825.2009.02.201 [20] 薄祥照. HGM高强无收缩灌浆材料的研制与应用[J]. 国防交通工程与技术, 2006, 4 (3): 58-60. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GFJT200603019.htmBO Xiang-zhao. The development and application of the HGM high-strength shrinkage-free grouting material[J]. Traffic Engineering and Technology for National Defence, 2006, 4 (3): 58-60. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GFJT200603019.htm [21] 陈康明, 吴庆雄, 黄宛昆, 等. 结合面底部带门式钢筋的铰接空心板桥受力性能参数分析[J]. 公路交通科技, 2016, 33 (8): 65-75. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GLJK201608011.htmCHEN Kang-ming, WU Qing-xiong, HUANG Wan-kun, et al. Parameter analysis on mechanical property of hinged voided slab with gate-type steel bars at the bottom part of junction surface[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2016, 33 (8): 65-75. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GLJK201608011.htm [22] YUAN Ji-qiu, GRAYBEAL B. Full-scale testing of shear key details for precast concrete box-beam bridges[J]. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2016, 21 (9): 1-14. [23] HUSSEIN H H, SARGAND S M, AL-JHAYYISH A K, et al. Contribution of transverse tie bars to load transfer in adjacent prestressed box-girder bridges with partial depth shear key[J]. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 2017, 31 (2): 1-11. [24] HUSSEIN H H, SARGAND S M, RIKABI F T A, et al. Laboratory evaluation of ultrahigh-performance concrete shear key for prestressed adjacent precast concrete box girder bridges[J]. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2017, 22 (2): 1-13. [25] 李海敏. 装配式空心板桥铰缝构造裂缝控制措施试验研究[D]. 福州: 福州大学, 2014.LI Hai-min. Experimental study on crack controlling applied in hinge of fabricated hollow slab bridges[D]. Fuzhou: Fuzhou University, 2014. (in Chinese).