DAN De-shan, HAN Lu-lu, JU Fa-xian, DONG Jun. Impact of ground motion incident angles on seismic vulnerability for bridge with thin-walled hollow tall pier[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2020, 20(6): 90-103. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2020.06.008
Citation: DAN De-shan, HAN Lu-lu, JU Fa-xian, DONG Jun. Impact of ground motion incident angles on seismic vulnerability for bridge with thin-walled hollow tall pier[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2020, 20(6): 90-103. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2020.06.008

Impact of ground motion incident angles on seismic vulnerability for bridge with thin-walled hollow tall pier

doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2020.06.008
Funds:

National Key Research and Development Program of China 2016YFC0802202

National Natural Science Foundation of China 51678489

National Natural Science Foundation of China 51978577

Science and Technology Project of Department of Transport of Yunnan Province 2017(A)03

More Information
  • Author Bio:

    SHAN De-shan(1969-), male, professor, PhD, desshan@163.com

  • Received Date: 2020-07-09
  • Publish Date: 2020-06-25
  • A certain 4-span rigid-frame-continuous composite bridge with tall piers in western China was considered as the research object to fully assess the seismic resistance performance of long-span bridge structures with thin-walled hollow tall piers. Combined with the current bridge seismic design code, the incremental dynamic analysis method was adopted to discuss the impact of horizontal ground motion incident angle on the seismic vulnerability of bridge components based on the three-dimensional seismic vulnerability analysis method, and the influence of vertical ground motion was considered. The impact law of ground motion incident angle on the seismic vulnerability of bridge structural system was analyzed in considering the first-order reliability theory. Analysis result indicates that the bending and shearing vulnerability nephograms of the 2# and 3# rigid-frame piers differ significantly from the corresponding nephograms of the 1# and 4# cantilever piers. The bending and shearing seismic vulnerabilities of pier are not only related to the ground motion incident angle but also to the pier structural type. The distributions for the damage probability of bearings with slight, moderate, severe, and complete damage states are similar. The ground motion incident angles for the maximum damage probability are 0 and 180° when the peak ground acceleration is 0.4g. The most unfavorable incident angles for the slight and moderate damage states are 0-180° as the peak ground acceleration increases over 0.6g. The most unfavorable ground motion incident directions for the bearing deformation are mainly the longitudinal and lateral directions of the bridge. It can be seen that the damage probabilities for various damage indices of the various key components differ along with the various intensities and directions for ground motions. The number and ranges for the most unfavorable ground motion incident angles and their relative intervals of the structural system and its components with various damage indices also differ. The seismic demand for the bridge structure can not be properly evaluated by only discussing the seismic vulnerability in the longitudinal and lateral directions of the bridge. The most unfavorable ground motion incident angle and even the seismic resistance performance of long-span bridges with tall piers can be located and evaluated accurately using the proposed three-dimensional seismic vulnerability analysis method.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    BHATNAGAR U R, BANERJEE S. Fragility of skewed bridges under orthogonal seismic ground motions[J]. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 2015, 11(9): 1113-1130. doi: 10.1080/15732479.2014.936880
    [2]
    BILLAH A H M M, ALAM M S, BHUIYAN M A R. Seismic fragility assessment of highway bridges: a state-of-the-art review[J]. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 2015, 11(6): 804-832. doi: 10.1080/15732479.2014.912243
    [3]
    GIDARIS I, PADGETT J E, BARBOSA A R, et al. Multiple-hazard fragility and restoration models of highway bridges for regional risk and resilience assessment in the united states: state-of-the-art review[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2017, 143(3): 4016188-1-17.
    [4]
    SOLTANIEH S, MEMARPOUR M M, KILANEHEI F. Performance assessment of bridge-soil-foundation system with irregular configuration considering ground motion directionality effects[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2019, 118: 19-34. doi: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.11.006
    [5]
    OMRANIAN E, ABDELNABY A E, ABDOLLAHZADEH G. Seismic vulnerability assessment of RC skew bridges subjected to mainshock-aftershock sequences[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2018, 114: 186-197. doi: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.07.007
    [6]
    FENG Riu-wei, WANG Xiao-wei, YUAN Wan-chen, et al. Impact of seismic excitation direction on the fragility analysis of horizontally curved concrete bridges[J]. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2018, 16(10): 4705-4733. doi: 10.1007/s10518-018-0400-2
    [7]
    TASKARI O, SEXTOS A. Multi-angle, multi-damage fragility curves for seismic assessment of bridges[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 2015, 44(13): 2281-2301. doi: 10.1002/eqe.2584
    [8]
    TORBOL M, SHINOZUKA M. The directionality effect in the seismic risk assessment of highway networks[J]. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 2014, 10(2): 175-188. doi: 10.1080/15732479.2012.716069
    [9]
    TORBOL M, SHINOZUKA M. Effect of the angle of seismic incidence on the fragility curves of bridges[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 2012, 41(14): 2111-2124. doi: 10.1002/eqe.2197
    [10]
    NOORI H Z, AMIRIG G, NEKOOEI M, et al. Seismic fragility assessment of skewed MSSS-I girder concrete bridges with unequal height columns[J]. Journal of Earthquake and Tsunami, 2016, 10(1): 1550013-1-16.
    [11]
    JEON J, DESROCHES R, KIM T, et al. Geometric parameters affecting seismic fragilities of curved multi-frame concrete box-girder bridges with integral abutments[J]. Engineering Structures, 2016, 122: 121-143. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.04.037
    [12]
    ABDEL-MOHTI A, PEKCAN G. Effect of skew angle on seismic vulnerability of RC box-girder highway bridges[J]. International Journal of Structural Stability and Dynamic, 2013, 13(6): 1350013-1-24. doi: 10.1142/S0219455413500132
    [13]
    YANG C S W, WERNER S D, DESROCHES R. Seismic fragility analysis of skewed bridges in the central southeastern United States[J]. Engineering Structures, 2015, 83: 116-128. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.10.025
    [14]
    PAHLAVAN H, ZAKERI B, AMIRI G G, et al. Probabilistic vulnerability assessment of horizontally curved multiframe RC box-girder highway bridges[J]. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 2016, 30(3): 4015038-1-12.
    [15]
    AMIRIHORMOZAKI E, PEKCAN G, ITANI A. Analytical fragility functions for horizontally curved steel I-girder highway bridges[J]. Earthquake Spectra, 2015, 31(4): 2235-2254. doi: 10.1193/022213EQS049M
    [16]
    SHIRAZI R S, PEKCAN G, ITANI A. Analytical fragility curves for a class of horizontally curved box-girder bridges[J]. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 2018, 22(5): 881-901. doi: 10.1080/13632469.2016.1264325
    [17]
    ZAKERI B, PADGETT J E, AMIRI G G. Fragility assessment for seismically retrofitted skewed reinforced concrete box girder bridges[J]. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 2015, 29(2): 4014043-1-12.
    [18]
    ZAKERI B, PADGETT J E, AMIRI G G. Fragility analysis of skewed single-frame concrete box-girder bridges[J]. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 2014, 28(3): 571-582. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000435
    [19]
    MANGALATHU S, CHOI E, PARK H C, et al. Probabilistic seismic vulnerability assessment of tall horizontally curved concrete bridges in California[J]. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 2018, 32(6): 4018080-1-11.
    [20]
    SERDAR N, FOLIC R. Vulnerability and optimal probabilistic seismic demand model for curved and skewed RC bridges[J]. Engineering Structures, 2018, 176: 411-425. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.09.020
    [21]
    WILSON T, CHEN S, MAHMOUD H. Analytical case study on the seismic performance of a curved and skewed reinforced concrete bridge under vertical ground motion[J]. Engineering Structures, 2015, 100: 128-136. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.06.017
    [22]
    WEI Biao, ZUO Cheng-jun, HE Xu-hui, et al. Effects of vertical ground motions on seismic vulnerabilities of a continuous track-bridge system of high-speed railway[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2018, 115: 281-290. doi: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.08.022
    [23]
    JEON J, SHAFIEEZADEH A, LEE D H, et al. Damage assessment of older highway bridges subjected to three-dimensional ground motions: characterization of shear-axial force interaction on seismic fragilities[J]. Engineering Structures, 2015, 87: 47-57. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.01.015
    [24]
    单德山, 张二华, 董俊, 等. 汶川地震动衰减特性及其大跨高墩连续刚构桥的地震响应规律[J]. 土木工程学报, 2017, 50(4): 107-115. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TMGC201704013.htm

    SHAN De-shan, ZHANG Er-hua, DONG Jun, et al. Ground motion attenuation characteristics of Wenchuan earthquake and seismic response law of long-span continuous rigid frame bridge with high-rise peir[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2017, 50(4): 107-115. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TMGC201704013.htm
    [25]
    刘健新, 张伟, 张茜. 洛河特大桥抗震性能计算[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2006, 6(1): 57-62. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1671-1637.2006.01.012

    LIU Jian-xin, ZHANG Wei, ZHANG Qian. Anti seismic performance calculation of Luohe Bridge[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2006, 6(1): 57-62. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1671-1637.2006.01.012
    [26]
    单德山, 顾晓宇, 董俊, 等. 基于可靠度的桥梁构件三维地震易损性分析[J]. 西南交通大学学报, 2019, 54(5): 885-896. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XNJT201905001.htm

    SHAN De-shan, GU Xiao-yu, DONG Jun, et al. 3D seismic vulnerability analysis of bridge structural components based on reliability[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2019, 54(5): 885-896. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XNJT201905001.htm
    [27]
    BRESLER B. Design criteria for reinforced concrete columns under axial load and biaxial bending[J]. ACI Journal, 1960, 57(11): 481-490.
    [28]
    VECCHIO F J, COLLINS M P. The modified compression-field theory for reinforced concrete elements subjected to shear[J]. ACI Journal, 1986, 83(1): 19-31.
    [29]
    JANGID R S. Seismic response of sliding structures to bidirectional earthquake excitation[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 1996, 25(11): 1301-1305. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199611)25:11<1301::AID-EQE618>3.0.CO;2-3
    [30]
    董俊, 单德山, 张二华, 等. 非规则连续刚构桥地震易损性分析[J]. 西南交通大学学报, 2015, 50(5): 845-851. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2015.05.012

    DONG Jun, SHAN De-shan, ZHANG Er-hua, et al. Seismic fragility of irregular continuous rigid frame bridge[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong Uninversity, 2015, 50(5): 845-851. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2015.05.012
    [31]
    BAKER J W. Quantitative classification of near-fault ground motion using wavelet analysis[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 2007, 99(5): 1486-1501.
    [32]
    BILLAH A H M M, ALAM M S, BHUIYUAN A R. Fragility analysis of retrofitted multi-column bridge bent subjected to near fault and far field ground moion[J]. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2013, 18(10): 992-1004. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000452
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (538) PDF downloads(630) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return