| Citation: | GAO Ding-gang, BAI Zheng-qi, ZHANG Le, SUN You-gang. Data-driven high-precision model identification and time series prediction for maglev train suspension systems[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2026, 26(9): 61-73. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2026.250 |
In response to low modeling accuracy and poor robustness in the suspension control systems of EMS-type maglev trains caused by high dimensionality, strong nonlinearity, and open-loop instability, a high-precision model identification and time series prediction method was proposed based on a long short-term memory (LSTM) improved by the Bayesian optimization (BO) algorithm. First, an experimental platform for a single-degree-of-freedom magnetic suspension system was built. A controller was used to track complex excitation signals, including sine, pulse, and white noise. Time series data of the control voltage and suspension gap covering the dynamic characteristics of the system were collected. The input and output sequences were reconstructed using the sliding window method. Second, an LSTM model was constructed to capture the time-dependent features of the suspension system. In response to the difficulty of manual parameter tuning in balancing efficiency and performance, the BO algorithm was introduced. A Gaussian process was selected as the probabilistic surrogate model, and the expected improvement was used as the acquisition function. The mean absolute error of the model on the validation set was set as the objective function. A global optimization was performed for the number of hidden layer neurons, initial learning rate, and L2 regularization coefficient of the LSTM model. Research results show that after BO, the model can accurately predict the key state changes of the suspension gap. The prediction error stabilizes within ±0.1 mm, and the error distribution conforms to a normal distribution, indicating that the structural deviation of the model is eliminated. Compared with the unoptimized LSTM model, the mean absolute error on the test set is reduced by 48.04%, and the root mean square error is decreased by 41.83%. This method effectively solves the difficulty of hyperparameter setting in suspension system modeling, and significantly improves the prediction accuracy and generalization ability of the model, providing a reliable model foundation for the design of high-precision suspension controllers and real-time condition monitoring of maglev trains.
| [1] |
LIN Guo-bin, LIU Wan-ming, XU Jun-qi, et al. Opportunities and challenges for the development of high-speed maglev transportation in China[J]. Science and Technology Foresight, 2023, 2(4): 7-18.
|
| [2] |
XIONG Jia-yang, SHEN Zhi-yun, CHI Mao-ru, et al. Review on high-speed maglev train technology[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2025, 25(2): 1-23. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2025.02.001
|
| [3] |
LI F X, SUN Y G, XU J Q, et al. Control methods for levitation system of EMS-type maglev vehicles: An overview[J]. Energies, 2023, 16(7): 2995. doi: 10.3390/en16072995
|
| [4] |
ZHANG He-hong, ZHANG Wen-jin, CHEN Jian, et al. Application of BP neural network tracking differentiator in maglev train suspension control[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2025, 25(1): 94-106. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2025.01.006
|
| [5] |
WANG Zhi-qiang, LONG Zhi-qiang, LI Xiao-long. Simulation analysis of levitation system of high-speed maglev trains with joint structure[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2024, 59(3): 590-599.
|
| [6] |
MA Wei-hua, HU Jun-xiong, LI Tie, et al. Technologies research review of electro-magnetic suspension medium-low-speed maglev train levitation frame[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2023, 58(4): 720-733.
|
| [7] |
DEY S, BANERJEE S, DEY J. Frequency-domain tuning of a robust optimal 2-DOF fractional order PID controller for a maglev system[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 2024, 20(9): 11348-11361. doi: 10.1109/TII.2024.3403249
|
| [8] |
ZHONG Zhi-xian, CAI Zhong-hou, QI Yan-ying. Model-free adaptive control for single-degree-of-freedom magnetically levitated system[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2022, 57(3): 549-557, 581.
|
| [9] |
SUN Y G, QIANG H Y, WANG L, et al. A fuzzy-logic-system-based cooperative control for the multielectromagnets suspension system of maglev trains with experimental verification[J]. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 2023, 31(10): 3411-3422. doi: 10.1109/TFUZZ.2023.3257036
|
| [10] |
JI W, LV D Y, LUO S H, et al. Multiple models-based fault tolerant control of levitation module of maglev vehicles against partial actuator failures[J]. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 2025, 74(2): 2231-2240. doi: 10.1109/TVT.2024.3399235
|
| [11] |
SUN You-gang, HUANG Zhi-chuang, LIN Guo-bin, et al. Fault-tolerant control for levitation systems of high-speed maglev train based on diversified basis neural networks[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2025, 25(2): 61-74. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2025.02.004
|
| [12] |
LONG Zhi-qiang, ZHAI Ming-da, WANG Zhi-qiang. Condition monitoring, fault diagnosis and fault-tolerant control of maglev train[M]. Shanghai: Shanghai Scientific & Technical Publishers, 2023: 57-68.
|
| [13] |
YU Xu-tao, WU Wei, NIU Gang. Research on fault detection of double redundant acceleration sensor for maglev train[J]. Chinese Journal of Scientific Instrument, 2023, 44(10): 138-144.
|
| [14] |
CAO Hui, WU Xing-wen, XIONG Jia-yang, et al. Research on load characteristics of levitation chassis of the normal-conducting maglev vehicle under fault conditions[J]. Electric Drive for Locomotives, 2023(1): 33-41.
|
| [15] |
HU Ke-ting, XU Jun-qi, LIU Zhi-gang, et al. Reinforcement learning-based suspension control for electromagnetic suspension maglev trains[J]. Journal of Tongji University (Natural Science), 2023, 51(3): 332-340.
|
| [16] |
LI Y L, XU H Z, GEGERILE. The research on model predictive control for linear synchronous motor of maglev train[J]. Science Discovery, 2017, 5(2): 77-85. doi: 10.11648/j.sd.20170502.11
|
| [17] |
HU W J, ZHOU Y H, ZHANG Z L, et al. Model predictive control for hybrid levitation systems of maglev trains with state constraints[J]. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 2021, 70(10): 9972-9985. doi: 10.1109/TVT.2021.3110133
|
| [18] |
LIU Yi-heng, ZHANG He-hong, LONG Zhi-qiang, et al. Research on suspension control of maglev train via enhanced tracking differentiator[J]. Electric Drive for Locomotives, 2023(2): 113-122.
|
| [19] |
WANG Mei-qi, ZENG Si-heng, LI Yuan, et al. Research on time lag control of levitation system of two-degree-of-freedom magnetic levitation train[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2024, 59(4): 812-822.
|
| [20] |
PIAO Ming-wei, LIANG Shi-kuan, XUE Shi-hai, et al. 2-DOF control of active levitation and guidance in high-speed maglev train[J]. China Railway Science, 2006, 27(4): 80-85.
|
| [21] |
CHEN C, XU J Q, LIN G B, et al. Model identification and nonlinear adaptive control of suspension system of high-speed maglev train[J]. Vehicle System Dynamics, 2022, 60(3): 884-905. doi: 10.1080/00423114.2020.1838564
|
| [22] |
MA Dan-rui. Research on identification and control technology of suspension system in maglev train based on neural network[D]. Changsha: National University of Defense Technology, 2020: 19-28.
|
| [23] |
SUN Y G, XU J Q, QIANG H Y, et al. Adaptive sliding mode control of maglev system based on RBF neural network minimum parameter learning method[J]. Measurement, 2019, 141: 217-226. doi: 10.1016/j.measurement.2019.03.006
|
| [24] |
WAI R J, CHEN M W, YAO J X. Observer-based adaptive fuzzy-neural-network control for hybrid maglev transportation system[J]. Neurocomputing, 2016, 175: 10-24. doi: 10.1016/j.neucom.2015.10.006
|
| [25] |
WANG Guo, SHI Kai, MIN Yong-zhi, et al. A hybrid TCN-Transformer architecture for braking modeling of medium-low speed maglev trains[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2026, 26(6): 2579-2591.
|
| [26] |
DE JESÚS RUBIO J, ZHANG L X, LUGHOFER E, et al. Modeling and control with neural networks for a magnetic levitation system[J]. Neurocomputing, 2017, 227: 113-121. doi: 10.1016/j.neucom.2016.09.101
|
| [27] |
KE Z H, LIU X N, CHEN Y N, et al. Prediction models establishment and comparison for guiding force of high-temperature superconducting maglev based on deep learning algorithms[J]. Superconductor Science and Technology, 2022, 35(2): 024005. doi: 10.1088/1361-6668/ac455d
|
| [28] |
WU Han, LIU Meng-juan, ZENG Xiao-hui. Suspension gap prediction of highspeed maglev train[J]. Journal of Tongji University (Natural Science), 2023, 51(3): 351-359.
|
| [29] |
KE Z H, LIU X N, YI H Y, et al. Nonlinear levitation-guidance coupling force prediction for HTS pinning maglev under arbitrary motion based on gated recurrent unit[J]. IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity, 2024, 34(3): 3600806.
|
| [30] |
YANG Biao, MEI Zi, LONG Zhi-qiang. Online anomaly detection method integrating LSTM and MGD for suspension system of maglev trains[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2023, 23(6): 216-231. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2023.06.014
|
| [31] |
SUN You-gang, XU Jun-qi, HE Zhen-yu, et al. Sliding mode cooperative control of multi-electromagnet suspension system based on error cross coupling[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2022, 57(3): 558-565.
|
| [32] |
HOCHREITER S, SCHMIDHUBER J. Long short-term memory[J]. Neural Computation, 1997, 9(8): 1735-1780. doi: 10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735
|
| [33] |
LINDEMANN B, MÜLLER T, VIETZ H, et al. A survey on long short-term memory networks for time series prediction[J]. Procedia CIRP, 2021, 99: 650-655. doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2021.03.088
|
| [34] |
WANG X L, JIN Y C, SCHMITT S, et al. Recent advances in Bayesian optimization[J]. ACM Computing Surveys, 2023, 55(13s): 1-36.
|
| [35] |
DU L, GAO R B, SUGANTHAN P N, et al. Bayesian optimization based dynamic ensemble for time series forecasting[J]. Information Sciences, 2022, 591: 155-175. doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2022.01.010
|