Attenuation law of retroreflection coefficient for highway traffic sign retroreflective sheeting
-
摘要: 对设置在交通运输部北京试验场的230个交通标志反光膜样本进行了连续13年的逆反射系数观测, 建立了不同颜色、不同类别的交通标志反光膜逆反射系数衰减值的预测模型, 分析了逆反射系数随设置时间的衰减规律。分析结果表明: 白色Ⅰ~Ⅲ类反光膜逆反射系数衰减值的预测模型分别为三次函数、对数函数、三次函数模型, 决定系数分别为0.581、0.732、0.559;红色Ⅰ~Ⅲ类反光膜逆反射系数衰减率的变化幅度分别为16.0%、28.0%、42.0%, 其他颜色反光膜逆反射系数衰减率的变化幅度小于21%。可见, 逆反射系数衰减值的二次函数、三次函数模型具有更好的拟合性, 不同颜色、不同类别反光膜的逆反射系数衰减规律存在显著差异, 但衰减均随着设置时间的延长而逐渐减缓。Abstract: The retroreflection coefficients of 230 traffic sign retroreflective sheetings set in Beijing test site of Ministry of Transport were observed continuously for thirteen years.The prediction models of attenuation values for the retroreflection coefficients of traffic sign retroreflective sheetings with different colors and types were built.The attenuation law of retroreflection coefficient with set time was analyzed.Analysis result shows that the prediction models of attenuation values for the retroreflection coefficient of white typesⅠ-Ⅲretroreflective sheetings are cubic function, logarithmic function and cubic function models respectively, and the determination coefficients are 0.581, 0.732 and 0.559 respectively.The variation amplitudes of attenuation rate for retroreflection coefficient of red types Ⅰ-Ⅲ retroreflective sheetings are 16.0%, 28.0% and 42.0% respectively, and the variation amplitudes of attenuation rates for retroreflection coefficients of retroreflective sheetings with other colors are less than 21%.So, the quadratic function and cubic function models of attenuation values for retroreflection coefficients have better fitting property, there are significant differences among attenuation laws of retroreflection coefficients for retroreflective sheetings with different colors and types, and theattenuation slows down with increase of set time.
-
表 1 白色Ⅲ类反光膜对应的数学模型
Table 1. Corresponding mathematical models of white typeⅢretroreflective sheeting
表 2 白色Ⅱ类反光膜对应的数学模型
Table 2. Corresponding mathematical models of white typeⅡretroreflective sheeting
表 3 白色Ⅰ类反光膜对应的数学模型
Table 3. Corresponding mathematical models of white typeⅠretroreflective sheeting
表 4 逆反射系数衰减值的预测模型
Table 4. Prediction models of attenuation values for retroreflection coefficients
表 5 逆反射系数衰减值的正态分布检验结果
Table 5. Normal distribution test result of attenuation values for retroreflection coefficients
表 6 逆反射系数衰减率的特征值
Table 6. Characteristic values of attenuation rates for retroreflection coefficients
% -
[1] National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Fatality analysis reporting system[R]. Washington DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 2011. [2] 中华人民共和国公安部. 2014年交通事故统计年报[R]. 北京: 人民交通出版社, 2015.The Ministry of Public Security of the People's Republic of China. Statistics annual report on traffic accidents in 2014[R]. Beijing: China Communications Press, 2015. (in Chinese). [3] 中华人民共和国交通运输部. 2014年国家干线公路交通情况分析报告[R]. 北京: 人民交通出版社, 2015.Ministry of Transport of the People's Republic of China. Analysis report of national arterial highway traffic situation in2014[R]. Beijing: China Communications Press, 2015. (in Chinese). [4] SCHRANK D, EISELE B, LOMAX T. TTI's 2012urban mobility report[R]. College Station: Texas A & amp; amp; M Transportation Institute, 2012. [5] 苏文英, 李丹. 道路交通标志逆反射性能与夜间视认性[J]. 公路交通科技, 2009, 26(2): 114-119. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GLJK200902022.htmSU Wen-ying, LI Dan. Retroreflectivity and night visibility of road traffic signs[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2009, 26(2): 114-119. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GLJK200902022.htm [6] MCGEE H W, TAORI S. Impacts on state and local agencies for maintaining traffic signs within minimum retroreflectivity guidelines[R]. Washington DC: Federal Highway Administration, 1998. [7] HAWKINS H G J, BARTOSKEWITZ R T, FENNO D W. Evaluation of rural guide signing: second year activities and preliminary recommendations[R]. Washington DC: Federal Highway Administration, 1995. [8] CARLSON P J, LUPES M S. Methods for maintaining traffic sign retroreflectivity[R]. Washington DC: Federal Highway Administration, 2007. [9] AL-MADANI H, AL-JANAHI A R. Assessment of drivers'comprehension of traffic signs based on their traffic, personal and social characteristics[J]. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2002, 5(1): 63-76. doi: 10.1016/S1369-8478(02)00006-2 [10] JONESM P, CHAPMAN P, BAILEY K. The influence of image valence on visual attention and perception of risk in drivers[J]. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 2014, 73: 296-304. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2014.09.019 [11] RÉJ M, MILES J D, CARLSON P J. An analysis of inservice type Ⅲ high intensity traffic sign retroreflectivity and deterioration rates in Texas[J]. Transportation Research Record, 2011(2258): 88-94. [12] EVANS T, HEASLIP K, BOGGS W, et al. Assessment of sign retroreflectivity compliance for development of a management plan[J]. Transportation Research Record, 2012(2272): 103-112. [13] KETOLA W D. Durability testing for retroreflective sheetings[J]. Transportation Research Record, 1989(1230): 67-76. [14] BLACK K L, MCGEE H W, HUSSAIN S F, et al. Service life of retroreflective signs[R]. Washington DC: Federal Highway Administration, 1991. [15] BLACK K L, HUSSAIN S F, PANIATI J F. Deterioration of retroreflection traffic signs[J]. ITE Journal, 1992, 62(7): 16-22. [16] PANIATI J F, MACE D J. Minimum retroreflectivity requirements for traffic signs[R]. Washington DC: Federal Highway Administration, 1993. [17] JENKINS S E, GENNAOUI F R. National survey of the photometric performance of retroreflective traffic signs[J]. Municipal Engineering in Australia, 1990, 17(5): 17-23. [18] BISCHOFF A, BULLOCK D. Sign retroreflectivity study[R]. Washington DC: Federal Highway Administration, 2002. [19] GÜLER Ö, ONAYGIL S. Comparison of the calculated and experimental results for visibility level on the road[R]. Istanbul: Istanbul Technical University, 2000. [20] GÜLER Ö, ONAYGIL S. Evaluation of visibility level formula in road lighting with field measurements[R]. Istanbul: Istanbul Technical University, 2002. [21] KIRK R, HUNT E A, BROOKS E W. Factors affecting sign retroreflectivity[R]. Salem: Oregon Department of Transportation, 2001. [22] WOLSHON B, DEGEYTER R, SWARGAM J. Analysis and predictive modeling of road sign retroreflectivity performance[C]//TRB. 16th Biennial Symposium on Visibility and Simulation. Washington DC: TRB, 2002: 1-9. [23] CARLSON P. Evaluation of sign retroreflectivity measurements from the advanced mobile asset collection(AMAC)system[R]. College Station: Texas A & amp; amp; M Transportation Institute, 2011. [24] CARLSON P J, HAWKINS H G J. Minimum retrorefectivity levels for overhead guide signs and street-name signs[R]. Washington DC: Federal Highway Administration, 2003. [25] BRIMLEY B K, CARLSON P J. The current state of research on the long-term deterioration of traffic signs[C]//TRB. Transportation Research Board 92nd Annual Meeting. Washington DC: TRB, 2013: 1-16. [26] 姜明, 张帆, 黎峰. 自然环境中指路标志反光膜逆反射系数衰减规律[J]. 公路交通科技, 2012, 29(3): 137-141, 148. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GLJK201203023.htmJIANG Ming, ZHANG Fan, LI Feng. Deterioration regularity of retroreflection coefficient of in-service guide signs'retroreflective sheeting[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2012, 29(3): 137-141, 148. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GLJK201203023.htm [27] 沈洋, 胡晓泉, 赵增林. 公路交通标志最低逆反射系数极值研究[J]. 公路交通科技: 应用技术版, 2013(4): 269-273. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GLJJ201304079.htmSHEN Yang, HU Xiao-quan, ZHAO Zeng-lin. Research on extreme value of minimum inverse reflection coefficient of highway traffic sign[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development: Application Technology, 2013(4): 269-273. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GLJJ201304079.htm [28] 蒋海峰, 王磊, 韩文元, 等. 交通标志反光膜逆反射性能与视认性关系试验研究[J]. 公路交通科技: 应用技术版, 2009(3): 19-24. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GLJJ200903008.htmJIANG Hai-feng, WANG Lei, HAN Wen-yuan, et al. Experimental study on the relationship between reflective performance and visual recognition of traffic sign retroreflective sheeting[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development: Application Technology, 2009(3): 19-24. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GLJJ200903008.htm [29] 谷天明. 公路标志标线的逆反射系数测量[J]. 交通标准化, 2003(5): 29-31. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JTBH200305008.htmGU Tian-ming. Measure coefficient of against direction for highway signs and markings[J]. Communications Standardization, 2003(5): 29-31. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JTBH200305008.htm [30] 罗卫华, 唐盛, 言子游. 邵怀高速交通标志反光材料的选择[J]. 公路工程, 2007, 32(5): 197-199, 214. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-0610.2007.05.046LUO Wei-hua, TANG Sheng, YAN Zi-you. Selection of traffic sign reflective material for Shaohuai Expressway[J]. Highway Engineering, 2007, 32(5): 197-199, 214. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-0610.2007.05.046 [31] 黄凯, 何勇, 唐健娟, 等. 指路标志反光膜配比优化技术[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2009, 9(4): 122-126. http://transport.chd.edu.cn/article/id/200904024HUANG Kai, HE Yong, TANG Jian-juan, et al. Optimization technology of configuration for reflecting film in guide sign[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2009, 9(4): 122-126. (in Chinese). http://transport.chd.edu.cn/article/id/200904024 [32] 杨勇, 张智勇, 李旭, 等. 光源光谱对标志逆反射系数的影响[J]. 光谱学与光谱分析, 2014, 34(1): 12-15. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GUAN201401003.htmYANG Yong, ZHANG Zhi-yong, LI Xu, et al. Study on influence of source spectra on retro-reflection coefficient[J]. Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis, 2014, 34(1): 12-15. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GUAN201401003.htm