Volume 23 Issue 1
Feb.  2023
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
WANG Yong-gang, WANG Long-jian, LIU Zhi-gang, REN Lu. Vulnerability metrics of multimodal composite transportation network[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2023, 23(1): 195-207. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2023.01.015
Citation: WANG Yong-gang, WANG Long-jian, LIU Zhi-gang, REN Lu. Vulnerability metrics of multimodal composite transportation network[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2023, 23(1): 195-207. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2023.01.015

Vulnerability metrics of multimodal composite transportation network

doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2023.01.015
Funds:

National Key Research and Development Program of China 2018YFB1600900

More Information
  • Author Bio:

    WANG Yong-gang(1977-), male, professor, PhD, wangyg@chd.edu.cn

    WANG Long-jian(1991-), male, doctoral student, wanglj@chd.edu.cn

  • Received Date: 2022-08-11
    Available Online: 2023-03-08
  • Publish Date: 2023-02-25
  • A topological model for multimodal composite transportation networks was constructed. The vulnerability metrics applicable to multimodal composite transportation networks were proposed from a new perspective combining the differences in each transportation mode, resource equity, and network accessibility. The metrics were sub-network sensitivity, station distribution balance, and accessibility index. Three different attack strategies were selected for Python simulation. The actual comprehensive transportation networks in developed coastal areas of Southeast China and mountainous border areas of Southwest China were taken as examples to comprehensively analyze the differences and commonalities of network structure vulnerability. In this way, the validity, stability, and applicability of the metrics were verified in multiple cases. Research results show that multimodal composite transportation networks in Zhejiang Province and Yunnan Province are in agreement with the characteristics of small-world networks. They are capable of making the advantages of each transportation mode complement each other and reducing network vulnerability. Under the three sets of contribution parameter values, regardless of the attack strategy, when the number of failed nodes is the same, the overall trend of the sub-network sensitivities from large to small in Zhejiang Province is highway network, waterway network and railway network, and Yunnan Province is aviation network, highway network and railway network. The Gini coefficients of the distribution of highway network stations in Zhejiang Province and Yunnan Province are 0.196 and 0.086, respectively, indicating equal distribution. The Gini coefficients of the distribution of railway network stations are 0.559 and 0.702, respectively, indicating highly unequal distribution. In addition, the Gini coefficient of the distribution of airports in Yunnan Province is 0.363, denoting a relatively reasonable distribution. The Gini coefficient of the distribution of ports in Zhejiang Province is 0.672, denoting highly unequal distribution. It can be concluded that the layouts of railway networks, waterway networks, and aviation networks should be further improved. The multimodal composite transportation network should be separated into multiple connected subgraphs or isolated nodes when subjected to continuous attacks. As a result, network accessibility is suddenly degraded. Recovery measures should be taken as early as possible to avoid this phenomenon. Therefore, the proposed vulnerability metrics are able to effectively describe the comprehensive transportation network vulnerability and discover the differences and commonalities of vulnerability among networks.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    MATTSSON L G, JENELIUS E. Vulnerability and resilience of transport systems—a discussion of recent research[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2015, 81: 16-34. doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2015.06.002
    [2]
    BERDICA K. An introduction to road vulnerability: what has been done, is done and should be done[J]. Transport Policy, 2002, 9(2): 117-127. doi: 10.1016/S0967-070X(02)00011-2
    [3]
    LATORA V, MARCHIORI M. Efficient behavior of small-world networks[J]. Physical Review Letters, 2001, 87(19): 198701. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.198701
    [4]
    TANG Ming, ZHOU Tao. Efficient routing strategies in scale-free networks with limited bandwidth[J]. Physical Review E: Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics, 2011, 84(2): 026116. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.84.026116
    [5]
    种鹏云, 帅斌. 基于复杂网络的危险品运输网络抗毁性测度分析[J]. 中南大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 45(5): 1715-1723. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZNGD201405046.htm

    CHONG Peng-yun, SHUAI Bin. Measure of hazardous materials transportation network invulnerability based on complex network[J]. Journal of Central South University (Science and Technology), 2014, 45(5): 1715-1723. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZNGD201405046.htm
    [6]
    LYU Lin-yuan, CHEN Duan-bing, REN Xiao-long, et al. Vital nodes identification in complex networks[J]. Physics Reports—Review Section of Physics Letters, 2016, 650: 1-63.
    [7]
    GUAN Zhi-hong, CHEN Long, QIAN Tong-hui. Routing in scale-free networks based on expanding betweenness centrality[J]. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 2011, 390(6): 1131-1138. doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2010.10.002
    [8]
    PETERMANN T, DE LOS RIOS P. Role of clustering and gridlike ordering in epidemic spreading[J]. Physical Review E: Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics, 2004, 69(6): 066116. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.69.066116
    [9]
    李成兵, 郝羽成, 王文颖. 城市群复合交通网络可靠性研究[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2017, 29(3): 565-571, 580. doi: 10.16182/j.issn1004731x.joss.201703014

    LI Cheng-bing, HAO Yu-cheng, WANG Wen-ying. Research on city agglomeration compound traffic reliability[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2017, 29(3): 565-571, 580. (in Chinese) doi: 10.16182/j.issn1004731x.joss.201703014
    [10]
    ZHANG Dong-ming, DU Fei, HUANG Hong-wei, et al. Resiliency assessment of urban rail transit networks: Shanghai metro as an example[J]. Safety Science, 2018, 106: 230-243. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2018.03.023
    [11]
    王绍博, 段伟, 秦娅风, 等. 高铁网络空间组织模式及其脆弱性评估: 以长三角为例[J]. 资源科学, 2022, 44(5): 1079-1089. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZRZY202205016.htm

    WANG Shao-bo, DUAN Wei, QIN Ya-feng, et al. Spatial organization model and its vulnerability assessment of high-speed rail network: taking the Yangtze River Delta as an example[J]. Resources Science, 2022, 44(5): 1079-1089. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZRZY202205016.htm
    [12]
    ZHANG Jian-hua, HU Fu-nian, WANG Shu-liang, et al. Structural vulnerability and intervention of high speed railway networks[J]. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 2016, 462: 743-751. doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2016.06.132
    [13]
    VOLTES-DORTA A, RODRÍGUEZ-DÉNIZ H, SUAU-SANCHEZ P. Vulnerability of the European air transport network to major airport closures from the perspective of passenger delays: ranking the most critical airports[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2017, 96: 119-145. doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2016.12.009
    [14]
    ZHANG Qian, YU Hao, LI Zhen-ning, et al. Assessing potential likelihood and impacts of landslides on transportation network vulnerability[J]. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2020, 82: 102304. doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2020.102304
    [15]
    NOGAL M, MORALES NÁPOLES O, O'CONNOR A. Structured expert judgement to understand the intrinsic vulnerability of traffic networks[J]. Transportation Research Record, 2019, 127: 136-152.
    [16]
    WU Jing, ZHANG Di, WAN Cheng-peng, et al. Novel approach for comprehensive centrality assessment of ports along the maritime silk road[J]. Transportation Research Record, 2019, 2673(9): 461-470. doi: 10.1177/0361198119847469
    [17]
    冯慧芳, 李彩虹, 王瑞. 河谷型城市公交网络脆弱性研究: 以兰州市为例[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2016, 16(1): 217-222. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXT201601034.htm

    FENG Hui-fang, LI Cai-hong, WANG Rui. Vulnerability study for public transport network of valley city: case of Lanzhou[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2016, 16(1): 217-222. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXT201601034.htm
    [18]
    ZHANG Lin, WEN Hui-ying, LU Jian, et al. Vulnerability assessment and visualization of large-scale bus transit network under route service disruption[J]. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2020, 88: 102570. doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2020.102570
    [19]
    马超群, 张爽, 陈权, 等. 客流特征视角下的轨道交通网络特征及其脆弱性[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2020, 20(5): 208-216. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2020.05.017

    MA Chao-qun, ZHANG Shuang, CHEN Quan, et al. Characteristics and vulnerability of rail transit network based on perspective of passenger flow characteristics[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2020, 20(5): 208-216. (in Chinese) doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2020.05.017
    [20]
    SUN Jian, GUAN Shi-tuo. Measuring vulnerability of urban metro network from line operation perspective[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2016, 94: 348-359. doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2016.09.024
    [21]
    ZHOU Yao-ming, WANG Jun-wei. Critical link analysis for urban transportation systems[J]. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2018, 19(2): 402-415. doi: 10.1109/TITS.2017.2700080
    [22]
    LIU Yang, YUAN Yun, SHEN Jie-yi, et al. Emergency response facility location in transportation networks: a literature review[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English Edition), 2021, 8(2): 153-169. (in Chinese)
    [23]
    STRANO E, SHAI S, DOBSON S, et al. Multiplex networks in metropolitan areas: generic features and local effects[J]. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 2015, 12(111): 20150651.
    [24]
    BAGGAG A, ABBAR S, ZANOUDA T, et al. Resilience analytics: coverage and robustness in multi-modal transportation networks[J]. EPJ Data Science, 2018, 7: 14.
    [25]
    ZHENG Zhi-hao, HUANG Zhi-ren, ZHANG Fan, et al. Understanding coupling dynamics of public transportation networks[J]. EPJ Data Science, 2018, 7: 23.
    [26]
    HONG Liu, ZHONG Xin, OUYANG Min, et al. Vulnerability analysis of public transit systems from the perspective of urban residential communities[J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2019, 189: 143-156.
    [27]
    FENG Xiao, HE Shi-wei, CHEN Xu-chao, et al. Mitigating the vulnerability of an air-high-speed railway transportation network: from the perspective of predisruption response[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part O: Journal of Risk and Reliability, 2021, 235(3): 474-490.
    [28]
    LI Tao, RONG Li-li, YAN Ke-sheng. Vulnerability analysis and critical area identification of public transport system: a case of high-speed rail and air transport coupling system in China[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2019, 127: 55-70.
    [29]
    LI Tao, RONG Li-li. Spatiotemporally complementary effect of high-speed rail network on robustness of aviation network[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2022, 155: 95-114.
    [30]
    SIENKIEWICZ J, HOŁYST J A. Statistical analysis of 22 public transport networks in Poland[J]. Physical Review E: Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics, 2005, 72(4): 046127.
    [31]
    代洪娜, 姚恩建, 刘莎莎, 等. 基于基尼系数的高速公路网流量不均衡性研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2017, 17(1): 205-211. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXT201701031.htm

    DAI Hong-na, YAO En-jian, LIU Sha-sha, et al. Flow inequality of freeway network based on Gini-coefficient[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2017, 17(1): 205-211. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXT201701031.htm
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (1012) PDF downloads(151) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return